Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
Chapter Outline
CH 11 Frequency Response 2
High Frequency Roll-off of Amplifier
CH 11 Frequency Response 3
Gain Roll-off: Simple Low-pass Filter
y
f(x)=x/(1+x)
0.5
x
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
-0.5
CH 11 Frequency Response 4
Gain Roll-off: Common Source
The culprit
1 Vout gm RD Vout gm RD
Vout gmVin RD ||
CL s Vin RD CL s 1 Vin RD2 CL2ω2 1
The capacitive load, CL, is the culprit (Criminal) for gain roll-
off since at high frequency, it will “steal” away some signal
current and shunt it to ground.
CH 11 Frequency Response 5
Example 4: Frequency Response of the CS Stage
Vout gm RD
Vin RD2 CL2 2 1
H s j
1 t
Vout t V0 1 exp u t
R12C122 1 R1C1
The relationship is such that as R1C1 increases, the
bandwidth drops and the step response becomes slower.
CH 11 Frequency Response 7
Bode Plot
s s
1 1
S= j
z1 z 2
j=
H (s) A0
break,
s s
critical,
1 1
cutoff freq p1 p2
Constant terms such as A0 contribute a straight horizontal
line of magnitude 20 log10(A0) Each occurrence of this
Each occurrence of zero at origin, causes a positively
sloped line passing through ω = 1 with a rise of 20 dB/dec
Zeros not at the origin: 0 dB and when we hit a zero, ωzj, the
Bode magnitude rises with a slope of +20 dB/dec.
Poles not at the origin: 0 dB and when we hit a pole, ωpj, the
Bode magnitude falls with a slope of -20 dB/dec
CH 11 Frequency Response 8
Bode Plot
CH 11 Frequency Response 9
Example 7: Bode Plot
1
p1
RDCL
The circuit only has one pole (no zero) at 1/(RDCL), so the
slope drops from 0 to -20 dB/dec as we pass ωp1.
CH 11 Frequency Response 10
Example 9: Pole Identification Example II
1
p1 1
1 p2
RS || Cin RDCL
gm
CH 11 Frequency Response 11
Circuit with Floating Capacitor
CH 11 Frequency Response 12
Miller’s Theorem
ZF ZF
Z1 Z2
1 Av 11/ Av
If Av is the gain from node 1 to 2, then a floating impedance
ZF can be converted to two grounded impedances Z1 and Z2.
CH 11 Frequency Response 13
Miller Multiplication
CH 11 Frequency Response 14
Example10: Miller Theorem
1
1 out
in 1
RS 1 gm RD CF RD 1 CF
gm RD
CH 11 Frequency Response 15
High-Pass Filter Response
Vout R1C1
2 2 2
Vin R1 C1 1 1
The voltage division between a resistor and a capacitor can
be configured such that the gain at low frequency is
reduced.
CH 11 Frequency Response 16
Example 11: Audio Amplifier
Ci 79.6nF
Ri 100K
gm 1/ 200
CL 39.8nF
CH 11 Frequency Response 18
Typical Frequency Response
CH 11 Frequency Response 19
High-Frequency Bipolar Model
C Cb Cje
CH 11 Frequency Response 22
MOS Intrinsic Capacitances
CH 11 Frequency Response 25
Transit Frequency
gm gm
2fT 2fT
CGS C
Transit frequency, fT, is defined as the frequency where the
current gain from input to output drops to 1.
CH 11 Frequency Response 26
Analysis Summary
CH 11 Frequency Response 27
High Frequency Circuit Analysis Procedure
CH 11 Frequency Response 28
Frequency Response of CS Stage
with Bypassed Degeneration
VX
s R1 R2 Ci s Vout
s gm RD RSCb s 1
Vin R1 R2 Ci s 1 VX RS Cb s gm RS 1
In order to increase the midband gain, a capacitor Cb is
placed in parallel with Rs.
The pole frequency must be well below the lowest signal
frequency to avoid the effect of degeneration.
CH 11 Frequency Response 29
Unified Model for CE and CS Stages
CH 11 Frequency Response 30
Unified Model for CE and CS Stages
CH 11 Frequency Response 31
Unified Model Using Miller’s Theorem
W =??, W =??
p,in p,out
CH 11 Frequency Response 32
Example 15: CE Stage
RS 200
IC 1mA
100
C 100 fF
C 20 fF
CCS 30 fF
p,in 2 516MHz
p,out 2 1.59GHz
The input pole is the bottleneck for speed.
gmRD= 78
CH 11 Frequency Response 33
Direct Analysis of CE and CS Stages (1/2)
2 KCLs
CH 11 Frequency Response 34
Direct Analysis of CE and CS Stages (2/2)
CH 11 Frequency Response 35
Direct Analysis of CE and CS Stages
Dominant Pole Approximation (1/3)
𝟏 𝒃
𝑨𝒑𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒙𝒊𝒎𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝝎𝒑𝟐 ≫ 𝝎𝒑𝟏 𝝎𝒑𝟏 = ; 𝝎𝒑𝟐 = ;
𝒃 𝒂
CH 11 Frequency Response 36
Direct Analysis of CE and CS Stages
Dominant Pole Approximation (3/3)
gm
| z |
CXY
1
| p1 |
1g mRL CXY RThev RThevCin RL CXY Cout
| p2 |
1 g mRL CXY RThev RThevCin RL CXY Cout
RThevRL CinCXY CoutCXY CinCout
1
p1
1 gm1 rO1 || rO2 C XY RS RS Cin rO1 || rO2 (CXY Cout )
p2
1 gm1 rO1 || rO2 C XY RS RS Cin rO1 || rO2 (CXY Cout )
RS rO1 || rO2 CinC XY CoutCXY CinCout
CH 11 Frequency Response 38
Example 18: Comparison Between Different
Methods
RS 200
CGS 250 fF
CGD 80 fF
CDB 100 fF
gm 1501
0
RL 2K
Miller’s Exact Dominant Pole
1 1
Zin || r Zin
C 1 gmRC C s CGS 1 gm RD CGD s
CH 11 Frequency Response 40