Professional Documents
Culture Documents
600-1100 AD
Author(s): Bas van Bavel, Michele Campoplano and Jessica Dijkman
Source: Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient , 2014, Vol. 57, No. 2,
Theme issue: Emerging and Declining Markets for Land, Labour and Capital: Iraq from
c. 700 BC to c. 1100 AD (2014), pp. 262-289
Published by: Brill
Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43303590
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Brill is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the
Economic and Social History of the Orient
Michele Campopiano
University of York
michele. campopiano@york. ac. uk
Jessica Dijkman
Utrecht University
j.dijkman@uiLnl
Abstract
This paper reconstructs the organization and development of factor markets in early
medieval Iraq. It shows that from the late Sasanian period on, and accelerating in the
early Islamic period, there was a relatively unrestricted functioning of markets for
goods, labour, and capital. This stimulated market exchange, associated with growing
monetization of the economy, especially in the towns, but also in the countryside,
even though coercion remained more pronounced there. We hypothesize that these
developments brought economic dynamism but simultaneously increased inequality
and furthered the rise of new, powerful elite groups, causing the decline of the same
markets.
Keywords
Factor markets - exchange of land, labour, and capital - early Islamic Iraq - early
Middle Ages - Abbasid period
* For their comments on an earlier draft of this paper, we would like to thank Maaike van
Berkel (uva, Amsterdam) and Michael Morony (ucla), and the anonymous referees whose
serious comments have stimulated us to revise this paper.
1 Introduction
1 For factor markets more generally and their role in economic and so
the introduction to this volume.
substantial taxes. The late Sasanian period had laid the foundation of the sys-
tem of land-tax extraction that was used after the Arab conquest. The admin-
istrative reforms accomplished under Khusraw I (531-579), which specifically
pertained to the Sawâd of Iraq, the fertile area of the river plains, changed the
land tax from a portion of the crop to a fixed amount per unit of area. This tax
rate varied according to the crops being grown: for example, tax rates for wheat
fields differed from rates for vineyards (Rubin 1995: 227-297; Frye 1984: 324-
325). The role of the state in tax collection also became more important: state
officers were made responsible for land administration and, at the district
level, for the collection of taxes and their remittance to the royal treasury
(Campopiano 2011: 244-245). Another consequence of Khusraw's policies was
that landholding was increasingly seen as a simple grant from the sovereign,
perhaps implying that the state was now able to reclaim the land grant upon
the death of the grantee (Gariboldi 2007: 37-38; Vahrāman 1997: 188-189). This
evolution changed the balance of power within the empire and influenced pat-
terns of landholding and land administration in Sasanian society, as can be
seen most conspicuously in the rise of the dihqãn described by Rezakhani and
Morony, or dahâqïn , as they are called in later Arabic sources: the petty noble
landowners, who also acted as tax collectors, constituted the rural elite and
became the backbone of the Persian military and fiscal organization
(Campopiano 2011: 247; Daryaee 2009: 147-148; Rezhakani and Morony, in this
issue of j es ho).
Land-tax assessment in Iraq after the conquest seems to have followed the
outline of Sasanian surplus collection, even though there were changes in ter-
minology, and a distinction was now made between Muslim-owned land and
that owned by non-Muslims. The main land tax was called kharāj : the tax,
imposed on the land of conquered populations who had not accepted Islam
before the conquest and had not signed a special agreement ( sulh ), was levied
on most of the conquered areas. Tax assessment on kharāj land mainly fol-
lowed a system called ť alā l-misāha : from a fixed portion of land a fixed amount
of money and/or crops was collected. Tax remissions may have been allowed in
cases of poor harvest (Daryaee 2009: 148; Campopiano 2011; Morony 1984: 100).
Another, less onerous tax assessment was the tithe ( (ushr)t which was assessed
on the land of believers (Muslims). Farmers residing on state lands were appar-
ently bound to pay taxes proportionate to their yields, as in the Sasanian period
(Campopiano 2012 and forthcoming (a); Morony 1984: 100). The Arabs confis-
cated the Sasanian crown lands but left the dahâqïn mostly in the possession
of the village estates that formed the basic taxation units; their knowledge of
existing taxation practices was valuable to the conquerors (Campopiano 2011:
251). In theory, the differentiation of tax regimes could have led to a reduced
transferability of land: i
tion of land from a heav
attempts to enforce th
both under 'Umar Ibn al
(Morony 1981: 139-40, 15
policies were deemed ne
non-Muslims to Muslims were common. Similar concerns for loss of tax reve-
nue seem to explain the argument made by Muslim jurists who claimed that
the status of kharāj land should be independent of the religious belief of the
owner. Abū Yûsuf, for instance, wrote that no one had the right to turn kharāj
land into lushr land (Abū Yûsuf 1969: 3). This argument concerned, in part, the
conversion of existing landlords to Islam, but it also referred to the sales of
land by unbelievers to an emerging Muslim elite - market transactions that, as
will be discussed in more detail below, contributed to a concentration of
landed property in the hands of that Muslim elite from at least the early eighth
century onwards (Campopiano 2011: 253-254).
Land Sales
of the arable land in Iraq - by far the most - was held privately and was bought
and sold between private parties.
Besides the land held and exchanged by peasants and petty noblemen, land
was also acquired by the new Arab Muslim elites, in part through sale. The sell-
ers were, at least in some cases, dahäqln , whose property rights to the land
seem to have been strengthened by the new legal regime. For example, Yahyä
Ibn Ādam reports that a dihqãn approached 'Abd Allāh Ibn Mas'ūd, a
Companion of the Prophet, asking him to buy his land. The Arab accepted,
provided that the old landlord would continue to pay kharāj on it (Yahyä Ibn
Ādam 1967: 49). Wealthy Arabs were increasingly converting the booty they
had acquired from the conquests and their monetary pensions into landown-
ership. Smaller holdings and individual plots of a hectare or so were also
bought and sold. Law books from the eighth century discuss extensively the
widespread purchasing of land by Christians and, especially, by Muslims
(Yahyä Ibn Ādam: 27, 28, 30, 33, 47-50).
These land acquisitions, as well as land grants to caliphal relatives, friends,
and supporters, gradually resulted in the rise of an elite of big landholding
families from the Sawäd, who also acted as tax farmers, government officials,
bankers, and merchant-entrepreneurs. It was the combination of these func-
tions and activities that allowed this elite increasingly to dominate both com-
modity and factor markets. The cultivation of market-oriented crops, such as
cotton and sugar cane, on the estates of these landowners could easily be com-
plemented by industrial processing or by wholesale trade in these commodi-
ties, sometimes combined with tax farming or high-ranking positions in the
state administration. A good example is 'All b. Ahmad al-Rāsibl (d. 913/914),
who allegedly owned eighty textile workshops in southeastern Iraq and adja-
cent Khuzistan; in this same region he was also a tax farmer and a provincial
governor (ben Abdallah 1986: 74; Serjeant 1943: 73). Owners of large estates and
industrial entrepreneurs such as al-Rāsibī benefited from the presence of a
labour market giving them access to a flexible labour force (discussed below).
They also profited from the presence - at least for wholesale trade - of free
and dynamic commodity markets. In the early tenth century, tax farmers,
estate owners, and high officials were, for instance, able to monopolize the
grain trade, storing wheat collected in kind and selling it at high prices on the
urban market (ben Abdallah 1986: 141-144).
Likewise, these elites could use the land market in accumulating land. Some
of the sales in this market were small-scale, as exemplified by the story, from
Basra in the first half of the ninth century, about a modest pedlar who sold
pepper and vegetables but was able to save some money and thus buy a piece
of arable land of one hundred jārīb (sixteen hectares) (al-Jāhiz 1951: 44). The
Tenancy
Tenancy systems in early medieval Iraq often involved more than just the allo-
cation of land-use rights: they frequently served also as instruments for the
allocation of labour and capital. There was variation in which element carried
the most weight. This variety of tenancy systems can best be envisaged as a
continuum, ranging from systems akin to lease contracts to those that were
more like labour contracts. Various forms of tenancy had also existed in the
Sasanian period. At that time, the main - and for the tenant most desirable -
form of tenancy was permanent share-cropping for one-quarter to one-third of
the crop (Morony 1981: 162-165; for the Sasanian period, see Rezakhani and
Morony in this issue of jesho). The sharecropper held permanent rights to the
land and could sublet it if he wished. Compared to the permanent sharecrop-
per, the contractual tenant (hoker, akkãr) was in a less favourable position: he
paid a fixed annual sum in cash or crops but had no permanent rights to the
land (Campopiano 2011).
After the Arabic conquests, these forms of tenancy were fitted into the
emerging framework of Islamic law. A distinction was made, in legal terms,
between the rent of land for a fixed sum in cash or kind (a contract of lease or
hire of usufruct, or ijãra) and sharecropping. Islamic jurists were opposed, in
principle, to sharecropping, because this system could be interpreted as a type
of ribā al-fadl, or undeserved income from unequal exchange of land, leading
to the exploitation of the weaker groups in society. In the course of the eighth
century, however, more jurists in Iraq attempted to legitimize its use
(Campopiano 2011). There are sharecropping contracts described by Abū Yûsuf
(d. 798), as, for instance, in a system in which the land tax is muqâsama , a tax
assessed on the basis of a share of the crops (Abü Yûsuf 1969: 115-116; Yanagihashi
2004: 253-275). It is striking that the initial resistance of Islamic jurists to share-
cropping, and the attention to its exploitative nature, had already weakened
during the eighth century, probably precisely because of the dominance of
sharecropping in Iraq and the impossibility of banning it.
In contrast to the permanent sharecropping dominant during the Sasanian
era, it seems that, in early medieval Iraq, sharecroppers holding grain land,
muzāra'a , held their land mostly for only one or two years. The types of crop
were decided by the landowner, and the tenants were allowed to retain only a
third or a quarter of the output, which made them resemble dependent labour-
ers rather than self-employed farmers. Sharecroppers holding plots with fruit
trees or olive trees were usually better off and had longer contracts, which is
not surprising, given the long-term investments needed (Yanagihashi 2004:
253-254; Lökkegaard, 1978: 174-175)-
Rural Labour
In the countryside, labour relations were affected by the power of the land-
owning elites (Banaji 2009: 78-85). Many rural inhabitants remained bound to
the land or in some state of (semi-)dependency (Morony 1981: 165). The fact,
observed by Baber Johansen, that legal theorists discussed whether the peas-
ants of the Sawâd could be seen as slaves seems to be an attempt to find a legal
rationalization for the conditions of Iraqi peasantry (Morony 1981: 165).
According to Abù 'Ubayd, 'Umar I forbade the purchase of a serf belonging to
dhimmīs ( raqîq ahi al-dhimma) because these people were ahi kharäj , people
of the land tax, that is, people subjected to the exaction of land tax (Ibn
Khurradādhbih 1989: 157). The people of the Sawäd were also called slaves
( ariqqď ) in a tradition reported by al-Tabari in the Kitãb ikhtilãf al-fuqahã '
from Sharik b. Sharlk b. 'Abd Allāh al-Nakha'I during the caliphate of al-Mansūr
(754-775) (al-Tabari 1933: 225; Robinson 1971: 33). The political constraint on the
peasantry is shown also by the fact that, under al-Hajjāj, force was used to
bring them back to the land (Forand 1971: 28; Coçgel, Miceli, and Ahmed 2009).
Besides these forms of peasant dependency, outright slavery also existed.
Slaves were used to remove the salty soil in order to make the land of southern
Iraq cultivable (al-Tabari 1879-1901: 1747-1750; Popovic 1976: 64-66). Conflicts
between slaves and masters often exploded in violent rebellions and, in south-
ern Iraq, Zanj rebellions occurred as early as 689-90 and 694 (Popovic 1976:
62-63).
However, although forms of dependence or bondage continued to exist at
least into the eighth century (Campopiano 2011; forthcoming (b)), the freedom
of labour probably increased in the early Islamic period, even in the country-
side. The traditional picture of self-sufficient, autarkic villages with property
held in common and small surpluses being extracted from an undifferentiated
mass of servile villagers in the form of levies, taxes, or corvée labour, found in
descriptions of the so-called Asiatic mode of production, is incorrect (Krader
1975: 286-296; cf. Banaji 2001). The rural economy was highly market-oriented,
communal agriculture unimportant, social differentiation pronounced, and
corvée labour scarce. Most labour was performed in forms of tenancy or as free
or semi-free independent labour, while wage labour was also employed. Iraqi
JESHO 57
Urban Labour
Urban labour in early medieval Iraq was highly specialized and diversified
(Shatzmiller 1994: 172, records 659 occupations from six sources from Iraq,
from the eighth to the twelfth century). A growing demand for products and
services, reinforced by
administrative and com
cialization. Abū SaťId
Dreams paints a vivid p
trade, and services th
The streets of the city
pedlars and traders se
and many others (Fah
labour market that wov
three formative princi
workers, and - by far
"employees" and their "
relations between cra
All three were influe
developing legal fram
the balance of power in
As in the late Sasania
labour: the army and
slaves (Beg 1975: 111, 11
prominent in the late
of the ninth century,
tary campaign in Egypt
some of whom were lat
in the Egyptian fashio
transfers appear to hav
there is no sign of an a
the towns under state
labour markets was ver
the muhtasib , a state f
industry, saw to it tha
were obeyed and that t
appears to have been bu
and labour conditions (S
Collective forms of sel
to the assertions of e
them, there is no evide
craftsmen and traders,
considerable of autonom
JESHO 57
ļjāra agreements thus suited a situation in which labour conditions, the dura-
tion of the contract, and the level of wages were determined by individual bar-
gaining based on market conditions.
Another way to embed labour relations in a legal framework was through an
investment contract {salam). Under a salam contract an investor provided
cash (or goods) to a producer, who committed in return to handing over a
product at a later date. Salam is also referred to as a sales contract, but it differs
from other sales contracts in that the delivery is deferred (Hallaq 2012: 250-251).
As this could, like the sharecropping discussed earlier, be seen as a violation of
the Quťanic prohibition of undeserved income from unequal exchange, jurists
were much concerned with an early and accurate assessment of the value of
the product to be made. That is why originally salam was mostly restricted to
agricultural products such as fruits or grain - products of a fairly uniform qual-
ity that could easily be weighed or measured. However, Baber Johansen has
shown that from at least the ninth century onwards salam contracts also began
to fulfil an important role in the production of and trade in manufactures such
as textiles. Merchants used these contracts to assemble stocks of products
made according to strict specifications; they thus suited the rise of merchant-
entrepreneurship in this era (Johansen 2006: 863-869).
In Iraq, the commercial nexus of the Abbasid empire, merchant-entrepre-
neurship in textiles probably emerged at an early stage. Cohen's analysis of the
biographies of scholars in religion and law has found several eighth-century
examples of theologians and jurisprudents who had a background as drapers
in Baghdad, Kufa, or Basra (Cohen 1970: 26-28). Under a salam contract, small
textile producers formally remained self-employed artisans, but in practice
they were economically dependent on the large entrepreneurs who commis-
sioned their work. Despite the fact that the legal discourse on salam contracts
emphasizes equality of exchange, there is reason to believe that their use
served mainly the interests of merchant-entrepreneurs and did not prevent
the exploitation of small producers. This is, for instance, suggested by the
Baghdad riots of 985 mentioned earlier. These riots were initiated by the peo-
ple of the Attabiya quarter, a centre of silk production, where the Attabi silks,
one of Baghdad's primary export products, were made. The fact that the silk
workers rose in protest against new taxes imposed on the manufacture of silks
suggests that they had to bear the brunt of the burden: the powerful silk mer-
chants probably tried to shift the financial consequences of the new tax to the
small producers (Amedroz and Margoliouth 1921: 119-120, 361-362).
JESHO 57
his avarice, who owned some 100,000 dinars, and Ahmad ibn Khalaf ai-YazIdl,
whose father left him and his brother a sum of 2.6 million dirhams and 140,0
dinars. These families were also linked to the religious elite, again disproving
the ideas of a supposed Muslim distrust of financial dealings. Of the religious
scholars of the Arabian heartland, including many from Iraq, a substantial par
was involved in business, sometimes combined with tax-farming, includin
some investors and moneylenders. The share of moneylenders and financi
dealers among them grew in this period, from three percent of the schola
before the ninth century to 5-8% in the ninth to eleventh centuries (Cohe
1970: 32-33> 43-44).
In part, credit had been a solution to the problem of the declining availabil-
ity of cash. The period of high monetization and ample availability of coin
ended in the tenth and eleventh centuries (Heidemann 2010: 649-650, 657-661;
Ilisch 1990; Ehrenkreutz 1959), such that the number of coins struck declined
dramatically, in Iraq even more than in other parts of the empire. The produc
tion of copper coins even ceased completely in Iraq in the last third of th
ninth century. From then on, fragments of silver and gold coins were used fo
small daily transactions, but these coins also became rarer (Heidemann 201
55; 2010: 657-661). Stefan Heidemann asserts that monetization in the eleventh
century had shrunk to a level not seen since the Hellenistic period, a millen-
nium before, which must have severely hindered the functioning of fact
markets. The period discussed in this chapter, including the late Sasania
period, thus stands out for its high monetization and dynamic markets.
The main goal of this contribution has been to outline the functioning of the
markets for land, labour, and capital in early medieval Iraq and to examine
their development between the seventh and the eleventh century ce. We will
not touch on the topic of economic growth and the decline of medieval Iraq
here. Rather, in this concluding section we intend to position factor markets in
a wider context by tentatively highlighting the way in which these markets
interacted with changing social and political relations. It will be clear that,
even for this more limited ambition, it is too early to draw firm conclusions,
but on the basis of the admittedly sketchy picture it is possible to formulate an
hypothesis that can be tested by future, more systematic research.
Factor markets in the seventh and eighth centuries, which probably built on
developments that had begun in the late Sasanian period, clearly display
growth in freedom and dynamism. This applies especially to the freedom of
Bibliography
Collins.
49: 107-118.
Ehrenkreutz, Andrew S. 1959. Studies in the Monetary History of the Near East in the
Middle Ages .Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 2: 128-161.
Farraxvmart Vahrāman. 1
Book , trans. A. Perikhan
Fischel, Walter J. 1933. Th
Economic History of the J
Asiatic Society of Great B
Forstner, Martin. 1968. Das Kalifat des Abbasiden al-MustaHn (248/862-252/866). PhD
diss. University of Mainz.
Frye, R.N. 1984. The History of Ancient Iran. Munich: Beck.
Gariboldi, A. 2007. II regno di Xusraw dall'anima immortale. Riforme economiche e
rivolte sociali nell'Iran Sasanide del VI secolo. Milan: Mimesis.
Goitein, Solomon. 1967. A Mediterranean Society: The Jewish Communities of the Arab
World as Portrayed in the Documents of the Cairo Geniza, vol. 1, Economic Foundations.
Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hallaq, Wael B. 2012. SharVa: Theory, Practice, Transformations. 3d ed. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Hamdani, Abbas. 2002. The Rasaïl Ikhwan al-Safa ' and the Controversy about the
Origin of Craft Guilds in Early Medieval Islam. In Money, Land and Trade. An
Economic History of the Muslim Mediterranean , ed. N. Hanna London: I.B. Tauris:
157-173-
Haque, Ziaul. 1977. Landlord and Peasant in Early Islam: A Study of the Legal Doctrine of
"Muzāra'a" or Sharecropping. Islamabad: Islamic Research Institute: 216-218.
al-Hassan, Ahmed, and Donald Hill. 1986. Islamic Technology: An Illlustrated History.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heidemann, Stefan. 2010. Numismatics. In The New Cambridge History of Islam , vol. 1,
The Formation of the Islamic World, Sixth to Eleventh Centuries , ed. Chase Robinson.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 648-663.
Ilisch, L. 1990. Whole and Fragmented Dirhams in Near Eastern Hoards. In Sigtuna
papers , ed. Kenneth Johnson and Brita Malmer. Stockholm: Spink: 121-131.
al-Jāhiz. 1951. Le livre des avares , trans. Ch. Pellat. Paris: Maisonneuve.
Johansen, Baber. 1988. The Islamic Law on Land Tax and Rent. The Peasants' Loss of
Property Rights as Interpreted in the Hanafite Legal Literature of the Mamluk and
Ottoman Periods. London: Croom Helm.
Lokkegaard, Frede. 1978. Islamic Taxation in the Classic Period with Special Reference to
Circumstances in Iraq. 2d ed. Philadelphia: Porcupine Press.
Margoliouth, David S. 1921-1922. The Table-Talk of a Mesopotamian Judge. Oriental
Translation Fund, New Series 28. London: Royal Asiatic Society.
Mez, Adam. 1992. Die Renaissance des Islãms. Heidelberg: Winter.
Michael the Syrian. 1905. Chronique de Michel le Syrien, patriarche Jacobite dAntioche
(1166-1199), vol. 3, trans. J.-B. Chabot. Paris: Leroux.
Morony, Michael G. 1981. Landholding in Seventh-Century Iraq: Late Sasanian and
Early Islamic Patterns. In The Islamic Middle East, 700-1900. Studies in Economic and
Social History, ed. Abraham L. Udovitch. Princeton: Darwin Press: 135-175.
Seijeant, R.B. 1943. Material for a History of Islamic Textiles up to the Mongol Conquest.
Ars Islamica 10: 71-104.
Shatzmiller, Maya. 1994. Labour in the Medieval Islamic World Leiden: Brill.
al-Tabari. 1933. Das Konstantinopler Fragment des Kitāb ihtilãf al-Juqahã 1 des Abū Gafar
Muhammad ibn Garīr at-Tabarī, ed. Joseph Schacht. Leiden: Brill.
Press.
Waines, David. 1977. The Third Century of Internal Crisis of the Abbasids Journal of the
Economic and Social History of the Orient 20: 282-306.
Watson, Andrew M. 1983. Agricultural Innovation in the Early Islamic World : The
Diffusion of Crops and Farming Techniques, 700-1100. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-
versity Press.
Wichard, Johannes C. 1995. Zwischen Markt und Moschee. Wirtschaftliche Bedürfnisse
und religiöse Anforderungen im frühen islamischen Vertragsrecht. Paderborn:
Ferdinand Schöningh.
Yahyä Ibn Ādam. 1967. Kitāb al-kharāj, trans. A. Ben Shemesh, Taxation in Islam , voi. 1.
Leiden: Brill.
Yanagihashi, Hiroyuki. 2004. ;4 History of the Early Islamic Law of Property ¡Reconstructing
the Legal Development, yth-gth centuries. Leiden: Brill.