Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2
Boulder
Cobble
Gravel
Sand
Clay Silt
sedimentation
sieve analysis
Cobble
Gravel
COARSE
FINE
Sand
Clay Silt
Boulder
Cobble
Gravel
GRANULAR
(Cohesionless)
COHESIVE
Sand
Silt
Clay
Sieve analysis
Particle size
distribution
7
PSD Curve
100
80
% Passing (Finer)
60
40
20
0
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
80
60
40
20
0
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
D 60
Uniformity
coefficient Cu
D10
2
Curvature D
coefficient Cc 30
D 60 . D10
Well, uniformly and gap graded:
19
Plasticity chart
Plasticity Chart - To determine if the fine
grained soil is silt or clay of low medium
or high plasticity
70
Inorganic
clay Organic silt
clay
Grading and Classification
Worked Example 1
– Grading curve for Soil A provided
– Grading data for a representative sample of Soil B of mass
1211g is given
– Sample of Soil C has a wL = 40, wP = 18 and a grading
curve as given
22
23
– Soil A:
• need to determine the PERCENTAGE PASSING for:
24
Smaller than 63m = 0%
0% finer
than 63m
25
26
– Soil A:
• need to determine the PERCENTAGE PASSING for:
– 2mm (distinction between sand and gravel)
27
Percentage passing (smaller) than 2mm = 23%
23% finer
than 2mm
28
29
30
Grading and Classification
Worked Example 1
– Soil A:
0.063mm < Sand =23% < 2mm
[BS classification table] => Very Sandy Gravel
31
Grading and Classification
32
– Soil A:
Very Sandy Gravel => Well graded or Poorly graded
(Uniformly graded or Gap graded)?
GWS
Grading and Classification
D60
D30
D10
34
Soil A:
D60 20
Cu 50 > 4 =well graded or gap-graded
D10 0.4
NAME:
Soil is a: Well-graded very Sandy GRAVEL
GWS
Worked Example 1
– Soil B:
45
Worked Example 1
– Soil B:
?
48
49
?
? 50
51
4
55
5
56
Worked Example 1
– Soil B:
Sand component 5 – 20%
(in this case: 0.063mm<13% <2mm), hence ‘Sandy’
57
Grading and Classification
58
Worked Example 1
– Soil B:
Grading curve covers a narrow range of particle
sizes within the classification, so is described as
‘poorly graded – uniformly graded’ (Proof??)
Grading
7
and Classification
D60
D30
D10
1.80mm 4mm
3.35mm
60
Worked Example 1
– Soil B:
Could carry out a quantitative analysis - Cu
D60 4
Cu 2 .2 Cu < 4 = uniformly graded
D10 1.8
Worked Example 1
– Soil B:
GPuS
Note: Symbols…
W => Well graded
Pu => Poorly graded uniformly graded
(uniformly graded)
Pg => Poorly graded gap graded (gap graded)
Worked Example 1
– Soil C has a wL = LL=40%, wP = PL=18% and
a grading curve as given.
66
67
Worked Example 1
– Soil C:
68
?
? 69
70
?
71
Worked Example 1
– Soil C:
72
73
Worked Example 1
– Soil C:
% of Sand =
[%passing 2mm - %passing 0.063mm] / [% retained
on 0.063mm]
Or:
% of Gravel =
[%passing 60mm - %passing 2mm] / [% retained on
0.063mm]
74
Worked Example 1
Soil C
(FINES)
(Sand + FINES)
(93%−53%)
=> × 100 = 85% of coarse soil is Sand >50%=>
47%
Sandy (Silt or Clay) ?
What level of Plasticity?
77
80
– Soil C:
wL = 40%; wP = 18%, hence PI=LL-PL = 22%
Point above A-line => It is a CLAY
PI = 22
wL = 40
82
MS
CS
– Soil C:
PI = 22
wL = 40
85
– Soil C:
CIS
or: FIS (Sandy FINES with intermediate plasticity)
Tutorial exercise1:
Tutorial exercise 2: Results from a cone penetration test on a fine grained soil
are as below.