1626569 - Hanaa Moustafa

Kamel - 172451
by 172451 Hanaa Moustafa Kamel

Submission date: 14-May-2020 11:47PM (UTC+0200)

Submission ID: 1322011457
File name: 115056_172451_Hanaa_Moustafa_Kamel_1626569_-_Hanaa_Moustafa_Kamel_-
_172451_154451_1141034094.docx (111.2K)
Word count: 7820
Character count: 51833
1626569 - Hanaa Moustafa Kamel - 172451
GRADEMARK REPORT

FINAL GRADE GENERAL COMMENTS

/100 Instructor

PAGE 1

PAGE 2

PAGE 3

PAGE 4

PAGE 5

PAGE 6

PAGE 7

PAGE 8

PAGE 9

PAGE 10

PAGE 11

PAGE 12

PAGE 13

PAGE 14

PAGE 15

PAGE 16

PAGE 17

PAGE 18

PAGE 19

PAGE 20
PAGE 21

PAGE 22

PAGE 23

PAGE 24

PAGE 25

PAGE 26

PAGE 27

PAGE 28

PAGE 29

PAGE 30

PAGE 31

PAGE 32

PAGE 33

PAGE 34

PAGE 35

PAGE 36
RUBRIC: R400RUBRIC 0 / 100

RESEARCH ACTI 0 / 10

20 Lack of creativity/ originality

(2)

40 Confusion of focus and ideas

(4)

60 Fairly clear focus and ideas

(6)

80 Clear focus and good ideas

(8)

100 Very well-written and creative/original ideas

(10)

AIMS, OBJECTI 0 / 20

20 Goals and aims not clearly defined <br /><br />Limited knowledge and many
(4) inaccuracies<br />

40 Muddled to some extent. Aims and goals unrealistic. <br /><br /><br />Fragmented
(8) knowledge and some inaccuracies<br />

60 Aims and goals fairly clear. <br /><br /><br /><br />Fairly good knowledge and
(12) understanding of concepts<br />

80 Clear and realistic aims and goals. <br /><br /><br />Good knowledge and insightful
(16) understanding<br />

100 Very well-defined and realistic aims and goals.<br /><br /><br />Broad knowledge and
(20) critical and in-depth understanding<br />

ANALYSIS OF D 0 / 30

20 Cursory and limited analysis of data. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Poor and
(6) confused application<br />

40 Limited analysis of data. Little synthesis. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Lacks control
(12) of research procedures/<br />Confusion in synthesizing data<br />

60 Fairly clear and sound analysis. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Some evidence
(18) of original insight/Good understanding of and well-implemented research methodology

80 Clear and thoughtful analysis. Very good synthesis. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br
(24) />Deep and original insight/presentation. <br />Well-chosen and well-defined and
implemented research methodology<br />
100 Insightful and accurate analysis. <br /><br />Excellent synthesis. <br />Original and
(30) thoughtful discussion and independence of thought. Excellent understanding and
implementation of research methodology<br />

RESULTS AND C 0 / 20

20 Unsound conclusions, irrelevant to arguments. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Lack insight
(4) into limitations of research<br />

40 Mostly vague conclusions, barely related to arguments. <br /><br /><br />Poor insight into
(8) limitations of research<br />

60 Conclusions to some extent flow from the main arguments <br /><br /><br /><br />Some
(12) understanding of research limitations<br />

80 Conclusions and results flow and are well-founded in data discussed. <br /><br /><br />
(16) <br /><br />Very good insight into limitations of research <br />

100 Excellent conclusions and results <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Excellent insight into
(20) limitations of the research<br />

LANGUAGE, STY 0 / 10

20 Fragmented and incoherent. <br /><br /><br /><br />In accurate use of language that
(2) affects clarity and distracts reader<br />

40 Somewhat fragment with occasional incoherence. <br /><br />Poor language and style
(4) though not distraction (meaning is generally clear)<br /><br />

60 Satisfactory organization and language. <br /><br /><br /><br />Acceptable style, though
(6) sometimes inaccurate.<br />

80 Good organization <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Good articulate language and
(8) style<br />

100 Very well-structured and excellent language. <br /><br /><br />Effective and
(10) communicative presentation.<br />

CITATION AND 0 / 10

20 Inaccurate and/or incomplete

(2)

40 Some sources are well referenced, while others are either inaccurately or wrongly
(4) referenced

60 Good referencing, with limited errors

(6)

80 Very good referencing with very few errors

(8)

100 Complete referencing with almost no errors

(10)