Professional Documents
Culture Documents
McArdle, S., Waters, L., Briscoe, J., & Hall, D. (2007). Employability
during Unemployment: Adaptability, career identity and human and social
capital. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71, 247-264
Sarah McArdle
Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Commerce,
The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3101, Australia
Lea Waters
Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Commerce,
The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3101, Australia
l.waters@unimelb.edu.au
Jon P. Briscoe
Department of Management, College of Business,
Northern Illinois University, Barsema Hall, 245 H, DeKalb, IL 60115-2897, USA
Today’s career environment is fundamentally different to that of the past. Careers that were once
characterised by vertical progression and job security now involve lateral movements across organi-
sations, increased instability and unemployment. In this insecure environment, the concept of em-
ployability has emerged as a new key to career success. Recently, Fugate, Kinicki and Ashforth
(2004) defined employability as a psycho-social construct comprised of 3 dimensions: (i) adaptabil-
ity; (ii) career identity; and (iii) human and social capital. The aim of the current paper was to em-
pirically test this model in a sample of unemployed Australians. Specifically, this research ex-
plored employability in relation to three aspects of unemployment: (1) self-esteem during unem-
ployment; (2) job search during unemployment; and (3) re-employment. Overall, the results of this
study provide broad support for the employability dimensions identified by Fugate et al. (2004) and
suggest that employability is highly applicable to the unemployment context.
Key Words: Employability; unemployment; job loss; career; employment; adaptability; career
identity; job search; re-employment.
movements across organisations, increased in- and Bateman and Crant (1993) proactive indi-
stability, and periods of unemployment for viduals are able to effect environmental change,
most workers. remaining relatively unimpeded by situational
In this insecure environment, the con- constraints. Proactive personality has been
cept of ‘employability’ has emerged as a new linked to identifying and acting on opportuni-
key to career success (Bagshaw, 1997; Fugate, ties; feelings of control; career initiative; per-
Kinicki & Ashforth, 2004; Garavan, 1999). severance; self-efficacy; self-direction; coping;
Employability can be broadly defined as the information-seeking; and effective career
ability to gain and maintain employment, both management (Bateman & Crant, 1993; Crant,
within and across organisations (Finn, 2000). 2000; Seibert et al., 1999; Seibert, Kraimer &
This definition, however, provides little indica- Crant, 2001; Thompson, 2005). According to
tion of the personal factors that contribute to Hall (1996a; 2004) adaptability is essential to
one’s employability. Indeed, very few articles success in the current era of career insecurity.
discussing employability offer insight into what Career identity represents the way indi-
it really means. Many authors use viduals define themselves in the career context,
uni-dimensional, outcome-based definitions, acting as a ‘cognitive compass’ used to navi-
labelling an individual as employable retrospec- gate career opportunities (Fugate et al., 2004).
tively based on their ability to gain employment Career identity reflects the ‘knowing-why’
(eg. Finn, 2000; Ritchie, 2000 and Van der competencies identified by Defillippi and Ar-
Heijden, 2001). However, if career practition- thur (1994). ‘Knowing-why’ competencies
ers, government bodies, researchers, organiza- encompass attributes, such as career motiva-
tions, and individuals are to use the concept of tion, personal meaning and individual values.
employability effectively (in both research and Given that career trajectories are less externally
practice), such vague definitions are inadequate. defined in the new career environment
It is primarily for this reason that the current (McGreevy, 2003), the use of an ‘internal ca-
paper adopts the more comprehensive model of reer compass’ has become critically important
employability recently presented by Fugate et in providing the direction needed to achieve
al. (2004). career success, especially when the individual
Fugate et al. (2004) present employabil- finds him/herself outside of the boundaries of
ity as a person-centred, psycho-social construct. an employing organization. Hall, Briscoe and
By situating employability within the individu- Kram (1997) suggest that, in today’s turbulent
al, it is separated from the external determinants career environment, identity needs to be de-
of employment, focussing instead on personal coupled from a specific job or organisation,
factors. According to Fugate et al., employa- instead representing an individual’s personal
bility comprises three separate, yet inter-related, values, motivations and broader career inter-
dimensions: (i) adaptability; (ii) career identity; ests. In support of this, Anakwe, Hall and Schor
and (iii) human and social capital. (2000) found that teaching MBA students to
An individual’s adaptability refers to reflect on their career-related values, needs and
their willingness and ability to change their motivations (assisting the formation or consol-
behaviours, feelings and thoughts in response idation of career identity) facilitated effective
to environmental demands (Fugate et al., 2004). career management, goal-setting and deci-
Fugate et al. propose that adaptability encom- sion-making.
passes: (1) optimism (2) a propensity to learn; Human capital refers to the personal varia-
(3) openness; (4) an internal locus of control; bles that may affect one’s career advancement,
and (5) generalised self-efficacy. Furthermore, including age, gender, education, work experi-
Savickas (1997) has linked adaptability to ence, training, skills and knowledge. Human
planfulness, a readiness to cope and a willing- capital encompasses the ‘knowing-how’ com-
ness to explore oneself and one’s environment. petencies outlined by Defillippi and Arthur
Encompassed in the dimension of adaptability (1994). ‘Knowing-how’ competencies refer
is the construct of proactive personality. Ac- to career-related knowledge and skills, built via
cording to Seibert, Crant and Kraimer (1999) occupational learning and professional devel-
McArdle, S., Waters, L., Briscoe, J., & Hall, D. (2007). Employability during Unemployment
opment activities. Social capital reflects the Self-esteem can be defined as “one’s
interpersonal aspect of employability, incorpo- evaluation of one’s worth as a person, based on
rating Defillippi and Arthur’s (1994) ‘know- an assessment of the qualities that make up the
ing-whom’ competencies concerning formal self-concept (Shaffer, 2002, p. 428)”. Re-
and informal career-related networks. Empir- search has consistently shown that self-esteem
ical work has demonstrated that interpersonal is a key psychological factor that is negatively
connections (who one knows) are crucial in affected by unemployment (see, for example:
shaping individuals’ self-perceptions (Eby et Hanisch, 1999; Jahoda, 1982; Winefield,
al., 2003), fostering effective career manage- Tiggemann & Winefield, 1992; Winegardner,
ment (Anakwe et al., 2000), and providing ac- Simonetti, & Nykodym, 1984). This paper
cess to information, resources and career spon- proposes, however, that employable individuals
sorship (Seibert, Kraimer and Liden, 2001). are less likely to suffer from low self-esteem
A particularly important aspect of social capital during unemployment. The planfulness and
during unemployment is social support. Social readiness to cope that are associated with
support can serve to ameliorate the destructive adaptability may lessen the shock of unem-
consequences of stressful events, such as un- ployment, allowing individuals to be prepared
employment (Lazarus and Folkman, 1984) and for change, and, hence, maintain a positive
has been consistently linked to increased men- self-evaluation (Savickas, 1997). According
tal health and life satisfaction during unem- to Eden and Aviram (1993) unemployment can
ployment (McKee-Ryan et al., 2004). be a significant blow to an individual’s
self-concept and, consequently, their
1. EMPLOYABILITY AND UNEMPLOYMENT self-esteem. This is likely to be especially so
Given the likelihood of periods of un- if the individual has invested much of their
employment for many people today, an effec- identity in a particular job or organization.
tive definition of employability must encom- However, the self-esteem of those individuals
pass attributes that assist individuals both in who define themselves more broadly in terms
and out of employment. Fugate et al.’s defi- of their career (i.e. have a strong career identi-
nition of employability serves this function as it ty) may not suffer such a devastating blow, as
is not determined by one’s employment status, their identity is decoupled from a particular
therefore maintaining applicability across var- firm or position.
ied employment contexts, including unem- Various elements of social and human
ployment. The psycho-social model may, capital may also serve to buffer self-esteem
therefore, be highly useful in helping individu- during unemployment. As Lazarus and
als to cope with unemployment, and to recog- Folkman (1984) argue, social capital (and so-
nise that their employability can be self-altered. cial support in particular) can help individuals
In their conceptual piece, Fugate et al. (2004) cope with stressful situations. According to
propose that employable individuals are (a) less McIntosh (1991) individuals who have strong
likely to be psychologically harmed by job loss, social support are more likely to feel valued
(b) more likely to engage in greater job search and, as a result, have higher self-esteem. Fur-
and (c) more likely to gain high quality thermore, the possession of human capital and
re-employment. However, to date, these as- social resources can provide important sources
sertions have not been empirically tested. of identity consolidation (Shaffer, 2002), lead-
The current studies address this by empirically ing to minimal damage to the self-concept and
investigating: (i) The relationship between em- self-esteem. In accordance with the above
ployability, self-esteem and job search during contentions, the first hypothesis addressed in
unemployment (study 1); and (ii) the relation- this research is as follows:
ship between employability, self-esteem, job
search and re-employment (study 2). Hypothesis 1: Employability (adaptability,
career identity, human and social capital) will
Employability and Self-Esteem during Unem- be positively related to self-esteem during un-
ployment employment.
McArdle, S., Waters, L., Briscoe, J., & Hall, D. (2007). Employability during Unemployment
Self-esteem has also been linked to job According to Kasl (1982) self-esteem may
search in the research literature. Kanfer et al. also play a role in re-employment. Kasl’s
(2001) found that higher self-esteem was linked ‘reverse-causation hypothesis’ proposes that
to increased job search intensity in an unem- positive psychological health (in general) and
ployed sample. Furthermore, Shamir (1986) high self-esteem (in particular) facilitates
found that individuals with high self-esteem re-employment. As mentioned earlier, unem-
were more likely to show initiative and asser- ployment is typically associated with low
tiveness during unemployment, obtaining self-esteem, however, Kasl proposes that hav-
greater information from their environment. ing low self-esteem may be detrimental to the
Interestingly, however, low self-esteem may unemployed, by inhibiting their ability to gain
also motivate job search by encouraging indi- re-employment. Kasl’s reverse-causation hy-
McArdle, S., Waters, L., Briscoe, J., & Hall, D. (2007). Employability during Unemployment
pothesis has been supported by authors such as The Study One sample consisted of 455
Winefield and Tiggeman (1985) and Vinkour unemployed people (62% male and 38% fe-
and Schul (1997). Nonetheless other research male) with a mean age of 33.52 years
(see for instance Waters and Moore, 2002a, and (sd=11.17). Respondents reported a variety of
Crossley and Stanton, 2005) has found no rela- education levels: 39.9% had finished high
tionship between self-esteem and school, 21.5% had completed university, 13.6%
re-employment. To investigate this relation- had obtained a TAFE (Training And Further
ship further, the current paper adopts Kasl’s Education) qualification, 10.8% had completed
original hypothesis, proposing a positive rela- part of a university course, and 6.6% had com-
tionship between self-esteem and pleted an apprenticeship.
re-employment:
1)Measures
Hypothesis 5: Self-esteem will be positively Adaptability, career identity, human
related to obtaining re-employment. capital, social capital, self-esteem and job
search were all assessed in Study One. With
Wanberg (1997), Wanberg et al. (2001), the exception of human capital, all items were
and Kanfer et al. (2001) have also found a posi- assessed using a 5-point likert scale from (1)
tive relationship between job search and ‘strongly disagree’ to (5) ‘strongly agree’. In all
re-employment. Accordingly, it is hypothesised scales, a higher score indicated a higher pres-
that job search will also be associated with ence of the construct.
re-employment: Proactive personality was used as a
proxy measure for adaptability. Participants
Hypothesis 6: Job search intensity will be posi- were assessed using the ten-item version of
tively related to obtaining re-employment. Bateman and Crant’s (1993) Proactive Person-
ality scale. The proactive personality scale in-
The six hypotheses outlined above are cludes items such as: “I excel at identifying
visually represented in Figure 1: opportunities”. The reliability for this scale in
the current study was α=0.872.
Stumpf, Colarelli and Hartman’s (1983)
Insert Figure 1 here Identity Awareness scale was used to assess
career identity. The Identity Awareness scale
includes 8 items, such as: “I have reflected on
Method and Results how my past career and activities matches my
future career”. The reliability of this scale
Design was α=0.82.
The current research was conducted as two The demographic variables of age,
studies following the same sample using a lon- gender and education were used to assess hu-
gitudinal, survey design 1 . Unemployed par- man capital. These factors have been recog-
ticipants for Study One were accessed via Job- nized in the literature as important aspects of
Network agencies and were re-contacted 6 human capital, and are commonly utilized as
months later with follow-up questionnaires for human capital measures in job loss research
Study Two. Both the Study One and Two sur- (eg. Wanberg, et al., 2002). Participants pro-
veys were self-administered by participants. vided their age in years and were asked to in-
dicate their gender (M/F) and highest level of
Study One education. Gender and education were coded
Sample dichotomously as follows: males were coded as
‘1’, and females as ‘0’; those who had engaged
1
The data collected in the current study came from a
2
survey distributed as part of a larger study by Waters, Tests of validity for all scales will be presented in the
Briscoe and Hall. results section.
McArdle, S., Waters, L., Briscoe, J., & Hall, D. (2007). Employability during Unemployment
in further education following high-school were the offices for a one-month period. Of the
coded as ‘1’ and those who had not gone be- 1000 surveys distributed, 752 were taken by
yond high-school were coded as ‘0’. Age was JobNetwork clients. Four-hundred and fif-
treated as a continuous variable. ty-five surveys were returned to the researcher,
Social capital was measured by a single resulting in an overall response rate of ap-
social support proxy item: “I have been sup- proximately 60%. On receipt of the initial sur-
ported by my family and friends”. Measuring vey, participants were given a study code and
a construct via a single item is an undesirable their contact details were recorded. On com-
situation, however, other items considered for pletion and return of the survey, respondents
inclusion (eg. “attended various networking were paid $10 via cheque. Incentives such as
meetings and workshops to learn about new this are used to indicate appreciation for the
career options”) were ultimately rejected due to time taken by participants, and are also useful
conceptual overlap with the job search meas- in increasing the response rate (Salant & Dill-
ure. This issue has been encountered by other man, 1994; Wanberg, Kanfer and Banas, 2000,
researchers such as Wanberg et al. (2002). Wanberg, Kanfer and Rotundo, 1999). Re-
Self-esteem was measured using Messer sponses were then entered into SPSS for analy-
and Harter’s (1985) 5-item scale. Sample items sis.
include: “I am very happy being the way that I
am”. Messer and Harter reported strong in- a) Results
ternal reliability for the scale (α=.92) and this Prior to hypothesis testing, the validity of
scale has also been used validly in unemploy- the study scales was tested using Exploratory
ment research by Waters and Moore (2002b) Factor Analysis, with the number of factors
and Waters and Muller (2003). In the current specified at four. On examination of the scree
study, however, factor analysis indicated that plot, this number of factors was revealed to be
two items did not validly represent the under- appropriate. Two self-esteem items failed to
lying construct (loading < 0.4). Consequent- meet the 0.4 cut-off loading and were dropped
ly, these items were dropped. The reliability from the analysis (as noted in the methodology
of the resultant 3-item scale was α=0.79. section). The final factor structure is present-
Kinicki and Latack’s (1990) Job search ed in Table 1.
behaviour scale was used to measure job search
intensity. This scale consists of 5 items, such Insert Table 1 here
as: “since being unemployed I have focused my
time and energy on job search activities”. This Missing values for identity awareness,
scale was found to have a reliability of α= 0.84. proactive personality, social support, job search
Kincki and Latack’s (1990) scale has been used and self-esteem were replaced using Estimation
successfully in the job loss literature by re- Maximisation (EM). In EM information from
searchers such as Lai and Chan (2002) and all the variables of interest is used to predict the
Wanberg (1997). missing items. No more than 19 values (4%)
were missing on any one item. Missing values
2) Procedure on the human capital measures were not re-
Participants were accessed via the Victorian placed, as they were unable to be estimated by
JobNetwork system. JobNetwork is an Austral- scores on other items. This left a total of 37
ian government initiative which provides un- cases (approximately 8%) with missing values.
employed individuals with access to a number Table 2 presents descriptive statistics and
of private and community organisations that correlations for all variables assessed in the
can assist in the job search process (JobNet- study. As Table 2 shows, age was not signif-
work, 2005). One-thousand surveys were icantly correlated with any other variable.
placed at the front counter of JobNetwork of- Gender was significantly negatively correlated
fices by the researchers, along with a plain with identity awareness and job search. Edu-
language statement (PLS), and pre-paid re- cation was negatively associated with social
turn-addressed envelope. Surveys were left in support and positively associated with
McArdle, S., Waters, L., Briscoe, J., & Hall, D. (2007). Employability during Unemployment
re-employment. Proactive personality, identity (1991) large samples have high statistical pow-
awareness, social support, job search and er, resulting in almost all reasonable models
self-esteem were all positively correlated with being rejected when only the chi-square value
each other. Re-employment was positively and its associated probability are considered.
correlated with education and proactive per- Consequently, it is important to examine the
sonality. other values. Analysis of the other indicators
suggests that the model fits the data well. In
Insert Table 2 here particular, as the TLI and NFI exceed the .90
acceptance level, and the CFI and GFI exceed
the .95 level, this model is accepted as a good
Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) was fit for the data (Hox & Bechger, 1998). Ide-
used to test hypotheses 1, 2 and 3. Prior ally, an RMSEA score of below .05 is required
to entering the data, scale items for proac- to accept a model (Hox & Bechger, 1998),
tive personality, identity awareness and job however, Hair, Anderson, Tatham and Black
search were grouped into 3 parcels. By (2004) and Hu and Bentler (1999) suggest that
parcelling scale items this way, the data is an RMSEA of less than 0.06 is acceptable.
reduced, facilitating model fit by reducing In testing the structural model, age, sex,
the number of parameters (Landis, Beal & education and social support were entered as
Tesluk, 2000). Self-esteem items were observed variables, while job search,
not parcelled, as there were only three self-esteem, identity awareness and proactive
items in the final scale. Factor analysis personality were entered as latent variables re-
was used to parcel items appropriately, by flected by the parcelled items. Age, sex, edu-
creating a 3 factor structure for each scale. cation and social support were not found to
Study variables were entered into AMOS load onto an underlying, latent ‘human and so-
(Version 4) for modelling. Prior to assessing cial capital’ factor, and were entered individu-
the structural model, the measurement model ally. The final model is presented in figure 2.
for the latent constructs (proactive personality, Age, sex and education were dropped from the
identity awareness, job search and self-esteem) model as they were not found to be significant-
was assessed. Given the positive correlations ly related to the outcome variables. The
between each construct (as identified in the pathways between self-esteem and job search,
preliminary analyses) double arrows were used and identity awareness and self-esteem were
to indicate assumed covariance between the also not significant and are not included in fig-
latent constructs. The measurement model is ure 3.
depicted in figure 2.
Insert Figure 3 here
Insert Figure 2 here
All the pathways retained in the model (figure
All parcelled items were significantly related to 3) were significant at the 0.05 level. The
the latent constructs, indicating high conver- goodness of fit indicators for this model were
gent validity. However, as the largest covari- as follows: chi-square (58) = 137.281, p <.05;
ance was .49, there is also evidence for diver- GFI=0.956; NFI=0.927; TLI=0.941;
gent validity between the constructs. The CFI=0.956; RMSEA=0.055. Again, the
goodness of fit indicators for the measurement chi-square test was significant, however, the
model were: chi-square (48) = 118.496, p <.05; other indicators suggest that this model fits the
GFI=0.959; NFI=0.935; TLI=0.945; data well. Figure 3 demonstrates that 16% of
CFI=0.960; RMSEA=0.057. While the the variance in self-esteem can be explained by
chi-square test was significant (which indicates the independent variables of proactive person-
poor fit), Hox and Bechger (1998) argue that, ality and social support. Twenty-six percent
when large sample sizes are used, the of the variance in Job Search is explained by all
chi-square test is almost always significant. three factors: proactive personality, identity
According to Raykov, Tomer and Nesselroade awareness and social support.
McArdle, S., Waters, L., Briscoe, J., & Hall, D. (2007). Employability during Unemployment
self-evaluation in the current unemployed sam- al.’s (2002) proposal that education may work
ple. Identity awareness was also not predictive as a ‘key’ to employment. Employers may
of re-employment. It may be that individuals use the level of education as a heuristic device
with strong identity awareness engage in job in making recruitment decisions, which would
search, but not simply to find a job. Instead create an advantage for those with education
they may devote time to this activity in order to beyond the high school level.
find the best job, in terms of person-job fit. Social support was significantly related
Consequently, identity awareness may not facil- to both job search and self-esteem during un-
itate re-employment per se, but may instead in- employment4. According to McIntosh (1991)
crease re-employment quality, when the identi- social support may enhance, or buffer,
ty-aware individual does accept a job (Waters, self-esteem by making individuals feel valued,
Hall & Briscoe, 2005). serving to reaffirm their identity and self-worth.
By and large, human capital (assessed via The emotional element of social support may
age, sex and education) was not found to play a be particularly relevant to self-esteem during
strong role in relation to the outcomes. Neither unemployment as it provides an outlet for stress
age nor sex was related to any of the outcomes and negative feelings, while providing reassur-
investigated in the study 3 . Education was, ance and comfort (McIntosh, 1991). Social
however, found to be a significant univariate support may also encourage job search by al-
predictor of re-employment, but was not related lowing individuals to vent the frustration and
to either self-esteem or job search. The lack grief associated with unemployment. Such
of a relationship between age, sex and the out- emotion-focussed coping (Lazarus & Folkman,
come variables is not especially surprising. 1984) can help individuals to ‘bounce back’
According to Creed and Watson (2003) the lit- from job rejections and unsuccessful inter-
erature surrounding age and gender effects views, helping them continue with the job
during unemployment is inconclusive. In search process (Kanfer et al., 2001; Vinokur &
their study, they found no association between Caplan, 1987). Instrumental and informational
gender and well-being, although they did find social support may also facilitate job search by
some age effects on outcomes such as social promoting problem-focussed coping. High
support, well-being and time structure. In the levels of social support may provide access to
future it may be beneficial to look at other as- contacts and informal networks (such as family
pects of human capital (such as skills, experi- and friends) that may help in the job search
ence, knowledge), which are variables over process.
which the individual has an element of control, Self-esteem was not significantly related to
rather than using variables such as age and sex either job search or re-employment in this
which are outside the individual’s control. study. This finding contradicts research by
Education was not related to self-esteem Kanfer et al. (2001) who found that individuals
or job search in the current study. However, higher on self-esteem engaged in greater job
education was assessed quite crudely, as a bi- search. Crossley and Stanton (2005) recently
nary construct and hence, some relationships found, however, that distress was also linked to
may have been distorted or obscured. Draw- job search intensity. Taken together, Wan-
ing finer distinctions between levels of educa- berg et al.’s (2002) and Crossley and Stanton’s
tion may produce different findings in the fu- (2005) results may suggest that individuals un-
ture. Interestingly, education was found to sig- dertake job search for different reasons, associ-
nificantly explain the variance in ated with both high and low self-esteem. This
re-employment. This supports Wanberg et may be explained in terms of Higgins’ (1997)
3 4
Sex did contribute to the combined variance in Social support did contribute to the combined vari-
re-employment when considered in combination with ance in re-employment in concert with education, pro-
proactive personality, education and social support. It active personality and sex. However, it was not a
was not, however, a significant univariate predictor. unique predictor of this outcome.
McArdle, S., Waters, L., Briscoe, J., & Hall, D. (2007). Employability during Unemployment
Regulatory Focus Theory, which proposes that Those engaging in high job search intensity
individuals will approach important goals may not necessarily be the most attractive to
through either a prevention or promotion focus. employers.
A prevention focus centres on alleviating or
avoiding negative outcomes, while a promotion Study Limitations
focus is associated with attaining positive out- As the first empirical study to explore
comes (Higgins, 1997; Idson & Higgins, 2000). Fugate et al.’s (2004) model of employability,
An individual low on self-esteem may engage this study addresses a gap in the literature.
in job search as part of a prevention focus, in The use of a longitudinal design, large sample,
order to alleviate the distress associated with and established measurement scales, lends va-
unemployment. Individuals who are high on lidity to the findings. Nonetheless, certain
self-esteem may engage in job search via a limitations were encountered. Firstly, a num-
promotion focus, seeking to attain the positive ber of the employability dimensions were as-
outcomes of employment and self-expression sessed via proxy measures. For instance, social
through work (eg. pursuing Hall’s (1996b) capital was measured via social support and
‘path with a heart’). This may indicate that the adaptability via proactive personality. It would
association between job search and self-esteem be beneficial in the future to use multiple
is more complex than a simple uni-directional measures to assess each underlying dimension
link. of employability. For instance, it may be
Self-esteem, as an independent variable, useful to incorporate other aspects of human
was also not related to re-employment. This capital such as knowledge and experience when
does not support Kasl’s (1984) reverse causa- assessing this variable in the future. Similar-
tion hypothesis but is, instead, consistent with ly, including other aspects of adaptability, such
Waters and Moore’s (2002a) finding that the as job mobility, optimism and self-efficacy may
two variables are not related. According to provide a richer picture. Given that this study
Shamir (1986) individuals who are higher on was the first to operationalise the employability
self-esteem are more discerning in terms of dimensions proposed by Fugate et al. (2004), it
re-employment and are unwilling to accept drew on existing scales and, subsequently,
less-than-ideal jobs. This suggests that indi- serves somewhat of an exploratory function.
viduals who are higher on self-esteem will only The relationships identified thus far, however,
accept a job if it is congruent with their desires provide early support for the model, encourag-
and expectations, while individuals who are ing further investigation in the area.
lower on self-esteem may be more likely to ac- In assessing Fugate et al.’s (2004) psy-
cept the first job they are offered. This would, cho-social model of employability, this paper
therefore, be unlikely to lead to a clear-cut as- focussed on examining the relationships be-
sociation between self-esteem and tween each of the employability dimensions
re-employment. Perhaps future researchers (adaptability, career identity, human and social
should consider assessing not only whether capital) and the outcomes of interest (job
re-employment was or was not obtained but search, self-esteem and re-employment).
also the quality of the re-employment and the Support for the separate roles played by each of
person-job fit obtained in the new job. It the dimensions was found, however, this paper
could be that self-esteem plays a stronger role did not investigate the way these dimensions
in these latter two aspects of re-employment. may work in concert. Fugate et al. theorise
Job search was not significantly related to that employability is a synergistic combination
re-employment. This finding contradicts of adaptability, career identity and human and
Wanberg (1997), Wanberg et al. (2001) and social capital. They conceptualise employa-
Kanfer et al.’s (2001) findings of an association bility as an aggregate multi-dimensional con-
between the two. The current finding may struct (MDC), proposing that the three dimen-
reflect the fact that job search is internally sions ‘cause’ a higher-order factor, known as
driven by the individual, while re-employment employability. Their proposal of an aggregate
is controlled by a third party (the employer). MDC is presented in contrast to a latent MDC
McArdle, S., Waters, L., Briscoe, J., & Hall, D. (2007). Employability during Unemployment
(in which the dimensions reflect an underlying to engage in self-reflection, in order to better
factor of employability). The current study understand their career-related experiences, as-
did not test the dimensions in relation to either pirations and values. If the aim is to build
an aggregate or latent MDC, instead focussing self-esteem, however, it would be more benefi-
on the direct relationships between each di- cial to concentrate on developing proactive
mension and each outcome. This was con- personality in unemployed individuals.
sidered an appropriate aim, given that this Strategies for achieving this could include as-
study is the first to empirically test the model. sisting individuals to reframe the way they
It was decided that the individual contributions view the experience of unemployment, so that
of the employability dimensions should be es- it is seen as a career and learning opportunity,
tablished first, prior to investigating an aggre- rather than a career failure.
gate model.
Future researchers may investigate the Conclusion
structure of the construct further, testing both The current study was the first to em-
the aggregate and latent MDC structures. pirically test Fugate et al.’s (2004) psy-
This paper has taken the first step, ascertaining cho-social model of employability. The re-
the existence of relationships between the di- sults provide broad support for the model, and
mensions and outcomes of interest. If, as Fu- demonstrate the significant role played by the
gate et al. argue, it is in concert that employa- various dimensions of employability in relation
bility is manifested, this remains to be seen. to self-esteem, job search and re-employment.
A potential problem in focussing on employa- Overall, this study indicates that employability
bility as a global MDC (whether latent or ag- is highly applicable to the unemployment con-
gregate), however, is that the individual (direct) text. Given the increasing labour market in-
relationships of each dimension may be ob- security in Australia, and the likelihood that
scured. The current study demonstrated that many Australians will experience periods of
some dimensions are more important than oth- unemployment during their career, research
ers, depending on the outcome of interest. For into the factors that help people cope with, and
instance, identity awareness had the strongest manage unemployment is essential. Further
relationship with job search but did not con- investigation into employability may benefit
tribute to self-esteem. both individuals, and career practitioners in
developing new and improved methods of cop-
Practical applications ing with, and alleviating, the experience of
In terms of the practical use of this con- unemployment.
struct by careers counsellors and unemploy-
ment care-workers, there needs to be recogni- References
tion of the individual effects of each dimension
as well as the effect that a global measure of Anakwe, U., Hall, J., & Schor, S. (2000).
employability may have. The results of this Knowledge-related skills and effective
study indicate that counsellors need to prioritise career management. International Jour-
certain dimensions over others depending on nal of Manpower, 21(7), 566-579.
the outcome of focus. For instance, to en-
courage job search, it may be most important to Bagshaw, M. (1997). Employability - creating a
focus on identity awareness, as this was found contract of mutual investment. Industrial
to be the strongest predictor of job search in the and Commercial Training, 29(6),
current study. Counsellors could help build 187-189.
identity awareness by providing unemployed
individuals with access to resources and infor- Bateman, T. & Crant, J. (1993) The proactive
mation that can help them to consolidate their component of organizational behavior.
career identity and integrate their previous Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14,
work experiences into a coherent identity nar- 103-118.
rative. Individuals could also be encouraged
McArdle, S., Waters, L., Briscoe, J., & Hall, D. (2007). Employability during Unemployment
Brown, P., Hesketh, A., & Williams, S. (2003). tions. Journal of Vocational Behavior,
Employability in a knowledge-driven 65(1), 14.
economy. Journal of Education and
Work, 16(2), 107-126. Garavan, T. (1999). Employability, the emerg-
ing new deal? Journal of European In-
Crant, J. (2000). Proactive behavior in organi- dustrial Training, 23(1).
zations. Journal of Management, 26,
435-462. Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R. & Black, W.
(1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, New
Creed, P. & Watson, T. (2003) Age, gender, Jersey: Prentice-Hall International.
psychological wellbeing and the impact
of losing the latent and manifest benefits Hall, D. T. (1996a). Protean careeers of the
of employment in unemployed people. 21st century. The Academy of Manage-
Australian Journal of Psychology, 55(2), ment Executive, 10(4), 8-16.
95-103
Hall, D. T. (1996b). The Career is Dead: Long
Crossley, C. & Stanton, J. (2005). Negative af- Live the Career. San Francisco:
fect and job search: Further examination Jossey-Bass Inc.
of the reverse causation hypothesis.
Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, Hall, D. T. (2004). The protean career: A quar-
549-560. ter-century journey. Journal of Vocation-
al Behavior, 65(1), 1-13.
Defillippi, R. & Arthur, M. (1994). The bound-
aryless career: a competency-based per- Hall, D. T., Briscoe, J. P., & Kram, K. E.
spective. Journal of Organizational Be- (1997). Identity, Values and Learning in
havior, 15(5), 307. the Protean Career. In C. L. Cooper & S.
E. Jackson (Eds.), Creating Tomorrow's
Eby, L. T., Butts, M., & Lockwood, A. (2003). Organizations (pp. 321-332): John Wiley
Predictors of success in the era of the & Sons Ltd.
boundaryless career. Journal of Organi-
zational Behavior, 24(6), 689. Hanisch, K. (1999). Job loss and unemploy-
ment research from 1994 to 1998: A re-
Eden, D., & Aviram, A. (1993). Self-efficacy view and recommendations for research
training to speed reemployment: Helping and intervention. Journal of Vocational
people to help themselves. Journal of Behavior, 55(2), 188-220.
Applied Psychology, 78(3), 352-360.
Higgins, E. (1997) Beyond pleasure and pain.
Finn, D. (2000). From full employment to em- American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
ployability: a new deal for Britain's un-
employed? International Journal of Hox, J. & Bechger, T. (1998). An Introduction
Manpower, 21(5), 384-399. to Structural Equation Modelling. Family
Science Review, 11, 354-373.
Folkman, S. & Lazarus, R. (1985) If it changes
it must be a process: study of emotion Hu, L. & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for
and coping during three stages of a col- fit indexes in covariance structure analy-
lege examination. Journal of Personality sis: Conventional criteria versus new al-
and Social Psychology, 48(1), 150-170. ternatives. Structural Equation Model-
ling, 6, 1-55.
Fugate, M., Kinicki, A. J., & Ashforth, B. E.
(2004). Employability: A psycho-social Idson, L. & Higgins, E. (2000) How current
construct, its dimensions, and applica- feedback and chronic effectiveness in-
McArdle, S., Waters, L., Briscoe, J., & Hall, D. (2007). Employability during Unemployment
Jahoda, M. (1982). Employment and Unem- McKee-Ryan, F. M., Song, Z., Wanberg, C. R.,
ployment: A social-psychological analy- & Kinicki, A. J. (2004). Psychological
sis. New York: Cambridge University and physical well-being during unem-
Press. ployment: A meta-analytic study. Journal
of Applied Psychology, In Press.
JobNetwork (2005). JobNetwork: An Australi-
an Government Initiative. Retrieved Au- Messer, B. & Harter, S. (1986). Adult
gust 11 from: Self-perception Profile: Manual. Denver:
http://workplace.gov.au/workplace/jobnet Denver University Press.
work.
Prussia, G. E., Fugate, M., & Kinicki, A. J.
Kanfer, R., Wanberg, C. R., & Kantrowitz, T. (2001). Explication of the coping goal
M. (2001). Job search and employment: construct: Implications for coping and
A personality-motivational analysis and reemployment. Journal of Applied Psy-
meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied chology, 86(6), 1179 - 1190.
Psychology, 86(5), 837-855.
Raykov, T., Tomer, A. & Nesselroade, J.
Kasl, S. V. (1982). Strategies of research on (1991). Reporting structural equation
economic instability and health. Psycho- modelling results in Psychology and Ag-
logical Medicine, 12, 637–649. ing: Some proposed guidelines. Psychol-
ogy and Aging, 6(4), 499-503.
Kinicki, A. & Latack, J. (1990). Explication of
the construct of coping with involuntary Raelin, J. A. (1997). Internal career develop-
job loss. Journal of Vocational Behavior, ment in the age of insecurity. Business
36, 339-360. Forum, 22(1), 19-23.
Lai, J. & Chan, K. (2002) The effects of Ritchie, J. (2000). New deal for young people:
job-search motives and coping on psy- Participants' perspectives. Policy Studies,
chological health and re-employment: a 21(4), 301-312.
study of unemployed Hong Kong Chi-
nese. International Journal of Human Rousseau, D. (1997). Organizational behavior
Resource Management, 13(3), 465-483. in the new organizational era. Annual Re-
view of Psychology, 48, 515-546.
Landis, R.S., Beal, D.J., & Tesluk, P.E. (2000).
A comparison of approaches to forming Salant, P. & Dillman, D. (1994) How to con-
composite measures in structural equation duct your own survey, Wiley, New York
models. Organization Research Methods,
3, 186-207. Savickas, M. (1997). Career adaptability: An
integrative construct for life-span,
Lazarus, R. & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, ap- life-space theory. Career Development
praisal and coping. New York: Springer. Quarterly, 45(3), 247-259.
McGreevy, M. (2003). The changing nature of Seibert, S., Crant, J., & Kraimer, M. (1999).
work. Industrial and Commercial Train- Proactive personality and career success.
ing, 35(5), 191-195. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84,
416-427.
McArdle, S., Waters, L., Briscoe, J., & Hall, D. (2007). Employability during Unemployment
.
McArdle, S., Waters, L., Briscoe, J., & Hall, D. (2007). Employability during Unemployment
B. H4
1) H1
Adaptability Self-Esteem
2) H1 1) H5
H1
6) H3
2.
Career Identity
7) H4 RE-EMPLOYMENT
3) H2
4) H2 H6
Human
and Social Capital Job Search
5) H2
1) H4
Figure 1: An illustration of the hypothesised relationships between employability (career identiy, adaptability, human and
social capital), self-esteem, job search and re-employment during unemployment. (H=Hypothesis) 18
McArdle, S., Waters, L., Briscoe, J., & Hall, D. (2007). Employability during Unemployment
Table 1: The pattern matrix of the factor structure of proactive personality, identity awareness, self-esteem and job search
* All factor loadings below .25 were suppressed and are not included in the matrix
19
McArdle, S., Waters, L., Briscoe, J., & Hall, D. (2007). Employability during Unemployment
Variable Mean SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
33.54 11.17 1.00
1. Age
6. Social Support 3.55 1.28 -0.08 -0.11* -0.06 0.13** 0.26** 1.00
7. Self-Esteem 3.37 0.89 -0.05 0.04 -0.06 0.36** 0.14** 0.15** 1.00
8. Job Search 3.77 0.77 0.04 -0.06 -0.12* 0.29** 0.34** 0.22** 0.09* 1.00
9. Re-employment (time 0.30 0.46 -0.06 0.18* -0.07 0.20* 0.11 0.14 0.13 0.10 1.00
2)
0 = unemployed
1 =re-employed
• Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed); ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tail
20
. 81 .84 Item1
P1
. 62 Identity Self- .87 Item2
P2 Awarenes Esteem
.18
.64 s .55
P3 Item3
. 81 .74P1
P1
. 36
.75 Proactive Job .64
P2 Personality Search P2
.75 .67
P3 P3
Figure 2: The measurement model of the latent constructs (identity awareness, proactive personality, self-esteem and
job search).
Note: P = parcel
McArdle, S., Waters, L., Briscoe, J., & Hall, D. (2007). Employability during Unemployment
Proactive
Personality
,37
Self-
,47
Esteem 16%
,11
Identity
,29
Awareness
,32
,14
,18
Job
26%
Social Support Search
,16
Figure 3: The relationships between identity awareness, proactive personality, social support, self-esteem and
job search during unemployment.
22