Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reliability/Utility/Surprise:
These 3 are under the same umbrella. You just need to remember PEEL * 2 + Motive/Purpose/Tone
You'll also have to read to see what is he saying. If it's a friend saying good things about his ally or
himself, it is not reliable/surprised. If it's an enemy saying bad things about his enemies, it is not
reliable/surprised. All your friends will say good things about you so they would remain friends. Your
enemy forever hates you and would say bad things all the time.
BUT IF your friend says bad things about his ally or himself, it is reliable/surprised! If an enemy says
good things about his enemy, it is reliable/surprised! These are things people would not rather say
since it is usually the truth and degrades themselves and their social circle.
Reliability:
Utility:
Surprise:
Inference:
Questions that are inference (w/o purpose): To identify questions that have no purpose, look at the
provenance of the source; Is it said by some famous person? Or is it by some random 70-year-old
uncle complaining about the Pioneer Generation Package? Aka if no names are given, and the person
1st para:
Questions that are inference (w/ purpose): "Do you think the cartoonist approved of the NHS? Explain
your answer, using details of the cartoon" (2012 Q1a) "Did the cartoonist approve of Argentina's
invasion of the Falkland Islands? Explain your answer, referring to details of the cartoon" (2004 Q1a)
"Why do you think Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher made this speech? Explain your answer" (2004
Q1c) "What is the message of this cartoon? Explain your answer, using details of the cartoon." (2007
1st para:
2nd para:
● State the target audience for the source (If it's published in the British newspaper, the
target is British citizens. )
● What does he or she want them to feel?
● What does he or she want them to do?
Comparison: This one should be the easiest to identify. They will smack down ask you to study two
sources.
1st para:
You could also skip steps and just directly state evidence from A and B at once then explain them
2nd para: