Professional Documents
Culture Documents
An Introduction to Digital Switchgear
Slide 2
Agenda
1
4/17/2018
Part 1: Definition & Concepts
Slide 4
Topics
− Why digital switchgear?
− What is digital switchgear?
− Digital switchgear in context
− Key digital switchgear components:
• Current and voltage sensors
• Protection & control relays
2
4/17/2018
Slide 5
ANSI switchgear
What do customers want?
Distribution
networks have Be flexible!
evolved and Be “smart”!
Be simple!
become more
complex. Be reliable! Be on time!
Switchgear, as
part of the grid, Be environmentally friendly!
has a more Be future proof!
important role
than before.
Be efficient! Be safe!
Be easy!
Slide 6
Digital Switchgear Defined
Applicable to any voltage class
An enclosure for circuit switching, interruption and control
devices where all measurement, device status information and
commands are reliably transferred on a common real‐time
Ethernet communication bus using the IEC 61850 protocol.
3
4/17/2018
Slide 7
ANSI medium voltage digital switchgear
Next phase in the evolution of switchgear
Current
Digital Switchgear is not only a new product, it is also a new
61850
Voltage
Temperature
Humidity
concept in protection, control, and automation. Partial discharge
Contact wear
Other …
SAFETY & SIMPLICITY are the most significant
benefits, but there are many more.
Both, sensors & common communication bus, are essential
to realize the full benefits of digital switchgear.
Slide 8
Digital switchgear in Context
Digital substation
4
4/17/2018
Slide 9
Digital Switchgear in Context
The IoT Architecture
Applications
Wi-Fi or Applications
Connecting to IoTSP
Equipment experts take care of the equipment using remote
connectivity, predicting critical issues before failure occurs or
before they develop into major defects.
A remote connectivity solution gets information from the
monitoring and diagnostic devices on switchgear.
The remote infrastructure lets field service technicians monitor
and connect to any switchgear without any change or interaction
with the existing protection and control network.
April 17, 2018Slide 10
5
4/17/2018
Slide 11
ANSI switchgear
Levels of digitalization
Digital switchgear Description Main switchgear value
1. Reduced weight
2. Space saving (primarily due to elimination of
Simply replace CTs & PTs with Current & Voltage
PT compartment)
Sensors.
3. Eliminates problems of saturation and
Level 0 Ferroresonance
Add additional sensor packages (e.g., temperature) as
4. Safety – no possibility of unsafe voltages from
needed.
open CT secondary circuits
Above +
Above + IEC61850‐8‐1 & GOOSE messaging 5. Significant reduction in wiring between
Level 1 Ethernet cabling between Protective Relays. frames
6. Late customization
Above + Process bus (61850‐9‐2LE)
Requires use of Merging Units (MUs), time Above +
Level 2 synchronization devices & Ethernet switches. 7. Improved flexibility – changes in protection
Fiber optic connection from bay (switchgear) to only require IED level changes.
substation.
Slide 12
Is Digital Switchgear constructed differently?
Form factor permits switchgear space savings
Voltage sensors
More flexibility in placement of
voltage sensors as compared
to PTs.
Located in bus/cable
compartment to remove the
necessity for a dedicated
drawer.
IEEE C37.20.2-2015 address the use of sensors in ANSI metal-clad switchgear (Annex D).
UL347 6th Edition does the same for Motor Control Centers in Annex E.
6
4/17/2018
Slide 13
Sensors – ideal for critical applications
Concerns better addressed by sensors
• 20+ yr old technology in switchgear
• Use solid state components and little or no ferromagnetic material in circuit
• Lack of magnetic core very low energy output – cannot typically transfer power to secondary
• Numerous form factors for indoor and outdoor application (voltage only, current only, combination)
• Wide variety of outputs – from ~100 mV / mA to 120 V / 1 Amp
• Increased safety
• Reduced footprint
• More linear response
• Simplified installations – less wiring, smaller footprint, lighter weight
• Reduced energy use, esp. in tight compartments
Slide 14
Non‐conventional instrument transformers
Current sensors Voltage sensors
Rogowski coil sensor Resistive voltage divider sensors
UP
– Output voltage is proportional to the derivative of primary current − Passive element
– Output voltage is integrated by protective relay − No fuses required
R1
R2
US UP
R1 R2
No saturation
R2
Open CT hazard
u s (t ) M
di p ( t ) No ferroresonance US
(air core) eliminated dt (non-inductive)
• IEC 60044‐8 (2002)
FOCS (Fiber Optic Current Sensor) • IEC 61869‐10 (NEW) IEEE PSIM Working Group
Current sensors
– Mainly used in high voltage applications due to higher cost Electronic current transformers formed recently to work on
an IEEE Guide that will be
• IEC 60044‐7 (1999) focus on testing of end‐to‐
Voltage sensors • IEC 61869‐11 (NEW) end sensor systems.
Electronic voltage transformers
7
4/17/2018
Slide 15
Current and voltage sensor connections to IED
Point‐to‐point wiring eliminated with RJ‐45 cables
Almost no analog wiring in the switchgear → increases reliability
Slide 16
Relays for digital switchgear
Future proof solution based on IEC 61850
Minimum requirements
– Supports IEC 61850 61850
• Vertical communication
• Horizontal GOOSE communication
• Process bus
– IEC 61850‐2‐LE (Sampled Values)
– LEA (Low Energy Analog) inputs
8
4/17/2018
Slide 17
IEC 61850‐9‐2LE process bus & GOOSE messaging
One line diagram
Common Ethernet
Station bus (IEC 61850-8-1), process bus (IEC 61850-9-2 LE) and IEEE 1588 v2 time synchronization
GOOSE
GOOSE
GOOSE
GOOSE
GOOSE
GOOSE
GOOSE
SMV
SMV
SMV
SMV
SMV
SMV
Digital data
SMV
IED
Analog measurements
Voltage sensor
Current sensor
Slide 18
61850‐9‐2LE Process Bus & GOOSE messaging in Digital Switchgear
Replacing copper with Ethernet
Before After
Digital substation reduces wiring No cable tray
complexity and resulting risks
for operations & maintenance
personnel
Single conduit to carry
fibers
9
4/17/2018
Slide 19
Digital Switchgear – the next evolutionary step
1890‐1920 1921‐1940 1940‐1970 1970‐present
• AC current won out over DC at the Chicago World’s fair • Circuit breaker technology was starting to advance
• Niagara Power House No. 1 built to supply power to • Interruption medium was still largely open air
Buffalo • 1921: Merlin Gerin produced the first oil circuit breaker
• Need for a circuit interrupting device discovered • 1924: 1919 Performance Standard was revised
• Indoor circuit breakers mounted on marble boards with • Prohibit flame during interruption
uninsulated bus
• Require the condition after an interruption to be
• Short‐circuit interruption occurred in open air or oil “…substantially the same as before”
• Electro‐mechanical protective relays introduced • Metal‐enclosed concept was carried over to MV levels
• First circuit breaker performance standard issued in 1919 • 1938: 2500‐5000 V metal‐enclosed switchgear with
interrupting capacity up to 150,000 kVA
• Units featured an enclosed, insulated bus
Slide 20
Digital Switchgear – the next evolutionary step
1890‐1920 1921‐1940 1940‐1970 1970‐present
Early years Moving into Going from oil to air Modern standards and switchgear construction
of power enclosures
• 1927: A patent for the first arc‐chute design filed • Breaker standards became fully developed
• 1940: Most oil tank breakers phased out for the preferred • C37.04, C37.06 & C37.09
minimum oil breaker design • Switchgear standards adapted to changing technology and addressed
• Produced up to the mid 1970’s construction differences
• 1940: First air‐blast circuit breaker offered commercially • C37.20.1: Metal‐Enclosed Low‐Voltage Switchgear
• 1945: C37.6 introduced preferred ratings for indoor, oil • C37.20.2: Metal‐Clad Switchgear
circuit breakers up to 34.5kV • C37.20.3: Metal‐Enclosed Interrupter Switchgear (1‐38 kV)
• Switchgear construction was still basically the same
(metal‐enclosed) until approximately 1960, when true
• Emergence & increased adoption of vacuum technology
• Development began as early as the 1920s
Next?
metal‐clad construction became popular
• Commercial products appeared in the late 1960s
• Protective Relays
• Dominant by the early 1980s at medium voltage
• 1943: Flexitest™ relay cases became available
• Provided advantages in size, interruption capability and
• 1960s: Continual improvement of electro‐mechanical
maintenance over oil
relays
• SF6 & GIS Technology enter the market in late 1970s.
• 1965: First solid state relay introduced
• Protective Relays
• 1980s: Microprocessor relays developed
• 1990s: Microprocessor relays replace solid state devices
10
4/17/2018
Slide 21
ANSI digital switchgear
Designed to meet the needs of the future (and today)
Minimal variation →
Low inventory needed
Be “smart”! Be flexible!
Be simple!
Be on time!
Be reliable! Measurement devices with high
Possibility of late accuracy over an extended range.
Simplified wiring customization Can deal with varying load flows
Slide 22
Part 2: Electronic Instrument Transformers
(Current & Voltage Sensors)
11
4/17/2018
Slide 23
Topics
− Sensor standards
− Introduction to current & voltage sensor technologies
− Sensors vs. Instrument Transformers
− Sensor performance
− Sensors in Digital Switchgear
• Benefits
• Challenges
Slide 24
Sensors & Digital Switchgear
• You can have digital switchgear without sensors.
• However, sensors are necessary to maximize the benefits
from digital switchgear.
12
4/17/2018
Slide 25
Standards for Current & Voltage Sensors – ANSI Markets
• ITs are primarily covered by IEEE C57.13‐2016; this standard does not cover sensors
• IEEE standards / guides for current & voltage sensors
– IEEE PSIM Working Group formed recently to work on an IEEE Guide that will be focus on
testing of end‐to‐end sensor systems
– IEEE C37.235‐2007 ‐ Guide for the Application of Rogowski Coils used for Protective Relaying
Purposes
– IEEE C37.92‐2005 ‐ Standard for Analog Inputs to Protective Relays From Electronic Voltage
and Current Transducers
– Recent switchgear standards (IEEE C37.20.2‐2015) explicitly address the use of current &
voltage sensors
Current sensors • IEC 60044‐8 (2002)
• IEC 61869‐10 (NEW)
• However, this should not limit your applications
• IEC 60044‐7 (1999)
– IEC standards cover sensors Voltage sensors
• IEC 61869‐11 (NEW)
Slide 26
Traditional ITs
• More than 100 year old technology
• Uses ferromagnetic circuit to tightly couple primary and secondary, with special
attention to maximizing accuracy of translation of voltage and current signals
• Also able to transfer power from primary to secondary
• Typically 1 or 5 amp current output, 120 or 240 volt voltage output
• Wide array of meters and relays supporting (electromechanical & solid state)
13
4/17/2018
Slide 27
Sensors
Measurement and Protection
• More than 20 year old technology
• Use solid state components and little or no ferromagnetic material in circuit
• Lack of large magnetic core very low energy output – cannot typically transfer power to secondary
• Numerous form factors for indoor & outdoor applications (voltage only, current only, combination)
• Wide variety of outputs – from ~100 mV / mA to 120 V / 1 Amp
Slide 28
Current sensor based on Rogowski coil principle
Typical Rogowski coil sensor
Us=180 mV for 60 Hz
Frequency dependent
Output voltage is proportional to the
derivative of primary current
Output voltage is integrated by IED
Uniformly wound coil with non-
magnetic core
Typical accuracy up to class 0.5
Applicable standards IEC 60044,
IEC 61869
14
4/17/2018
Slide 29
Voltage sensors – resistive and capacitive dividers
• Resistive voltage dividers used typically
in MV sensors for voltage measurement
UP UP
• Capacitive dividers used on both C1
measurement and for voltage indication R1
• Light based sensors evolving but typically
more expensive than resistive dividers R2 C2
US US
• Example ratios include 1440:1, 10,000:1
• Typical accuracy up to class 0.5 US
R2
UP C1
R1 R 2 Us U
• Passive elements C1 C 2
P
Slide 30
Rogowski coil current sensor
ε[%] Typical protection accuracy limit
class 5P
+5%
+1.5%
Typical metering accuracy
+0.75% limit class 0.5
+0.5%
4 A 16 A 80 A 2500 A 50 kA
≈
-5%
15
4/17/2018
Slide 31
Resistive voltage sensor
Combined voltage accuracy class 0.5/3P
ε[%]
+6%
Protection accuracy limit class 3P
+3%
+0.5%
≈
≈
-0.5% 0.02*Upn 0.8*Upn Upn 1.2*Upn 1.9*Upn Up
-3%
-6%
Slide 32
Examples of Indoor Voltage Sensors
Examples of Voltage Sensors for Indoor Air and Gas Insulated Environments.
Lots of different form factors possible depending on application.
16
4/17/2018
Slide 33
Sensor Ratings
Examples of rating labels
Current Sensor Voltage Sensor
Slide 34
Accuracy Comparison – Rogowski Coil vs. Traditional CT
Current sensor accuracy for
pure Rogowski coil – may
vary slightly if using hybrid
Rogowski coil (some iron
material in magnetic circuit).
17
4/17/2018
Slide 35
Sensor vs. Traditional IT Comparison
Slide 36
Benefits of Sensors vs. Traditional ITs
Safety – One of the most important benefits
Low voltage, low energy output signals
No need to use PT fuses
Secondary can be left open or short‐circuited
Increased safety for personnel during testing/ operation
TRADITIONAL ITs
WARNING!!! The secondary circuit of CTs should never be opened or left open when current is
flowing in the primary. If the secondary circuit is open, the primary current will drive the core to
saturation, inducing abnormally high and possibly lethal PEAK voltages.
18
4/17/2018
Slide 37
Key Benefits of Sensors vs. Traditional ITs
• Increased safety
• Reduced chances of failure
• Reduced footprint
• More linear response
• Simplified installations – less wiring, smaller footprint, lighter weight
• Reduced energy use, especially in tight compartments
Slide 38
Benefits of Sensors vs. Traditional ITs (contd.)
• Flexibility toward varying load flow – linear response, extensive dynamic range (no core saturation)
• Typically no risk of ferro‐resonance (voltage sensor vs. PT)
• Upgrade of switchgear parameters without additional costs
• Indoor sensors can often be retrofitted in existing structures with new relays
• Reduced footprint: lighter weight, smaller form factors – e.g., PT drawout trays in switchgear may be avoided
• More linear response, esp. when harmonics present
• Less energy consumption by the device itself
• Standardization ‐ one sensor covers full voltage or current range of traditional IT family
• Improved inventory management
• Change‐out flexibility
• Simpler documentation
• Environmental friendliness (less raw material needed)
Especially attractive in critical applications where ferroresonance, harmonic response, and safety are essential.
19
4/17/2018
Slide 39
Sensor Challenges
• Cabling – sensors impedance matched
• May be sensitive to magnetic fields – current cross talk, line sag may affect accuracy
• Lack of power transfer to secondary to power devices
• Lack of voltage reference for overhead line mounted sensors, unless additional connection is provided
• Percentage error still not comparable to traditional ITs (though linearity is better)
• Lack of standardization
• Standards limited in N. America
• No standard for “burden” – using impedance values (e.g., 1 MΩ) vs VA ratings as with traditional ITs
• Varied output and current voltage levels
• Limited selection today of meters and relays compatible with sensors
• General understanding of sensors is less as opposed to ITs
Slide 40
Traditional ITs – Still Have a Place
• When seeking compatibility with existing meters or relays not
compatible with sensor outputs
• When power is needed as well as accurate signal translation
(control power application)
• When change of equipment to match differing dimensions is
not desirable
20
4/17/2018
Slide 41
Considerations for Sensor Selection
• Type of application – protection vs metering
• Availability of power for meter or relay
• Compatible relays / meters – voltage, current compatibility, integration in
controller for Rogowski coil sensors
• Cabling – sensors typically use shielded cables and are specifically
manufactured to be “tuned” to the cable impedance
• No simple cut / splice
• Form factor of sensor – post, fully insulated or 600V for insulated busbar, etc.
• Space availability for sensor mounting
• Temperature rating of sensor compared to application environment
Slide 42
Secondary Device Compatibility
Sensors Require Proper Selection of Compatible Relays or Meters
615
620
Relion®
Examples of sensor compatible relays and meters (may not support pure Rogowski coil sensor inputs).
Others available as well including models from ABB, Beckwith, Cooper, GE, Satec, SEL and S&C.
21
4/17/2018
Slide 43
Current and Voltage Sensors
Form factor permits
switchgear space savings Voltage sensors
Slide 44
Examples of Current Sensors for Air Insulated Switchgear
22
4/17/2018
Slide 45
Examples of Voltage Sensors for Air Insulated Switchgear
Slide 46
Example of Combined Sensors for Air Insulated Switchgear
Voltage
sensors
23
4/17/2018
Slide 47
Typical Current Sensor for Gas Insulated Switchgear (GIS)
Slide 48
Examples of Voltage Sensors for Gas Insulated Switchgear
24
4/17/2018
Slide 49
Typical Combo Sensors in Gas Insulated Switchgear
ABB Nexans
Kabeldon Euromold
NKT Raychem
Slide 50
Typical Combo Sensor in MV Circuit Breakers
25
4/17/2018
Slide 51
Example of Current & Voltage Sensor Connections to IED
in Switchgear
SENSORS TEST SWITCH PROTECTION RELAY
Point‐to‐point wiring eliminated with RJ‐45 Cables
Almost no analog wiring in the switchgear – increases reliability
April 17, 2018
Slide 52
Benefits of Sensors in Digital Switchgear Applications
Safety Speed
• Low energy analog output eliminates Concept allows for compression of time from
hazard associated with open CT secondary order to delivery
• Fewer wires to install makes switchgear Late customization possible
easier to maintain
Simplicity
Savings
Fewer wires to install, commission & maintain
• Form factor of voltage sensors =
switchgear space savings Fewer parts to fail leads to increased reliability
• Size of current & voltage sensors = weight
reduction Sustainability
• Broad application range of the sensors =
inventory savings Handle future load changes without mechanical
reconfiguration of system
• Significant energy savings during operation
Lower lifetime environmental impact
• Savings on total cost of ownership
26
4/17/2018
Slide 53
Sensor Evolution
• Technology around for decades, with adoption in Europe preceding
adoption in N. America
• Most applications today are for protection, emerging applications
for metering
TODAY • Linearity is typically excellent, even with harmonics present
• Error percentage (accuracy) of sensors still lags traditional ITs –
typical values 0.5% ‐ 3% error vs. 0.15% to 0.6%
• Typical LV and MV sensors today are low energy analog devices
using solid state components
• Some sensors, including HV sensors, use optical technology ‐
require supplemental processing units (merging units)
Slide 54
Sensor Evolution
• Onboard A/D enabling accuracy improvements
• Increased integrated communications options
• Ability to power secondary devices
TOMORROW • Greater end to end application standardization including both
protection and metering
• Wider array of form factors, LV, MV and HV
• Much wider array of compatible relays and meters
• Increased accuracies
• Increased standards and industry guidelines for sensor application
27
4/17/2018
Slide 55
ANSI digital switchgear
Designed to meet the needs of the future (and today)
Minimal variation →
Low inventory needed
Be “smart”! Be flexible!
Be simple!
Be on time!
Be reliable! Measurement devices with high
Possibility of late accuracy over an extended range.
Simplified wiring customization Can deal with varying load flows.
Slide 56
Part 3: Protection and Control in
Digital Switchgear
28
4/17/2018
Slide 57
Topics
− Implementation of protection within Digital Switchgear
• Merging Units
• Digital Substations
− Testing protective relays connected to sensors
− Preferred communication network for digital switchgear
− Zones of Protection
− Application examples of protection and control for the different zones of
protection
− Implementation of Automatic Transfer Schemes in Digital Switchgear
− Cost effective implementation of bus protection in Digital Switchgear
− Summary
Slide 58
Relays for Digital Switchgear
Future proof solution based on IEC 61850
Minimum requirements
– Supports IEC 61850
• Vertical communication
• Horizontal GOOSE communication
• Process bus
– IEC 61850‐2‐LE (Sampled values)
– LEA (Low Energy Analog) inputs
Preferred requirements
– Support IEC 61850 Ed2
– UL certification
61850
29
4/17/2018
Slide 59
Digital Switchgear
Why IEC 61850?
Characteristics
− IEC 61850 is an open protocol
− IEC 61850 provides interoperability between different vendors
− IEC 61850 defines all objects in your electrical one line
Components
− IEC 61850 MMS ‐ Vertical communications (Typical Master‐Slave component)
− IEC 61850 GOOSE messages ‐ Operation guaranteed in less than 10ms (Peer to Peer functionality)
− IEC 61850 Sampled Values ‐ Allow you to digitize current and voltage signals allowing you to pass information
to other protective relays for utilization of the information (Peer to Peer functionality)
Slide 60
IEC61850 Based Substation Automation Systems
Basics:
• Fast Ethernet (100 MBps to 1 GBps)
• MMS
• Station Bus 61850 8‐1
• Process Bus 61850 9‐2
• Data Model
• Substation Configuration Language
Much more than a protocol:
• Modularization and structuring of data
• On‐line meaningful information
Modbus RTU… • Free allocation of functions in IEDs
DNP…
• Complete description of configuration
TCP/IP…
• Structured engineering & services
IEC 62271…
• Testing, validation, and certification
“Combining the best properties in a new way...”
30
4/17/2018
IEC 61850‐9‐2LE Process Bus & GOOSE Messaging
One line diagram (relays can act as merging units)
Common Ethernet
Station bus (IEC 61850-8-1), process bus (IEC 61850-9-2 LE) and IEEE 1588 v2 time synchronization
GOOSE
GOOSE
GOOSE
GOOSE
GOOSE
GOOSE
GOOSE
SMV
SMV
SMV
SMV
SMV
SMV
Digital data
SMV
IED
Analog measurements
Voltage sensor
Current sensor
Slide 62
ANSI Medium Voltage Digital Switchgear
Replacing copper with Ethernet
Before After
Digital substation reduces wiring No cable tray
complexity and resulting risks
for operations & maintenance
personnel
Single conduit to carry
fibers
31
4/17/2018
Slide 63
IEC 61850‐9‐2LE Process Bus & GOOSE messaging
Footprint, copper wires, safety, reliability, and cost
Slide 64
Digital Test Switch
Testing operation
L1
L1
Test Plug
Test set
32
4/17/2018
Slide 65
Communication Networks
Reliability, Robustness, Resilience
Slide 66
Communication Networks
HSR
– Optional second fiber‐optic or galvanic port
(only fiber‐optic for RED615)
– Enables redundant Ethernet communication
controlled by a managed switch with IEC 61850
HSR protocol support
– Avoids single point of failure without any delay
– Secures highly critical communication between
devices
• Communication downtime is eliminated.
• If the ring is broken, messages will still arrive
over the intact path.
• A broken ring is easily detected since
duplicate messages are no longer received
33
4/17/2018
Slide 67
Communication Networks
HSR
Slide 68
Communication Networks
PRP
Gateway
– Optional second fiber‐optic or galvanic port
(only fiber‐optic for RED615)
– Enables redundant Ethernet communication
controlled by a managed switch with IEC 61850
standard PRP support
– Avoids single point of failure without any delay
– Secures highly critical communication between
devices
• Communication downtime is eliminated.
• The communication network is fully
duplicated.
• If only one packet is received, the receiver
knows the other path is broken.
34
4/17/2018
Slide 69
Zones of Protection
Introduction to Protective Relaying
The power system is divided into protection zones defined Six categories of protection zones are possible in each power system:
by the equipment and the available circuit breakers.
1 Generators and generator–transformer units
2 Transformers
3 Buses
Lines (transmission, sub‐transmission, and
4 distribution)
Utilization equipment (motors, static loads, or
5 other)
Capacitor or reactor banks (when separately
6 protected).
Slide 70
Zones of Protection
Introduction to Protective Relaying
35
4/17/2018
Slide 71
Zones of Station B
protection Station A
G
G
G
Station C
Station D
M
Slide 72
Zones of Station B
protection Station A
G
G
G
Station C
Generator
Station D Protection
M
36
4/17/2018
Slide 73
Zones of Station B
protection Station A
G
G
G
Station C
Transformer
Station D Protection
M
Slide 74
Zones of Station B
protection Station A
G
G
G
Station C
Bus
Station D Protection
M
37
4/17/2018
Slide 75
Zones of Station B
protection Station A
G
G
G
Station C
Line
Station D Protection
M
Slide 76
Zones of Station B
protection Station A
G
G
G
Station C
Motor/Feeder
Station D Protection
M
38
4/17/2018
Slide 77
Application examples
Introduction to Protective Relaying
Example 1
Typical one line with transformer, bus, feeder, motor, line differential
and generator protection.
Example 2
Typical one line with a double ended substation, with feeder, line
differential, small motor and ATS.
Slide 78
Example 1
All zones of
protection
Typical One Line showing all Zones of Protection
Typical One Line showing all Zones of Protection
39
4/17/2018
Slide 79
Example 1
All zones of
protection
Cost Effective Bus Protection Scheme
Slide 80
Example 1
All zones of
protection
Feeders can be changed to current and voltage sensors
40
4/17/2018
Slide 81
Example 1
All zones of
protection
Small Motors can be changed to current sensors
Slide 82
Example 1
All zones of
protection
Voltage connection can be removed to the motor relay with current sensor inputs
41
4/17/2018
Slide 83
Example 1
All zones of
protection
Line Differential can be connected to current sensors
Slide 84
Example 1
All zones of
protection
Voltage connection can be removed to the line differential relay with current sensor inputs
42
4/17/2018
Slide 85
IEC 61850-9-2LE
Example 1
All zones of
protection
Voltage information can be send via sample values (IEC 61850‐9‐2LE)
Slide 86
Example 2
ATS with line
differential,
feeder and
small feeder
protection
Traditional scheme using GOOSE and standard CTs and PTs
43
4/17/2018
Slide 87
IEC 61850-9-2LE
Example 2
ATS with line
differential,
feeder and
small feeder
protection
Scheme using current and voltage sensors
Slide 88
Automatic Transfer Schemes
− Main tie main normal configuration overview
− Traditional automatic bus transfer scheme
− Automatic bus transfer scheme using a relay with LEA inputs
• Relay basic I/O setup
• Communication requirements
• Normal operation condition
• Operation scenarios
• Maintenance transfer
44
4/17/2018
Slide 89
Main Tie Main
Normal Configuration
Source 1 Source 2
52 52
M1 M2
(N.C.) (N.C.)
52
TIE
(N.O.)
52 52 52 52
F1‐1 F1‐2 F2‐1 F2‐2
Slide 90
Traditional Automatic Transfer Scheme
Overview
Transfer scheme implemented using:
– Electromechanical or solid state relays
– Hardwire connections
– Auxiliary relays
– Auxiliary timers
45
4/17/2018
Slide 91
Traditional Automatic Transfer Scheme
Overview
Main(s)
Slide 92
Traditional Automatic Transfer Scheme
Overview
Tie
46
4/17/2018
Slide 93
Traditional ATS Example
Overview
– Bus configuration: Two main breakers and a normally open tie breaker
– Protection and Controls: Each breaker is equipped with a REF615 relay providing current and
voltage protection, breaker controls, and automatic bus transfer scheme (ABTS)
– ABTS logic includes bus transfer, automatic closed transition retransfer, open transition retransfer
and auto/manual maintenance transfer
– The tie relay is programmed to execute the ABTS and sync check functions
– “GOOSE” is applied for relay‐to‐relay communication
Slide 94
Automatic Bus Transfer Scheme
Relay basic I/O setup
REF615_M1
52a
52b M1 BKR Open
(52Ha) M1 O/C Trip
M1 27 Operate
M1 Volt. Healthy
Open BKR
Close BKR
(BF Trip)
Open BKR
Close BKR
(BF Trip)
REF615_M2
REF615_TIE (Not shown)
47
4/17/2018
Slide 95
Automatic Bus Transfer Scheme
Relay basic communication setup
Ethernet Switch
Slide 96
Automatic Bus Transfer Scheme
Relay Advanced Communication Setup
Ethernet Switch
48
4/17/2018
Slide 97
Automatic Bus Transfer Scheme
Normal Operation Condition
(Note 1) (Note 1) Vs only
AUTO/ Note 1: Used for sync check
Source 1 MANUAL Source 2 only to close the tie breaker, if:
• The tie relay is on
(3 VTs) (3 VTs) MANUAL TRANSFER
mode
• Both 52-M1 and 52-M2
breakers are closed and
energized
(GOOSE) (GOOSE)
52 REF615 52
M1 M2
REF615 52
REF615
TIE
(N.O.)
52 52 52 52
F1‐1 F1‐2 F2‐1 F2‐2
Slide 98
Automatic Bus Transfer Scheme
Normal Operation Condition
M1_27/47_OP
(S1_HEALTHY)
M1_CB_CLOSE AND
M1_CB_RACKED
TIE_ABTS_AUTO
AND T (s)
TIE_CB_OPEN AND SYSTEM_NORMAL
TIE_CB_RACKED (Normal Operation Condition)
M2_27/47_OP
M2_CB_CLOSE AND
(S2_HEALTHY)
M2_CB_RACKED
49
4/17/2018
Slide 44
(GOOSE) (GOOSE)
52 52
REF615
M1 M2
REF615 52
TIE
REF615
(N.O.)
52 52 52 52
F1‐1 F1‐2 F2‐1 F2‐2
Slide 100
Automatic Bus Transfer Scheme
Loss of Source 1
M1_27/47_OP
(S1_LOSS)
M1_50/51_OP AND
M1_CB_OPEN
T (s)
TIE_ABTS_AUTO
AND AND CLOSE_TIE_CB
TIE_CB_OPEN (AUTO_TRANSFER)
M2_27/47_OP
AND
(S2_HEALTHY)
M2_CB_CLOSE
50
4/17/2018
Slide 46
(GOOSE) (GOOSE)
52 52
REF615
M1 M2
REF615 52
TIE
REF615
(N.O.)
52 52 52 52
F1‐1 F1‐2 F2‐1 F2‐2
Slide 102
Automatic Bus Transfer Scheme
Return of source 1 – auto closed transition
T (s)
M1_CB_OPEN
AND CLOSE_M1_CB
SYNC_OK
(S1_HEALTHY)
TIE_ABTS_AUTO
AND AND T (s)
OPEN_TIE_CB
TIE_CB_CLOSE (AUTO_RESTRANFER)
M2_27/47_OP
AND
(S2_HEALTHY)
M2_CB_CLOSE
51
4/17/2018
Slide 48
(GOOSE) (GOOSE)
52 52
REF615
M1 Manual M2
CLOSE
REF615 52
TIE
REF615
(N.O.)
Manual
52 52 52 52
OPEN
F1‐1 F1‐2 F2‐1 F2‐2
Slide 49
(GOOSE) (GOOSE)
52 52
REF615
M1 M2
REF615 52
TIE
REF615
(N.O.)
52 52 52 52
F1‐1 F1‐2 F2‐1 F2‐2
52
4/17/2018
Slide 105
Automatic Bus Transfer Scheme
Loss of Both Sources
M1_27/47_OP
(S1_LOSS)
AND OPEN_M1_CB
M1_CB_CLOSE
TIE_ABTS_AUTO
AND AND OPEN_TIE_CB
TIE_CB_CLOSE (BLACK_OUT)
M2_27/47_OP
AND OPEN_M2_CB
(S2_LOSS)
M2_CB_CLOSE
Slide 51
(GOOSE) (GOOSE)
52 52
REF615
M1 M2
REF615 52
TIE
REF615
(N.O.)
52 52 52 52
F1‐1 F1‐2 F2‐1 F2‐2
53
4/17/2018
Slide 107
Automatic Bus Transfer Scheme
Return of source 2 & loss of source 1
M1_27/47_OP
(S1_LOSS)
AND OPEN_M1_CB
M1_CB_OPEN
TIE_ABTS_AUTO
T (s)
AND AND CLOSE_TIE_CB
TIE_CB_OPEN (AUTO_TRANSFER)
T (s)
M2_27/47_OP
AND CLOSE_M2_CB
M2_CB_OPEN (S2_RETURN)
Slide 53
(GOOSE) (GOOSE)
52 52
REF615
M1 Manual M2
OPEN
REF615 52
TIE
REF615
(N.O.)
Manual
52 52 52 52
CLOSE
F1‐1 F1‐2 F2‐1 F2‐2
54
4/17/2018
Slide 109
Automatic Bus Transfer Scheme
Maintenance transfer for source 1
M1_27/47_OP
(S1_HEALTHY)
AND
M1_CB_CLOSE
TIE_ABTS_MANUAL
SYNC_OK AND AND MANUAL_CLOSE_TIE_CB_ENABLED
TIE_CB_OPEN (MANTENANCE_TRANSFER)
M2_27/47_OP
AND
(S2_HEALTHY)
M2_CB_CLOSE
Slide 110
Bus Protection
Novel method using GOOSE messaging
– Utilization of directional overcurrent elements of feeder protection relays.
Dedicated bus protection relay is not required (reduces footprint)
– Reliable: operates only against faults on the protected bus
• All contributing breakers are tripped and block‐closed
• Acceptable operating speed
– Secure: able to distinguish external (through) faults
• Allows the individual breaker to trip first
55
4/17/2018
Slide 111
Bus Protection
Unique features
– Flexible to multiple incoming/contributing sources
– The bus protection is accomplished by each breaker’s associated relay, which is
usually already existing, i.e. feeder protection relay and breaker failure relay
– A “master” relay is assigned to perform the bus protection scheme with a
“backup” relay automatically assuming the “master” relays operation during relay
failure
– All contributing relays communicate to the “master” and “backup” relays via
Ethernet based IEC61850 GOOSE communication
Slide 112
Bus Protection
Scheme development
– IEC61850 compliant and capable of GOOSE communication
• If the constant integrity/quality check of the GOOSE communication is bad, the
scheme shall be disabled and an alarm is issued immediately
– Two phase and ground directional overcurrent elements:
• 67P/N‐1 as reverse direction (REV) for detecting fault current flow into the bus
• 67P/N‐2 as forward direction (FWD) for both detecting and tripping fault
current flow out of the bus (through) fault
56
4/17/2018
Slide 113
Bus Protection
Principle of operation (internal bus fault)
– Bus fault occurs
– At least one reverse direction
(REV) element is detected
67‐1 67‐1 67‐1 67‐1
– Not any forward direction (FWD) P/N
67‐2 (Master)
P/N
67‐2
P/N
67‐2
P/N
67‐2
element is pending P/N
(Backup)
P/N P/N P/N
– The “master” relay trips and
REV REV REV REV
breaker via GOOSE
Ethernet Switch
Slide 114
Bus Protection
Principle of operation (external through fault)
– An external/through fault
occurs, i.e., on Feeder #2
– Feeder #2 relay FWD detected
67‐1 67‐1 67‐1 67‐1
– The rest of relays either see P/N
67‐2 (Master)
P/N
67‐2
P/N
67‐2
P/N
67‐2
REV or not FWD P/N
(Backup)
P/N P/N P/N
– Feeder #2 breaker trips
REV REV REV FWD
Ethernet Switch
57
4/17/2018
Slide 115
Bus Protection
Logic diagram
Peer Relay Peer Relay Master Relay
GOOSE_VALID ALARM
(FUTURE)
FWD 0
10ms AN AN
FWD 0 D (NO_FWD) D
10ms
FWD 0
10ms
S
Q TRIP_BUS
R
(FUTURE)
REV O
REV R (ANY_REV)
REV
(FUTURE)
CB_OPEN AN
CB_OPEN D (ALL_CB_OPEN)
CB_OPEN
Legend: GOOSE Signal
Slide 116
Bus Protection
Scheme validation testing results
Operating Times for Internal Bus Fault Operating Times for External Through Fault
Processing Time ‐ Includes relay time only
58
4/17/2018
Slide 117
Bus Protection
Backup protection 67‐1
P/N
67‐2
67‐1
P/N
67‐2
67‐1
P/N
67‐2
67‐1
P/N
67‐2
P/N P/N P/N P/N
E‐Switch
52 Master Relay 52 Backup Relay
GOOSE_VALID ALARM
IRF
NO_FWD
AN
Source #1 Source #2 D
S
ANY_REV Q TRIP_BUS
R
BI
ALL_CB_OPEN
TRANSF
TRIP
86/94
Legend: GOOSE Signal
Slide 118
Bus Protection
Communication redundancy
Ethernet Switch Ethernet Switch
59
4/17/2018
Slide 119
Bus Protection
Benefits versus conventional schemes
– Safer to handle relays on energized switchgear due to digitized CTs and PTs
– Can be applied to either AIS or GIS switchgear
– Adaptable towards increases in system fault levels without the need to upgrade system components
– Flexible to bus expansion without labor intensive scheme changes versus conventional schemes.
– Reduction of wiring versus conventional schemes that removes the requirements for dedicated bus CTs
– Improved scheme security by being immune to the effects of CT saturation
– Low or no cost of bus protection scheme
– Communication redundancy
– Simpler
Slide 120
Protection and Control for Digital Switchgear
Summary
− Based on IEC61850 − Provides protection using voltage and current
• Reduce wires with GOOSE messages sensors for
• Takes advantage of sampled values (IEC • Feeders
61850‐9‐2LE) • Line Differential
− Reliable communications • Motor applications for small motors
− Provides protection using standard CTs and PTs for
• Transformers
• Large Motors
• Generators
− Cost effective Bus Protection
− Cost Effective Automatic Transfer Schemes
60
4/17/2018
Part 4: Digital switchgear applications
and value proposition
Slide 122
Topics
− Recap ‐ What is digital switchgear?
− Benefits of digital switchgear
− Examples
61
4/17/2018
Slide 123
ANSI medium voltage digital switchgear
Next phase in the evolution of switchgear
Current
Digital Switchgear is not only a new product, it is also a new
61850
Voltage
Temperature
Humidity
concept in protection, control, and automation. Partial discharge
Contact wear
Other …
SAFETY & SIMPLICITY are the most significant
benefits, but there are many more.
Both, sensors & common communication bus, are essential
to realize the full benefits of digital switchgear.
Slide 124
ANSI switchgear
Levels of digitalization
Digital switchgear Description Main switchgear value
1. Reduced weight
2. Space saving (primarily due to elimination of
Simply replace CTs & PTs with Current & Voltage
PT compartment)
Sensors.
3. Eliminates problems of saturation and
Level 0 Ferroresonance
Add additional sensor packages (e.g., temperature) as
4. Safety – no possibility of unsafe voltages from
needed.
open CT secondary circuits
Above +
Above + IEC61850‐8‐1 & GOOSE messaging 5. Significant reduction in wiring between
Level 1 Ethernet cabling between Protective Relays. frames
6. Late customization
Above + Process bus (61850‐9‐2LE)
Requires use of Merging Units (MUs), time Above +
Level 2 synchronization devices & Ethernet switches. 7. Improved flexibility – changes in protection
Fiber optic connection from bay (switchgear) to only require IED level changes.
substation.
62
4/17/2018
Slide 125
Is Digital Switchgear constructed differently?
Form factor permits switchgear space savings
Voltage sensors
More flexibility in placement of
voltage sensors as compared to
PTs. Major space savings possible
if we use them as bus supports.
Current sensors
Slide 126
63
4/17/2018
Slide 127
Digital Switchgear Benefits – Speed
Late changes / late customization
Slide 128
Digital Switchgear Benefits – Speed
Flexibility for varying applications
64
4/17/2018
Slide 129
Digital Switchgear Benefits – Speed
Quicker Delivery Time ‐ from order to completion
Slide 130
Digital Switchgear Benefits – Safety
Substation availability and personnel safety
Solution has less live parts and is flexible towards grid disturbances
Ferro-resonance free solution without conventional PTs
Solution has increased safety for personnel during testing/operation
No dangerous CT secondary signals that could be touched
Solution is continuously self-supervising with maximized error detection
Solutions with less use of material, thus with less aging stress and
reduced chance of failure
65
4/17/2018
Digital Switchgear Benefits – Savings
Space saving solution / reduced weight up to 15%
Slide 132
Space and Weight Reduction – Example
Conventional 15kV 36” wide metal‐clad switchgear
324” (27’)
Estimated Weight (lbs.) 33625
CT and PT Wiring (ft.) 2500
CT and PT # of Wire Terminations 910
A/W/T Hours 135
Number of Shipping Splits 3
66
4/17/2018
Slide 133
Space and Weight Reduction – Example
15kV 26” wide metal‐clad switchgear with same functionality
- 27.8%
234” (19.5’)
Estimated Weight (lbs.) 29100
CT and PT Wiring (ft.) 2500 - 13.5%
CT and PT # of Wire Terminations 910
A/W/T Hours 135
Number of Shipping Splits 3
Slide 134
Space and Weight Reduction – Example
15kV 26” wide digital switchgear with same functionality
- 25.1%
Estimated Weight (lbs.) 25182 - 88.4%
Sensor Wiring (ft.) 289
- 91.6%
Sensor # of Wire Terminations 76
- 82.6%
A/W/T Hours 24
- 33.3%
Number of Shipping Splits 2
*compared with conventional 36in Wide Switchgear
208” (17.33’)
67
4/17/2018
Slide 135
Digital switchgear benefits
Reference project: Typical MTM arrangement
Slide 136
Digital switchgear benefits
Reference project: Two Frame Main‐Tie‐Main Lineup Single Line Drawing & Front View
68
4/17/2018
Slide 137
Digital switchgear benefits
Reference project: Typical MTM arrangement
The use of non-conventional instrument transformers (NCITs) like sensors in place of current
and voltage transformers will allow for a reduction from 3 to 2 frames for M-T-M arrangements.
In addition, the use of sensors makes the 2-frames more flexible since current and voltage
sensors are not dependent on ratios/ratings (they are programed in the IED).
Therefore, regardless of load variances, the same lineup can now be used for the following
schemes:
Open Transition
Closed Transition
Fast Transfer
Zone Selective Interlocking
Slide 138
Digital switchgear benefits
Reference project: ANSI switchgear at a US polymer chemicals complex
69
4/17/2018
Slide 139
Digital switchgear benefits
Reference project: ANSI switchgear at a US polymer chemicals complex
Voltage Sensor
to relay
to relay
Footprint: ‐25%, costs: ‐8.9%
Slide 140
Digital switchgear benefits
Reference project: IEC switchgear on an offshore platform in Europe
70
4/17/2018
Slide 141
Digital switchgear benefits
Reference project: IEC switchgear on an offshore platform in Europe
Footprint: ‐6.5%, costs: ‐3%
Slide 142
Digital Switchgear Benefits – Savings
Reduced total cost of ownership
Reduced losses during operation
Sensor losses are low
Saving potential of up to 250 MWh over 30 years (sample
switchgear with 14 frames & 42 CTs or Sensors)
Improved equipment reliability
Fewer live parts, fewer failure opportunities reducing outage
potential and troubleshooting costs
Reduced inventory need
Lower inital price due to fewer frames needed. This solution requires
less space
Complete PT compartments can be eliminated
Reduced space means lower costs for housing
71
4/17/2018
Slide 143
Digital Switchgear Benefits – Energy Savings
Feeder CTs Number of Number Power Energy consumption in 30
panels of CTs consumption years
Incoming 1000:1/1A 2 6 140 VA 36 698 kWh Calculation for switchgear
CT w/1A rated
with 14 frames:
secondary
− 2 incoming feeders
Outgoing 2 100:1/1A 4 12 102 VA 26 724 kWh with CTs 1000:x/x A
− 8 outgoing feeders
Total ‐ 14 42 690 VA 181 198 kWh with CTs 200:x/x A
− 4 outgoing feeders
Incoming 1000:5/5A 2 6 172 VA 45 244 kWh with CTs 100:x/x A
CT w/5A rated
secondary
current
Slide 144
Digital Switchgear Benefits – Inventory Savings
Variants
Voltage 10’s
transformers
Current 100’s
transformers
2
Sensors
1
72
4/17/2018
Slide 145
Digital Switchgear Benefits – Sustainability
Lower environmental impact
Digital
Slide 146
ANSI digital switchgear
Designed to meet the needs of the future (and today)
Minimal variation >
Low inventory needed
Be “smart”! Be flexible!
Be simple!
Be on time!
Be reliable! Measurement devices with high
Possibility of late accuracy over an extended range.
Simplified wiring customization Can deal with varying load flows.
73
4/17/2018
74