GLOBAL STRATEGY MISTAKES

1- porter’s five forces should be reviewed FULLY, MEANING THAT

EVERY POINT DESCRIBED IN EACH OF THE FIVE FORCES OF
THE FRAMEWORK SHOULD BE ANALYSED AND MENTIONED
WITH NO EXCLUSION.
BETTER REPRESENT IT AS A TABLE…

2- VRIO IS DONE COMPLETELY WRONG BECAUSE in each of the point of the

framework u should view it the following way:
First Describe why is it valuable, if yes, then why??? if no, then detect competitive
disadvantage and explain it
Then explain why is it rare, if it isn’t rare then detect and describe what is the competitive
parity in this case
Then find why is it inimitable , if no then detect and describe temporary competitive
advantage
Finally decide on the last point if it is well organised explain why and if no then detect
and describe unused competitive advantage
3-this is swot
Weakness which I circled in red she has deleted and told me to put it into the threats, so u
gotta think about more weaknesses BECAUSE IT WILL ALSO AFFECT TOWS
LATER U WILL SE

4-the whole tows thing is one of the MOST CRUCIAL THINGS IN THIS WORK.
WE HAVE STRENGTHS WEKNESSES OPPS AND THREATS
WE SHOULD USE THEM ONLY AND USE THEM BOTH WAYS MEANING
THATH IF U CREATE S/O STRATEGY IT SHOUDL BE MADE BASING ON
THOSE OPPS AND STRENGTHS THAT ARE MENTIONED AND IT SHOULD BE
VERY CLEARLY SEEN AND OBVIOUSLY THE SAME WAY APPLIES TO THE
OTHER ONES W/O STRATEGY OR S/T OR W/T STRATEGY
She has deleted those couple strategies which I have circled in red because she told me
that IT IS WEAK
LIKE SHE COULD SEE THE RELATION BETWEEN ADAPTING TO CUTOMER’S
PREFERENCES AND NEW PRODUCT LINES
BECAUSE U SAY - NEW PRODUCT LINES in opps section but in the strategy itself
u say investing in product lines that are preferred by existing customers, JUST THINK
DOR A SECOND AAIGHT!!!!!- ITS NOT INVESTING IN THE NEW PRODUCT
LINES so bro it is done bad it should be more serious more legit more CONCRETE
AND CLEAR, SO SHE CAN UNDERSTAND EVERYTHING AND FEEL THE
SENSE OF THIS SHIT INSTEAD OF THE WATER U POURED OKAY ?????
REGARDING W1/O3 STRATEGY I TOLD YOU ALREADY PREVIOUSLY THAT
SHE HAS DELETED AND MOOVED LESS DEMAND AND REDUCED
REVENUES FORM WEAKNESSES TO THREATS SO THIS STRATEGY
SHOULD ALSO BE REVIEWED !!!!

5-STRATEGIC RECOMENDATIONS
BOTH OF THEM SHOULD ALSO BE MORE CONCRETE AND SHOULD BE DONE
BASING ON WHOLE SWOT TOWS THING AND ONLY
NO SEPARATE ASSUMPTIONS OR STUFF LIKE THAT AND NO WATER
IF U NAME ONE OF THE RECOMMENDATION (a) Product Improvements
and Continuous Innovations: THEN U HAVE TO MENTION PRODUCT
IMPROVEMENT IN THE SWOT AND TOWS WITH NO EXCLUSION AS
WELL AS CONTINIOUS INNOVATION
IF U NAME ANOTHER (B )Strategic Collaborations and Diversification: THEN
THESE TWO THINGS SHOULD BE STRAIGHT UP MENTIONED IN SWOT
OR IN TOWS OR BETTER IN BOOOOOTTHH OF THEM THINGS