Table 1.

Academic Achievement of Senior High School in General Mathematics

Grades Frequency ( N=105) Percentage Cumulative Percentage

75-79 (Fairly Satisfactory) 4 3.81 3.81

80-84 (Satisfactory) 14 13.33 17.14

85-89 (Very Satisfactory) 57 54.29 71.43

90-100 (Outstanding) 30 28.57 100

Mean: 87.43
Minimum: 75
Maximum: 100

The first research problem examined senior high school students’ academic

achievement in general mathematics.

The first research challenge is summarized in Table 1. It indicates that the respondents'

minimum grade is 75 and their maximum grade is 100, with a mean of 87.43,

suggesting that they have a high level of Academic Achievement in their General

Mathematics subject. Additionally, it demonstrates that 3.81 percent of respondents

have low academic achievement in General Mathematics, whereas 28.57 percent have

outstanding academic achievement.

 Table 2.1. Senior High School Academic Background of the respondents in terms
of Track

Track Frequency Percentage Cumulative Frequency

Academic 92 87.62 87.62

Technical-Vocational 9.52 97.14

10
Livelihood
2.86 100
Arts & Design, and 3
Sports

Others 0 0 0

The second study problem examined the respondents' Senior High School

Academic Background in terms of Track.

Table 2 summarizes the outcome of the second research problem. It

demonstrates that most respondents (87.62 percent) enrolled in the Academic Track.

Arts & Design and Sports have the lowest enrollment rates at 2.86 percent.
 Table 2.2. Senior High School Academic Background of the respondents in terms
of Strand

Strand Frequency Percentage Cumulative Frequency

Accountancy, Business, 20 19.05 19.05

and Management (ABM)

Humanities and Social

21 20.00 39.05
Sciences (HUMSS)

Science, Technology,
Engineering, and 46 43.81 82.86
Mathematics (STEM)

General Academic Strand 6 5.71 88.57

(GAS)

Others:

Food and
5 4.76 93.33
Beverages/Cookery

ICT 7 6.67 100

 Table 2.3. Senior High School Academic Background of the respondents in terms
of Type of School

Type Of School Frequency Percentage Cumulative Frequency

Private 66 62.86 62.86

Public 39 37.14 100

 Table 3.1. Self-efficacy of the respondents in terms of Aspects of Learning
Techniques (Psychological Aspects)

Statements Mean Cumulative Frequency

I believe that getting

enough sleep before the 4.9810 Oftentimes
exam/class would make
me understand more of
the Math subject.

I believe that if I work

5.1905 Always
hard, I’ll get good grades.

I believe I can score very

well in Math assignments 3.8857 Usually
and tests in this online
class.

I believe I can understand

the most difficult
concepts in mathematics 3.5333 Usually
taught by lecturers even
though they are online.

I believe taking guided

meditation can help me 4.6095 Oftentimes
focus on learning
Mathematics.

Over All Mean 4.44 Oftentimes

Legend:

1.0-1.82-Never
1.83-2.67-Rarely
2.68-3.48-Sometimes
3.49-4.31-Usually
4.32-5.14-Oftentimes
5.15-6.0-Always
As shown in the table above, the overall mean is 4.44 in which the interpretation is Oftentimes at the
same time it falls on the second level of Aspects of Learning Techniw

Table 3.2. Self-efficacy of the respondents in terms of Aspects of Learning

Techniques (Organization Aspects)

Legend:

1.0-1.82-Never
1.83-2.67-Rarely
2.68-3.48-Sometimes
3.49-4.31-Usually
4.32-5.14-Oftentimes
 5.15-6.0-Always

Table 3.3. Self-efficacy of the respondents in terms of Aspects of Learning

Techniques (Social Interaction Aspects)

Statements Mean Cumulative Frequency

I engage in academic
discussions with my 4.2762 Usually
friends through social
media.

I ask for help from my

4.6857 Oftentimes
friends when I have
issues in subject matters.

I have study buddies 4.0286 Usually

during an online exams.

I would ask students

leaders regarding Math 4.1048 Usually
engaging activities.

I would seek help from

my parents and siblings
to help me understand 3.4190 Sometimes
Math subject.
4.1029 Usually
Over All Mean

Legend:

1.0-1.82-Never
1.83-2.67-Rarely
2.68-3.48-Sometimes
3.49-4.31-Usually
4.32-5.14-Oftentimes
5.15-6.0-Always
 Table 3.4. Self-efficacy of the respondents in terms of Aspects of Time
Management (Forming Right Habits)

Statements Mean Cumulative Frequency

I set an alarm so that I 4.2667 Usually

could do things on time.

I draw up a study plan

written on a sticky note or 3.9524 Usually
being posted on the wall.

I would decline any

activities that would
4.2571 Usually
distract me from doing
the things that are
needed to be done on
time.

I have a hard time getting 4.2000 Usually

used to studying math on
time according to a
schedule.

I am doing the things 3.8667 Usually

(assignments, school
works and etc.) on time
with no delays.
4.1086 Usually
Over All Mean

Legend:

1.0-1.82-Never
1.83-2.67-Rarely
2.68-3.48-Sometimes
3.49-4.31-Usually
4.32-5.14-Oftentimes
 5.15-6.0-Always

Table 3.5. Self-efficacy of the respondents in terms of Aspects of Coping

Mechanism (Cognitive Aspects)

Statements Mean Cumulative Frequency

I listen to the positive 4.9048 Oftentimes

feedback of the people
around me.

I make sense of feedback

on my assignments. 4.7143 Oftentimes

I tend to wake up early

3.9905 Usually
before my alarm does.

I tend to listen music to

4.6857 Oftentimes
help me relax and go
back to my workplace.

I tend to be distracted
when doing homework’s 4.2190 Usually
or activities.

Over All Mean 4.5029 Always

Legend:

1.0-1.82-Never
1.83-2.67-Rarely
2.68-3.48-Sometimes
3.49-4.31-Usually
4.32-5.14-Oftentimes
5.15-6.0-Always
Table 3.6. Self-efficacy of the respondents in terms of Aspects of Coping
Mechanism (Affective Aspects)

Legend:

1.0-1.82-Never
1.83-2.67-Rarely
2.68-3.48-Sometimes
3.49-4.31-Usually
4.32-5.14-Oftentimes
5.15-6.0-Always
 Table 3.7. Self-efficacy of the respondents in terms of Aspects of Coping
Mechanism (Learning Aspects)

Statements Mean Cumulative Frequency

I ask questions from my

instructor if there is
something I am not 4.3333 Usually
certain or did not
understand.

I ask help from my

classmates to elaborate 4.4952 Oftentimes
the lesson to me.

I pause when something

is so confusing. 4.7619 Oftentimes

I do some multi-tasking
for me to finish the
activities once and for all. 4.2571 Usually

I find problems related to

the lesson and tried to
4.2381 Usually
solve it for me to learn
better Mathematics.

Over All Mean 4.4171 Oftentimes

Legend:

1.0-1.82-Never
1.83-2.67-Rarely
2.68-3.48-Sometimes
3.49-4.31-Usually
4.32-5.14-Oftentimes
5.15-6.0-Always
 Table 3.7. Self-efficacy of the respondents in terms of Aspects of Class
Performance (Independent Learning)

Statements Mean Cumulative Frequency

I am very attentive in 4.0476 Usually

every class discussion.

I can solve problems on

my own using pen and
notebook during the class 3.9048 Usually
to fully understand how it
works.

I have enough attention

span when it comes to 3.8952 Usually
Mathematics subject.

I can understand the

subject even if the 3.2000 Sometimes
discussion is very fast.

I am able to solve the

problem given by the 3.7905 Usually
teacher.

Over All Mean 3.7676 Usually

Legend:

1.0-1.82-Never
1.83-2.67-Rarely
2.68-3.48-Sometimes
3.49-4.31-Usually
4.32-5.14-Oftentimes
5.15-6.0-Always
 Table 3.9. Self-efficacy of the respondents in terms of Aspects of Class
Performance (Collaborative Learning)

Statements Mean Cumulative Frequency

I ask questions to the

instructors through 4.2190 Usually
chatting in terms of
academic matters.

I engage in active
4.3143 Usually
discussion with my peers
and classmates through
social media.

I am able to communicate
my classmates to solve 4.4762 Oftentimes
difficult Math problems in
this online learning.

We do group study for

this mathematics course. 3.9714 Usually

I get attach with

resources how to handle 4.3048 Oftentimes
unforeseen situations.

Over All Mean 4.2571 Usually

Legend:

1.0-1.82-Never
1.83-2.67-Rarely
2.68-3.48-Sometimes
3.49-4.31-Usually
4.32-5.14-Oftentimes
5.15-6.0-Always
 Table 3.10. Self-efficacy of the respondents in terms of Aspects of Learning
Distractions (Environmental Factors)

Statements Mean Cumulative Frequency

I do not have a good 3.5048 Usually

learning environment.

My current work space as

working student is not 3.4762 Sometimes
conducive for learning.

I have a congested
neighborhood thus
3.4476 Sometimes
learning Mathematics is
hard for me.

I cannot focus because of

the environmental issues
in the neighborhood e.g., 3.8000 Usually
dogs barking, vehicles,
construction sites.

I cannot control noises

from the people around 4.3333 Oftentimes
me.

Over All Mean 3.7124 Usually

Legend:

1.0-1.82-Never
1.83-2.67-Rarely
2.68-3.48-Sometimes
3.49-4.31-Usually
4.32-5.14-Oftentimes
5.15-6.0-Always
 Table 3.11. Self-efficacy of the respondents in terms of Aspects of Learning
Distractions (Familial Concerns)

Statements Mean Cumulative Frequency

We are so many in the

family thus learning Math 3.2476 Sometimes
subject is not easy.

I have family issues

which affect my capacity 2.8952 Sometimes
to learn.

I have an inadequate
space and big family thus 3.0667 Sometimes
noises are evident while
in class.

I have someone who can

call for help but they also
don’t know how because 3.1143 Sometimes
of low educational level.

I do have any one at

home to assist me in 3.6190 Usually
learning Mathematics.

Over All Factors 3.1886 Sometimes

Legend:

1.0-1.82-Never
1.83-2.67-Rarely
2.68-3.48-Sometimes
3.49-4.31-Usually
4.32-5.14-Oftentimes
5.15-6.0-Always
 Table 3.12. Self-efficacy of the respondents in terms of Aspects of Learning
Distractions (Online Resources)

Statements Mean Cumulative Frequency

I live in a place where the

connectivity is very slow
thus it affects my capacity 4.0476 Usually
to learn better
Mathematics.

I find it hard to
3.5048 Usually
manipulate digital
devices, software and
etc.

I do not have adequate

devices to be used during 3.6095 Usually
the synchronous
sessions thus learning
Mathematic subjects is
easy for me. 3.6476 Usually
I do not have enough
resources because of
poor living.
3.5524 Usually
I do not have enough
money load and other
gadgets as a mode of
3.6724 Usually
learning.

Over All Mean

Legend:

1.0-1.82-Never
1.83-2.67-Rarely
 2.68-3.48-Sometimes
3.49-4.31-Usually
4.32-5.14-Oftentimes
5.15-6.0-Always

Table 4. Mathematics in the Modern World Performance of The respondents in

terms of Final Grade S.Y. 2020-2021 first semester:

Grades Frequency ( N=105) Percentage Cumulative Frequency

75-79 (Fairly Satisfactory) 7 6.66 6.66

80-84 (Satisfactory) 28 26.67 33.33

85-89 (Very Satisfactory) 55 52.38 85.71

90-100 (Outstanding) 15 14.29 100

Mean: 85. 5619

Minimum: 75
Maximum: 100

The fourth study problem examined respondents' performance in mathematics in the

modern world in terms of final grade S.Y 2020-2021 first semester:

Table 4 summarizes the outcome of the fourth research problem. It demonstrates that

respondents have a minimum grade of 75 and a maximum grade of 100, with an

average of 85.5619, indicating that respondents have a high level of performance in

their Mathematics in the Modern World topic. Additionally, it reveals that 6.66 percent of

respondents have terrible performance in mathematics in the modern world, while 52.38

percent have a strong performance.