eco fone

by Mihaela Bircu

Submission date: 28-Dec-2019 12:57PM (UTC+0000)

Submission ID: 117088181
File name: eco_fone_68996_293666058.doc (182.5K)
Word count: 2456
Character count: 12379
eco fone
ORIGINALITY REPORT

25 %
SIMILARITY INDEX
10%
INTERNET SOURCES
3%
PUBLICATIONS
25%
STUDENT PAPERS

PRIMARY SOURCES

1
Submitted to Roehampton University
Student Paper 18%
2
Submitted to University of Western Sydney
Student Paper 2%
3
Submitted to The Robert Gordon University
Student Paper 1%
4
Submitted to Nottingham Trent University
Student Paper 1%
5
Submitted to University of Salford
Student Paper 1%
6
eprints.qut.edu.au
Internet Source 1%
7
Submitted to University of Sheffield
Student Paper 1%
8
Submitted to Staffordshire University
Student Paper <1%
9
Submitted to Grand Canyon University
Student Paper <1%
10
www.brillianttermpapers.com
Internet Source <1%

Exclude quotes Off Exclude matches Off

Exclude bibliography Off
eco fone
GRADEMARK REPORT

FINAL GRADE GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

30
TASK 1 - Overview

The overview presented seems adequate. Although

you have not comprehensively analysed key elements
of the mobile phone market in the UK. You could have

/100
also mentioned that 5% of workers used smartphones
for timesheets and 43% use WhatsApp. There is also a
need to check for SPAG errors and logical flow in your
report and use of in-text citation.

The clustered bar chart is missing in your report.

TASK 2 - Forecast

The line chart and polynomial order 2 are missing in

your report.

TASK 3 - Age Features

The report presented seems inadequate and have not

clearly highlighted some of the key features
contributing to increase in smartphone sales to older
customers . Their affordability, face recognition and
ability to pay features could have been mentioned.

TASK 4 - Pros & Cons

The reason for expanding business to Kingston was

adequately captured using pros and cons table.
However, there is a need to review calculation of
average used in your justifications.

TASK 5 - Mortgage

The monthly repayment mortgage calculation are

accurate and you have satisfactorily presented 6 logos
of mortgage lenders. However, you have not clearly
presented the mortgage formula.

TASK 6 - Shops

The null and alternative hypotheses are not clearly

stated and Standard error calculated inaccurately. Your
 report is missing clear logical conclusion on why H0
should be accepted and normal distribution chart
showing acceptance region based on 5% level of
significance.

TASK 7 - Customer Data

The means score calculations are missing.

TASK 8 - Accounts

The probability calculation are missing.

TASK 9 - Summary

The overall summary seems inadequate and you have

not reflected key findings of Task 1-8 in your
concluding part. Overall structure requires
improvement.

TASK 10 - References

References properly presented

PAGE 1

PAGE 2

PAGE 3

PAGE 4

PAGE 5

PAGE 6

PAGE 7

PAGE 8

PAGE 9

PAGE 10
PAGE 11

PAGE 12

PAGE 13

PAGE 14
RUBRIC: AIDPS 2019 30 / 100

OVERVIEW (10%) 35 / 100

Smartphones Overview

SCALE 1 Very poor clarity and conciseness in the overview

(0)

SCALE 2 Fail to show clarity and conciseness in the overview

(25)

SCALE 3 Marginally fail to show clarity and conciseness in the overview

(35)

SCALE 4 Satisfactory clarity and conciseness in the overview

(45)

SCALE 5 Good clarity and conciseness in the overview

(55)

SCALE 6 Very good clarity and conciseness in the overview

(65)

SCALE 7 Excellent clarity and conciseness in the overview

(75)

SCALE 8 Outstanding clarity and conciseness in the overview

(85)

SCALE 9 Optimally outstanding in every aspect of the task.

(100)

FORECAST (10%) 0 / 100

Line Chart & Forecast

SCALE 1 Very poor evidence of creating scatter diagram and explaining forecast
(0)

SCALE 2 Fail to show evidence of creating scatter diagram and explaining forecast
(25)

SCALE 3 Marginally fail to show evidence of creating scatter diagram and explaining forecast
(35)

SCALE 4 Satisfactory evidence of creating scatter diagram and explaining forecast

(45)

SCALE 5 Good evidence of creating scatter diagram and explaining forecast

(55)

SCALE 6 Very good evidence of creating scatter diagram and explaining forecast
(65)
SCALE 7 Excellent evidence of creating scatter diagram and explaining forecast
(75)

SCALE 8 Outstanding evidence of creating scatter diagram and explaining forecast

(85)

SCALE 9 Optimally outstanding in every aspect of the task.

(100)

AGE FEATURES (10%) 25 / 100

Age Issues

SCALE 1 Very poor evidence of explaining age-related features

(0)

SCALE 2 Fail to explain evidence of explaining age-related features

(25)

SCALE 3 Marginally fail to explain evidence of explaining age-related features

(35)

SCALE 4 Satisfactory evidence of explaining age-related features

(45)

SCALE 5 Good evidence of explaining age-related features

(55)

SCALE 6 Very good evidence of explaining age-related features justification

(65)

SCALE 7 Excellent evidence of explaining age-related features

(75)

SCALE 8 Outstanding evidence of explaining age-related features

(85)

SCALE 9 Optimally outstanding in every aspect of the task.

(100)

PROS & CONS (10%) 65 / 100

Pros & Cons Table

SCALE 1 Very poor evidence of analysing Pros & Cons method for possible Eco-Fone expansion
(0)

SCALE 2 Fail to provide evidence of analysing Pros & Cons method for possible Eco-Fone
(25) expansion

SCALE 3 Marginally fail to provide evidence of analysing Pros & Cons method for possible Eco-
(35) Fone expansion

SCALE 4 Satisfactory evidence of analysing Pros & Cons method for possible Eco-Fone expansion
(45)
SCALE 5 Good evidence of analysing Pros & Cons method for possible Eco-Fone expansion
(55)

SCALE 6 Very good evidence of analysing Pros & Cons method for possible Eco-Fone expansion
(65)

SCALE 7 Excellent evidence of analysing Pros & Cons method for possible Eco-Fone expansion
(75)

SCALE 8 Outstanding evidence of analysing Pros & Cons method for possible Eco-Fone expansion
(85)

SCALE 9 Optimally outstanding in every aspect of the task.

(100)

MORTGAGE (10%) 75 / 100

Commercial Mortgage

SCALE 1 Very poor in providing evidence of analysing mortgage issues & lenders
(0)

SCALE 2 Fail to provide evidence of analysing mortgage issues & lenders

(25)

SCALE 3 Marginally fail to provide evidence of analysing mortgage issues & lenders
(35)

SCALE 4 Satisfactory evidence of analysing mortgage issues & lenders

(45)

SCALE 5 Good evidence of analysing mortgage issues & lenders

(55)

SCALE 6 Very good evidence of analysing mortgage issues & lenders

(65)

SCALE 7 Excellent clear and concise evidence of analysing mortgage issues & lenders
(75)

SCALE 8 Outstanding clear and concise evidence of analysing mortgage issues & lenders
(85)

SCALE 9 Optimally outstanding in every aspect of the task.

(100)

SHOPS (10%) 0 / 100

Hypothesis Test

SCALE 1 Very poor in providing evidence of applying hypothesis tests on two means
(0)

SCALE 2 Fail to provide evidence of applying hypothesis tests on differences between two means
(25)
SCALE 3 Marginally fail to provide evidence of applying hypothesis tests on differences between
(35) two means

SCALE 4 Satisfactory evidence of applying hypothesis tests on differences between two means
(45)

SCALE 5 Good evidence of applying hypothesis tests on differences between two means
(55)

SCALE 6 Very good evidence of applying hypothesis tests on differences between two means
(65)

SCALE 7 Excellent evidence of applying hypothesis tests on differences between two means
(75)

SCALE 8 Outstanding evidence of applying tests on two means

(85)

SCALE 9 Optimally outstanding in every aspect of the task.

(100)

CUSTOMER DATA (10%) 0 / 100

Analysing Customer Questionnaires

SCALE 1 Very poor in application of Excel to analyse customer data

(0)

SCALE 2 Fail to apply Excel to analyse customer data

(25)

SCALE 3 Marginally fail to apply Excel analysis to customer data

(35)

SCALE 4 Satisfactory evidence of applying Excel to analyse customer data

(45)

SCALE 5 Good evidence of applying Excel to analyse customer data

(55)

SCALE 6 Very good evidence of applying Excel to analyse customer data

(65)

SCALE 7 Excellent evidence of applying Excel to analyse customer data

(75)

SCALE 8 Outstanding evidence of applying Excel to analyse customer data

(85)

SCALE 9 Optimally outstanding in every aspect of the task.

(100)

ACCOUNTS (10%) 0 / 100

Probability Distribution
SCALE 1 Very poor in application of Excel to analyse accounts data
(0)

SCALE 2 Fail to apply Excel analysis to analyse account data

(25)

SCALE 3 Marginally fail to apply Excel analysis to analyse accounts data

(35)

SCALE 4 Satisfactory evidence of applying Excel analysis to analyse accounts data

(45)

SCALE 5 Good evidence of applying Excel analysis to analyse accounts data

(55)

SCALE 6 Very good evidence of applying Excel analysis to analyse accounts data
(65)

SCALE 7 Excellent evidence of applying Excel analysis to analyse accounts data

(75)

SCALE 8 Outstanding evidence of applying Excel analysis to analyse accounts data

(85)

SCALE 9 Optimally outstanding in every aspect of the task.

(100)

REFERENCES (10%) 75 / 100

Prepare References

SCALE 1 Very poor in providing sources and listing in Harvard style

(0)

SCALE 2 Fail to apply finding good sources and list in Harvard style
(25)

SCALE 3 Marginally fail to find good sources and list in Harvard style
(35)

SCALE 4 Satisfactory evidence of finding good sources and listing in Harvard style
(45)

SCALE 5 Good evidence of finding good sources and listing in Harvard style
(55)

SCALE 6 Very good evidence of finding good sources and listing in Harvard style
(65)

SCALE 7 Excellent evidence of finding good sources and listing in Harvard style
(75)

SCALE 8 Outstanding evidence of finding good sources and listing Harvard style
(85)
SCALE 9 Optimally outstanding in every aspect of the task.
(100)

SUMMARY (10%) 25 / 100

Summary of Findings

SCALE 1 Very poor attempt to write succinct summary

(0)

SCALE 2 Fail to write succinct summary

(25)

SCALE 3 Marginally fail to write succinct summary

(35)

SCALE 4 Satisfactory evidence of applying writing succinct summary

(45)

SCALE 5 Good evidence of writing succinct summary

(55)

SCALE 6 Very good evidence of writing succinct summary

(65)

SCALE 7 Excellent evidence of writing succinct summary

(75)

SCALE 8 Outstanding evidence of writing succinct summary

(85)

SCALE 9 Optimally outstanding in every aspect of the task.

(100)