You are on page 1of 49

Table 10.1 Population Exposure Table, Municipality/City of ___________________.

Hazard:

LIKELIHOOD OF
BARANGAY
OCCURRENCE

A B

Total Exposed Total No.exposed of


Residential (HAS) Population

Instructions:
1. Identify in Column A the barangays affected by the hazard based on the overlay of the hazard map and the base exposure m
2. In column B, assign the likelihood of occurence of the hazard using the suggested indicative scoring below:
Frequent (1-3 years): 6
Moderate (4-10 years): 5
Occasional Slight Chance (11-30 years): 4
Improbable (31 - 100 years): 3
Rare (101-200 years): 2
Very Rare (>200 years): 1

3. Using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and values for each Population exposure and vulnerability indicato
4. In column E, assigning the severity of consequence score shall be based on expected magnitude of the hazard (hazard chara
the combination of which will be the basis for determining the severity of consequence rating.
Very High (4): > 20% of the population are affected and in need of immediate assistance.
High (3): >10 - <20% of affected population in need of immediate assistance
Moderate (2): >5%-10% of affected population in need of immediate assistance
Low (1): < 5% of the affected population in need of immediate assistance

5. In column F, compute and categorize the risk by multiplying Likelihood of Occurrence Score (Column B) and Severity of Cons
Low: 1-4
Moderate: 6-10
High: 12-24

6. In colum G, provide existing adaptive or preventive measures of the muncipality/city.


____.

Percentage of Pecentage of Percentage of


Percentage of Exposed Total No. exposed of
exposed of exposed Male exposed Female
Population Households
Households Population Population

lay of the hazard map and the base exposure map.


sted indicative scoring below:

Population exposure and vulnerability indicators, Columns C and D respectively.


xpected magnitude of the hazard (hazard characterization), the extent of exposure (determined through hazard exposure mapping), and t
equence rating.
need of immediate assistance.
ediate assistance
mmediate assistance
ate assistance

currence Score (Column B) and Severity of Consequences Score (Column E). Based on the derived risk scores and corresponding risk catego

ality/city.
EXPOSURE

C
SOCIAL

Percentage of Percentage of Exposed


Percentage of exposed Percentage of exposed
exposed municipal of teachers & personnel
agriculture farmers commercial fishermen
fisherfolk per school

rd exposure mapping), and the vulnerabilities of the exposed elements (compiled in the exposure database),

nd corresponding risk categories, reclassify the risk scores into risk categories.
Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of
Exposed Students Exposed Exposed Students Exposed Students Exposed health
(Elementary) Students(HS) (College) (Graduate) workers per center
ECONOMIC

Percentage of Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Percentage of


Exposed Farming Livestock Farming Exposed Fisheries Exposed Informal
Dependent HH Dependent HH Dependent HH Settlers (HH)
Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed
Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed
young dependent (0-15 households living below
old dependents (>60 yo) Persons with disabilities
yo) the poverty threshold
SOCIAL

Percentage of Percentage of Exposed


Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed
Exposed Population without
Malnourished Children population without
Malnourished Old regular income/
individuals access to PhilHealth
individuals employment
VULNERABILITY

Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed


Percentage of Exposed
population without farming families farmers without
fishers without access
access to hazard dependent to commercial access to hazard
to hazard information
information input information
Percentage of Exposed
Percentage of
Percentage of Exposed RHUs without basic
Percentage of Exposed Exposed Farming
RHU without qualified health
ndigneous Peoples Areas without
health personnel equipment/facilities /
technical support
medicine
ECONOMIC

Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed


farmers without access fisherfolk without own fisherfolk without access fisherfolk without direct
to alternative livelihood boats & fishing nets to alternative livelihood access to market
SEVERITY OF
RISK ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
CONSEQUENCE

E F G

Score Score Category Wealth Technology Infrastructure Institutional


TY

Social Capital
Table 10.2 Natural Resources Expoosure Table, Municipality/City of ___________________.
Hazard:

LIKELIHOOD OF
BARANGAY
OCCURRENCE SCORE

A B

Percentage of Exposed
Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed
species of endemic
LGU Forest Area in species of endemic
fauna in the forest
Hectares flora in the forest area
area

Instructions:
1. Identify in Column A the barangays affected by the hazard based on the overlay of the hazard map and the base exposure map.
2. In column B, assign the likelihood of occurence of the hazard:
Frequent (1-3 years): 6
Moderate (4-10 years): 5
Occasional Slight Chance (11-30 years): 4
Improbable (31 - 100 years): 3
Rare (101-200 years): 2
Very Rare (>200 years): 1

3. Using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and values for each Natural Resources exposure and vulnerability indicator
4. In column E, assigning the severity of consequence score shall be based on expected magnitude of the hazard (hazard characterizati
which will be the basis for determining the severity of consequence rating.
Very High (4): > 40% of exposed production areas/means of livelihood such as shponds, crops, poultry and livestock
High (3): 20 to <40% of exposed production areas/means of livelihood such as shponds, crops, poultry and livesto
Moderate (2): 10 to <20% of exposed production areas/means of livelihood such as shponds, crops, poultry and l
Low (1): < 10% and below of of exposed production areas/means of livelihood such as fishponds, crops, poultry an

5. In column F, compute the risk by multiplying Likelihood of Occurrence Score (Column B) and Severity of Consequences Score (Colum
Low: 1-4
Moderate: 6-10
High: 12-24

6. In colum G, provide existing adaptive or preventive measures of the muncipality/city.


______.

Environment

Percentage of Exposed
Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed
CADT /CADC in
Protected Area CBFMS Agricultural Area Mangrove Areas
Hectares

rd map and the base exposure map.

ces exposure and vulnerability indicators, Columns C and D respectively.


ude of the hazard (hazard characterization), the extent of exposure (determined through hazard exposure mapping), and the vulnerabilities of the
as shponds, crops, poultry and livestock and other agricultural/forest products are severely damaged
h as shponds, crops, poultry and livestock and other agricultural/forest products are severely damaged
d such as shponds, crops, poultry and livestock and other agricultural/forest products are severely damaged
ood such as fishponds, crops, poultry and livestock and other agricultural/forest products are severely damaged

Severity of Consequences Score (Column E). Based on the derived risk scores and corresponding risk categories, reclassify the risk scores into risk c
EXPOSURE

Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed


Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed
Declared Watershed Area Allocation for Ave. Output per ha per
Fish Sanctuaries Crop Types
Area Farming crop (PHP)

mapping), and the vulnerabilities of the exposed elements (compiled in the exposure database), the combination of

ed
aged

ories, reclassify the risk scores into risk categories.


Economic

Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed


Percentage of Exposed Ave. Output per ha per Percentage of Exposed
Area Devoted to Crop Area devoted to
Livestock Types livestock (peso) (PHP) Aquaculture Types
Farming livestock farming
VU

Social

Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed


Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed
persons dependent to persons dependent to
Area devoted to persons living within persons living within
forest/watershed for forest/watershed for
Aquaculture the forest area the watershed
survival survival
VULNERABILITY

Environment

Percentage of Exposed
Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed
areas affected by
Area Susceptible to hectares where kaingin areas susceptible to areas where kaingin
indiscriminate cutting
Forest Fires exists forest fires exists
of trees
SEVERITY OF
CONSEQUENCE RISK ADAPTIVE CAPACITY

E F G

Percentage of Exposed Score Score Category Wealth Technology


Percentage of exposed
areas affected by
HH without proper
indiscriminate cutting
waste seggregation
of trees
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY

Infrastructur
Institutional Social Capital
e
Table 10.3 Critical Facilities Exposure Table, Municipality/City of ___________________.
Hazard:

LIKELIHOOD OF
BARANGAY OCCURRENCE
SCORE
A B
Economic

Percentage of
Percentage of
Exposed post Percentage of
Exposed Parks and
harvest Exposed
Recreation
facilities evacuation centers
Facilities
/processing plants

Instructions:
1. Identify in Column A the barangays affected by the hazard based on the overlay of the hazard map and the base exposure m
2. In column B, assign the likelihood of occurence of the hazard:
Frequent (1-3 years): 6
Moderate (4-10 years): 5
Occasional Slight Chance (11-30 years): 4
Improbable (31 - 100 years): 3
Rare (101-200 years): 2
Very Rare (>200 years): 1

3. Using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and values for each Critical Facilities exposure and Vulnerability ind
4. In column E, assigning the severity of consequence score shall be based on expected magnitude of the hazard (hazard chara
elements (compiled in the exposure database), the combination of which will be the basis for determining the severity of cons
Very High (4):Damages may lead to the disruption of services which may last one week or more
High (3): Damages lead may to the disruption of services which may last three days to less than a week
Moderate (2): Damages may lead to the disruption of service lasting for one day to less than three days
Low (1): Damages may lead to the disruption of service lasting less than one day

5. In column F, compute the risk by multiplying Likelihood of Occurrence Score (Column B) and Severity of Consequences Scor
Low: 1-4
Moderate: 6-10
High: 12-24

6. In colum G, provide existing adaptive or preventive measures of the muncipality/city.


___.

EXPOSURE

C
Infrastructure

Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of


Percentage of
Exposed Exposed Material Exposed Irrigation Exposed storage
Exposed fishports
multipurpose halls Recovery Facilities facilities facilities

he hazard map and the base exposure map.

Facilities exposure and Vulnerability indicators, Columns C and D respectively.


d magnitude of the hazard (hazard characterization), the extent of exposure (determined through hazard exposure mapping), and the vuln
asis for determining the severity of consequence rating.
h may last one week or more
ay last three days to less than a week
ng for one day to less than three days
s than one day

mn B) and Severity of Consequences Score (Column E). Based on the derived risk scores and corresponding risk categories, reclassify the ris

ty.
EXPOSURE

C
Infrastructure

Percentage of Percentage of
Percentage of
Exposed School Exposed School Percentage of
Percentage of Exposed health
(kindly specify Classification Exposed
Exposed school centers and type
Name and Type (Primary, classrooms per
buildings (wood, steel,
(wood, steel, Secondary, school bldg..
mixed)
mixed)) Tertiary)

hazard exposure mapping), and the vulnerabilities of the exposed

ponding risk categories, reclassify the risk scores into risk categories.
Econ
Percentage of
Percentage of Percentage of Exposed
Percentage of
Exposed Hospital Exposed of lying-in government
Exposed Areas
Percentage of (kindly specify clinics with owned halls
without irrigation
Exposed hospitals name and Type birthing facilities (please specify
coverage (rain
(wood, steel, and type (wood, names) and type
fed) in hectares
mixed) steel, mixed) (wood, steel,
mixed)
Economic
Percentage of
Exposed Sports
Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of
and Recreation
Exposed Exposed Exposed livestock Exposed livestock
Facilities that are
production areas production areas and poultry and poultry
dilapidated, need
without Post without post houses wihtout houses wihtout
renovation etc.
Harvest Facilities harvest faciliies slaughter houses slaughter houses
(please specify
names)
VULNERABILITY

D
Infrastructure
Percentage of
Percentage of
Percentage of Percentage of Exposed areas
Percentage of Exposed public
Exposed SRF used Exposed Areas without access to
Exposed SRF market. that are
as Evacuation without water transportation &
without toilet dilapidated, needs
centers (specify impoundment in animal evacuation
facilities renovation, etc.
name) hectares centers in
(specify names)
hectares
Infrastructure
Percentage of
Percentage of Exposed Schools,
Exposed school Percentage of used as Percentage of Names of health
bldgs. that are Exposed one- Evacuation Center Exposed school centers that are
dilapidated, needs storey school (please specify building without dilapidated, needs
renovation, etc. buildings names, no. of toilet facilities renovation, etc.
(specify names) classrooms, and
type of structure)
SEVERITY OF
RISK ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
CONSEQUENCE

E F G

Percentage of
Percentage of Score Score Category Wealth Technology
Exposed health
Exposed one-
centers without
storey RHUs
toilet facilities
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY

Social
Infrastructure Institutional
Capital
Table 10.4 Lifeline Facilities Exposure Table, Municipality/City of ___________________.
Hazard:

LIKELIHOOD OF
BARANGAY OCCURRENCE
SCORE
A B
Social

Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of


ExposedArea with Exposed Farm to Exposedf bridges
electricity & water Market Road (per type of
supply in hectares (specify kms) construction)

Instructions:
1. Identify in Column A the barangays affected by the hazard based on the overlay of the hazard map and the base exposure m
2. In column B, assign the likelihood of occurence of the hazard:
Frequent (1-3 years): 6
Moderate (4-10 years): 5
Occasional Slight Chance (11-30 years): 4
Improbable (31 - 100 years): 3
Rare (101-200 years): 2
Very Rare (>200 years): 1

3. Using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and values for each Lifeline Facilities exposure and vulnerability ind
4. In column E, assigning the severity of consequence score shall be based on expected magnitude of the hazard (hazard chara
elements (compiled in the exposure database), the combination of which will be the basis for determining the severity of cons
Very High (4):Disruption of service by lasting one week or more (for Municipalities) and one day for Highly
High (3): Disruption of service by approximately five days for municipalities and less than 18 hour disrupti
Moderate (2): Disruption of service by approximately three days for municipalities and less than six hour d
Low (1): Disruption of service by approximately one day for municipalities and less than six hour disruption

5. In column F, compute the risk by multiplying Likelihood of Occurrence Score (Column B) and Severity of Consequences Scor
Low: 1-4
Moderate: 6-10
High: 12-24

6. In colum G, provide existing adaptive or preventive measures of the muncipality/city.


___.

EXPOSURE

C
Infrastructure

Percentage of
Percentage of Exposed of Roads
Percentage of Percentage of
Exposed drainage (per road Percentage of
Exposed rrigation Exposed flood
systems (per type classification. Exposed sea walls
system control dikes
of construction) Please specify
name)

he hazard map and the base exposure map.

e Facilities exposure and vulnerability indicators, Columns C and D respectively.


d magnitude of the hazard (hazard characterization), the extent of exposure (determined through hazard exposure mapping), and the vuln
asis for determining the severity of consequence rating.
or Municipalities) and one day for Highly Urbanized Areas
nicipalities and less than 18 hour disruption for highly urbanized area
or municipalities and less than six hour disruption for highly urbanized areas
ipalities and less than six hour disruption for highly urbanized areas

mn B) and Severity of Consequences Score (Column E). Based on the derived risk scores and corresponding risk categories, reclassify the ris

ty.
Percentage of
Percentage of
Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Exposed
Exposed
Exposed electric Exposed Power Exposed TelCom households
households
towers lines Towers (Company) without access to
without electricity
water

hazard exposure mapping), and the vulnerabilities of the exposed

ponding risk categories, reclassify the risk scores into risk categories.
Social

Percentage of
Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of
Exposed health
Exposed schools Exposed schools Exposed schools Exposed schools
centers without
without access to without access to without access to without access to
access to water
electricity electricity water supply water supply
supply
VULNERABILITY

D
Social

Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of


Percentage of Percentage of
Exposed health Exposed health Exposed public
Exposed hospitals Exposed hospiltals
centers without centers without markets without
without access to without access to
access to water access to access to water
electricity water supply
supply electricity supply
Infrastructure

Percentage of
Percentage of
Exposed Percentage of Percentage of
Exposed Public Percentage of
government Exposed Exposed areas
markets without Exposed rough
owned facilities cemented / without road
access to road
without access to asphalt road access
electricity
water supply
Infrastructure

Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of


Percentage of Exposed roads Exposed Road Exposed roads
Percentage of
areas without leading to health leading to schools, leading to health
Exposed wooden
upgraded drainage centers (please school buildings centers (please
electric post
system specify name and (please specify specify name and
type) name and type) type
SEVERITY OF
RISK ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
CONSEQUENCE

E F G

Score Score Category Wealth Technology Infrastructure Institutional


Y

Social
Capital
Table 10.5 Urban Use Exposure Table, Municipality/City of ___________________.
Hazard:

LIKELIHOOD OF
BARANGAY
OCCURRENCE SCORE

A B
Social

Total Percentage
Existing Land exposed Exposed Area of Exposed
Use Area/Land (%) school
use (Has) buildings

Instructions:
1. Identify in Column A the barangays affected by the hazard based on the overlay of the hazard map and the base exposu
2. In column B, assign the likelihood of occurence of the hazard:
Frequent (1-3 years): 6
Moderate (4-10 years): 5
Occasional Slight Chance (11-30 years): 4
Improbable (31 - 100 years): 3
Rare (101-200 years): 2
Very Rare (>200 years): 1

3. Using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and values for each Urban Use Facilities exposure and vulnerab

4. In column E, assigning the severity of consequence score shall be based on expected magnitude of the hazard (hazard ch
exposure mapping), and the vulnerabilities of the exposed elements (compiled in the exposure database), the combination
rating.
Very High (4): ≥40% of non-residential structures are severely damaged or≥20% of residential structure
High (3): >20 to <40% of nonresidential structures are severely damaged or >10-20% of residential stru
Moderate (2): >10 to 20% of non-residential structures are severely damaged or>5 to10% of residentia
Low (1): < 10% of non-residential structures are severely damagedor ≤5% of residential structures are

5. In column F, compute the risk by multiplying Likelihood of Occurrence Score (Column B) and Severity of Consequences S
categories, reclassify the risk scores into risk categories.
Low: 1-4
Moderate: 6-10
High: 12-24

6. In colum G, provide existing adaptive or preventive measures of the muncipality/city.


EXPOSURE

C
Infrastructure

Percentage Percentage
Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage
of Exposed of Exposed
of Exposed of Exposed of Exposed of Exposed of Exposed
Parks and buildings for
Health Public evacuation buildings for hospital
Recreation commercial
Centers Markets center industrial use buildings
facilities use

hazard map and the base exposure map.

e Facilities exposure and vulnerability indicators, Columns C and D respectively.

magnitude of the hazard (hazard characterization), the extent of exposure (determined through hazard
posure database), the combination of which will be the basis for determining the severity of consequence

ed or≥20% of residential structures are severely damaged


aged or >10-20% of residential structures are severely damaged
damaged or>5 to10% of residential structures are severely damaged
≤5% of residential structures are severely damaged

B) and Severity of Consequences Score (Column E). Based on the derived risk scores and corresponding risk
VULNERABILITY

D
Infrastructure

Percentage Percentage of Percentage of


Percentage of
of Exposed Exposed Exposed
Percentage Exposed buildings
buildings Replacement Cost buildings with in
structures not
of Exposed walls with light to employing
(others, dilapidated/cond
government salvageable hazard-resistant
please emned condition
buildings materials building design
specify
names)
SEVERITY OF
ABILITY RISK ADAPTIVE CAPACI
CONSEQUENCE

E F G
ucture Percentag Risk
e of Score Risk Score Wealth Technology
Category
Exposed
Percentage of areas with
Exposed no access
structures not to
employing infrastruct
hazard-resistant ure -
building design related
hazard
mitigation
measures
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY

G
Social
Infrastructure Institutional
Capital
Table 11. Disaster Risk Assessment Summary Matrix

Social
Barangay Implications when
(a) Observed Conditions Causes
unresolved
(b) (c)
(d)

Instructions:

A. Based on the risks maps generated for the various exposure units, highlight and identify decision areas or elements.
B. List down the significant findings/observed conditions and causes by describing the area or element in terms of the level of
C. List down the planning/development implications when the identified vulnerabilities in the various decision areas are not ad
D. Identify various policy interventions that should seek to reduce the level of vulnerability by addressing the exposure, sensiti
Environment
Implications when
Policy Options Observed Conditions Causes
unresolved
(e) (b) (c)
(d)

sion areas or elements.


element in terms of the level of vulnerability, highlighting the various contributing factors such as exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capac
arious decision areas are not addressed.
ddressing the exposure, sensitivity, with consideration to the current adaptive capacities.
Infrastructure
Implications when
Policy Options Observed Conditions Causes
unresolved
(e) (b) (c)
(d)

ure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity.


Economic
Implications when
Policy Options Observed Conditions Causes
unresolved
(e) (b) (c)
(d)
Policy Options
(e)

You might also like