Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
FINAL EXAM LOB7
Df1 = 2
Df2 = 47
Astrid Gabriela Hassan-2201925084
2
FINAL EXAM LOB7
Conclusion: there is evidence that there is linear relationship between dependent variable dan
independent variables)
T test
Hipotesis untuk x1
Ho: b=0, x1 is not significance to impact Y
H1: b ≠ 0, x1 is significance to impact Y
T test for x1
p value = 0.00
alpha = 0.05
0.00 < 0.05 --> reject H0 (income is significance to impact house size)
Hipotesis untuk x2
Ho: c=0, x2 is not significance to impact Y
H1: c ≠ 0, x2 is significance to impact Y
T test for x2
p value = 0.002
alpha = 0.05
0.002 < 0.05 -->reject H0 (family size is significance to impact house size)
Kesimpulan:
There is evidence that income and family size are significance to impact house size at significance
level 5%. So, the independent variables that significance to impact house size is income and family
size.
d. How far can you rely upon this model? Or, what is the percentage variation in House explained by the
model?
Percentage variation in house size explained by variation in income dan family size → R2 = 71.89%
e. What is the predicted house size (in hundreds of square feet) for an individual earning an annual
income of IDR 400 million and having a family size of 4?
X1 = 400
X2 = 4
Conclusion: For income 400 IDR Million and family size of 4, the house size is 187.1402 (in hundred of
square feet).
a. Compute the expected value of each alternative size of station, and select the best decision.
Best decision: open large station to maximize the monetary value, because the EMV for large
station is the highest.
b. Construct the opportunity loss table and determine the best decision.
At the good and fair market, CEO can open large station, and at the poor market, CEO can open
small station.
Astrid Gabriela Hassan-2201925084
4
FINAL EXAM LOB7
Best decision: open large station to gain optimum profit because the optimum profit in large
station is the highest.
Best decision: open large station because CEO just have to pay 4 IDR Billions to get perfect
information.
TV
Count 8 8 8 24
Sum 4223 4729 5215 14167
Average 527.875 591.125 651.875 590.2916667
Variance 5451.2679 9182.9821 4338.4107 9127.9088
Socmed
Count 8 8 8 24
Sum 4729 5560 4654 14943
Average 591.125 695 581.75 622.625
Variance 9182.9821 7624.8571 6772.2143 8811.9231
Newspaper
Count 8 8 8 24
Sum 5528 4642 5508 15678
Average 691 580.25 688.5 653.25
Variance 7111.7143 6213.9286 12575.4286 12315.1536
Total
Count 24 24 24
Sum 14480 14931 15377
Average 603.3333333 622.125 640.7083333
Variance 11323.8841 9798.0272 9255.6938
ANOVA
Fstat = 5.6512
p-value = 0.0006
alpha = 0.05
Kesimpulan: there is evidence that there is interaction between media and marketing strategy
alpha = 0.05
Kesimpulan: there is no evidence that there is effect due to media on the new juice product
H0: there is no effect due to marketing strategy on the new juice product
H1: there is effect due to marketing strategy on the new juice product
alpha = 0.05
Kesimpulan: there is no evidence that there is effect due to marketing strategy on the new juice
product
Test at a 5% significance level whether causes of fire and regions of fires are related.
Observed Frequencies
Column variable
Row variable Lightning Accident Arson Others Total
Region A 12 8 4 8 32
Region B 5 11 14 5 35
Region C 4 12 2 15 33
Total 21 31 20 28 100
Expected Frequencies
Column variable
Row variable Lightning Accident Arson Others Total
Region A 6.72 9.92 6.4 8.96 32
Region B 7.35 10.85 7 9.8 35
Region C 6.93 10.23 6.6 9.24 33
Total 21 31 20 28 100
Degree of freedom = 6
Alpha = 0.05
X2stat = 23.96925
Kesimpulan: there is evidence that there is relationship between cause of fire dan region (related)