Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1) Reproducibility
2) Day-to-day reproducibility
3) Standard Curve
4) Correlation
5) Interference testing
6) Difference of results between
analysis channels
To readers of this scientific data
Sysmex corporation
Scientific division
4-4-4 Takatsukadai, Nishi-ku, Kobe 651-2271 JAPAN
Tel : 078-991-1911
Fax : 078-991-1917
E-mail address : scientific@sysmex.co.jp
1
CA-50
Results
2
CA-50
Results
Comment
Ci-Trol Level 1, 2 and 3 were measured 10 times consecutively using Thromborel S to test
within-run reproducibility.
Results were excellent and the CVs were less than 2.50%.
3
CA-50
Results
Comment
Normal plasma (normal pooled plasma and Control Plasma N), abnormal plasma (abnormal
pooled plasma and Control Plasma P) were measured 10 times consecutively using Thrombo
plastin•C Plus to test within-run reproducibility.
Results were excellent and the CVs were less than 3.00%.
4
CA-50
Results
Comment
Ci-Trol Level 1, 2 and 3 were measured 10 times consecutively using Thromboplastin•C Plus
to test within-run reproducibility.
Results were excellent and the CVs were less than 2.00%.
5
CA-50
Results
Comment
Normal plasma (normal pooled plasma and Control Plasma N) and abnormal plasma (abnormal
pooled plasma and Control Plasma P) were measured 10 times consecutively using Innovin to
test within-run reproducibility.
Results were excellent and the CVs were less than 2.00%.
6
CA-50
Results
Comment
Ci-Trol Level 1, 2 and 3 were measured 10 times consecutively using Innovin to test within-
run reproducibility.
Results were excellent and the CVs were less than 1.50%.
7
CA-50
Results
1 st 2 nd 3 rd 4 th 5 th Total
1 11.1 11.1 11.2 11.0 11.3
2 11.2 11.3 11.1 11.1 11.2
3 11.1 11.2 11.2 11.0 11.3
4 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.0 11.1
5 11.0 11.1 11.0 10.9 11.2
Mean 11.10 11.18 11.16 11.00 11.22 11.13
SD 0.063 0.075 0.102 0.063 0.075 0.076
CV(%) 0.57 0.67 0.91 0.57 0.67 0.68
(sec)
(sec)
12.0
Clotting time
11.5
11.0
10.5
10.0
1 2 3 4 5 (days)
Time
Comment
Ci-Trol Level 1 (normal rage plasma) was measured for PT on 5 consecutive days using
Thromboplastin•C Plus to test day-to-day reproducibility.
Results were excellent, and CVs 1.00% or less was achieved for each plasma.
8
CA-50
Results
Log.Pt.Pt
9
CA-50
Results
Log.Pt.Pt
10
CA-50
Results
Log.Pt.Pt
11
CA-50
Results
CA-50 vs CA-6000
(sec)
120
90
CA-50
60
30 y = 1.087x - 1.293
r = 0.998
0
0 30 60 90 120 (sec)
CA-6000
Comment
Correlation of PT determination on the CA-50 and the CA-6000 using the Thrombrel S in both
instruments. Results were excellent and the correlation was r=0.998 and y=1.087x-1.293.
12
CA-50
Results
CA-50 vs CA-6000
(%)
120
90
CA-50
60
30
y = 0.932x + 2.152
r = 0.998
0
0 30 60 90 120 (%)
CA-6000
Comment
Correlation of PT activity on the CA-50 and the CA-6000 using the Thrombrel S in both in
struments. Results were excellent and the correlation was r=0.998 and y=0.932x+2.152.
13
CA-50
Results
CA-50 vs CA-6000
(sec)
50
40
30
CA-50
20
y = 1.026x - 0.157
10 r = 0.997
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 (sec)
CA-6000
Comment
Correlation of PT determination on the CA-50 and the CA-6000 using the Thromboplastin•C
Plus in both instruments. Results were excellent and the correlation was r=0.997 and
y=1.026x-0.157.
14
CA-50
Results
CA-50 vs CA-6000
(%)
150
100
CA-50
50
y = 0.912x + 3.747
r = 0.997
0
0 50 100 150 (%)
CA-6000
Comment
Correlation of PT activity on the CA-50 and the CA-6000 using the Thromboplastin•C Plus in
both instruments. Results were excellent and the correlation was r=0.997 and y=0.912x+3.747.
15
CA-50
Results
CA-50 vs CA-6000
(sec)
40
30
CA-50
20
y = 0.896x + 1.236
r = 0.998
10
10 20 30 40 (sec)
CA-6000
16
CA-50
Results
CA-50 vs CA-6000
(%)
150
100
CA-50
50
y = 1.106x + 0.503
r = 0.996
0
0 50 100 150 (%)
CA-6000
Comment
Correlation of PT determination on the CA-50 and the CA-6000 using the Innovin both instru
ments. Results were excellent and the correlation was r=0.996 and y=1.106x+0.503.
17
CA-50
Results
(1) Hemoglobin
Hemoglobin conc. (mg/dL) 0 86 172 258 344 430
Measured value (sec) 12.85 12.70 12.55 12.55 12.55 12.45
Interference (%) - -1.2% -2.3% -2.3% -2.3% -3.1%
(2) Lipid
Lipid conc. (Formazine turbidity unit) 0 566 1,132 1,698 2,264 2,830
Measured value (sec) 12.90 12.90 12.70 12.80 12.65 12.65
Interference (%) - 0.0% -1.6% -0.8% -1.9% -1.9%
Comment
Interference of Hemoglobin, Lipid and Conjugated bilirubin in the PT measurement was ex
amined. Various concentration of Hemogloin, Lipid and Conjugated bilirubin were added to
the pooled plasma, which was then assayed for PT, using Thromborel S. Hemoglobin made no
influence on PT result up to 430 mg/dL. Lipid made no influence on PT result up to 2,830 For
mazine turbidity unit. Conjugated bilirubin made no influence on PT result up to 21.5 mg/dL.
18
CA-50
Results
(1) Hemoglobin
(sec)
16.0
Clotting time
14.0
12.0
10.0
0 100 200 300 400 500 (mg/dL)
Hemoglobin concentration
(2) Lipid
(sec)
16.0
Clotting time
14.0
12.0
10.0
0 1,000 2,000 3,000
Lipid concentration (Formazine turbidity unit)
14.0
12.0
10.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 (mg/dL)
Conjugated bilirubin concentration
19
CA-50
Results
(1) Hemoglobin
Hemoglobin conc. (mg/dL) 0 86 172 258 344 430
Measured value (sec) 12.10 12.00 11.85 11.85 11.90 11.90
Interference (%) - -0.8% -2.1% -2.1% -1.7% -1.7%
(2) Lipid
Lipid conc. (Formazine turbidity unit) 0 566 1,132 1,698 2,264 2,830
Measured value (sec) 12.15 12.10 12.00 12.00 11.90 11.95
Interference (%) - -0.4% -1.2% -1.2% -2.1% -1.6%
Comment
Interference of Hemoglobin, Lipid and Conjugated bilirubin in the PT measurement was ex
amined. Various concentration of HemogloinL, Lipid and Conjugated bilirubin were added to
the pooled plasma, which was then assayed for PT, using Thromboplastin•C Plus. Hemoglobin
made no influence on PT result up to 430 mg/dL. Lipid made no influence on PT result up to
2,830 Formazine turbidity unit. Conjugated bilirubin made no influence on PT result up to 21.5
mg/dL.
20
CA-50
Results
(1) Hemoglobin
(sec)
14.0
Clotting time
13.0
12.0
11.0
10.0
0 100 200 300 400 500 (mg/dL)
Hemoglobin concentration
(2) Lipid
(sec)
14.0
Clotting time
13.0
12.0
11.0
10.0
0 1,000 2,000 3,000
Lipid concentration (Formazine turbidity unit)
13.0
12.0
11.0
10.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 (mg/dL)
Conjugated bilirubin concentration
21
CA-50
Results
Ch 1 Ch 2 Ch 3 Ch 4 Ch 1 Ch 2 Ch 3 Ch 4
1 12.2 12.0 12.1 12.1 1 24.2 24.4 24.3 24.5
2 12.0 11.9 12.0 12.0 2 24.3 24.0 24.5 24.0
3 12.0 12.1 11.9 12.0 3 24.5 24.4 24.3 24.2
4 12.1 11.9 11.8 11.9 4 24.6 24.2 24.2 24.6
5 11.9 12.0 11.9 11.8 5 24.6 24.2 24.3 24.0
6 11.8 11.8 11.9 11.8 6 24.4 24.7 24.3 24.0
7 11.9 11.9 11.9 12.0 7 24.5 24.4 24.3 24.2
8 12.2 12.1 12.2 12.1 8 24.1 24.7 24.0 24.1
9 11.8 12.0 12.0 12.0 9 24.3 24.6 24.1 24.4
10 12.1 12.2 12.0 11.9 10 24.1 24.3 24.1 24.3
Mean 12.00 11.99 11.97 11.96 Mean 24.36 24.39 24.24 24.23
SD 0.141 0.114 0.110 0.102 SD 0.180 0.217 0.136 0.205
CV(%) 1.18 0.95 0.92 0.85 CV(%) 0.74 0.89 0.56 0.85
(sec) (sec)
The order of a measurement
Comment
Difference of results between analysis channels was examined on the PT measurement. Ci-Trol
Level 1 (normal range plasma) and Ci-Trol Level 2 (abnormal range plasma) were measured
10 times consecutively each analysis channels (Ch1-4) using Thromboplastin•C Plus.
Results were excellent and showed no difference between analysis channels.
22