KPI

Emp. Name:
Emp. ID:
Total Score: ###
Designation: Sr.Planning Engineer
Location:
S. No. KPI Wt.age Measure Score Average Score Total Score

Measurable-70%
Time Efficiency
Timely Submission Excellent-100%

Delay (1 Day) Good-75%

1 Program and Progress Reports 10% 0.00%
Delay (2 Days) Average-60%

Delay (> 2 Days) Poor-50%

Performance
Variance calculated (Internal / External), Delay Notification send . Alerts forwarded
internally along with recovery programs. Excellent-100%

Variance calculated (Internal / External) & Delay notification send only Good-75%
2 Program Updates 10% 0.00%
Variance calculated (Internal / External) Average-60%

Only baseline updated. Variances not calculated Poor-50%

S/C Performance baseline establish, progress tracked, variances calculated and required Excellent-100%
action taken
Sub-Contractor Performance Tracking S/C Performance baseline establish, progress tracked Good-75%
3 (Engineering, Procurement and 5% 0.00%
Construction) Only progress monitored Average-60%

S/c Performance tracking not establish Poor-0%

Material and S/c Procurement tracking system implemented from

prequalification/submittal approval till delivery/joining at site. Excellent-100%
Material delivery followed from 1st delivery till last batcj delivery. Frequent visits done at
factory.
Material and Sub-Contractor Procurement
4
Tracking 5% Material and S/C Procurement prepared and followed. Material 1st delivery followed only. Good-75%
0.00%

Material and S/C Procurement prepared and followed. Average-60%

Material and S/ C procurement tracking not establish Poor-0%

Realistic Look Ahead Prepared , distributed and followed up. Excellent-100%

Realistic Look Ahead Prepared not followed up. Good-75%

5 Look Ahead and Target Program 5% 0.00%
Look Ahead prepared but not realistic Average-60%

No Look Ahead Prepared Poor-0%

6 Tracking of Overall Engineering
Tracking of Engineeing system implemented for method statements / shop darwings. Time
taken by TGC / S/C for each submital /revision monitored and internal delays highlighted Excellent-100%
while for sub contractors delay notification raised. Time taken by Engineer also
montitored and delay notifications sent and subsequqntly claim raised (If any)
5% 0.00%
Tracking of Engineering system implemented, tracked and delay notification sent to
Good-75%
Engineer and claim prepared (if any)
Tracking of Engineering system implemented, tracked and delays highlighted. Average-60%
Tracking of Engineering system not implemented. Poor-0%

Preparing Risk Register and Monitoring Excellent-100%

Prepare Risk Register Good-75%

7 Risk Register 5% 0.00%
Only prepare Areas of concern Average-60%
Nothing prepared periodically, only at time of need Poor-50%
Quality
Approved in 1st Submission Excellent-100%
Baseline Program Preparation in Approved in Revision 1 with Compliance Statement Good-75%
8 accordance with company standard and 10% 0.00%
contract Approved in Revision 2 with Compliance Statement Average-60%

More than two revisions Poor-50%

No Comments or Minor Comments complied within 1st Submission with compliance Excellent-100%
statement

Major Comments complied within 1st Submission with compliance statement Good-75%
9 Comments in Reports and Compliance 5% 0.00%
Major Comments complied within 2nd Submission with compliance statement Average-60%

Repeated Comments Poor-30%

EOT Claim submitted as per contract requirements Excellent-100%

10 EOT claim 10% EOT claim submitted but not complying with the contact requirements Good-75% 0.00%

Delay Notification Sent but EOT not submitted Average-50%

Cost Efficiency
Not Measurable-30%
Personality and Communication
Communication Skills: (Orally and in
11
writing providing relevant and timely 15% 0.00%
information to management and in
internal & external.

12
Understanding problems & making timely, 5% 0.00%
practical decisions.
13 Meetings & Presentation 5% 0.00%

14 Presentation Skills 5% 0.00%

 KPI
Emp. Name:
Emp. ID:
Total Score: 0.00%
Designation: Sr.Planning Engineer
Location:
S. No. KPI Wt.age Measure Score Average Score Total Score

Measurable-70%
Time Efficiency
Timely Submission Excellent-100%

Delay (1 Day) Good-75%

1 Program and Progress Reports 10% 0.00%
Delay (2 Days) Average-60%

Delay (> 2 Days) Poor-50%

Performance
Variance calculated (Internal / External), Delay Notification send . Alerts forwarded
internally along with recovery programs. Excellent-100%

Variance calculated (Internal / External) & Delay notification send only Good-75%
2 Program Updates 10% 0.00%
Variance calculated (Internal / External) Average-60%

Only baseline updated. Variances not calculated Poor-50%

S/C Performance baseline establish, progress tracked, variances calculated and required Excellent-100%
action taken
Sub-Contractor Performance Tracking S/C Performance baseline establish, progress tracked Good-75%
3 (Engineering, Procurement and 5% 0.00%
Construction) Only progress monitored Average-60%

S/c Performance tracking not establish Poor-0%

Material and S/c Procurement tracking system implemented from

prequalification/submittal approval till delivery/joining at site. Excellent-100%
Material delivery followed from 1st delivery till last batcj delivery. Frequent visits done at
factory.
Material and Sub-Contractor Procurement
4
Tracking 5% Material and S/C Procurement prepared and followed. Material 1st delivery followed only. Good-75%
0.00%

Material and S/C Procurement prepared and followed. Average-60%

Material and S/ C procurement tracking not establish Poor-0%

Realistic Look Ahead Prepared , distributed and followed up. Excellent-100%

Realistic Look Ahead Prepared not followed up. Good-75%

5 Look Ahead and Target Program 5% 0.00%
Look Ahead prepared but not realistic Average-60%

No Look Ahead Prepared Poor-0%

6 Tracking of Overall Engineering
Tracking of Engineeing system implemented for method statements / shop darwings. Time
taken by TGC / S/C for each submital /revision monitored and internal delays highlighted Excellent-100%
while for sub contractors delay notification raised. Time taken by Engineer also
montitored and delay notifications sent and subsequqntly claim raised (If any)
5% 0.00%
Tracking of Engineering system implemented, tracked and delay notification sent to
Good-75%
Engineer and claim prepared (if any)
Tracking of Engineering system implemented, tracked and delays highlighted. Average-60%
Tracking of Engineering system not implemented. Poor-0%

Preparing Risk Register and Monitoring Excellent-100%

Prepare Risk Register Good-75%

7 Risk Register 5% 0.00%
Only prepare Areas of concern Average-60%
Nothing prepared periodically, only at time of need Poor-50%
Quality
Approved in 1st Submission Excellent-100%
Baseline Program Preparation in Approved in Revision 1 with Compliance Statement Good-75%
8 accordance with company standard and 10% 0.00%
contract Approved in Revision 2 with Compliance Statement Average-60%

More than two revisions Poor-50%

No Comments or Minor Comments complied within 1st Submission with compliance Excellent-100%
statement

Major Comments complied within 1st Submission with compliance statement Good-75%
9 Comments in Reports and Compliance 5% 0.00%
Major Comments complied within 2nd Submission with compliance statement Average-60%

Repeated Comments Poor-30%

EOT Claim submitted as per contract requirements Excellent-100%

10 EOT claim 10% EOT claim submitted but not complying with the contact requirements Good-75% 0.00%

Delay Notification Sent but EOT not submitted Average-50%

Cost Efficiency
Not Measurable-30%
Personality and Communication
Communication Skills: (Orally and in
11
writing providing relevant and timely 15% 0.00%
information to management and in
internal & external.

12
Understanding problems & making timely, 5% 0.00%
practical decisions.
13 Meetings & Presentation 5% 0.00%

14 Presentation Skills 5% 0.00%

 Planning Engineer KPI
Emp. Name: Muhammad Arslan Tanveer
Emp. ID: TRD12875
Total Score: ###
Designation: Planning Engineer-MEP
Location: Water Edge's Residential Buildings & Al Falah Village
S. No. KPI Wt.age Measure Score Average Score Total Score

Measurable-70%
Time Efficiency
Timely Submission Excellent-100%

Delay (1 Day) Good-75%

1 Program and Progress Reports 10% 100% 10.00%
Delay (2 Days) Average-60%

Delay (> 2 Days) Poor-50%

Performance
Variance calculated (Internal / External), Delay Notification send . Alerts forwarded
internally along with recovery programs. Excellent-100%

Variance calculated (Internal / External) & Delay notification send only Good-75%
2 Program Updates 10% 60% 6.00%
Variance calculated (Internal / External) Average-60%

Only baseline updated. Variances not calculated Poor-50%

S/C Performance baseline establish, progress tracked, variances calculated and required Excellent-100%
action taken
Sub-Contractor Performance Tracking S/C Performance baseline establish, progress tracked Good-75%
3 (Engineering, Procurement and 5% 75% 3.75%
Construction) Only progress monitored Average-60%

S/c Performance tracking not establish Poor-0%

Material and S/c Procurement tracking system implemented from

prequalification/submittal approval till delivery/joining at site. Excellent-100%
Material delivery followed from 1st delivery till last batcj delivery. Frequent visits done at
factory.
Material and Sub-Contractor Procurement
4
Tracking 5% Material and S/C Procurement prepared and followed. Material 1st delivery followed only. Good-75%
100% 5.00%

Material and S/C Procurement prepared and followed. Average-60%

Material and S/ C procurement tracking not establish Poor-0%

Realistic Look Ahead Prepared , distributed and followed up. Excellent-100%

Realistic Look Ahead Prepared not followed up. Good-75%

5 Look Ahead and Target Program 5% 75% 3.75%
Look Ahead prepared but not realistic Average-60%

No Look Ahead Prepared Poor-0%

6 Tracking of Overall Engineering
Tracking of Engineeing system implemented for method statements / shop darwings. Time
taken by TGC / S/C for each submital /revision monitored and internal delays highlighted Excellent-100%
while for sub contractors delay notification raised. Time taken by Engineer also
montitored and delay notifications sent and subsequqntly claim raised (If any)
5% 100% 5.00%
Tracking of Engineering system implemented, tracked and delay notification sent to
Good-75%
Engineer and claim prepared (if any)
Tracking of Engineering system implemented, tracked and delays highlighted. Average-60%
Tracking of Engineering system not implemented. Poor-0%

Preparing Risk Register and Monitoring Excellent-100%

Prepare Risk Register Good-75%

7 Risk Register 5% 75% 3.75%
Only prepare Areas of concern Average-60%
Nothing prepared periodically, only at time of need Poor-50%
Quality
Approved in 1st Submission Excellent-100%
Baseline Program Preparation in Approved in Revision 1 with Compliance Statement Good-75%
8 accordance with company standard and 10% NA #VALUE!
contract Approved in Revision 2 with Compliance Statement Average-60%

More than two revisions Poor-50%

No Comments or Minor Comments complied within 1st Submission with compliance Excellent-100%
statement

Major Comments complied within 1st Submission with compliance statement Good-75%
9 Comments in Reports and Compliance 5% 75% 3.75%
Major Comments complied within 2nd Submission with compliance statement Average-60%

Repeated Comments Poor-30%

EOT Claim submitted as per contract requirements Excellent-100%

10 EOT claim 10% EOT claim submitted but not complying with the contact requirements Good-75% 90% 9.00%

Delay Notification Sent but EOT not submitted Average-50%

Cost Efficiency
Not Measurable-30%
Personality and Communication
Communication Skills: (Orally and in
writing providing relevant and timely
11
information to management and in
15% 80% 12.00%
internal & external.
Understanding problems & making timely,
12
practical decisions.
5% 90% 4.50%

13 Meetings & Presentation 5% 80% 4.00%

14 Presentation Skills 5% 80% 4.00%

 KPI
Emp. Name:
Emp. ID:
Total Score: 0.00%
Designation: Jr. Planner
Location: Palm Tower & Kizad
S. No. KPI Wt.age Measure Score Average Score Total Score

Measurable-70%
Time Efficiency
Timely Submission Excellent-100%

Delay (1 Day) Good-75%

1 Program and Progress Reports 10% 0.00%
Delay (2 Days) Average-60%

Delay (> 2 Days) Poor-50%

Performance
Variance calculated (Internal / External), Delay Notification send . Alerts forwarded
internally along with recovery programs. Excellent-100%

Variance calculated (Internal / External) & Delay notification send only Good-75%
2 Program Updates 10% 0.00%
Variance calculated (Internal / External) Average-60%

Only baseline updated. Variances not calculated Poor-50%

S/C Performance baseline establish, progress tracked, variances calculated and required Excellent-100%
action taken
Sub-Contractor Performance Tracking S/C Performance baseline establish, progress tracked Good-75%
3 (Engineering, Procurement and 5% 0.00%
Construction) Only progress monitored Average-60%

S/c Performance tracking not establish Poor-0%

Material and S/c Procurement tracking system implemented from

prequalification/submittal approval till delivery/joining at site. Excellent-100%
Material delivery followed from 1st delivery till last batcj delivery. Frequent visits done at
factory.
Material and Sub-Contractor Procurement
4
Tracking 5% Material and S/C Procurement prepared and followed. Material 1st delivery followed only. Good-75%
0.00%

Material and S/C Procurement prepared and followed. Average-60%

Material and S/ C procurement tracking not establish Poor-0%

Realistic Look Ahead Prepared , distributed and followed up. Excellent-100%

Realistic Look Ahead Prepared not followed up. Good-75%

5 Look Ahead and Target Program 5% 0.00%
Look Ahead prepared but not realistic Average-60%

No Look Ahead Prepared Poor-0%

6 Tracking of Overall Engineering
Tracking of Engineeing system implemented for method statements / shop darwings. Time
taken by TGC / S/C for each submital /revision monitored and internal delays highlighted Excellent-100%
while for sub contractors delay notification raised. Time taken by Engineer also
montitored and delay notifications sent and subsequqntly claim raised (If any)
5% 0.00%
Tracking of Engineering system implemented, tracked and delay notification sent to
Good-75%
Engineer and claim prepared (if any)
Tracking of Engineering system implemented, tracked and delays highlighted. Average-60%
Tracking of Engineering system not implemented. Poor-0%

Preparing Risk Register and Monitoring Excellent-100%

Prepare Risk Register Good-75%

7 Risk Register 5% 0.00%
Only prepare Areas of concern Average-60%
Nothing prepared periodically, only at time of need Poor-50%
Quality
Approved in 1st Submission Excellent-100%
Baseline Program Preparation in Approved in Revision 1 with Compliance Statement Good-75%
8 accordance with company standard and 10% 0.00%
contract Approved in Revision 2 with Compliance Statement Average-60%

More than two revisions Poor-50%

No Comments or Minor Comments complied within 1st Submission with compliance Excellent-100%
statement

Major Comments complied within 1st Submission with compliance statement Good-75%
9 Comments in Reports and Compliance 5% 0.00%
Major Comments complied within 2nd Submission with compliance statement Average-60%

Repeated Comments Poor-30%

EOT Claim submitted as per contract requirements Excellent-100%

10 EOT claim 10% EOT claim submitted but not complying with the contact requirements Good-75% 0.00%

Delay Notification Sent but EOT not submitted Average-50%

Cost Efficiency
Not Measurable-30%
Personality and Communication
Communication Skills: (Orally and in
11
writing providing relevant and timely 15% 0.00%
information to management and in
internal & external.

12
Understanding problems & making timely, 5% 0.00%
practical decisions.
13 Meetings & Presentation 5% 0.00%

14 Presentation Skills 5% 0.00%