You are on page 1of 7

Conductive Polypyrrole Composite Films Prepared

Using Wet Cast Technique With a Pyrrole–Cellulose


Acetate Solution

Tsubasa Takano, Aya Mikazuki, Takaomi Kobayashi


Department of Materials Science and Technology, Nagaoka University of Technology, 1603-1 Kamitomioka,
Nagaoka, Niigata 940-2188, Japan

Conductive polypyrrole-cellulose acetate films were synthesis of PPy can be performed by dissolution in the
prepared from cellulose acetate (CA) solution of pyrrole solvent [14] which disperses PPy particles in the film.
(Py) using wet cast method. In the composite films, Py Although PPy has been studied in various fields, PPy
was used as a solvent for CA which was dissolved with
different concentration. Then, to prepare PPy–CA com- presents difficulties in mechanical strength and shape con-
posite film, the Py viscous solution of CA was cast on trol of the films. Nevertheless, appropriate composite films
glass plate and immersed in FeCl3 aqueous solution. can be expected to provide various new applications for
When the CA film was formed in the aqueous solution, PPys. For example, conductive films made of PPy have
the polymerized PPy particles having about 1 lm diam- been applied and used particularly as antistatic agents [15],
eter were formed in composite film. The resultant com-
posite films were characterized, showing good film transistors [16, 17], and actuators [18, 19]. In report for
fabrication and electrical conductivity of around 6.9 3 composite conductive polymer films, a method of forming
1024 to 3.6 3 101 S/cm. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 54:78–84, 2014. PPy was developed using a nitrate-cellulose acetate com-
ª 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers posite film by a two-compartment cellulose–polypyrrole.
Ge et al. reported that the composite material could be
applied to drug delivery system [20]. But, still little is
known about such composite conductive films, although
they have advantages in shaping films with better mechani-
INTRODUCTION cal strength and flexibility.
Polypyrrole (PPy) is known as an important conducting This article describes a unique technique of preparation
polymer and has been widely used in recent years for elec- of conductive PPy composite films. In our preliminary
trical and electronic applications such as sensors and solar study, it is revealed that Py can dissolve many polymers
cells [1–7]. Conductive polymers are known to have exten- such as polyethylene glycol, polysulfone, polystyrene, and
sive p electron conjugated systems in the chemical struc- cellulose acetate (CA). With emphasis on CA, preparation
ture of the main chain. This is the reasons for its electrical of PPy composite film is attempted using a straightfor-
conductivity expressed by delocalizing a main chain using ward wet cast technique. Here, CA is well known as a de-
a dopant such as halogen and alkali metal in conjugated rivative of cellulose obtained by its acetylation. CA film
polymer [8–11]. Most of PPy films can be produced by shows good capabilities such as excellent chemical resist-
electrochemical polymerization, but film fabrication ance, heat resistance, and flame resistance. In diverse
presents some important shortcomings: the resultant film is applications, CA has been used for cigarette filters, photo-
fragile, and dedicated equipment must be used. Relative to graphic film, and separation membranes [21–25]. Among
the electrochemical method, chemical reactions were also these applications, CA film was reported to be formed
used to prepare PPy [12]. Among them, oxidative polymer- using the phase inversion method [26, 27]. This wet cast
ization of Py formed PPy in the presence of FeCl3 [13]. method was known to be useful for transforming polymer
But, the obtained PPys in chemical polymerization are gen- liquid solution to a solid state in wet cast technique. The
erally limited to powders, and they are difficult in several polymer solidification was performed via polymer coagu-
applications for film formation. To solve these problems, lation in poor solvent by immersion for coagulation [28,
29]. When the coagulation occurred, forming a porous
CA film was proceeded in coagulation water. In this
Correspondence to: Takaomi Kobayashi; e-mail: takaomi@nagaokaut. work, oxidation polymerization of Py was observed to
ac.jp
DOI 10.1002/pen.23545
proceed simultaneously with the coagulation of CA for
Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). formation of PPy–CA composite films. In the wet-coagu-
C 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers
V lated films, porous CA was found with PPy layer on the

POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE—-2014


scaffold, when the CA solution in Py was used in the TABLE 1. Calculated results of PPy amount, yield, and tensile strength
oxidation of Py polymerization. Such idea suggests an of PPy-CA films prepared in several concentrations of FeCl3 in aqueous
attractive method for preparing conductive composite solution.
films. When the Py polymerization occurred in the FeCl3 PPy amount Yield of PPy Tensile strength
composite films, effects of FeCl3 concentration and solution (mM) in CAa (g/gCA) (%) (N/mm2)
coagulation conditions were examined.
0 0 – 38.1
10 3.6 3 1026 2.1 3 1023 33.8
EXPERIMENTAL 20 8.1 3 1024 4.7 3 1021 26.5
40 1.4 3 1023 7.9 3 1021 14.4
60 3.0 3 1023 1.7 9.4
Materials 80 7.1 3 1023 4.1 8.2
100 8.0 3 1023 4.7 6.8
Pyrrole (Py) was used as the solvent and monomer
a
(Tokyo Kasei Kogyo Company, Japan). The CA used The values were estimated from FT-IR spectra of sample by using
contained 39.7 wt % acetyl content (Aldrich) with aver- those of mixture films of PPy and CA.
age molecular weight of ca. 50,000. Iron (III) chloride
(anhydrous FeCl3; Nacalai Tesque Japan) was used as the
polymerization initiator and dopant.
FT-IR spectra of thick film samples were measured using
an infrared microscope (AIM8800; Shimadzu Corporation,
Preparation of PPy-CA Composite Films Japan) connected to an existing infrared spectrometer at
670–4600 cm21. UV–vis spectra in transmittance and
In a typical procedure, CA was soluble in pyrrole with reflection models for the samples were obtained using a
14 wt % of CA in the Py solvent. The Py–CA viscous so- UV–vis spectrometer (V-570; Jasco Corporation, Japan).
lution was stirred overnight at room temperature until a Electrical conductivity of the PPy–CA films was deter-
homogeneous solution was obtained. The CA film was mined using a resistivity meter (Loresta-GP MCP; Mitsu-
then prepared using wet cast technique as follows. The bishi Chemical Corporation, Japan) with a four-probe
resultant Py–CA viscous solution was spread on a glass method. Sample film morphology was observed using
plate (75 3 25 mm) with about 100 lm thickness of the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (JSM-5400; JEOL,
spread solution. The thickness of the film was controlled Japan). The sample films were sputtered with gold under
by using lumirror film (Toray, Japan) used as a spacer to vacuum using a coater (Quick Cool Coater SC-701MC;
be about 100 lm. Then, the plate with the spread Py–CA Sanyu Denshi K.K., Japan). In addition, for the measure-
solution layer was immersed immediately in aqueous ment of another evaluation of PPy-CA films, the strength
solution containing different concentrations of FeCl3 at of the film was determined (LTS-500N-S20; Minebea
258C. The CA coagulation was conducted in water (100 Company, Japan). The elasticity data were recorded with
mL) containing different concentration of FeCl3, since the pulling speeds of 10 mm/min.
oxidation polymerization of Py was occurred [30]. The
PPy formed in the CA film matrix on the glass plate
became black after a certain time. The resultant black film RESULT AND DISCUSSION
was washed using distilled water to remove excess Py
and PPy from the composite film. Then, the films were
dried in vacuum at room temperature overnight. Preparation of PPy-CA Composite Films
Table 1 shows PPy amounts in CA film. When the
FeCl3 concentration was changed in the range of 10–100
Characterization of Polymer Solutions and Films
mM, PPy loading in the composite films was charged
The sample solution viscosities were measured using a from 3.6 3 1026 g/gCA to 8.0 3 1023 g/gCA. Here, the
B type viscosity meter (Tokyo Keiki, Japan). Fourier PPy–CA films were prepared in FeCl3 aqueous medium
transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of the film samples by coagulation of CA for 24 h. The PPy loading amount
were measured using a IRprestige-21 spectrometer in the CA scaffold increased gradually to be 2.1 3
(Shimadzu Corporation, Japan) with transmittance mode. 1023% to 4.7%, when the concentration of the FeCl3 so-
Spectra were recorded at the 400–4600 cm21 region. To lution was increased from 10 mM to 100 mM, respec-
evaluate PPy amounts in the CA films, FT-IR spectra tively. Table 1 also lists tensile strength of the resultant
were measured. When the loading content of PPy in the films. The values of tensile strength were decreased from
CA film was changed in different contents in mixing to- 38.1 to 6.8 N/mm2, as the FeCl3 concentration was
gether with KBr powder, FT-IR spectra was applied for changed from 0 to 100 mM.
their mixtures as calibration. In the spectral data, charac- Figure 1 depicts pictures of the PPy–CA film formed
teristic IR bands for PPy and CA were chosen for estima- on the glass plate at different FeCl3 concentrations.
tion of PPy loading in the composite films. Reflection As changed from 10 mM to 100 mM of FeCl3, it was

DOI 10.1002/pen POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE—-2014 79


In Fig. 2, the following SEM images of the resultant
PPy–CA composites are shown for films prepared in 100
mM FeCl3 aqueous solution at room temperature. For the
film obtained in the presence of FeCl3, panels (a) and (b)
show the typical surface morphology of the PPy–CA film
on the solution side and on the side of the glass plate.
The glass side of the PPy–CA film had a smooth surface
in the shape, but the solution side of the PPy–CA film
indicated that there were many PPy particles with diame-
ter of about 1 lm. Furthermore, the cross-section image
of the PPy–CA film shown in panel (c) presented that the
thickness of the film was about 25 lm. Then, in panel
FIG. 1. Pictures of the PPy–CA films prepared at a concentration from (d), the surface layer attached consisted of the PPy par-
10 mM to 100 mM of FeCl3 aqueous solution. [Color figure can be ticles with about a few micrometer thickness of the PPy.
viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]
Furthermore, in Fig. 2e, SEM image was focused on the
PPy particles on the composite film having thickness of
apparent that the resultant film color became black with 0.2 mm. It could be observed that the PPy particles show-
increasing FeCl3 concentration. This indicated that Py in ing about 1-lm diameter were attached on CA layer.
the water layer was polymerized in the presence of FeCl3 These results indicate that the PPy layers were distributed
on the CA scaffold. In addition, these data meant that on the CA scaffold.
efficient formation of PPy occurred on the surface of the Figure 3 shows FT-IR spectra of the PPy–CA films.
CA scaffold film, when FeCl3 became high concentration. The characteristic peaks of CA for the carboxylate group

FIG. 2. SEM images of PPy–CA film of (a) solution side, (b) glass side, (c) cross-section PPy particles on
the high magnification for (d) cross-section, and (e).

80 POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE—-2014 DOI 10.1002/pen


FIG. 5. Electrical conductivity of PPy–CA film prepared in various
concentration FeCl3 aqueous solutions at various immersion times.
FIG. 3. FT-IR spectra of the PPy–CA films prepared at a concentration
from 10 mM to 100 mM of FeCl3 aqueous solution. relative to that of 1745 cm21 band, when the FeCl3 con-
centration increased. This supports that the formed
amounts of PPy in the CA scaffold film increased with
(C¼¼O) were observed at 1745 cm21 and the CO group increasing FeCl3 concentration. To compare the presence
at 1219 cm21. The strong band at 1029 cm21 was of measure PPys in the glass side and the solution side on
assigned to the COC band. Reportedly, the broad the scaffold film, reflection FT-IR spectra of the PPy–CA
band centered at 3441 cm21 was assigned to O H film were measured (Fig. 4). The comparison of these
stretching of CA [31]. In addition with their CA bands, spectra was made that the solution side had high PPy
the related PPy bonds were assigned in the fundamental band at 1527 cm21 relative to that of the glass side.
vibration centered at 1527 cm21, the ¼ ¼CH inplane Observations revealed that the 1745 cm21 band of the CA
vibration at 1290 and 1122 cm21, and the NH stretch- was weaker in the spectrum (a), apparently because the
ing vibration at 3400 cm21 for the pyrrole ring. With the PPy component was formed gradually to be decreased
increase of FeCl3 concentration in the aqueous solution, from the surface of the film to the inside.
the 1527 cm21 band became intense, indicating that the
PPy formation was enhanced in the CA film.
The FT-IR spectra data show that the amounts of PPy Electrical Conductivity of PPy–CA Film
in the PPy–CA film were calculated from the peak inten-
sity ratio of 1745 cm21 of the CA with 1527 cm21 Figure 5 presents the influence of immersion time on
derived from the PPy. Results clarified that the value of electrical conductivity of the resultant films at different
the peak intensity of the 1527 cm21 band was increased concentration of FeCl3. Results for the solution side of
the film show a tendency with an increase of the electrical
conductivity of the PPy–CA film, when the immersion
time was changed from 1 h to 6 h. However, immersion

FIG. 6. Electrical conductivity of the solution side and the glass side
FIG. 4. FT-IR spectra of the PPy–CA film of (a) solution side and of the PPy–CA film prepared in various concentration FeCl3 aqueous
(b) glass side for the film prepared with 100 mM FeCl3. solutions at various immersion times.

DOI 10.1002/pen POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE—-2014 81


FIG. 7. Reflection UV–vis spectrum of PPy–CA film prepared from 10 mM to 100 mM of FeCl3 aqueous
solutions.

beyond 8 h changed the value of the electrical conductiv- band on the CA scaffold film. This result suggests that
ity only slightly, because the formation of polymerized the PPy interacted with dopant of Cl2 [32]. The peak
PPy layer was almost stopped at these times. Moreover, a intensity of the p ? p* band of the PPy showed almost
progressive increase was observed in the electrical con- identical intensity on the surface, but the bipolaron band
ductivity of the PPy–CA film, as higher concentrations of intensity increased gradually on the solution side, when
FeCl3 were used in the aqueous solution. These data show the concentration of the FeCl3 solution was increased.
that a high concentration of FeCl3 can influence formation Figure 8a shows relationship of both electrical conduc-
of the numbers of PPy particles on the CA scaffold film. tivity of the resultant PPy–CA film and PPy contents in
On the other hand, the electrical conductivity on the glass the CA scaffold for the films prepared with different
side of the film shows lower values than that of the solu- immersion temperature. Here, the FeCl3 concentration
tion side of the film, showing that the PPy formation was was fixed at 100 mM in the coagulation water. Decreasing
began from the solution side to inside of the film. change in the temperature of the coagulation bath appa-
Figure 6 presents the influence of FeCl3 concentration rently caused higher electrical conductivity of the PPy–
on the film electrical conductivity prepared for 2, 6, and 24 CA film. Furthermore, the PPy contents in the CA scaf-
h in the coagulation time. When the immersion time was fold was decreased, when the temperature was increased
increased, the difference in electrical conductivity of the from 58C to 508C. To ascertain the temperature effects,
resultant films in solution side and glass side became to be the change in the viscosity of the Py–CA cast solution
almost same. However, a comparison of the results for 2-h was also measured at different temperatures. As shown in
immersion showed large difference in the electrical con- Fig. 8b, the viscosity of the Py–CA solution increased
ductivity. From these results, these FeCl3 concentrations more at 58C than at 258C. The comparison indicates 10
and the immersion time were influenced in the film electri- times higher viscosity achieved at 58C for 28.2 Pa s than
cal conductivity and the electrical conductivity was at 508C for 2.2 Pa s, meaning that the low temperature
searched to be distributed in the CA film inside, at 24 h. became highly viscous solution. These date suggested that
Figure 7 shows reflection UV–Vis spectra of the PPy– the formation of PPy particles in the PPy CA films
CA film prepared in the FeCl3 aqueous solution. Here, strongly depended upon the coagulation temperature. The
these were measured on the glass side and the water solu- electrical conductivity data on (a) showed that in the low
tion side. The solution side shows that the absorption viscosity at 58C, Py polymerization was highly occurred.
band around 400 nm was caused by p ? p* electronic This might be due to that the Py monomers were moved
transition of the PPy component. It was noted that the to water layer at high temperature during the film was
broaden band was observed around 500–700 nm in the formed. Therefore, to ensure Py concentration in water
spectra indicating that the PPy had bipolaron transition solution used for CA coagulation during the film forma-

82 POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE—-2014 DOI 10.1002/pen


CONCLUSIONS
As a unique technique, PPy–CA composite films were
prepared using wet cast method, when Py–CA solution
was used. In the method proposed, the resultant composite
CA included PPy particles having about 1-lm diameters.
The amounts of PPy changed from 3.6 3 1026 g/gCA to
8.0 3 1023 g/gCA, when FeCl3 concentration was from
10 mM to 100 mM, respectively. At 100 mM FeCl3,
resultant film expressed 3.6 3 101 S/cm electrical conduc-
tivity on the solution side of the film. Also, electrical
conductivity was observed depending on the preparation
conditions like immersion time, and immersion tempera-
ture in addition with FeCl3 concentration.

ABBREVIATIONS
CA Cellulose acetate
FT-IR Fourier transform infrared
PPy Polypyrrole
SEM Scanning electron microscopy
FIG. 8. (a) Electrical conductivity and PPy wt % of PPy–CA film
prepared at several temperatures and (b) Viscosity of Py–CA solution at
several temperature. REFERENCES

tion, absorption spectra of Py in the coagulation water 1. S. Radhakrishnan and S. Paul, Sens. Actuat. B: Chem., 125,
were measured at different temperature. Figure 9 shows 60 (2007).
the Py amount coagulated in water measuring by UV 2. J. Li, X. Qian, J. Chen, C. Ding, and X. An, Carbohydr.
absorption at 210 nm, at different immersion times for Polym., 82, 504 (2010).
different temperatures. These data showed that the Py 3. D. Svirskis, J. Travas-Sejdic, A. Rodgers, and S. Garg,
concentration in the water solution was increased at J. Control. Release, 146, 6 (2010).
higher temperatures. This was because that the solvent 4. X. Luo and X.T. Cui, Electrochem. Commun., 11, 402 (2009).
exchange of Py with H2O occurred more rapidly at higher 5. C. Gong, H.B. Yang, Q.L. Song, Z.S. Lu, and C.M. Li, Sol.
temperatures. The UV absorption intensity at 210 nm for Energ. Mater. Sol. Cells., 95, 969 (2011).
the Py band was increased with an increase of the immer- 6. A. Grabulosa, M. Beley, and P.C. Gros, Inorg. Chim. Acta.,
sion time, and then became constant. It was noted that the 363, 1404 (2010).
dissolution amount of the Py became markedly higher at 7. V. Tamilavan, M. Song, S.H. Jin, and M.H. Hyun, Synth.
508C, meaning that the Py monomer in the coagulated Met., 161, 1199 (2011).
CA layer became low and decrease the number of PPy 8. K. Jradi, B. Bideau, B. Chabot, and C. Daneault, J. Mater.
particles. As results, the electrical conductivity became Sci., 47, 3752 (2012).
lower at higher temperature. 9. R. Ansari, E.-J. Chem., 13, 186 (2006).
10. A. Ashery, A.A.M. Faragb, and M.A. Shenashen, Synth.
Met., 162, 1357 (2012).
11. M. Onoda, Y. Abe, and K. Tada, Thin Solid Films, 518, 743
(2009).
12. S. Dong and J. Ding, Synth. Met., 20, 119 (1987).
13. R.E. Myers, J. Electronic. Mater., 15, 61 (1986).
14. K.S. Jang, H. Lee, and B. Moon, Synth. Met., 143, 289
(2004).
15. H.H. Kuhn, A.D. Child, and W.C. Kimbrell, Synth. Met.,
71, 2139 (1995).
16. H.S. White, G.P. Kittlesen, and M.S. Wrighton, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 106, 5375 (1984).
17. C.-T. Kou and T.-R. Liou, Synth. Met., 82, 167 (1996).
18. J.D. Madden, R.A. Cush, T.S. Kanigan, and I.W. Hunter,
Synth. Met., 113, 185 (2000).
FIG. 9. Calculated dissolution rate of Py from the Py–CA viscous 19. G.M. Spinks, L. Liu, G.G. Wallace, and D. Zhou, Adv.
solution in the water. Funct. Mater., 12, 437 (2002).

DOI 10.1002/pen POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE—-2014 83


20. D. Ge, X. Ru, S. Hong, S. Jiang, J. Tu, J. Wang, A. Zhang, 26. M. Ramamoorthy and M. Ulbricht, J. Membr. Sci., 217, 207
S. Ji, V. Linkov, B. Ren, and W. Shi, Electrochem. Com- (2003).
mun., 12, 1367 (2010). 27. D. Murphy and M.N. Pinho, J. Membr. Sci., 106, 245
21. G. Szamel, A. Domjan, S. Klebert, and B. Pukanszky, Eur. (1995).
Polym. J., 44, 357 (2008). 28. J-F. Blanco, J. Sublet, Q.T. Nguyen, and P. Schaetzel,
22. P.R. Rao and P.V. Diwan, Pharm. Acta. Helv., 72, 47 (1997). J. Membr. Sci., 283, 27 (2006).
23. M.C.C. Lucena, A.E.V. de Alencar, S.E. Mazzeto, and S.A. 29. K. Takeda and T. Kobayashi, J. Membr. Sci., 275, 61
Soares, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 80, 149 (2003). (2006).
24. A.M. Lazarin, C.A. Borgo, and Y. Gushiken, J. Membr. 30. R.E. Myers, J. Electron. Mater., 15, 61 (1986).
Sci., 221, 175 (2003). 31. J. Liu and M. Wan, J. Mater. Chem., 11, 404 (2001).
25. R. Morita, F.Z. Khan, T. Sakaguchi, M. Shiotsuki, Y. Nishio, 32. J. Arjomandia, A.A. Shah, S. Bilal, H.V. Hoang, and R.
and T. Masuda, J. Membr. Sci., 305, 136 (2007). Holze, Spectrochim Acta A, 78, 1 (2011).

84 POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE—-2014 DOI 10.1002/pen

You might also like