Identification HAZARD

Flood Likelihood of
Barangay Name of Facility
Susceptibility Occurrence Score

(low,
(POSSIBLE ANSWER) refer to LO Table
moderate,high)
 CRITICAL POINT FACILITY DATA BASE AND RISK TO FLOODING BY BAR

ZARD EXPOSURE

Expected Flood Estimated Affected Total Area

Storey % of Affected Area
Depth Area (sq.m.)

Estimated affected
≤1m for low & Flr area (if any) Flr area (if any)
area divided by
moderate No. of Flrs Area of facility Area of facility
Total Floor area
≥1m for high compound compound
multiply by 100
ISK TO FLOODING BY BARANGAY AND BY TYPE OF SUSCEPTIBILITY

Proportion of the Proportion of

Existing structure in Structure Made
Unit Cost Replecement Cost
Condition dilapidated/ of Light
condemned Condition Materials

if poor or faair ≤5% of Structure

Total Estimated >5 to10% of
good, ≤5% of Structure
Construction cost affected area Structure
excellent, fair, >5 to10% of Structure
per sq.m. multiply by Unit >10-20% of Structure
>10-20% of
poor Structure
Cost ≥20% of structure ≥20% of structure
 VULNERABILITY

Year Employing Hazard Capacity

Constructed Resistant Design and willingness
Protected to retrofit
by Mitigation Measures or to relocate

Before 1960s ≤5% of Structure

Between >5 to10% of Structure
Yes or No
1960-1991 >10-20% of Structure
after 1991 ≥20% of structure

Refer to notes below

The owner or concerned

administrator has a plan,
capacity and willingness
to retrofit (A)
The owner or concerned
administrator has the
capacity to retrofit but no
plan yet (B)
The owner or concerned
adminsitrator has capacity
to retrofit but not willing
to retrofit ©
No capacity to retrofit (D)
 Severity of Risk Risk
Percentage of Consequence Score_ Score Category
structures covered by
property
Insurance

≤5% of Structure Use the severity of

>5 to10% of Structure Consequence
>10-20% of Structure Indicator SC X
≥20% of structure Likelihood
of
Occurrence Low-High
 Identification HAZARD

Landslide Likelihood of
Barangay Name of Facility
Susceptibility Occurrence Score

(low,
(POSSIBLE ANSWER) refer to LO Table
moderate,high)
 CRITICAL POINT FACILITY DATA BASE AND RISK T

EXPOSURE

Estimated Affected Total Area

Storey % of Affected Area Unit Cost
Area (sq.m.)

Estimated affected
Flr area (if any) Flr area (if any)
area divided by Construction cost
No. of Flrs Area of facility Area of facility
Total Floor area per sq.m.
compound compound
multiply by 100
Y DATA BASE AND RISK TO LANDSLIDE BY BARANGAY AND BY TYPE OF SUSCEPTIBILITY

VULNERABILITY

Proportion of the Proportion of

Existing structure in Structure Made Year
Replecement Cost
Condition dilapidated/ of Light Constructed
condemned Condition Materials

if poor or faair ≤5% of Structure

Total Estimated >5 to10% of Before 1960s
good, ≤5% of Structure
affected area Structure Between
excellent, fair, >5 to10% of Structure
multiply by Unit >10-20% of Structure
>10-20% of 1960-1991
poor Structure
Cost ≥20% of structure after 1991
≥20% of structure
SUSCEPTIBILITY

VULNERABILITY

Employing Hazard Capacity

Resistant Design and willingness
Protected to retrofit
by Mitigation Measures or to relocate

≤5% of Structure
>5 to10% of Structure
Yes or No >10-20% of Structure
≥20% of structure

Refer to notes below

The owner or concerned

administrator has a plan,
capacity and willingness
to retrofit (A)
The owner or concerned
administrator has the
capacity to retrofit but no
plan yet (B)
The owner or concerned
adminsitrator has capacity
to retrofit but not willing
to retrofit ©
No capacity to retrofit (D)
 Severity of Risk Risk
Percentage of Consequence Score_ Score Category
structures covered by
property
Insurance

≤5% of Structure Use the severity of

>5 to10% of Structure Consequence
>10-20% of Structure Indicator SC X
≥20% of structure Likelihood
of
Occurrence Low-High
 Identification

Likelihood of
Barangay Name of Facility Storey
Occurrence Score

(POSSIBLE ANSWER) refer to LO Table No. of Flrs

 CRITICAL POINT FACILITY DATA BASE AND RISK TO TSU

EXPOSURE

Estimated Affected Total Area

% of Affected Area Unit Cost Replecement Cost
Area (sq.m.)

Estimated affected Total Estimated

Flr area (if any) Flr area (if any)
area divided by Construction cost affected area
Area of facility Area of facility
Total Floor area per sq.m. multiply by Unit
compound compound
multiply by 100 Cost
BASE AND RISK TO TSUNAMI BY BARANGAY AND BY TYPE OF SUSCEPTIBILITY

VULNERABILITY

Proportion of the Proportion of

Existing structure in Structure Made Year Employing Hazard
Condition dilapidated/ of Light Constructed Resistant Design
condemned Condition Materials

if poor or faair ≤5% of Structure

>5 to10% of Before 1960s
good, ≤5% of Structure
Structure Between
excellent, fair, >5 to10% of Structure Yes or No
>10-20% of Structure
>10-20% of 1960-1991
poor Structure
≥20% of structure after 1991
≥20% of structure
TY

VULNERABILITY

Capacity Percentage of
and willingness structures covered by
Protected to retrofit property
by Mitigation Measures or to relocate Insurance

≤5% of Structure ≤5% of Structure

>5 to10% of Structure >5 to10% of Structure
>10-20% of Structure >10-20% of Structure
≥20% of structure ≥20% of structure

Refer to notes below

The owner or concerned

administrator has a plan,
capacity and willingness
to retrofit (A)
The owner or concerned
administrator has the
capacity to retrofit but no
plan yet (B)
The owner or concerned
adminsitrator has capacity
to retrofit but not willing
to retrofit ©
No capacity to retrofit (D)
 Severity of Risk Risk
Consequence Score Score Category

Use the severity of

Consequence
Indicator SC X
Likelihood
of
Occurrence Low-High
 Identification HAZARD

Flood
Barangay Name of Water Source
Susceptibility
Type of Water
Source

(low,
(POSSIBLE ANSWER)
moderate,high)
 LIFELINE FACILITY DATA BASE AND RISK TO FLOODING BY BARANGAY

HAZARD EXPOSURE

Likelihood of Expected Flood Number of HH Estimated Affected Total Area

Occurrence Score Depth Served Area (sq.m.)

≤1m for low & Flr area (if any) Flr area (if any)
refer to LO Table moderate Area of facility Area of facility
≥1m for high compound compound
LOODING BY BARANGAY AND BY TYPE OF SUSCEPTIBILITY

POSURE

Proportion of the Proportion of

Existing structure in Structure Made
% of Affected Area Replecement Cost
Condition dilapidated/ of Light
condemned Condition Materials

if poor or faair ≤5% of Structure

Estimated affected Total Estimated >5 to10% of
good, ≤5% of Structure
area divided by affected area Structure
excellent, fair, >5 to10% of Structure
Total Floor area multiply by Unit >10-20% of Structure
>10-20% of
poor Structure
multiply by 100 Cost ≥20% of structure ≥20% of structure
 VULNERABILITY

Year Employing Hazard Capacity

Constructed Resistant Design and willingness
Protected to retrofit
by Mitigation Measures or to relocate

Before 1960s ≤5% of Structure

Between >5 to10% of Structure
Yes or No
1960-1991 >10-20% of Structure
after 1991 ≥20% of structure

Refer to notes below

The owner or concerned

administrator has a plan,
capacity and willingness
to retrofit (A)
The owner or concerned
administrator has the
capacity to retrofit but no
plan yet (B)
The owner or concerned
adminsitrator has capacity
to retrofit but not willing
to retrofit ©
No capacity to retrofit (D)
 Severity of Risk Risk
Percentage of Consequence Score_ Score Category
structures covered by
property
Insurance

≤5% of Structure Use the severity of

>5 to10% of Structure Consequence
>10-20% of Structure Indicator SC X
≥20% of structure Likelihood
of
Occurrence Low-High
 Identification HAZARD

Landslide
Barangay Name of Water Source
Susceptibility
Type of Water
Source

(low,
(POSSIBLE ANSWER)
moderate,high)
 LIFELINE FACILITY DATA BASE AND RISK TO LANDSLIDE BY BARANGAY AND BY

HAZARD EXPOSURE

Likelihood of Number of HH Estimated Affected Total Area

% of Affected Area
Occurrence Score Served Area (sq.m.)

Estimated affected
Flr area (if any) Flr area (if any)
area divided by
refer to LO Table Area of facility Area of facility
Total Floor area
compound compound
multiply by 100
DE BY BARANGAY AND BY TYPE OF SUSCEPTIBILITY

VULNERABILITY

Proportion of the Proportion of

Existing structure in Structure Made Year
Replecement Cost
Condition dilapidated/ of Light Constructed
condemned Condition Materials

if poor or faair ≤5% of Structure

Total Estimated >5 to10% of Before 1960s
good, ≤5% of Structure
affected area Structure Between
excellent, fair, >5 to10% of Structure
multiply by Unit >10-20% of Structure
>10-20% of 1960-1991
poor Structure
Cost ≥20% of structure after 1991
≥20% of structure
 VULNERABILITY

Employing Hazard Capacity

Resistant Design and willingness
Protected to retrofit
by Mitigation Measures or to relocate

≤5% of Structure
>5 to10% of Structure
Yes or No >10-20% of Structure
≥20% of structure

Refer to notes below

The owner or concerned

administrator has a plan,
capacity and willingness
to retrofit (A)
The owner or concerned
administrator has the
capacity to retrofit but no
plan yet (B)
The owner or concerned
adminsitrator has capacity
to retrofit but not willing
to retrofit ©
No capacity to retrofit (D)
 Severity of Risk Risk
Percentage of Consequence Score_ Score Category
structures covered by
property
Insurance

≤5% of Structure Use the severity of

>5 to10% of Structure Consequence
>10-20% of Structure Indicator SC X
≥20% of structure Likelihood
of
Occurrence Low-High
 LIFELI

Identification

Likelihood of
Barangay Name of Water Source
Occurrence Score
Type of Water
Source

(POSSIBLE ANSWER) refer to LO Table

 LIFELINE FACILITY DATA BASE AND RISK TO TSUNAMI BY BARANGAY AND BY TYPE OF

EXPOSURE

Number of HH Estimated Affected Total Area

% of Affected Area Replecement Cost
Served Area (sq.m.)

Estimated affected Total Estimated

Flr area (if any) Flr area (if any)
area divided by affected area
Area of facility Area of facility
Total Floor area multiply by Unit
compound compound
multiply by 100 Cost
RANGAY AND BY TYPE OF SUSCEPTIBILITY

VULNERABILITY

Proportion of the Proportion of

Existing structure in Structure Made Year Employing Hazard
Condition dilapidated/ of Light Constructed Resistant Design
condemned Condition Materials

if poor or faair ≤5% of Structure

>5 to10% of Before 1960s
good, ≤5% of Structure
Structure Between
excellent, fair, >5 to10% of Structure Yes or No
>10-20% of Structure
>10-20% of 1960-1991
poor Structure
≥20% of structure after 1991
≥20% of structure
VULNERABILITY

Capacity Percentage of
and willingness structures covered by
Protected to retrofit property
by Mitigation Measures or to relocate Insurance

≤5% of Structure ≤5% of Structure

>5 to10% of Structure >5 to10% of Structure
>10-20% of Structure >10-20% of Structure
≥20% of structure ≥20% of structure

Refer to notes below

The owner or concerned

administrator has a plan,
capacity and willingness
to retrofit (A)
The owner or concerned
administrator has the
capacity to retrofit but no
plan yet (B)
The owner or concerned
adminsitrator has capacity
to retrofit but not willing
to retrofit ©
No capacity to retrofit (D)
 Severity of Risk Risk
Consequence Score_ Score Category

Use the severity of

Consequence
Indicator SC X
Likelihood
of
Occurrence Low-High