MECH0018.1 Assignment 2 QP Fall 2021

Stress Analysis (MECH0018.
1) – Fall - 2021 – CW (Assignment 2) – Session A&B – QP
IN SEMESTER (INDIVIDUAL) ASSIGNMENT

Module Code: MECH0018.1 Module Name: Stress Analysis
Level: 3 Max. Marks: 100

Instructions to Student
• Answer all questions.
• Deadline of submission: 16/ 12/ 2021 23:59
• The marks received on the assignment will be scaled down to the actual weightage of the
assignment which is 35 marks
• Different question parameters will be given according to the final number of registered students.
• Only Microsoft Word format accepted for your answer (No handwriting or photos will be accepted)
• Formative feedback on the complete assignment draft will be provided.
• Feedback after final evaluation will be provided by 23/ 12/ 2021 23:59
Module Learning Outcomes

The following LOs are achieved by the student by completing the assignment successfully
1) Critically evaluate the implications of the theories of elastic and plastic fracture mechanics and apply these
to simple problems.
2) Review the applications of the linear Theory of Elasticity, Theory of Plasticity and Fracture Mechanics to
practical design problems and identify the limitations of these theories.
3) Review the basics of failure analysis in the light of the Theory of Plasticity and apply the plasticity
fundamentals to the solution of specific problems.
Assignment Objective
The main objective of this assignment is to develop the students’ understanding of stress analysis, behavior of materials
and finite element solution procedures, thus enabling them to select and apply concepts creatively in the solution to
complex problems of stress analysis in design.
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_03 Page 1 of 17
Stress Analysis (MECH0018.1) – Fall - 2021 – CW (Assignment 2) – Session A&B – QP
Assignment Tasks
Question 1: (26%)
The vertical rectangular cross section column shown in Fig. Q1 is Fix – Free ends. Assuming EX
= 2.1 e 5, Prxy = 0.3, Density = 7.8 e -9, No. of elements for each line = 50, and Element Type:
Beam 188. Using the dimensions given in Table Q1 below, perform the static and Eigen buckling
analysis with ANSYS APDL software (With Screen Capture Step by Step), then answer the
following questions:
1) Describe the element type that you used in the model. (6 marks)
2) Time/ Freq. for each required mode. (6 marks)
3) The deflection at points A, B, and C in X , Y , and Z directions. (6 marks)
4) For ANSYS file (8 marks)
Please tabulate your results in the answer table below
L2
L1
Figure Q1: Rectangular Cross Section Column
Table Q1: The column dimensions
Student Name Student L1 L2 F B H No. of

Modes
ID to
Extract
AHMED 100 80 7 0.2 0.4 5

SULAIMAN SAID 16F16087
AL SALMI
ASAD SAUD ALI 120 100 8 0.4 0.6 7
19F18962
AL HASHILI
AYMAN SALIM 95 75 5 0.3 0.5 6
SAIF AL 20S20038
MAAMARI
ISHAQ SAID 175 150 9 0.1 0.2 5
KHALFAN AL 16F16090
ABRI
MAZIN ADIM SAID 280 240 16 0.15 0.25 7
19S18838
SALIM AL SADAIRI
MAZIN
MOHAMMED
ABDULLAH AL
18F18317 175 150 10 0.1 0.2 7
YAZEEDI
RASHID SHAMIS
SULTAN SHAMIS 19F19561 120 100 8 0.15 0.25 6
AL HAJRI
SAID HAMDAN
SAID AL 19F19556 95 75 6 0.4 0.6 5
KHANBASHI
SAOUD ALI SAID
AL ALAWI
16F16248 110 90 8 0.15 0.25 7
SUHAIB ABDULLA
MOHAMMED AL- 15F14844 160 140 8 0.4 0.6 5
RAWAHI
SULTAN SAIF
MOHAMMED AL 15F14269 115 95 5 0.3 0.5 7
MAMARI
YASIR ALI KHAMIS
AL RAWAHI
17S16331 170 150 9 0.1 0.2 6
Answer Table:
Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3 Mode 4 Mode 5 Mode 6 Mode 7
Time/ Freq.
Def. At a (X Direction)
Def. At a (Y Direction)
Def. At a (Z Direction)
Def. At b (X Direction)
Def. At b (Y Direction)
Def. At b (Z Direction)
Def. At c (X Direction)
Def. At c (Y Direction)
Def. At c (Z Direction)
Question 2: (24%)
(A) The ductile behaviour of a certain metal is well described by 𝝈 = 𝟗𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝜺𝟎.𝟐𝟓 . The metal undergoes
uniform work hardening process to a reduction in area of r = 40%, find the yield stress of the work-
hardened metal. (4 marks)
(B) If the metal in (A) above, governed by the same ductile behavior equation, is cold-worked first by 30%
which is still followed by an additional cold work of 35%, find the yield stress of the metal.
(6 marks)
(C) Provide your comment(s) why the yield stresses in (A) and (B) above are not the same.
(6 marks)
(D) If a bar of same metal of (A) above is initially cold worked some unknown amount. It is then subjected
to 20% additional cold work and its yield strength is measured as 78,541 𝑵/𝒎𝟐 . What was the unknown
amount of cold work induced prior to the 20% added cold work?
(8 marks)
Please Use the values given in Table Q2 below
Table Q2
Student Name Student
Values
ID
AHMED SULAIMAN SAID (A) σ = 10000ε 0.23 , r = 30%
AL SALMI (B) initially 15% followed by 20%
16F16087
(D) 25%, yield strength of 72,000 𝑵/𝒎𝟐
ASAD SAUD ALI AL (A) σ = 10000ε 0.25 , 20%
HASHILI (B) initially 10% followed by 20%
19F18962
AYMAN SALIM SAIF AL (A) σ = 10000ε 0.24 , 25%
MAAMARI 20S20038 (B) initially 20% followed by 20%
ISHAQ SAID KHALFAN (A) σ = 10000ε 0.25 , 40%
AL ABRI (B) initially 30% followed by 35%
16F16090
MAZIN ADIM SAID SALIM (A) σ = 10000ε 0.25 , 30%
AL SADAIRI (B) initially 20% followed by 30%
19S18838
MAZIN MOHAMMED (A) σ = 10000ε 0.25 , 40%
ABDULLAH AL YAZEEDI (B) initially 30% followed by 35%
18F18317
RASHID SHAMIS (A) σ = 10000ε 0.3 , 20%

SULTAN SHAMIS AL (B) initially 15% followed by 20%
HAJRI 19F19561
(A) σ = 10000ε 0.25 , 20%

19F19556 (B) initially 10% followed by 20%
SAID HAMDAN SAID AL (D) 20%, yield strength of 74,000 𝑵/𝒎𝟐
KHANBASHI
(A) σ = 10000ε 0.24 , 25%
SAOUD ALI SAID AL (D) 30%, yield strength of 65,000 𝑵/𝒎𝟐
ALAWI
(A) σ = 10000ε 0.23 , 35%
SUHAIB ABDULLA 15F14844 (B) initially 25% followed by 20%
MOHAMMED AL- (D) 30%, yield strength of 62,000 𝑵/𝒎𝟐
RAWAHI
(A) σ = 10000ε 0.24 , 15%
SULTAN SAIF (D) 30%, yield strength of 70,000 𝑵/𝒎𝟐
MOHAMMED AL MAMARI
(A) σ = 10000ε 0.25 , 35%

17S16331 (B) initially 20% followed by 25%
YASIR ALI KHAMIS AL (D) 25%, yield strength of 48,000 𝑵/𝒎𝟐
RAWAHI
Question 3: (30%)
The vertical rectangular cross section column shown in Fig. Q3 is pinned at both ends. Assuming
the young's modulus E for the column material is 200 GPa, 𝝈𝒀 = 𝟐𝟓𝟎 𝑴𝑷𝒂, L1, L2, a, and b
are given in Table Q3 below. Please Use the dimensions given in Table Q3 below
1) Find the maximum compressive load P that can be applied to the column without failure
(8 marks)
2) Determine the allowable load. (6 marks)
3) Do you think this column will yield before it buckled? (Take FS = 2.5) (4 marks)
4) What is the difference in the results of 1, 2, and 3 above if the column length is increased
by 20% ? Discuss the difference. (6 marks)
5) Discuss the main factors influencing on Buckling behavior (6 marks)
L1
b
a
L2
Y
Z
Figure Q3: Rectangular Cross Section Column
Table Q3
Student Name Student L1 L2 a b
ID
AHMED SULAIMAN 100 80 0.02 0.04
16F16087
SAID AL SALMI
ASAD SAUD ALI 120 100 0.015 0.025
19F18962
AL HASHILI
AYMAN SALIM 95 75 0.01 0.02
20S20038
SAIF AL MAAMARI
ISHAQ SAID 160 140 0.04 0.06
KHALFAN AL 16F16090
ABRI
MAZIN ADIM SAID 190 170 0.035 0.05
19S18838
SALIM AL SADAIRI
MAZIN MOHAMMED 115 85 0.02 0.04
ABDULLAH AL 18F18317
YAZEEDI
RASHID SHAMIS 125 110 0.015 0.025
SULTAN SHAMIS AL 19F19561
HAJRI
SAID HAMDAN SAID 90 100 0.02 0.03
19F19556
AL KHANBASHI
SAOUD ALI SAID AL 130 120 0.025 0.04
16F16248
ALAWI
SUHAIB ABDULLA 190 170 0.01 0.03
MOHAMMED AL- 15F14844
RAWAHI
SULTAN SAIF 170 150 0.03 0.05
MOHAMMED AL 15F14269
MAMARI
YASIR ALI KHAMIS 120 90 0.025 0.045
17S16331
AL RAWAHI
Question 4: (20%)
(A) A 65.4 mm wide aircraft inspection panel is made of 7074-T651 aluminium alloy. The
material properties are (Fracture toughness, KIc = 25.8 MN m-3/2 and Yield stress, σy = 505
MPa. Following inspection, an edge through-crack, a, of length 6.4 mm is found. During
flight, this plate is subjected to a cyclic stress of 90 MPa. Ignoring the effect of the mean
stress, calculate the number of cycles to failure (Nf) using Paris’ Law and the material
constants (in their standard units): A = 1.5x10-12 m/(MNm-3/2)n per cycle and m = 2.8,
(Take Y = 1.12) (10 marks)
(B) Discuss the effect of the fracture toughness KIc if its value reduced to be 20 MN m-3/2
(4 marks)
(C) Differentiate between the stress concentration factor, toughness, and stress intensity
factor. (6 marks)
Rules & Regulations:
• All resources should be cited using APA style of referencing (APA 7th Edition).
• The final assignment must have a Title page, Table of Contents, References/ bibliography using
APA style of referencing (APA 7th Edition) and page numbers.
• Title Page must have Assignment Name, Module name, Session, your name, ID, and the name of
the faculty.
• Softcopy in word format is to be submitted through Turnitin link on Moodle.
• Viva will be conducted after the assignment submission as per the dates informed earlier.
Guidelines:
• Assignment must be computer typed.

➢ Font - Times New Roman
➢ Font – Style - Regular
➢ Font - Size - 12
➢ Heading should be with Font Size 14, Bold, Capital and Underline.
• Explain with suitable diagrams wherever required. Diagrams must be drawn using suitable
software or by pencil.
• Each student has to do the assignment individually.
• You can refer books in E-Library or use internet resource. But you should not cut and paste
material from internet nor provide photocopied material from books. The assignment answers
should be in your own words after understanding the matter from the above resources.
Assessment Evaluation Criteria

Knowledge and Understanding
Classification /
Technical / Practical Skills Reflection and critical analysis General / Transferable skills*
And % Range Application of Theory /
Evidence of Reading
• Outstanding knowledge and • Tasks completed with very • Outstanding skills for critical • Outstanding ability to use
depth of understanding of high accuracy. analysis, evaluation and learning resources
principles and concepts. • Outstanding skills in synthesizing. • Outstanding presentation,
• Outstanding ability to apply interpretation of results / • Outstanding reflective logically structured, using
the theoretical concepts by and accomplishing practical practices, demonstrating accurate grammar and
considering of information tasks. outstanding personal spelling.
systematically. • Demonstrates high degree of learning and growth, insight • Mostly correct cross-
• Evidence of reading a wide autonomy in completing into required professional referencing and links to
range of educational tasks values and principles and supporting evidence
literature/research and professional development • Outstanding ability to
Outstanding where applicable workplace planning. communicate the
strategies, policies and • Original Findings presented information verbally and in
94 -100 procedures. with conviction and justified writing.
very well • Outstanding ability to work in
groups and to manage
teams.
• Outstanding ability to learn
autonomously.
• Very accurate referencing
and bibliography using
appropriate referencing style
• Outstanding problem solving
skills and outstanding
First Class
decision-making skills.
• Excellent knowledge and • Tasks completed with high • Excellent skills for critical • Excellent ability to use
depth of understanding of accuracy. analysis, evaluation and learning resources
principles and concepts. • Excellent skills in synthesizing.
• Excellent ability to apply the interpretation of results / • Excellent reflective practices, • Excellent presentation,
theoretical concepts by and accomplishing practical demonstrating excellent logically structured, using
considering of information tasks. personal learning and accurate grammar and
systematically. growth, insight into required spelling.
• Evidence of beyond the professional values and • Mostly correct cross-
minimum expected range of principles and professional referencing and links to
of educational development planning. supporting evidence
literature/research and • Findings presented with • Excellent ability to
Excellent
where applicable workplace conviction and justified well communicate the
strategies, policies and information verbally and in
84 – 93.99
procedures. writing.
• Excellent ability to work in
teams.
• Excellent ability to learn
autonomously.
• Accurate referencing and
bibliography using
• Excellent problem solving
skills for decision-making
skills.
• Very good knowledge and • Tasks completed with very • Very good skills for critical • Very good ability to use
depth of understanding of good accuracy. analysis, evaluation and learning resources
principles and concepts. • Very good skills in synthesizing. • Very good presentation,
• Very good ability to apply the interpretation of results / • Very good reflective logically structured, using
theoretical concepts by and accomplishing practical practices, demonstrating accurate grammar and
considering of information tasks. very Good personal learning spelling.
systematically. and growth, insight into • Mostly correct cross-
• Evidence of reading a very required professional values
Second Class, Upper Division
referencing and links to

good number of educational and principles and supporting evidence
literature/research and professional development • Very good ability to
Very Good
where applicable workplace planning. communicate the
strategies, policies and • Findings presented with information verbally and in
77 – 83.99
procedures. conviction with very good writing.
justification • Very good ability to work in
teams.
• Very good ability to learn
autonomously.
• Precise referencing and
bibliography using
• Very good problem solving
skills decision-making skills.
• Good knowledge and depth • Tasks completed with good • Good skills for critical • Good ability to use learning
of understanding of accuracy. analysis, evaluation and resources
principles and concepts. • Good skills in interpretation synthesizing. • Good presentation, logically
• Good ability to apply the of results / and • Good reflective practices, structured, using accurate
theoretical concepts by accomplishing practical demonstrating good grammar and spelling.
considering of information tasks. personal learning and • correct cross-referencing
systematically. growth, insight into required
Second Class, Lower Division
and links to supporting

• Evidence of reading a good professional values and evidence
number of educational principles and professional • Good ability to communicate
Good
literature/research and development planning. the information verbally and
where applicable workplace • Findings presented with in writing.
70 – 76.99
strategies, policies and conviction and good • Good ability to work in
procedures. justification. groups and to manage
teams.
• Good ability to learn
autonomously.
• Good referencing and
bibliography using
• Good problem solving skills
and decision-making skills.
• Satisfactory knowledge and • Tasks completed with • Satisfactory skills for critical • Satisfactory presentation,
depth of understanding of satisfactory accuracy. analysis, evaluation and logically structured, using
principles and concepts. • Satisfactory skills in synthesizing. accurate grammar and
• Fair application of the interpretation of results / • Satisfactory reflective spelling.
theoretical concepts by and accomplishing practical practices, demonstrating fair • Satisfactory cross-
considering of information tasks. personal learning and referencing and links to
Satisfactory systematically. growth, insight into required supporting evidence
Third Class
• Evidence of reading a fair professional values and • Satisfactory ability to

60 – 69.99 number of educational principles and professional communicate the
literature/research and development planning. information verbally and in
where applicable workplace • Findings presented with writing.
strategies, policies and conviction and satisfactory • Satisfactory ability to work in
procedures. justification. groups and to manage
teams.
• Satisfactory ability to learn
autonomously.
• Satisfactory referencing and

bibliography using
• Satisfactory problem solving
skills and exceptionally
competent for decision-
making.
• Basic knowledge and depth • Tasks completed with • Basic skills for critical • Acceptable presentation,
of understanding of minimum acceptable analysis, evaluation and logically structured, using
principles and concepts. accuracy. synthesizing. accurate grammar and
• Basic ability to apply the • Acceptable skills in • Basic reflective practices, spelling.
theoretical concepts by interpretation of results / demonstrating some • Acceptable cross-referencing
considering of information and accomplishing practical personal learning and and links to supporting
systematically. tasks. growth, insight into required evidence
• Evidence of reading a few professional values and • Basic ability to communicate
Acceptable /
number of educational principles and professional the information verbally and
Pass
literature/research and development planning. in writing.
where applicable workplace • Findings presented with • Basic ability to work in
50 – 59.9
strategies, policies and conviction and acceptable groups and to manage
procedures. justification. teams.
• Basic ability to learn
autonomously.
• Basic referencing and
bibliography using
• Basic problem solving skills
• Inadequate knowledge and • Tasks not completed • Poor skills for critical analysis, • Poor presentation, logically
understanding of principles • Poor skills in interpretation evaluation and synthesizing. structured, using accurate
and concepts. of results / and • Poor reflective practices, grammar and spelling.
• Poor application of the accomplishing practical demonstrating some • Inadequate cross-
theoretical concepts tasks. personal learning and referencing and links to
• No evidence of reading growth, insight into required supporting evidence
Fail / Poor educational professional values and • Poor ability to communicate
literature/research and principles and professional the information verbally and
<50 where applicable workplace development planning. in writing.
strategies, policies and • Findings presented • Poor ability to work in groups
procedures. unconvincingly with and to manage teams.
improper justification. • Poor ability to learn
autonomously.
• Inadequate referencing and
bibliography using
• Poor problem solving skills
Important Policies to be followed
1. Student Academic Integrity Policy*:
• MEC upholds the spirit of academic integrity in all forms of academic work and any form of
violation of academic integrity shall invite severe penalty. Any benefit obtained by indulging
in the act of violation of academic integrity shall be cancelled.
• MEC also reserves the right to notify the appropriate law enforcement authorities of any
unlawful activity and to cooperate thereafter in any investigation of such activity.
• Faculty can conduct a viva to investigate and ascertain that the work submitted is student’s
own work as per the guidelines for the same. A student can be given a maximum of 2
chances to attend the viva in such cases. It is expected that the student attends the viva
during the first chance itself unless due to extenuating circumstances. If the student does
not attend the viva in spite of being given 2 chances and fails to submit valid reasons,
he/she will be awarded a fail in the module and this shall be counted as a case of academic
integrity violation.
All cases of violation of academic integrity on the part of the student shall fall under any of the below
mentioned categories:
1. Plagiarism
2. Malpractice
3. Ghost Writing
4. Collusion
5. Other cases
If the student fails a module and has a proven case of academic integrity violation in this module,
the student is required to re-register the module. This is applicable to first and second offence of
academic integrity violation of plagiarism type
1.1. First Offence of Academic Integrity Violation:
1.1.1. Plagiarism
a. If a student is caught first time in an act of academic integrity violation during
his/her course of study in any assignment other than project work and if the type
of violation is plagiarism, then the student will be allowed to re-submit the
assignment once as per the period allowed for re submission However, a penalty
of deduction of 25% of the marks obtained for the resubmitted work will be
imposed.
b. Period of re-submission: The student will have to re-submit the work within one
week (5 working days) from the date he or she is advised to re-submit.
c. Re-submission of the work beyond the allowed period of resubmission will not be
accepted and the assessment will be awarded a zero mark.
d. If the re-submitted work (within the allowed period of resubmission) is also found
to be plagiarized, then that assessment component will be awarded a zero mark.
It shall also contribute to the total count of academic integrity violation for that
student.
e. If plagiarism is detected in UG Project work (Project 1, Project Planning and Project
Design and Implementation), the above clauses do not apply, and the work will be
summarily rejected. In these cases the student will be awarded a fail (F) grade and
is required to reregister the module.
1.1.2. Malpractice / Ghostwriting / Collusion
If a student is caught first time in an act academic integrity violation during his/her course
of study for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester and
if the type of violation is Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion, then the student shall fail
the module.
1.2. Second Offence of Academic Integrity Violation:

1.2.1. Plagiarism
a. If any student is caught second time in an act of academic integrity violation during
his/her course of study and if the type of violation is plagiarism, then the student
will not be allowed to resubmit the work, and s/he will directly be awarded zero
for the work in which plagiarism is detected.
b. The student shall also receive a warning of suspension in such cases.
1.2.2. Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion
a. If a student is caught a second time in an act academic integrity violation for an
assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester and if the type
of violation is Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion, then the student shall fail the
module.
b. The student shall also receive a warning of suspension in such cases.
1.3. Third Offence of Academic Integrity Violation:
a. If a student is caught a third time in an act of academic integrity violation for an
assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester then the student
shall fail the module and also shall be suspended for one semester from the College,
once the academic integrity violation case is confirmed by Institutional Assessment
Review Committee.
b. The student shall be suspended for the immediate subsequent semester and can
register for modules only after having served the suspension period fully. This is also
applicable for semesters offered in block mode.
c. During the suspension period, the student shall have to mandatorily complete a course
on academic integrity/writing before s/he can register for any modules.
d. During the period of suspension, the student shall be allowed to attempt
supplementary examinations if s/he is eligible for the same. S/he shall also be allowed
access to all college facilities permitted for a regular student except for registering the
modules.
1.4. Fourth Offence of Academic Integrity Violation:
a. If a student is caught a fourth time in an act of academic integrity violation for an
assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester, the student shall
fail the module and also shall be expelled from the College, once the case is confirmed
by Institutional Assessment Review Committee.
b. The student shall be expelled from the college and all access to the college facilities
and premises shall cease to exist. The documents shall be released only after getting
the NOC (No Objection Certificate) from Registration Office.
c. `On termination, the student shall not be refunded any fees paid for the academic
semester in which academic integrity violation was observed.
1.5. Other cases
If a student commits an act of academic integrity violation as per the definition of “other
cases” mentioned in the previous section or of a different nature, student’s case shall be
forwarded to an Institutional Assessment Review Committee, Chaired by the Associate
Dean, Academic Affairs. The committee shall investigate the case by means of a viva and/or
a hearing of the parties concerned if required and shall take appropriate decision. The
penalty that can be granted to a proven case of academic integrity violation which falls in
this category of “other cases” can be a warning/component zero/ module
fail/suspension/expulsion depending on the nature and gravity of the offence.
1.6. Types/Variations of cases of Plagiarism and associated actions
Type 1: In case plagiarism is detected in any component or part submission (submitted at
different times) of one assessment (assignment), the deduction in marks will be applicable
for the whole assessment (assignment), even if only the component or part submission alone
needs to be resubmitted.
Type 2: In case plagiarism is detected in a group assessment, all students of the group will be
considered as having committed an act of plagiarism irrespective of whether plagiarism is on
account of the act of all or a few or only one member. The policy will then be applied to all
students.
If some students in the group are eligible to re-submit (first offence) and others are not
eligible, only eligible students will be allowed to re-submit within a period of one week and
the penalty will be applied as per the policy for each student according to his / her history of
violations.
Type 3: Combination of Type 1 and Type 2: In case plagiarism is detected in any component
or part submission (submitted at different times) of a group assessment (assignment), the
deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment (assignment), even if only the
component or part submission alone needs to be resubmitted. All students of the group
would be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism irrespective of whether

plagiarism is on account of the act of all or a few or only one member. The policy will then be
applied to all the students of the group.
the penalty will be applied as per the policy for each student according to his / her history of
violation.
Type 4: Variation of Type 1 and Type 2: In cases where the assessment consists of
components or part submissions that could be a group assessment component (e.g. group
assignment) and an individual assessment component (e.g. individual reflection), the
following will be applicable:
a. If plagiarism is detected in the group assessment component, all students of the group will
be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism, irrespective of whether plagiarism
is on account of the act of all or a few or only one member. The policy will then be applied to
all students of the group. In such cases the group assessment component will be resubmitted.
the penalty will be applied for each student according to his / her history of violation.
b. If plagiarism is detected in the individual assessment component, the individual assessment

component will be resubmitted - if the student is eligible for resubmission-. The policy will
then be applied to that student alone.
c. In both cases (a) and/or (b), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole
assessment (assignment).
1.7. Types/Variation of Cases of Multiple Offences

If student is caught with multiple violations of same or different nature in different modules
of the same semester, they will be considered as one offence and student will be penalized
for each violation according to the type of the offence.
If student is caught with multiple violations of same or different nature in the same module
of the same semester, then they will be considered as different offences and each will
contribute to the overall count of AIV. The student then shall be penalized for each violation
according to the count and type of each offence.
* For further details Refer to MEC Student Academic Integrity Policy in Student Handbook.
2. Late Submission Regulations:

It is the students’ responsibility to check all relevant timelines related to assessments.
As per the Assessment Policy at MEC, late submissions are allowed for one week (5 working days)
for all UG modules with a penalty. In such cases, a deduction of 5% of the marks obtained for the
submitted work shall be imposed for each working day following the last date of submission
till the date of actual submission. Assessment documents submitted beyond a period of one
week (5 working days) after the last date of submission will not be accepted and will be awarded
a zero for that assessment. In cases where the submission has been delayed due to extenuating
circumstances, the student may be permitted to submit the work without imposing the late
submission policy stated above. The extended period of submission will be one week from the
original last date of submission. In such cases, the student is expected to submit the supporting
certificates on or before the original last date of submission of the assessment and the decision
of extension rests with faculty responsible for the assessment .The late submission policy shall be
applied if the student fails to submit the work within one week of the original last date of
submission.
Students may contact their teachers for clarification on specific details of the submission time if
required.
3. Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy
To protect and respect the rights, dignity, health, safety, and privacy of research subjects involved
including the welfare of animals and the integrity of environment, all student projects are
expected to be undertaken as per the MEC Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy. Accordingly the
following shall apply.
• Research and other enterprise activities shall be conducted by maintaining the high ethical
standards consistent with national and international standards and conventions.
• Any research at MEC that is categorized as high-risk research shall be subject to review and
approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety Committee.
• Research activities involving collection of human or animal tissues and manipulation of microbial,
animal or plant cells shall be subject to review and approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety
Committee.
• Participants involved in research must be informed about the purpose of research and intended
uses of research findings. Written consent must be obtained from people involved prior to the
commencement of research.
• Data obtained from participants must be treated with high confidence and should be used only
for the intended purpose of research.

MECH0018.1 Assignment 2 QP Fall 2021

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

MECH0018.1 Assignment 2 QP Fall 2021

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Stress Analysis (MECH0018.

1) – Fall - 2021 – CW (Assignment 2) – Session A&B – QP

IN SEMESTER (INDIVIDUAL) ASSIGNMENT

Level: 3 Max. Marks: 100

Module Learning Outcomes

Please tabulate your results in the answer table below

Figure Q1: Rectangular Cross Section Column

Table Q1: The column dimensions

Student Name Student L1 L2 F B H No. of

AHMED 100 80 7 0.2 0.4 5

Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3 Mode 4 Mode 5 Mode 6 Mode 7

RASHID SHAMIS (A) σ = 10000ε 0.3 , 20%

(A) σ = 10000ε 0.25 , 20%

(A) σ = 10000ε 0.25 , 35%

5) Discuss the main factors influencing on Buckling behavior (6 marks)

Figure Q3: Rectangular Cross Section Column

Rules & Regulations:

• Assignment must be computer typed.

Assessment Evaluation Criteria

referencing and links to

and links to supporting

• Evidence of reading a fair professional values and • Satisfactory ability to

• Satisfactory referencing and

Important Policies to be followed

1. Student Academic Integrity Policy*:

1.2. Second Offence of Academic Integrity Violation:

would be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism irrespective of whether

b. If plagiarism is detected in the individual assessment component, the individual assessment

1.7. Types/Variation of Cases of Multiple Offences

2. Late Submission Regulations:

3. Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy

You might also like