EVIDENCE OUTLINE

Atty DEMETRIO CUSTODIO JR.

RULE 129 SECTIONS 1-3 – JUDICIAL NOTICE

1. Baterina v HRET GR 210303 April 21, 2015
2. Degayo v Dinglasan GR 173148 April 6, 2015
3. Lee v Land Bank of the Philippines GR 170422 March 7, 2008
4. State Prosecutors vs. Muro – 236 S 505
5. Spouses Latip v Rosalie Palana Chua GR 177809; Oct 10, 2009
6. People vs. Reanzares – 334 S 624
7. People vs. Tundag – 342 S 704

RULE 129 SECTION 4 – JUDICIAL ADMISSIONS

1. Agbayani vs Lupa Realty GR 201193 June 10, 2019
2. Camitan v Fidelity GR 163684 April 16, 2008
3. Silot vs dela Rosa GR 159240 February 4, 2008
4. Palma Development Corp vs Municipality of Malangas GR 152492 October 16, 2003
5. Casent Realty vs Philbanking GR 150731 September 14, 2007
6. Aguenza vs. Metropolitan Bank & Trust Co. – 271 S 1
7. Philamgen vs. Sweet Lines, Inc. – 212 S 195
8. Alano vs. CA – 283 S 269
9. People vs. Solayao – 262 SCRA 255

RULE 130 SECTION 1 – OBJECT EVIDENCE

1. People vs Olarte GR 233209 March 13, 2019
2. People vs Rullepa GR 131516 March 5, 2003
3. People vs Villarta GR 217887 March 14, 2018
4. People vs. Manalo – 219 S 656
5. People vs. Malimit – 264 S 167
6. People vs. Jumamoy – 221 S 333
7. People vs. Flores – 328 S 461

Rule 130 SECTION 2- DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE

1. BPI v Reyes GR 157177 February 11, 2008

RULE 130 SECTION 3 – ORIGINAL DOCUMENT RULE

1. Country Bankers Insurance Corp v Lagman 653 S 765
2. National Power Corporation v Codilla GR 170491 April 4, 2007
3. Republic v Lorenzo and Mateo GR 148025 August 14, 2004
4. RCBC Bankard vs Oracion GR 223274 June 19, 2019
5. Borje vs. Sandiganbayan – 125 S 763
6. Widows and Orphans Association, Inc. vs. CA – 212 S 360
7. People vs. Tandoy – 192 S 28
8. Security Bank and Trust Co. vs. Triumphs Lumber and Construction Corp. – 301 S 537
RULE 130 SECTION 10 – PAROL EVIDENCE RULE
1. Raymundo vs Lunaria et al GR 171036 October 17, 2008
2. Republic vs Roque GR 203610 October 10, 2016
3. Eagleridge vs Cameron Granville GR 204700 November 24, 2014
4. Inciong, Jr. vs. CA – 257 S 578
5. National Irrigation Administration vs. Gamit – 215 S 436
6. CKH Industrial and Development Corp. vs. CA – 272 S 333

Interpretation of documents
1. Alanis vs Court of Appeals GR 216425, November 11, 2020

RULE 130 SECTION 21 – WITNESSES

1. Marcos v Heirs of Navarro GR 198240 July 3, 2013
2. People vs Rullepa GR 131516 March 5, 2003
3. People vs. Taneo – 218 S 494
4. People vs. Balanon – 233 S 679
5. People vs. Baid – 336 S 656
6. People vs Lolito Honor – 584 S 547
7. People vs Solomon Dioneda – 587 S 312

RULE 130 SECTION 23 – DISQUALIFICATION BY REASON OF MARRIAGE

1. Alvarez vs Ramirez GR 143439 October 14, 2005
2. People v Quidato GR 117401 October 1, 1998
3. People v Pansensoy GR 140634 September 12, 2002
4. Ordoño vs. Daquigan – 62 S 270
5. People vs. Castañeda Jr. – 88 S 562

RULE 130 SECTION 24 – DISQUALIFICATION BY REASON OF PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION

1. Saura vs Atty Agdeppa AC 4426 February 17, 2000
2. Gonzales vs Court of Appeals GR 117740 October 30, 1998
3. Sanvicente vs People GR 132081 November 26, 2002
4. Air Philippines vs Pennswell GR 172835 December 13, 2007
5. Lim vs. CA – 214 S 273
6. Krohn vs. CA – 233 S 146
7. Fortich vs. CA – 268 S 152

RULE 130 SECTION 27 – ADMISSIONS OF A PARTY

1. People vs. Agustin – 240 S 541
2. Tuason vs. CA – 241 S 695
3. People vs. Chua Uy – 327 S 335
4. People vs. Cepeda – 324 S 290

RULE 130 SECTION 28 – OFFER OF COMPROMISE NOT ADMISSIBLE

1. San Miguel Corp v Kalalo. GR 185522, June 3, 2012.
2. People v Nazareno. GR 180915, Aug 9, 2010
3. People vs. Lase – 219 S 584
4. Trans Pacific Industrial Supplies, Inc. vs. CA – 235 S 494
5. People vs. Buemio – 265 S 582

2
 6. People vs. Amaca – 277 S 215

RULE 130 SECTION 29 – ADMISSION BY THIRD PARTY

1. Tamargo v Awingan GR 177727 January 19, 2010
2. People v Ragas GR 29393 March 29, 1972
3. Cruz v Court of Appeals GR 126713 July 27, 1998

RULE 130 SECTION 31 – ADMISSION BY CONSPIRATOR

1. People vs Surigawan GR 82315 December 15, 1993
2. People vs Palijon GR 123545 October 18, 2000
3. People vs Rodriguez GR 129211 October 2, 2000

RULE 130 SECTION 33 – ADMISSION BY SILENCE

1. Villanueva v Balaguer GR 180197 June 23, 2009
2. Naawan Community Bank v Martinez AM No. P-02-1587, June 5, 2002
3. People v Ciobal GR 86220 April 2, 1990

RULE 130 SECTION 34 – CONFESSION

1. People vs Cachuela GR 191752 June 10, 2013
2. People vs Garcia GR 147784 January 20, 2004
3. People vs. Agustin – 240 S 541
4. People vs. Tiozon – 198 S 368
5. People vs. Tujon – 215 S 559
6. People vs Ladao – GR 100940-41 November 27, 2001
7. People vs Encipido – 146 S 478
8. People vs Janjalani – 639 S 157

RULE 130 SECTION 37 – HEARSAY RULE

(previous rule)
1. People vs. Valero – 112 S 661
2. People vs. Damaso - 212 S 547
3. Agcaoli vs. Molina – 249 S 482
4. People vs. Brioso – 37 S 336

(new rule on hearsay)

RULE 130 SECTION 38 – DYING DECLARATION

1. People v Sergio and Lacanilao GR 240053 October 9, 2019
2. People vs. De Joya – 203 S 343
3. People vs. Dunig – 215 S 469
4. People vs. Amaca – 277 S 215

RULE 130 SECTION 39 – DEAD MAN STATUTE RULE

1. Garcia v Vda de Caparas. GR 180843, April 17, 2013.
2. Razon vs. IAC – 207 S 234

RULE 130 SECTION 40 – DECLARATION AGAINST INTEREST

3
 1. Lazaro v Agustin. GR 152364, April 15, 2010.

RULE 130 SECTION 41 – DECLARATION ABOUT PEDIGREE

1. Nepomuceno v Lopez, GR 181258, March 19, 2010,

RULE 130 SECTION 44 – PART OF THE RES GESTAE

1. Manulat v People, GR 190892, August 17, 2015.
2. People vs Garcia GR 147784 January 20, 2004
3. People vs. Tiozon – 198 S 368
4. People vs. Palomones – 336 S 80
5. People vs. Raquel – 265 S 248
6. People v Sace 617 S 336
7. People v Esoy 617 S 552
8. Talidano v Falcon Maritime 558 S 279
9. Zarrate v RTC 591 S 510

RULE 130 SECTION 45 - RECORDS OF REGULARLY CONDUCTED BUSINESS ACTIVITY

1. Security Bank v Gan 493 S 239

RULE 130 SECTION 46 – ENTRIES IN OFFICIAL RECORDS

1. People vs. Bernaldez – 294 S 317
2. People vs. Divina – 221 S 209
3. People vs. Leones – 117 S 382
4. People vs. Crisostomo – 160 S 47
5. Feria vs. CA – 325 S 525

RULE 130 SECTION 49 – TESTIMONY OR DEPOSITION AT A FORMER PROCEEDING

1. Republic v Sandiganbayan, GR 152375, Dec 13, 2011.
2. De Leon vs. People – 210 S 151

RULE 130 SECTION 51 – OPINION RULE

1. Lim vs. CA – 214 S 273 (supra)
2. People vs. Galleno – 291 S 762

RULE 130 SECTION 52 – OPINION OF EXPERT WITNESS

RULE 130 SECTION 53 - OPINION OF ORDINARY WITNESSES
1. Cebu Shipyard and Engineering Works, Inc. vs. William Lines, Inc. – 306 S 762

RULE 130 SECTION 54 – CHARACTER EVIDENCE NOT GENERALLY ADMISSIBLE

RULE 131 SECTION 1 – BURDEN OF PROOF

1. Lee v Court of Appeals GR 117913-14 February 1, 2002
2. Rivera vs Court of Appeals GR 115625 January 23, 1998
3. Heirs of Villanueva vs Heirs of Mendoza GR 209132 June 5, 2017
4. Jimenez vs. NLRC – 256 S 84
5. Mallari vs. CA – 265 S 456

RULE 131 SECTION 3 – CONCLUSIVE PRESUMPTIONS

4
 1. Midway Maritime and Technological Foundation v Castro, GR 189061, August 6, 2014.

RULE 131 SECTION 3 – DISPUTABLE PRESUMPTIONS

1. Celedonio v People, GR 200137, July 1, 2015.
2. Diaz v People, GR 208113, December 2, 2015.
3. People v Godoy, GR 115908-09.
4. Philippine Trust Company v Court of Appeals GR 150318, November 22, 2010
5. Spouses Villamar v People GR 178652, December 8, 2010
6. Lozano vs. De Los Santos – 274 S 45
7. LRT vs. Natividad – 397 S 75
8. Del San Transport Lines vs. C&A Const. Inc. – 412 S 524
9. People vs. De Guzman – 229 S 795
10. People vs. Navaja – 220 S 624
11. People vs. Castañeda – 252 S 247
12. People vs. Simbulan – 214 S 537
13. People vs. Balluda – 318 S 503

RULE 131 SECTION 5 – PRESUMPTIONS IN CIVIL ACTIONS AND PROCEEDINGS

(new)

RULE 131 SECTION 6 – PRESUMPTIONS AGAINST AN ACCUSED IN CRIMINAL CASES

(new)

RULE 132 SECTION 3 – RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF A WITNESS

1. People vs. Salveron – 228 S 92
2. People vs. Malimit – 264 S 167 (supra)

RULE 132 SECTION 4 – ORDER IN THE EXAMINATION OF AN INDIVIDUAL WITNESS

1. Bachrach Motors Co. Inc. vs. CIR – 86 S 27
2. People vs. Padero – 226 S 810

RULE 132 SECTION 10 – LEADING AND MISLEADING QUESTIONS

1. People vs. Caparas – 111 S 68

RULE 132 SECTION 11 – IMPEACHMENT OF ADVERSE PARTY’S WITNESS

1. Gaw v Chua, GR 160855, April 16, 2008.

RULE 132 SECTION 12 – IMPEACHMENT BY EVIDENCE OF CONVICTION OF CRIME

(new)

RULE 132 SECTION 14 – HOW WITNESS IMPEACHED BY EVIDENCE OF INCONSISTENT

STATEMENTS
1. People vs. Relucio – 86 S 227
2. People vs. Winston De Guzman – 288 S 346

5
RULE 132 SECTION 19 – CLASSES OF DOCUMENTS
1. Joson vs. Baltazar – 194 S 114
2. Sales vs. CA – 211 S 858
3. Lucente vs. Evangelista, Jr. – 396 S 627
4. Yturralde vs. Azurin – 28 S 407

ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE (as functional equivalent of documentary evidence)

1. RCBC Bankard vs Oracion GR 223274 June 19, 2019
2. National Power v Honorable Codilla GR 170491 April 3, 2007
3. MC Industrial Corp v Ssangyong GR 170633, October 17, 2007
4. Ang v CA GR 182835 April 20 2010

RULE 132 SECTION 20 – PROOF OF PRIVATE DOCUMENT

1. Raz vs. IAC – 184 S 720
2. Ong vs. People – 342 S 372
3. Office of the Ombudsman v Coronel 493 S 392

RULE 132 SECTION 22 – HOW GENUINENESS OF HANDWRITING PROVED

1. Layno vs. People – 213 S 686
2. Jacob vs. CA – 224 S 189
3. Security Bank and Trust Co. vs. Triumph Lumber and Construction Corp. – 301 S 537
(supra)
4. Sy vs. CA – 330 S 550

RULE 132 SECTION 23 – PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AS EVIDENCE

1. Alameda v Santos GR 194189, Sept 14, 2017
2. Realubit v Jaso 658 S 146
3. Manzano Jr v Garcia 661 S 186
4. Reyes v Sotero 482 S 520
5. Delfin v Billones 485 S 38

RULE 132 SECTION 34 – OFFER OF EVIDENCE

1. Heirs of Carmen Cruz-Zamora v Multiwood International Inc GR 146428, January 19,
2009
2. Heirs of Pasag v Spouses Parocha et al GR 155483 April 27, 2007
3. Catuira vs. CA – 236 S 398
4. Vda. de Onate vs. CA – 250 S 283
5. Sy vs. CA – 330 S 550 (supra)
6. Macasiray vs. People – 291 S 154
7. Tuason vs. CA – 241 S 695
8. Candido and Rumbaua vs. CA – 253 S 78
9. People vs. Barellano – 319 S 567
10. People vs. Sanchez – 308 S 264
11. Chua v CA GR 88383 February 19, 1992

RULE 133- WEIGHT AND SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE

SECTION 1 – PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE, HOW DETERMINED

6
 SECTION 2 – PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT
1. DBP Pool of Accredited Insurance Companies vs Radio Mindanao Network GR 147039,
Jan 27, 2006
2. Encinas v National Book Store GR 162704, November 19, 2004
3. People vs Villarico GR 158362, April 4, 2011
4. People vs. Mejia – 55 S 453
5. People vs. Matrimonio – 215 S 613
6. People vs. Gondora – 265 S 408
7. People vs. Cabiles – 248 S 207
8. People vs. Lorenzo – 240 S 624
9. People vs. Rigodon – 238 S 27
10. Tin vs. People – 362 S 594

RULE 133 SECTION 4 – CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, WHEN SUFFICIENT

1. People v Cachuela GR 191752 June 10, 2013
2. Manulat v People, GR 190892, August 17, 2015.
3. People v Anticamara GR 178771, June 8, 2011
4. People vs. Salvame – 270 S 766
5. People vs. Malimit – 264 S 167 (supra)
6. People vs. Ramos – 240 S 191
7. People vs. Adofina – 239 S 67

RULE 133 SECTION 5 – WEIGHT TO BE GIVEN OPINION OF EXPERT EVIDENCE

(new)

RULE 133 SECTION 6 – SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

1. Ang Tibay vs. CIR – 69 P 635
2. Bascos v Taganahan GR 180666, February 18, 2009
3. Fabella vs. CA – 282 S 256
4. PAL vs. NLRC – 263 S 638
5. Villaflor vs. CA – 280 S 297
6. Office of the Ombudsman v Coronel supra
7. Gupilan-Aguila v Office of the Ombudsman GR 197307 Feb 26, 2014