Table 10.1 Population Exposure Table, Municipality/City of ___________________.

Hazard:

LIKELIHOOD OF
BARANGAY
OCCURRENCE

A B
SOCIAL

Percentage of Pecentage of Percentage of

Total Exposed Total No.exposed of Percentage of Exposed Total No. exposed of
exposed of exposed Male exposed Female
Residential (HAS) Population Population Households
Households Population Population

Instructions:
1. Identify in Column A the barangays affected by the hazard based on the overlay of the hazard map and the base exposure map.
2. In column B, assign the likelihood of occurence of the hazard using the suggested indicative scoring below:
Frequent (1-3 years): 6
Moderate (4-10 years): 5
Occasional Slight Chance (11-30 years): 4
Improbable (31 - 100 years): 3
Rare (101-200 years): 2
Very Rare (>200 years): 1

3. Using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and values for each Population exposure and vulnerability indicators, Columns C and D respectively.
4. In column E, assigning the severity of consequence score shall be based on expected magnitude of the hazard (hazard characterization), the extent of exposure (determined through hazard exposure mapping), and the vulnerabilities o
the combination of which will be the basis for determining the severity of consequence rating.
Very High (4): > 20% of the population are affected and in need of immediate assistance.
High (3): >10 - <20% of affected population in need of immediate assistance
Moderate (2): >5%-10% of affected population in need of immediate assistance
Low (1): < 5% of the affected population in need of immediate assistance

5. In column F, compute and categorize the risk by multiplying Likelihood of Occurrence Score (Column B) and Severity of Consequences Score (Column E). Based on the derived risk scores and corresponding risk categories, reclassify the
Low: 1-4
Moderate: 6-10
High: 12-24
6. In colum G, provide existing adaptive or preventive measures of the muncipality/city.
 EXPOSURE

C
SOCIAL

Percentage of
Percentage of exposed Percentage of Exposed
Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of
Percentage of exposed
exposed municipal of teachers & personnel Exposed Students Exposed Exposed Students Exposed Students Exposed health
agriculture farmers commercial fishermen
fisherfolk per school (Elementary) Students(HS) (College) (Graduate) workers per center

hazard exposure mapping), and the vulnerabilities of the exposed elements (compiled in the exposure database),

res and corresponding risk categories, reclassify the risk scores into risk categories.
 ECONOMIC

Percentage of Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed
Percentage of Exposed
Exposed Farming Livestock Farming Exposed Fisheries Exposed Informal young dependent (0-15 households living below
old dependents (>60 yo) Persons with disabilities
Dependent HH Dependent HH Dependent HH Settlers (HH) yo) the poverty threshold
 VULNERABILITY

D
SOCIAL

Percentage of Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Percentage of

Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed
Exposed Population without population without farming families Exposed farmers Exposed fishers
Malnourished Children population without
Malnourished Old regular income/ access to hazard dependent to commercial without access to without access to
individuals access to PhilHealth
individuals employment information input hazard information hazard information
 ECONOMIC

Percentage of Exposed
Percentage of Percentage of Exposed
Percentage of Exposed RHUs without basic Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed
Percentage of Exposed Exposed Farming fisherfolk without
RHU without qualified health farmers without access fisherfolk without own fisherfolk without direct
ndigneous Peoples Areas without access to alternative
health personnel equipment/facilities / to alternative livelihood boats & fishing nets access to market
technical support livelihood
medicine
 SEVERITY OF
RISK ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
CONSEQUENCE

E F G

Score Score Category Wealth Technology Infrastructure Institutional Social Capital

Table 10.2 Natural Resources Expoosure Table, Municipality/City of ___________________.
Hazard:

LIKELIHOOD OF
BARANGAY EX
OCCURRENCE SCORE

A B

Environment

Percentage of Exposed
Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed
species of endemic Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed
LGU Forest Area in species of endemic CADT /CADC in
fauna in the forest Protected Area CBFMS Agricultural Area Mangrove Areas
Hectares flora in the forest area Hectares
area

Instructions:
1. Identify in Column A the barangays affected by the hazard based on the overlay of the hazard map and the base exposure map.
2. In column B, assign the likelihood of occurence of the hazard:
Frequent (1-3 years): 6
Moderate (4-10 years): 5
Occasional Slight Chance (11-30 years): 4
Improbable (31 - 100 years): 3
Rare (101-200 years): 2
Very Rare (>200 years): 1

3. Using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and values for each Natural Resources exposure and vulnerability indicators, Columns C and D respectively.
4. In column E, assigning the severity of consequence score shall be based on expected magnitude of the hazard (hazard characterization), the extent of exposure (determined through hazard exposure mapping), and the vulnerabilities of the ex
which will be the basis for determining the severity of consequence rating.
Very High (4): > 40% of exposed production areas/means of livelihood such as shponds, crops, poultry and livestock and other agricultural/forest products are severely damaged
High (3): 20 to <40% of exposed production areas/means of livelihood such as shponds, crops, poultry and livestock and other agricultural/forest products are severely damaged
Moderate (2): 10 to <20% of exposed production areas/means of livelihood such as shponds, crops, poultry and livestock and other agricultural/forest products are severely damaged
Low (1): < 10% and below of of exposed production areas/means of livelihood such as fishponds, crops, poultry and livestock and other agricultural/forest products are severely damaged

5. In column F, compute the risk by multiplying Likelihood of Occurrence Score (Column B) and Severity of Consequences Score (Column E). Based on the derived risk scores and corresponding risk categories, reclassify the risk scores into risk ca
Low: 1-4
Moderate: 6-10
High: 12-24
6. In colum G, provide existing adaptive or preventive measures of the muncipality/city.
 EXPOSURE

Economic

Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Ave. Output per ha
Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed
Declared Watershed Area Allocation for Ave. Output per ha Area Devoted to Crop Area devoted to per livestock (peso)
Fish Sanctuaries Crop Types Livestock Types Aquaculture Types
Area Farming per crop (PHP) Farming livestock farming (PHP)

ure mapping), and the vulnerabilities of the exposed elements (compiled in the exposure database), the combination of

maged
damaged

tegories, reclassify the risk scores into risk categories.

 VULNERABILITY

Social Environment

Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed

Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed
persons dependent to persons dependent to areas affected by
Area devoted to persons living within persons living within Area Susceptible to hectares where areas susceptible to areas where kaingin
forest/watershed for forest/watershed for indiscriminate cutting
Aquaculture the forest area the watershed Forest Fires kaingin exists forest fires exists
survival survival of trees
 SEVERITY OF
CONSEQUENCE RISK ADAPTIVE CAPACITY

E F G

Percentage of Exposed Infrastructur Social

areas affected by
Percentage of exposed Score Score Category Wealth Technology
e
Institutional
Capital
HH without proper
indiscriminate cutting
waste seggregation
of trees
Table 10.3 Critical Facilities Exposure Table, Municipality/City of ___________________.
Hazard:

LIKELIHOOD OF
BARANGAY OCCURRENCE EXPOSURE
SCORE
A B C
Economic Infrastructure

Percentage of
Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of
Exposed post Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of
Exposed Exposed Parks Exposed Material Percentage of
harvest Exposed Exposed Exposed storage Exposed school
evacuation and Recreation Recovery Facilities Exposed fishports
facilities multipurpose halls Irrigation facilities facilities buildings
centers Facilities
/processing plants

Instructions:
1. Identify in Column A the barangays affected by the hazard based on the overlay of the hazard map and the base exposure map.
2. In column B, assign the likelihood of occurence of the hazard:
Frequent (1-3 years): 6
Moderate (4-10 years): 5
Occasional Slight Chance (11-30 years): 4
Improbable (31 - 100 years): 3
Rare (101-200 years): 2
Very Rare (>200 years): 1

3. Using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and values for each Critical Facilities exposure and Vulnerability indicators, Columns C and D respectively.
4. In column E, assigning the severity of consequence score shall be based on expected magnitude of the hazard (hazard characterization), the extent of exposure (determined through hazard exposure mapping), and the vulnerabilities o
elements (compiled in the exposure database), the combination of which will be the basis for determining the severity of consequence rating.
Very High (4):Damages may lead to the disruption of services which may last one week or more
High (3): Damages lead may to the disruption of services which may last three days to less than a week
Moderate (2): Damages may lead to the disruption of service lasting for one day to less than three days
Low (1): Damages may lead to the disruption of service lasting less than one day

5. In column F, compute the risk by multiplying Likelihood of Occurrence Score (Column B) and Severity of Consequences Score (Column E). Based on the derived risk scores and corresponding risk categories, reclassify the risk scores into
Low: 1-4
Moderate: 6-10
High: 12-24

6. In colum G, provide existing adaptive or preventive measures of the muncipality/city.

EXPOSURE

C
Infrastructure Economic
Percentage of
Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Exposed
Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of
Exposed School Exposed School Percentage of Exposed Hospital Exposed of lying- government
Exposed health Exposed Areas Exposed Exposed
(kindly specify Classification Exposed Percentage of (kindly specify in clinics with owned halls
centers and type without irrigation production areas production areas
Name and Type (Primary, classrooms per Exposed hospitals name and Type birthing facilities (please specify
(wood, steel, coverage (rain without Post without post
(wood, steel, Secondary, school bldg.. (wood, steel, and type (wood, names) and type
mixed) fed) in hectares Harvest Facilities harvest faciliies
mixed)) Tertiary) mixed) steel, mixed) (wood, steel,
mixed)

re mapping), and the vulnerabilities of the exposed

egories, reclassify the risk scores into risk categories.

 VULNERABILITY

D
Economic Infrastructure
Percentage of Percentage of
Percentage of
Exposed Sports Percentage of Percentage of Exposed Schools,
Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Exposed areas
and Recreation Percentage of Exposed public Exposed school Percentage of used as
Exposed livestock Exposed livestock Facilities that are Exposed SRF used Exposed Areas without access to market. that are
Exposed SRF bldgs. that are Exposed one- Evacuation Center
and poultry and poultry as Evacuation without water transportation &
dilapidated, need without toilet dilapidated, needs dilapidated, needs storey school (please specify
houses wihtout houses wihtout centers (specify impoundment in animal evacuation
renovation etc. facilities renovation, etc. renovation, etc. buildings names, no. of
slaughter houses slaughter houses name) hectares centers in
(please specify (specify names) (specify names) classrooms, and
hectares
names) type of structure)
 SEVERITY OF
RISK ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
CONSEQUENCE
E F G

Percentage of Names of health Percentage of Social

Percentage of Score Score Category Wealth Technology Infrastructure Institutional
Exposed school centers that are Exposed health Capital
Exposed one-
building without dilapidated, needs centers without
storey RHUs
toilet facilities renovation, etc. toilet facilities
Table 10.4 Lifeline Facilities Exposure Table, Municipality/City of ___________________.
Hazard:

LIKELIHOOD OF
BARANGAY OCCURRENCE EXPOSURE
SCORE
A B C
Social Infrastructure

Percentage of
Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Exposed of Roads
Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of
ExposedArea with Exposed Farm to Exposedf bridges Exposed drainage (per road Percentage of
Exposed rrigation Exposed flood Exposed electric
electricity & water Market Road (per type of systems (per type classification. Exposed sea walls
system control dikes towers
supply in hectares (specify kms) construction) of construction) Please specify
name)

Instructions:
1. Identify in Column A the barangays affected by the hazard based on the overlay of the hazard map and the base exposure map.
2. In column B, assign the likelihood of occurence of the hazard:
Frequent (1-3 years): 6
Moderate (4-10 years): 5
Occasional Slight Chance (11-30 years): 4
Improbable (31 - 100 years): 3
Rare (101-200 years): 2
Very Rare (>200 years): 1

3. Using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and values for each Lifeline Facilities exposure and vulnerability indicators, Columns C and D respectively.
4. In column E, assigning the severity of consequence score shall be based on expected magnitude of the hazard (hazard characterization), the extent of exposure (determined through hazard exposure mapping), and the vulnerabilities o
elements (compiled in the exposure database), the combination of which will be the basis for determining the severity of consequence rating.
Very High (4):Disruption of service by lasting one week or more (for Municipalities) and one day for Highly Urbanized Areas
High (3): Disruption of service by approximately five days for municipalities and less than 18 hour disruption for highly urbanized area
Moderate (2): Disruption of service by approximately three days for municipalities and less than six hour disruption for highly urbanized areas
Low (1): Disruption of service by approximately one day for municipalities and less than six hour disruption for highly urbanized areas
5. In column F, compute the risk by multiplying Likelihood of Occurrence Score (Column B) and Severity of Consequences Score (Column E). Based on the derived risk scores and corresponding risk categories, reclassify the risk scores into
Low: 1-4
Moderate: 6-10
High: 12-24

6. In colum G, provide existing adaptive or preventive measures of the muncipality/city.

 Social

Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of

Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of
Percentage of Exposed Exposed health Exposed health Exposed health
Exposed TelCom Exposed Exposed schools Exposed schools Exposed schools Exposed schools
Exposed Power households centers without centers without centers without
Towers households without access to without access to without access to without access to
lines without access to access to water access to water access to
(Company) without electricity electricity electricity water supply water supply
water supply supply electricity

re mapping), and the vulnerabilities of the exposed

egories, reclassify the risk scores into risk categories.
 VULNERABILITY

D
Infrastructure

Percentage of Percentage of
Percentage of Percentage of
Percentage of Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Exposed roads
Exposed hospitals Exposed hospiltals Exposed public
Exposed Public Percentage of Percentage of
government Exposed Exposed areas areas without leading to health
markets without markets without Exposed rough Exposed wooden
without access to without access to access to water owned facilities cemented / without road upgraded centers (please
access to road electric post
electricity water supply without access to asphalt road access drainage system specify name and
supply electricity
water supply type)
 SEVERITY OF
RISK ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
CONSEQUENCE

E F G

Percentage of Percentage of
Exposed Road Exposed roads Social
leading to schools, leading to health Score Score Category Wealth Technology Infrastructure Institutional
Capital
school buildings centers (please
(please specify specify name and
name and type) type
Table 10.5 Urban Use Exposure Table, Municipality/City of ___________________.
Hazard:

LIKELIHOOD OF
BARANGAY
OCCURRENCE SCORE

A B
Social

Total Percentage
Existing Land exposed Exposed of Exposed
Use Area/Land Area (%) school
use (Has) buildings

Instructions:
1. Identify in Column A the barangays affected by the hazard based on the overlay of the hazard map and the base exposu
2. In column B, assign the likelihood of occurence of the hazard:
Frequent (1-3 years): 6
Moderate (4-10 years): 5
Occasional Slight Chance (11-30 years): 4
Improbable (31 - 100 years): 3
Rare (101-200 years): 2
Very Rare (>200 years): 1

3. Using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and values for each Urban Use Facilities exposure and vulnerab

4. In column E, assigning the severity of consequence score shall be based on expected magnitude of the hazard (hazard c
exposure mapping), and the vulnerabilities of the exposed elements (compiled in the exposure database), the combination
rating.
Very High (4): ≥40% of non-residential structures are severely damaged or≥20% of residential structure
High (3): >20 to <40% of nonresidential structures are severely damaged or >10-20% of residential stru
Moderate (2): >10 to 20% of non-residential structures are severely damaged or>5 to10% of residenti
Low (1): < 10% of non-residential structures are severely damagedor ≤5% of residential structures are

5. In column F, compute the risk by multiplying Likelihood of Occurrence Score (Column B) and Severity of Consequences S
categories, reclassify the risk scores into risk categories.
Low: 1-4
Moderate: 6-10
High: 12-24

6. In colum G, provide existing adaptive or preventive measures of the muncipality/city.

 EXPOSURE

C
Infrastructure

Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage

of Exposed of Exposed
of Exposed of Exposed of Exposed of Exposed of Exposed
Parks and buildings for
Health Public evacuation buildings for hospital
Recreation commercial
Centers Markets center industrial use buildings
facilities use

e hazard map and the base exposure map.

e Facilities exposure and vulnerability indicators, Columns C and D respectively.

magnitude of the hazard (hazard characterization), the extent of exposure (determined through hazard
posure database), the combination of which will be the basis for determining the severity of consequence

ed or≥20% of residential structures are severely damaged

aged or >10-20% of residential structures are severely damaged
damaged or>5 to10% of residential structures are severely damaged
r ≤5% of residential structures are severely damaged

B) and Severity of Consequences Score (Column E). Based on the derived risk scores and corresponding risk
 VULNERABILITY

D
Infrastructure
Percentage Percentage of Percentage of
Percentage of
of Exposed Exposed Exposed
Percentage Replacement buildings with Exposed structures not
buildings buildings in
of Exposed Cost walls with light employing
(others, dilapidated/cond
government to salvageable hazard-resistant
please emned condition
buildings materials building design
specify
names)
 SEVERITY OF
ABILITY RISK ADAPTIVE CAPACI
CONSEQUENCE

Percentag E F G
ucture e of
Exposed Risk
Score Risk Score Wealth Technology
Percentage of areas with Category
Exposed no access
structures not to
employing infrastruc
hazard-resistant ture -
building design related
hazard
mitigation
measures
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY

G
Social
Infrastructure Institutional
Capital
Table 11. Disaster Risk Assessment Summary Matrix

Social Environment
Barangay Implications when
(a) Observed Conditions Causes Policy Options Observed Conditions Causes
unresolved
(b) (c) (e) (b) (c)
(d)

Instructions:

A. Based on the risks maps generated for the various exposure units, highlight and identify decision areas or elements.
B. List down the significant findings/observed conditions and causes by describing the area or element in terms of the level of vulnerability, highlighting the various contributing factors such as expo
C. List down the planning/development implications when the identified vulnerabilities in the various decision areas are not addressed.
D. Identify various policy interventions that should seek to reduce the level of vulnerability by addressing the exposure, sensitivity, with consideration to the current adaptive capacities.
 Environment Infrastructure
Implications when Implications when
Policy Options Observed Conditions Causes Policy Options Observed Conditions
unresolved unresolved
(e) (b) (c) (e) (b)
(d) (d)

buting factors such as exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity.

ve capacities.
 Economic
Implications when
Causes Policy Options
unresolved
(c) (e)
(d)