You are on page 1of 8

Letter https://doi.org/10.

1038/s41586-019-1462-2

Metamorphism and the evolution of plate tectonics


Robert M. Holder1,2*, Daniel R. Viete1, Michael Brown3 & Tim E. Johnson4,5

Earth’s mantle convection, which facilitates planetary heat loss, We assess changes in the global distribution of metamorphic T/P
is manifested at the surface as present-day plate tectonics1. When using a database of age and (P, T) conditions of metamorphic rocks
plate tectonics emerged and how it has evolved through time are from 564 localities from ref. 4. The data define distinct modes centred
two of the most fundamental and challenging questions in Earth at about 2.6, 1.8, 1.0, 0.5 and <0.2 Gyr ago4 (Extended Data Fig. 1).
science1–4. Metamorphic rocks—rocks that have experienced solid-
state mineral transformations due to changes in pressure (P) and
temperature (T)—record periods of burial, heating, exhumation a 5.0

–1
and cooling that reflect the tectonic environments in which they Metamorphic rock

Pa
G
4.5 compilation
formed5,6. Changes in the global distribution of metamorphic

°C
0
(P, T) conditions in the continental crust through time might

15
4.0
therefore reflect the secular evolution of Earth’s tectonic processes.
On modern Earth, convergent plate margins are characterized by 3.5 KDE
metamorphic rocks that show a bimodal distribution of apparent
3.0
thermal gradients (temperature change with depth; parameterized
here as metamorphic T/P) in the form of paired metamorphic belts5, P (GPa)
2.5 °C
which is attributed to metamorphism near (low T/P) and away from 500 –1
(high T/P) subduction zones5,6. Here we show that Earth’s modern 2.0 GPa
plate tectonic regime has developed gradually with secular cooling
of the mantle since the Neoarchaean era, 2.5 billion years ago. We 1.5
evaluate the emergence of bimodal metamorphism (as a proxy for
1.0
secular change in plate tectonics) using a statistical evaluation of
the distributions of metamorphic T/P through time. We find that 0.5 1,500 °C
–1
the distribution of metamorphic T/P has gradually become wider GPa
and more distinctly bimodal from the Neoarchaean era to the 0
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100
present day, and the average metamorphic T/P has decreased since
T (°C)
the Palaeoproterozoic era. Our results contrast with studies that
b 30
inferred an abrupt transition in tectonic style in the Neoproterozoic 500 °C GPa–1
era (about 0.7 billion years ago1,7,8) or that suggested that modern
plate tectonics has operated since the Palaeoproterozoic era (about 25
two billion years ago9–12) at the latest.
The theory of plate tectonics can explain the assembly and break-up
20
of supercontinents, how mountain ranges and major mineral deposits
form13, and perhaps even why there is life on Earth14,15. However, it
Frequency

is unclear how plate tectonics emerged and why it does not occur on 15
other planets in the Solar System. Although there is broad agreement
that plate tectonics has been dominant during the last billion years of
KDE

our planet’s history, how and when it emerged, and how it has evolved 10
through time, are disputed2,3,6,7. A diagnostic feature of plate tectonics
on modern Earth is the bimodal distribution of metamorphic tempera- 5
tures and pressures (Fig. 1), which is expressed in paired metamorphic
belts5,6 and is key to the identification of the past operation of plate
tectonics from the rock record. Here we present a statistical evaluation 0
1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6
of metamorphic T/P through Earth’s history, with the purpose of doc-
log[T/P (°C GPa–1)]
umenting the emergence and evolution of the bimodal distribution of
metamorphic T/P as a proxy for the emergence and evolution of Earth’s Fig. 1 | Metamorphism in the last 0.2 Gyr is characterized by a bimodal
plate tectonic regime. We show that the modern bimodal distribution distribution of apparent metamorphic thermal gradients, T/P. a, Kernel
density estimates (KDE) of metamorphic (P, T) conditions in rocks
of metamorphic T/P, and therefore modern plate tectonics, developed
younger than 0.2 Gyr (ref. 4). The red line (500 °C GPa−1) represents the
gradually since the end of the Neoarchaean era, about 2.5 Gyr ago. We dividing line between the two modes shown in b. b, Histogram and KDE
hypothesize that the development of modern plate tectonics is linked to of metamorphic T/P, plotted logarithmically to illustrate more clearly
secular cooling of the mantle and associated changes in the thickness, the bimodal distribution shown in a. This bimodal distribution of T/P
buoyancy and rheology of oceanic lithosphere, resulting in evolution is manifest in paired metamorphic belts and is considered a diagnostic
in the styles of both subduction and collisional orogenesis. feature of plate tectonics.

1
Morton K. Blaustein Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. 2Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann
Arbor, MI, USA. 3Laboratory for Crustal Petrology, Department of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA. 4School of Earth and Planetary Sciences, The Institute for Geoscience
Research (TIGeR), Space Science and Technology Centre, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. 5State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China
University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China. *e-mail: roholder@umich.edu

N A t U r e | www.nature.com/nature
RESEARCH Letter

a b c
0 Gyr Low T/P High T/P
Cenozoic
0.2–0
Mesozoic Gyr
0.2

Palaeozoic
Low T/P High T/P Low T/P High T/P
0.4
0.85–0.2
Gyr
Neoproterozoic 0.6

0.8

1.0
1.4–0.85 Gyr
Mesoproterozoic

1.2

1.4

1.6
2.2–1.4 Gyr Non-Gaussian

1.8
Palaeoproterozoic

2.0

2.2

2.4
Gaussian
>2.2 Gyr Mean = 2.96
Neoarchaean
s.d. = 0.11
2.6

1.8 3.6 1.8 3.6 2.2 3.4


log[T/P (°C GPa–1)] log[T/P (°C GPa–1)] log[T/P (°C GPa–1)]

Fig. 2 | The bimodal distribution of modern metamorphism evolved (95% confidence intervals; 2.2–1.4 Gyr ago, n = 106, p = 5.4 × 10−5; 1.4–
gradually since the end of the Neoarchaean era. a, Histograms and 0.85 Gyr ago, n = 45, p = 0.017; 0.85–0.2 Gyr ago, n = 232, p = 3.6 × 10−7;
KDEs of metamorphic T/P since the Neoarchaean era. b, Fits of the 0.2–0 Gyr ago, n = 109, p = 2.2 × 10−7), but is well described by bimodal
distributions of metamorphic T/P shown in a with bimodal Gaussian mixed-Gaussian distributions. c, Linear regressions of low-T/P and high-
mixing models. Global metamorphism >2.2 Gyr ago can be fitted by a T/P modes (from b) with 95% confidence envelopes. The best-fit bimodal
unimodal Gaussian distribution (95% confidence interval, n = 72, distributions of metamorphic T/P become increasingly distinct, showing
p value of 0.23); metamorphism ≤2.2 Gyr ago is non-Gaussian divergence and cooling of the low-T/P and high-T/P modes through time.

These peaks broadly correspond to peaks in the global distribution represent a single Gaussian distribution) at a 95% confidence inter-
of igneous and detrital zircon U–Pb ages16–18 and, similarly to those val, according to the Shapiro–Wilk test20. If the data distributions were
studies, we interpret the peaks to reflect cyclicity4. To provide more assessed to be non-Gaussian, we fitted a bimodal mixed-Gaussian dis-
statistically robust (larger number of data points per calculation) char- tribution (that is, two Gaussian distributions; Fig. 2b, Extended Data
acterization of secular changes in the distributions of metamorphic Table 1) to evaluate how these compare to the bimodal distribution of
T/P from one cycle to the next, we binned the data about each of these the modern metamorphic rock record (Figs. 1, 2a). The distribution
peaks, as shown in Extended Data Fig. 1. Histograms and kernel den- of data older than 2.2 Gyr is Gaussian with a mean and standard devi-
sity estimates (KDE) of each distribution are shown in Fig. 2a. With ation of 2.96 and 0.11 (for log[T/P (°C GPa−1)]), respectively. By con-
decreasing age: (1) the KDE of >2.2-Gyr-old metamorphism is narrow trast, each of the younger (<2.2 Gyr old) distributions is non-Gaussian
and symmetric; (2) the KDE of 2.2–1.4-Gyr-old metamorphism is but is well described by a bimodal mixed-Gaussian distribution. The
skewed towards lower T/P, with three low-T/P eclogite outliers11,12,19; difference between the two best-fit Gaussian distributions (‘low-T/P’
(3) the KDE of 1.4–0.85-Gyr-old metamorphism shows a distinct and ‘high-T/P’ in Fig. 2b) increases through time (Fig. 2c). Viewed
low-T/P mode that is not apparent in the >1.4-Gyr-old KDEs; together, the KDEs and modelled mixed-Gaussian distributions show
(4) the KDE of 0.85–0.2-Gyr-old metamorphism is notably broader a continuous increase in the variability of thermal gradients recorded
than the older distributions, with a prominent mode at lower T/P; and by metamorphic rocks, as well as a gradual emergence of a discrete
(5) the KDE of <0.2-Gyr-old (‘modern’) metamorphism is bimodal, with and prominent low-T/P mode of metamorphism since the end of the
distinct high-T/P and low-T/P peaks that are much more pronounced Archaean eon.
than for the older distributions. Qualitatively, the secular evolution The Palaeoproterozoic era (about 2 Gyr ago) is notable in that it
in the KDEs is interpreted to represent a gradual transition from a has three distinct outliers with low-T/P gradients comparable to
narrow, unimodal distribution of metamorphic T/P in the Archaean those of rocks formed in modern cold collisional environments11,12,19
eon, to a distinctly bimodal distribution in the modern metamorphic (Fig. 3). These data have been used to suggest that subduction and col-
rock record. lision similar to those of modern Earth may have been operative dur-
To assess this interpretation quantitatively, we fitted a Gaussian ing the Palaeoproterozoic era11,12,19. Alternatively, the data may reflect
mixing model to each distribution (Fig. 2b). First, the distributions local, anomalous subduction–collision similar to that in modern
were assessed by whether they are non-Gaussian (that is, do not tectonic environments, but not representative of the dominant

N A t U r e | www.nature.com/nature
Letter RESEARCH

Increase in diversity and overall Increase in diversity of


cooling of metamorphic environments metamorphic environments
2,000

Metamorphic T/P (°C GPa–1)


1,200

600

Fada N’Gourma greenstone belt,


300 Eburnean orogen, Burkina Faso

Kovik tectonic window, Trans-Hudson orogen, Canada


Nordre Stromfjord,
Nagssugtoqidian orogen, Eclogite xenolith in carbonatite,
150
Greenland Trans-North-China orogen, China
1,650
Kumdy-Kol,
Mantle potential21, T (°C)

Kokchetav Massif,
Kazakhstan
1,500

1,650
1,350

Mantle potential22, T (°C)


1,500
1,200

1,350

1,200

0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0


Age (Gyr)

Fig. 3 | The range of metamorphic T/P (blue symbols) has become coincides with secular cooling of the upper mantle. Large brown symbols
increasingly varied through time, with its average value decreasing are from ref. 21, with ages modified as described in ref. 30. Small brown
since about 2 Gyr ago. Metamorphic rocks that fall outside this trend symbols are from ref. 22, modified for direct comparison with ref. 21, as
(anomalously low T/P for their age) are labelled. The overall lowering of described in Methods. Both datasets are shown with best-fit quadratic
metamorphic T/P (and increase in metamorphic diversity) through time regressions and 95% prediction intervals.

global tectonic regime during the Palaeoproterozoic era4. Here we Greater thickness and buoyancy of oceanic lithosphere before 1 Gyr
focus on the broader, continuous global trends in metamorphic T/P ago might have favoured more uniformly shallow (less steeply dip-
outlined above. ping) subduction and overall higher thermal gradients in subduction
From the statistical evaluation of the distributions of metamorphic environments, similar to the moderate-T/P metamorphism (green-
T/P through time presented here, it is hypothesized that the mod- schist–amphibolite–eclogite series) associated with modern collisional
ern style of plate tectonics—characterized by a distinctly bimodal orogenesis.
distribution of metamorphic T/P—developed gradually (Fig. 3). This A possible young analogue for shallower, hotter subduction meta-
hypothesis can be considered an alternative to: (1) hypotheses that morphism that might have been more prevalent before 1 Gyr ago is the
infer plate tectonics to have begun abruptly in the Neoproterozoic era, greenschist–amphibolite-facies Orocopia–Pelona–Rand schist (OPRS)
based on the apparently sudden appearance of blueschist and ultrahigh- of southern California, which records T/P (500–650 °C GPa−1)26 com-
pressure (UHP) metamorphism about 0.7 Gyr ago7; (2) hypotheses parable to many eclogites, high-pressure granulites and amphibolites
that infer that a plate tectonic regime similar to the modern one has in the Palaeo- and Mesoproterozoic eras (2.5–1.0 Gyr ago; Fig. 3,
been operative since the Palaeoproterozoic era (about 2 Gyr ago)10–12 at Extended Data Fig. 2). The OPRS is thought to have formed in response
the latest, and; (3) the hypothesis of transient (≤0.3 Gyr) modern-like to a transition from steeper, colder subduction (Franciscan-type) to
plate tectonic behaviour in the Palaeoproterozoic era, before true plate shallower, hotter subduction related to the incoming of an oceanic
tectonics began in the Neoproterozoic era1. The hypothesis presented plateau (thicker, more buoyant oceanic lithosphere)26. Consideration
here, of a gradual but continuous transition in tectonic style since about of similar >1-Gyr-old rocks as plausibly related to subduction, rather
2.5 Gyr ago, is similar to the hypothesized gradual onset of plate tec- than focusing only on blueschist and UHP metamorphism, might offer
tonics between 3.2 and 2.5 Gyr ago proposed in ref. 2, but extends that new insights into subduction processes (oceanic and continental) on
gradual change in tectonic style through to the modern era. We argue the early Earth. Many 2.5–1.0-Gyr-old orogenic belts—including
that the most plausible mechanism for the hypothesized gradual change the Grenville, Sveconorwegian, Trans-North China, Trans-Hudson,
in plate tectonic style since the Archaean eon is secular cooling of the Eburnean, Ubendian–Usagaran and Belomorian belts—preserve
upper mantle (Fig. 3). bimodal distributions of metamorphic rocks, with the lowest-T/P
Changes in the temperature of the upper mantle affect not only the rocks characterized by T/P similar to that of the OPRS (about 500–
thermal state of the crust but also the thickness and density of oceanic 650 °C GPa−1; Extended Data Fig. 2)26. These contrast the blueschist
lithosphere. Under the higher upper-mantle temperatures that are and UHP metamorphism that are common on modern Earth. We
thought to have existed during the Proterozoic and Archaean eons21–23, hypothesize that modern-style plate tectonics might have developed as
the degree of decompression melting at mid-ocean ridges is predicted the time to neutral buoyancy became substantially less than the average
to have been higher, resulting in thicker oceanic lithosphere23,24 (as age of oceanic lithosphere, favouring colder, steeper subduction of the
much as 135 km 2.5 Gyr ago versus 60 km today)25, which could have type most common in modern subduction zones.
remained buoyant (relative to the underlying asthenosphere) for sub- This study focuses on metamorphic T/P—a proxy for the ther-
stantially longer than modern oceanic lithosphere (as much as 0.1 Gyr mal gradients of different tectonic environments—as a more reliable
to attain neutral buoyancy 2.5 Gyr ago versus 0.01–0.03 Gyr today)25. indicator of the tectonic regime than either T or P. However, another

N A t U r e | www.nature.com/nature
RESEARCH Letter

important secular change in metamorphism relates to a large increase 1. Stern, R. J. The evolution of plate tectonics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 376,
in the maximum pressure of metamorphism through the Proterozoic 20170406 (2018).
2. Cawood, P. A. et al. Geological archive of the onset of plate tectonics. Philos.
eon (2.5–0.55 Gyr ago), resulting in the widespread occurrence of con- Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170405 (2018).
tinental UHP metamorphism beginning in the Neoproterozoic era, 3. Korenaga, J. Crustal evolution and mantle dynamics through Earth history.
about 0.7 Gyr ago4. The T/P values of UHP rocks are consistent with Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170408 (2018).
4. Brown, M. & Johnson, T. Time’s arrow, time’s cycle: granulite metamorphism
the gradual change proposed here (Figs. 2, 3), but the reason for their and geodynamics. Mineral. Mag. 83, 323–338 (2019).
higher maximum pressures requires additional comment. Although 5. Miyashiro, A. Evolution of metamorphic belts. J. Petrol. 2, 277–311 (1961).
many mechanisms have been invoked to explain the formation and 6. Brown, M. Duality of thermal regimes is the distinctive characteristic of plate
tectonics since the Neoarchean. Geology 34, 961–964 (2006).
exhumation of continental UHP rocks27, their observation at Earth’s 7. Stern, R. J. Evidence from ophiolites, blueschists, and ultrahigh-pressure
surface in general requires that: (1) positively buoyant material be metamorphic terranes that the modern episode of subduction tectonics began
carried to depth; and (2) the downward force acting on the material in Neoproterozoic time. Geology 33, 557–560 (2005).
subsequently ceases (for example, owing to physical separation from 8. Stern, R. J., Leybourne, M. I. & Tsujimori, T. Kimberlites and the start of plate
tectonics. Geology 44, 799–802 (2016).
the denser material driving subduction or foundering), allowing the 9. Harrison, T. M. The Hadean crust: evidence from >4 Ga zircons. Annu. Rev. Earth
material to return towards Earth’s surface. The geodynamic controls Planet. Sci. 37, 479–505 (2009).
on the formation of UHP rocks have been addressed through numer- 10. Ganne, J. et al. Modern-style plate subduction preserved in the
Palaeoproterozoic West African craton. Nat. Geosci. 5, 60–65 (2012).
ical experiments by ref. 28, which hypothesized that the formation 11. Weller, O. M. & St-Onge, M. R. Record of modern-style plate tectonics
and exhumation of UHP rocks might have been precluded by shal- in the Palaeoproterozoic Trans-Hudson orogen. Nat. Geosci. 10, 305–311
lower slab breakoff associated with a hotter mantle (and rheologically (2017).
12. Xu, C. et al. Cold deep subduction recorded by remnants of a Paleoproterozoic
weaker plates) earlier in Earth’s history. Although further simulations carbonated slab. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–8 (2018).
are needed to understand slab breakoff during subduction, these results 13. Goldfarb, R. J., Bradley, D. & Leach, D. L. Secular variation in economic geology.
suggest that the increase in maximum metamorphic pressure, the emer- Econ. Geol. 105, 459–465 (2010).
14. Russell, M. J., Hall, A. J. & Martin, W. Serpentinization as a source of energy at
gence of a distinct low-T/P mode of metamorphism (Fig. 2) and the the origin of life. Geobiology 8, 355–371 (2010).
overall decrease in metamorphic T/P since the end of the Neoarchaean 15. Turner, S., Rushmer, T., Reagan, M. & Moyen, J. F. Heading down early on? Start
era, 2.5 Gyr ago (Fig. 2), can be all linked to gradual cooling of the of subduction on Earth. Geology 42, 139–142 (2014).
16. Condie, K. C. & Aster, R. C. Episodic zircon age spectra of orogenic granitoids:
upper mantle (Fig. 3). the supercontinent connection and continental growth. Precambr. Res. 180,
In summary, we present a statistical evaluation of metamorphic T/P 227–236 (2010).
through Earth’s history, with the purpose of documenting the gradual 17. Puetz, S. J., Ganade, C. E., Zimmermann, U. & Borchardt, G. Statistical analyses
emergence of the modern bimodal distribution of metamorphic T/P of Global U-Pb Database 2017. Geoscience Frontiers 9, 121–145 (2018).
18. Campbell, I. H. & Allen, C. M. Formation of supercontinents linked to increases
as a proxy for the emergence of Earth’s modern plate tectonic regime. in atmospheric oxygen. Nat. Geosci. 1, 554–558 (2008).
This approach is rooted in the classical concept of paired metamor- 19. Glassley, W. E., Korstgard, J. a., Sorensen, K. & Platou, S. W. A new UHP
phic belts5 as a diagnostic feature of plate tectonics, while leaving open metamorphic complex in the 1.8 Ga Nagssugtoqidian Orogen of West
Greenland. Am. Mineral. 99, 1315–1334 (2014).
the possibility that, owing to evolution in the style of plate tectonics29, 20. Shapiro, S. S. & Wilk, M. B. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete
paired metamorphism in Earth’s past might have been characterized samples). Biometrika 52, 591–611 (1965).
by different apparent thermal gradients than today. We show that the 21. Herzberg, C., Condie, K. & Korenaga, J. Thermal history of the Earth and its
petrological expression. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 292, 79–88 (2010).
modern bimodal distribution of metamorphic T/P developed gradu- 22. Condie, K. C., Aster, R. C. & Van Hunen, J. A great thermal divergence in the
ally since the end of the Neoarchaean era, about 2.5 Gyr ago, and that mantle beginning 2.5 Ga: geochemical constraints from greenstone basalts and
globally bimodal metamorphism emerged before either blueschist or komatiites. Geoscience Frontiers 7, 543–553 (2016).
23. Keller, B. & Schoene, B. Plate tectonics and continental basaltic geochemistry
UHP metamorphism in the geological record. We hypothesize that throughout Earth history. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 481, 290–304 (2018).
both the development of bimodal metamorphism and the appearance 24. Langmuir, C. H., Klein, E. M. & Plank, T. in Mantle Flow and Melt Generation at
of blueschist and UHP metamorphism are linked to secular cooling Mid-Ocean Ridges (eds Morgan, J. P. et al.) 183–280 (American Geophysical
Union, 1992).
of the mantle and to associated changes in the thickness, buoyancy 25. Korenaga, J. in Archean Geodynamics and Environments (eds Benn, K. et al.)
and rheology of oceanic lithosphere, resulting in evolution in the 7–32 (American Geophysical Union, 2006).
styles of both subduction and collisional orogenesis. Importantly, this 26. Chapman, A. D. The Pelona–Orocopia–Rand and related schists of southern
and other hypotheses concerning changes in tectonic style (or lack California: a review of the best-known archive of shallow subduction on the
planet. Int. Geol. Rev. 59, 664–701 (2017).
thereof)1,4,6,7,10–12,19 through time are testable through further numer- 27. Hacker, B. R. & Gerya, T. V. Paradigms, new and old, for ultrahigh-pressure
ical modelling and continued examination of the Precambrian meta- tectonism. Tectonophysics 603, 79–88 (2013).
morphic rock record. 28. Sizova, E., Gerya, T. & Brown, M. Contrasting styles of Phanerozoic and
Precambrian continental collision. Gondwana Res. 25, 522–545 (2014).
29. Chowdhury, P., Gerya, T. & Chakraborty, S. Emergence of silicic continents as the
Online content lower crust peels off on a hot plate-tectonic Earth. Nat. Geosci. 10, 698–703
Any methods, additional references, Nature Research reporting summaries, (2017).
source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer 30. Johnson, T. E., Brown, M., Kaus, B. J. P. & Vantongeren, J. A. Delamination and
recycling of Archaean crust caused by gravitational instabilities. Nat. Geosci. 7,
review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and 47–52 (2014).
statements of data and code availability are available at https://doi.org/10.1038/
s41586-019-1462-2. Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional
claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Received: 18 January 2019; Accepted: 30 May 2019;
Published online xx xx xxxx. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2019

N A t U r e | www.nature.com/nature
Letter RESEARCH

Methods Acknowledgements This work was funded by the Morton K. Blaustein


KDEs (Figs. 1, 2a) and bimodal mixed-Gaussian distributions (Fig. 2b, Extended Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences at Johns Hopkins University. T.E.J.
acknowledges support from the State Key Laboratory for Geological Processes
Data Table 1) were calculated using the ksdensity and fitgmdist functions, respectively, and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan (Open
of Matlab release R2018b. The linear regressions and corresponding 95% confidence Fund GPMR210704). R. Rudnick and B. Hacker provided helpful discussion
envelopes, shown in Fig. 2c, were calculated by Monte Carlo analysis (number of in the project’s infancy. The authors thank P. Cawood and R. Stern for their
regressions: 10,000). For each regression, values of T/P and age were selected at constructive reviews of this work.
random from each modelled Gaussian distribution (Fig. 2b, Extended Data Table 1)
and the age ranges used to bin the data for the mixed-Gaussian fitting (0–0.2 Gyr, Author contributions R.M.H.: conceptualization, formal analysis, methodology,
0.2–0.85 Gyr, 0.85–1.4 Gyr and 1.4–2.2 Gyr). To plot mantle potential temperatures visualization and writing (original draft, review and editing). D.R.V.: funding
acquisition, visualization and writing (original draft, review and editing). M.B.:
(temperature corrected adiabatically for pressure) from ref. 22 in Fig. 3, the reported
data curation, investigation, visualization and writing (original draft, review and
‘magma-generation’ (P, T) conditions for ‘depleted mantle’ compositions were used editing). T.E.J.: data curation, investigation, visualization and writing (original
and corrected for pressure assuming a liquid adiabat of 30 °C GPa−1. Quadratic draft, review and editing).
regressions and 95% prediction envelopes of the mantle potential temperature
(Fig. 3) were calculated using the curve-fitting toolbox of Matlab release R2018b. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests.

Data availability Additional information


The metamorphic pressure and temperature data used in this study are avail- Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to R.M.H.
Peer review information Nature thanks Peter Cawood and Robert Stern for their
able online with their original publication (ref. 4) and in the EarthChem contribution to the peer review of this work.
community data repository (http://www.earthchem.org/library; doi:10.1594/ Reprints and permissions information is available at http://www.nature.com/
IEDA/111316). reprints.
RESEARCH Letter

0.2–0 Gyr, modern


50
0.85–0.2 Gyr,
40 Pangea
Frequency

30 1.4–0.85 Gyr, 2.2–1.4 Gyr, >2.2 Gyr,


Rodinia Columbia Super Cratons
20

10

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Age (billions of years before present: Gyr)
Extended Data Fig. 1 | Distribution of ages of metamorphism. The metamorphic data presented in this paper, the data were binned about
distribution of ages of metamorphism is characterized by peaks at each of these discrete peaks to provide more statistically robust (with
about 2.6, 1.9, 1.0, 0.5 and <0.2 Gyr ago. For the statistical evaluation of higher number of data points) interpretations.
Letter RESEARCH

2,000 2,000
High T/P
Intermediate T/P
Low T/P
1,500 1,500

T/P (°C/GPa)
T/P of OPRS

1,000 1,000

500 500

a
0 1 2 3 4

2,000 2,000

1,500 1,500
T/P (°C/GPa)

1,000 1,000

500 500

0 1 2 3 4
Age (billions of years before present)
Extended Data Fig. 2 | Comparison between T/P values for the  to the incoming of an oceanic plateau (thicker, more buoyant oceanic
Orocopia–Pelona–Rand schist and for the entire dataset used in this lithosphere)26. Many Mesoproterozoic and Palaeoproterozoic orogenic
study. a, All data are divided into low-, intermediate- and high-T/P after belts preserve bimodal distributions of metamorphism, with the lower-T/P
ref. 4. b, Moving averages (300-Myr window) and one-standard-deviation rocks (‘intermediate-T/P’ in this figure) being characterized by average
envelopes of the data shown in a. The OPRS is thought to have formed T/P similar to that of the OPRS (about 500–650 °C GPa−1)26, including the
in response to a transition from steeper, colder subduction (‘Franciscan- Grenville, Sveconorwegian, Trans-North China, Trans-Hudson, Eburnean,
type’) to shallower (more gently dipping), hotter subduction related Ubendian–Usagaran and Belomorian belts.
RESEARCH Letter

Extended Data Table 1 | Results of mixed-Gaussian models

High T/P Low T/P


Age Mean Component Mean Component
s.d. s.d.
(Gyr) (log10 °C/GPa) Proportion (%) (log10 °C/GPa) Proportion (%)
0.2–0 2.92 0.11 32 2.42 0.10 68

0.85–0.2 2.81 0.19 59 2.36 0.09 41

1.4–0.85 3.08 0.11 78 2.68 0.08 22

2.2–1.4 3.05 0.05 30 2.86 0.23 70

>2.2 2.96 0.11 100 — — —

Mean and standard deviation (s.d.) of the bimodal mixed-Gaussian models shown in Fig. 2b. The distribution of data older than 2.2 Gyr could not be distinguished from a Gaussian distribution at the
95% confidence interval by the Shapiro–Wilk test (n = 72, p = 0.23); for these data the mean and standard deviation of the best-fit single Gaussian distribution are shown. Each distribution <2.2 Gyr
old is distinguishable from a single Gaussian distribution at the 95% confidence interval (2.2–1.4 Gyr old, n = 106, p =5.4 × 10−5; 1.4–0.85 Gyr old, n = 45, p = 0.017; 0.85–0.2 Gyr old, n = 232,
p = 3.6 × 10−7; 0.2–0 Gyr ago, n = 109, p = 2.2 × 10−7).

You might also like