Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By EDWARD CLAPAREDE
this school an impression of home life, and that the life they
were called upon to live there should be an actual rendering of
lifeD• That's why we called it House, rather than School. At
the outset we laid out our plans on the lines known as those of
Madame Montessori, but we soon found that her ideas on a
free, active child life constitute license, and we could not con-
tinue to follow her without reservations. So we broke up the
too rigid frame-work of her methods.
On the one hand the ever identical material she uses is an
undue limitation of child impulses. It does not keep up with
the unceasing mobility of the throb of life. Moreover, the
Montessori system opens up an outlook principally on exercise
or training: that of the senses and the practice of movements.
That is very well. But this is an insufficient outlook, if we take
our stand on the furthering of functional child-life. The mis-
take attaching to the Montessorian exercises is that they are
carried out for their own sake exclusively and are not bound
up with the complexities of child-life, its multifarious composi-
tion.
On the contrary, the fine material contrived by Miles. Ande-
mars and Lafendel, the stock of which is ever increasing, has
been put together in such a fashion that the children may, with
its help, solve a number of small problems issuing from their
own little lives'". Above all, the material which finds some
application in their games and many occasions for use in the
natural playfulness of their age, calls up before them those small
but puzzling trials of ingenuity which are the life breath of their
young personalities.
The Institute had also formed a House for older children,
ranging from eight to twelve. It was interesting, using the
same methods, to continue to teach children who were sent up
from the House of the Little Ones. Unfortunately and much
to our grief, we were compelled to close the Higher House
owing to the economic crisis. It is a great pity that, on purely
98 THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE CHILD AT GENEVA
Switzerland
NOTES
1. See for the general program which the Institute proposes to fill:
Ed. Claparede, "Un Institut des Sciene. de l'lldueation, and
lei beloiDs auxquek n repond," Archives le Psychologie, XII,
1912:-and Pierre Bovet, "Un Instltut de P8dagoeie Imperi·
mem.tale," Annee psychol., 1912, p. 520.
2. A. Descoeudres, "L'education des enfants anorrnaux", Neuchatel,
1916.-Decroly et Monchamps, "L'initiation a l'activite par les
jeux educatifs", Neuchatel, 1914.-The "]eux educatifs" edited
by Mlle. Descoeudres, two boxes to be had at Institute
Rousseau, Geneva.
3. Dr. P. Godin.
4. Ed. Claparede, "Psychologic de l'enfant." 10. ed. Geneve, 1924
(The fourth ed. was translated under the title "Experimental
Pedagogy and the Psychology of the Child, London, 19111.
5. P. Bovet "La tache nouvelle de l'ecole", Intermediaire des Educa-
teurs, Dec. 1923.-Ad. Ferriere "L'eoole active" Neuchatel et
Geneve, 1922.-Ed. Claparede, "La psychologie de l'ecole
active," Intermed, des Educ., Dec. 1923.-E. Duvillard, "Les
tendances actuelles de l'enseignement primaire", Neuchatel
1919.
See also the fine study of P. Bovet on "Le genie de Baden-
Powell (Neuchatel et Geneve), in which the author shows
how much Baden-Powell has been able to lay base and
actuate the motives which can call forth activity in young
people.
6. Ed. Claparede "L'eeole sur mesure", Lausanne & Geneve, 1920.
7. O. Pfister, "La psychanalyse au service de l'education", Berne,
1921;-P. Bovet, "La psychanalyse et l'education", Lausanne,
1920.
8. Ch. Baudouin "Suggestion and Auto-suggestion," London.
9. Audemars et Lafendel "La Maison des Petits", Neuchatel 1923.-
Ed. Claparede, "Les nouvelle conceptions educatives et leur
verification par l'experience", Scientia, 1919.
10. This material includes a set of different games which can be
ordered from the Institute Rousseau.
104 THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE CHILD AT GENEVA
Edward Claparede
To cite this article: Edward Claparede (1925) The Psychology of the Child at Geneva and the J. J.
Rousseau Institute, The Pedagogical Seminary and Journal of Genetic Psychology, 32:1, 92-104,
DOI: 10.1080/08856559.1925.10532319
Article views: 10
Download by: [The University Of Melbourne Libraries] Date: 23 June 2016, At: 00:28