Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. INTRODUCTION
2. DEFINING ENVIRONMENT
3. DEFINING E-WASTE
4. THE PROBLEM OF TECHNOLOGICAL GARBAGE
5. PRIMARY CONTAMINANTS
6. SECONDARY CONTAMINANTS
7. TERTIARY CONTAMINANTS
8. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF PROCESSING E-WASTE
9. HOW CAN WE REDUCE TECHNOLOGICAL GARBAGE?
10. CURRENT CHALLENGES FOR E-WASTE ELIMINATION
11. E-WASTE LEGISLATIONS IN INDIA
Solid residues- solid residues left after leaching processes are typically
composed of plastics and other metals
Leaching agents- various types of solutions are used during the leaching
of e-waste. These includes a range of acids (sulphuric, hydrochloric,
nitric, aqua regia, cyanides, halides (fluorine, chlorine, bromine, iodine
and astatine) thiourea or thiosulphate)
Fluxes and salts- some approaches mix these substances with the e-waste
in the smelting process to either capture valuable metals or to separate and
concentrate materials.
Gas injection- in smelting, oxygen bearing gases such as air are injected
to the bath to oxidize metals.
Reduce
We are using more and more devices and replacing them more often.
Changing this habit depends as much on the consumer-who should
be less susceptible to marketing strategies that encourage
consumption-as on manufactures who are increasingly adopting
policies like Eco-design.
REUSE
The experts in electronic recycling recommend that friends or
family inherit devices that work, or that they be offered on the
second hand market. There is also a possibility of donating them to
specialized charities or underprivileged people.
RECYCLE
When the item no longer works and there is no chance of it being
used by someone close, recycling should be the option. One option
for the consumer is to hand the old device in to the shop where the
new one is being purchased, or to some company that specialises in
electronic refurbishment.
RE-EVALUATE
Do you really need that extra gadget? Try finding one device with
multiple function.
EXTEND THE LIFE OF YOUR ELECTRONICS
Buy a case, keep your device clean, and avoid overcharging the
battery.
BUY ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY ELECTRONICS
Look for products labelled energy star or certified by the Electronic
Product Environmental Assessment Tool (EPEAT).
Recycling electronic gadgets does not just improve the quality of the
environment, it also brings other benefits. The International
Telecommunication Union (ITU) reckons that these items, correctly
recycled, could generate opportunities worth over $62.5 billion annually
and create millions of new jobs worldwide. With this in mind, both this
organization and the UN have set themselves a target to increase global
recycling to 30% and to reach 50% in countries with legislation on e-
waste.
India ranks 117 amongst 180 countries and is amongst the bottom five
countries on the environmental performance index 2018, as per report
released at the World Economic Forum 2018. This was linked to poor
performance in the environment health policy and deaths due to air
pollution categories. Also, India is ranked fifth in the world amongst top
e-waste producing countries after the USA, China, Japan, and Germany
and recycles less than 2% of the total e-waste it produces annually
formally. Seelampur in Delhi is the largest e-waste dismantling centre of
India. Adults as well as children spend 8-10 hours daily extracting
reusable components and precious materials like copper, gold, and various
functional parts from the devices. E-waste recyclers use processes such as
open incineration and acid-leeching. This situation could be improved by
creating awareness and improving the infrastructure of recycling units
along with the prevalent policies. The majority of the e-waste collected in
India is managed by an unorganized sector.
Hazardous waste means any waste which, by reason of any of its physical,
chemical, reactive, toxic, flammable, explosive or corrosive
characteristics, causes danger or is likely to cause danger to health or
environment, whether alone or when in contact with other wastes or
substances.
The key difference between the previous set of rules that is the 2011
version and the 2016 version of e-waste management rules which is the
current one is the “ reverse chain” that is mandated to be created by the
producers under the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) to ensure
electronic products are recovered for safe recycling. A “buy back” policy
for electronics has also been suggested meaning the producers can buy the
products back for safe recycling. Furthermore, the new set has taken
cognizance of and has tried to include the informal sector which handles
over 90% of e-waste generated in India, in the mainstream. The informal
sector will be formalized and the workers will be trained to handle e-waste
rather than burning them after extracting the precious metals from them.
This will fall under the state’s responsibility to train the workers of the
informal sector and including them in the mainstream so as to avoid
leakages to the e-waste generated and recycled. The rules have been
extended to the bulk consumers like companies that buy electronic goods
in masses. The bulk consumers must collect the items and hand them over
to the authorised recyclers and it will be the responsibility of the one
buying in the bulk.
The new rules have for the first time included the Compact Fluorescent
Lamp (CFL) and other mercury containing lamps and equipment in their
ambit. And there is a liability clause with financial penalties, where
environmental degradation is happening and things are not being done
scientifically. Urban local bodies (Municipal
committee/council/corporation) has been assigned the duty to collect and
channelized the orphan products to authorized dismantler or recycler.
The amendment in the rules has been done with the objective of
channelizing the e-waste generated in the country towards authorised
dismantlers and recyclers in order to formalise the e-waste recycling
sector. The collection targets under the provision of Extended Producer
Responsibility (EPR) in the rules have been revised and targets have been
introduced for new producers who have started their sales operation
recently.
The amended rules revise the collection targets under the provision of
EPR with effect from 1st October, 2017. By way of revised targets and
monitoring under the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), effective
and improved management of e-waste would be ensured. As per the
revised targets of e-waste collection, 10% of the quantity of waste
generated shall be collected during 2017-2018. Further, there shall be a
10% increase every year until the year 2023. After 2023, the e-waste
collection target has been fixed at 70% of the quantity of waste generation.
Separate collection targets have been introduced for new producers who
have recently begun their sales operations. These would be producers
whose sales operation are lesser than the average life of their product.
To undertake the activities prescribed for PROs under these rules, the
PROs shall apply to CPCB for registration. This is a significant and note
worth amendment as the requirement of PROs to register with CPCB
would ensure that CPCB can constantly supervise and keep a check on
the activities of PROs.
Bamako Convention
Bamako convention on the ban on the import into Africa and the control
of transboundary movement and management of hazardous wastes within
Africa is a treaty of African nations prohibiting the import of any
hazardous (including radioactive) waste. The convention was negotiated
by twelve nations of the organisations of Africa Unity at Bamako, Mali in
January 1991 and came into force on 1998.
Impetus for the Bamako convention arose from the failure of the Basel
Convention to prohibit trade of hazardous waste to less developed
countries, and from the realization that many developed nations were
exporting toxic wastes to Africa. The Bamako convention uses a format
and language similar to that of the Basel convention, but is much stronger
in prohibiting all imports of hazardous waste. Additionally, it does not
make exceptions on certain hazardous waste (like those for radioactive
materials) made by the Basel convention.
These agreements or arrangements can also set out controls which are
different from those prescribed by the convention itself, provided such
control do not reduce the level of environmental protection intended by
the convention.
States that are eligible to ratify the convention but have not yet done so
are France, the United Kingdom, Marshall Islands, The United States and
Palau. Palau has signed the agreement but has not ratified it.
13. CONCLUSION
The informal sector has played a critical role in managing the e-waste in
India with its vast reach and access to waste from both urban and rural
areas. But is that enough? India ranks 117 among 180 countries in the case
of recycling the e-wastes that we generate and often import e-wastes from
other countries to our country without even thinking of the problems it is
about to cause to our environment. The legislations here on the e-waste
problem is not strong enough to protect the interests of environment and
about 85% of the people here are not even aware about the problems that
technological garbage can do to our bio-diversity. People here love to
upgrade their gadgets day by day without even thinking the possibility of
pollution and health problems which can be caused by their previous
gadgets when it becomes trash. The government can and they need to play
a role in generating the awareness which can be a critical driver in
changing the status quo in consumer behaviour.
It is high time that we realize that what a small amount of mercury or lead
or cadmium from the e-waste can do to our nature and how it can
contaminate our resources. The way out of this maze is only through
reducing the generation of e-waste, reusing our gadgets and recycling our
electronic wastes. Strict legislations and creating awareness should also
be considered in order to create a green world. Let’s make the world great
again for our future generation to come by.
14. BIBILIOGRAPHY
E-WASTE (MANAGEMENT AND HANDLING) RULE, 2011
E-WASTE MANAGEMENT RULE, 2016
Mondaq.com
Economics research international- Hindawi.com
Research article/ M. Khurrum S. Bhatta, Adnan Omar, Xiaozhe Yang,
“electronic waste: a growing concern in today’s environment”
Intechopen.com
R. Cayumil, R. Khanna, R. Rajarao, M. Ikram-Ul-Haq, P.S Mukherjee and v.
Sahajwala (June 29th 2016) environmental impact of processing electronic
waste- key issues and challenges.
Technological pollution a 21st century problem- iberdrola.com
sustainabledevelopment.un.org
www.Basel.int
www.sourcetoday.com
www.legalservicesindia.com
www.downtoearth.org.in
Vikaspedia.in
www.meity.gov.in