Directions: Below is a rubric for assessing the group presentation.

Assess the output by putting the score on the last column of the rubric opposite the stated criterion. Then write your
comment about the output that will justify the score that you have given.

Criteria/ Dimension Excellent Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Fair Poor

Score
5 4 3 2 1
Content (Congruence The content of the entire at least 80% of the content of the entire at least 60 % of the content of the At least 60 % of the content of the less than 40% of the content of the
with the intended presentation output is aligned to presentation output is aligned to the ILO entire presentation output is aligned entire presentation output is aligned to entire presentation output is aligned
learning outcomes) the ILO to the ILO the ILO to the ILO

Content (Accuracy) All informations are accurate. at least 80% of the information at least 60% of the information at least 40% of the information less than 40% of the information
There is an in-depth discussion & presented is accurate. There is an in- presented is accurate. There is an in- presented is accurate. The presented presented is accurate. No in-depth
elaboration about the activity in all depth discussion & elaboration about depth discussion and elaboration dicussions are not clearly elaborated. discussion and elabotation of the
sections of the presentation. the activity in almost all sections of the about the activity in some sections of content.
presentation. the presentation.

free from any grammatical erros 1-3 errors are commited in spelling, 4-6 errors are commited in spelling, 7-9 errors are commited in spelling, 10 or more errors are commited in
punctuation and grammar punctuation and grammar punctuation and grammar spelling, punctuation and grammar

Contetnt (References) Presented more than two Presented at least two referecnes and Presented at least one reference and Presented refernces but are not No reference was cited
referecnes and all are reliable and all are reliable and well cited is reliable and well cited reliable and not well-cited
well cited

Use of ICT ( Usefulness All media/app used (graphics, at least 80% of the media/app used at least 60% of the media/app used at least 40% of the media/app used less than 40% of the media/app used
of the chosen media) video, sounds, text) reinforce (graphics, video, sounds, text) reinforce (graphics, video, sounds, text) (graphics, video, sounds, text) reinforce (graphics, video, sounds, text)
content content reinforce content content reinforce content

USe of ICT (Design and Layout makes the entire Layout makes the entire presentation of Layout is pleasing but the design is Layout is somewhat pleasing. The Layout makes more that 40% of
layout of Presentation) presentation of the content easy the content easy to read but fails to somewhat inapproprite to the design in some part of the presentation presentation of the content difficult
to read and captures attention of capture the attention of the audience content is distructive. to read. Design is inconsistent and
the audience. throughout the viewing process. inapproprite to the ontent
Design is consistent and Design is consistent and
approprite to the content approprite to the content

Time Submitted the group presentation submitted the group presentation submitted the group presentation submitted the group presentation submitted the group presentation
output on of before the deadline output a day ater the deadline output 2 days after the deadline output 3 days after the deadline output more than 3 days after the
deadline.

Cooperation all members of the group at least 80% of the members of the at least 60 % of the members of the at least 40% members of the group less than 40% of the members of the
participated in the development group participated in the development group participated in the participated in the development and group participated in the
and presentation of group output and presentation of group output development and presentation of presentation of group output development and presentation of
group output group output

Average Score 0
Equivalent 0
 Group No. Course/Yr. & Sec.

Leader
Members

Comment:

Name of Assessor: Year & Section: (for student)

Designation
Directions: Below is a rubric for assessing the group presentation. Assess the output by putting the score on the last column of the rubric opposite the stated criterion. Then write your
comment about the output that will justify the score that you have given.

Criteria/ Dimension Excellent Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Fair Poor

Score
5 4 3 2 1
Content (Congruence The content of the entire at least 80% of the content of the entire at least 60 % of the content of the At least 60 % of the content of the less than 40% of the content of the
with the intended presentation output is aligned to presentation output is aligned to the ILO entire presentation output is aligned entire presentation output is aligned to entire presentation output is aligned
learning outcomes) the ILO to the ILO the ILO to the ILO 4

Content (Accuracy) All informations are accurate. at least 80% of the information at least 60% of the information at least 40% of the information less than 40% of the information
There is an in-depth discussion & presented is accurate. There is an in- presented is accurate. There is an in- presented is accurate. The presented presented is accurate. No in-depth
elaboration about the activity in all depth discussion & elaboration about depth discussion and elaboration dicussions are not clearly elaborated. discussion and elabotation of the
sections of the presentation. the activity in almost all sections of the about the activity in some sections of content.
presentation. the presentation.
4
free from any grammatical erros 1-3 errors are commited in spelling, 4-6 errors are commited in spelling, 7-9 errors are commited in spelling, 10 or more errors are commited in
punctuation and grammar punctuation and grammar punctuation and grammar spelling, punctuation and grammar

Contetnt (References) Presented more than two Presented at least two referecnes and Presented at least one reference and Presented refernces but are not No reference was cited
referecnes and all are reliable and all are reliable and well cited is reliable and well cited reliable and not well-cited
well cited 4
Use of ICT ( Usefulness All media/app used (graphics, at least 80% of the media/app used at least 60% of the media/app used at least 40% of the media/app used less than 40% of the media/app used
of the chosen media) video, sounds, text) reinforce (graphics, video, sounds, text) reinforce (graphics, video, sounds, text) (graphics, video, sounds, text) reinforce (graphics, video, sounds, text)
content content reinforce content content reinforce content
4

USe of ICT (Design and Layout makes the entire Layout makes the entire presentation of Layout is pleasing but the design is Layout is somewhat pleasing. The Layout makes more that 40% of
layout of Presentation) presentation of the content easy the content easy to read but fails to somewhat inapproprite to the design in some part of the presentation presentation of the content difficult
to read and captures attention of capture the attention of the audience content is distructive. to read. Design is inconsistent and
the audience. throughout the viewing process. inapproprite to the ontent
Design is consistent and
approprite to the content
Design is consistent and
approprite to the content
4

Time Submitted the group presentation submitted the group presentation submitted the group presentation submitted the group presentation submitted the group presentation
output on of before the deadline output a day ater the deadline output 2 days after the deadline output 3 days after the deadline output more than 3 days after the
deadline. 5

Cooperation all members of the group at least 80% of the members of the at least 60 % of the members of the at least 40% members of the group less than 40% of the members of the
participated in the development group participated in the development group participated in the participated in the development and group participated in the
and presentation of group output and presentation of group output development and presentation of presentation of group output
group output
development and presentation of
group output
5

Average Score 4.2

Equivalent Excelent
 Group No. 1 Course/Yr. & Sec. BTLED IV-B

Leader Kristel Joy Bautista

Members Agbuya, Jely Ann Sarmiento Bacani, Irish T Caraulia, Erica B
Andaya, Jeda Mae Gipa Bangcaya, Ronalie Ann Rodriguez Chavez, Maylene Cayabyab

Aquino, Judy Ann A Baniqued, John Mike Garcia De Guzman, Beverly Joy N
Austria, Krisha Mae A. Caranto, Nica May Serilla De Vera, Beverly Busel
Austria, Shaina Martinez De Vera, Seth Casiwan De Vera, Jane Bugarin

Comment:

Name of Assessor: REA R. TIANGSON Year & Section: (for student)

Designation FS Mentor
Directions: Below is a rubric for assessing the group presentation. Assess the output by putting the score on the last column of the rubric opposite the stated criterion. Then write your
comment about the output that will justify the score that you have given.

Criteria/ Dimension Excellent Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Fair Poor

Score
5 4 3 2 1
Content (Congruence The content of the entire at least 80% of the content of the entire at least 60 % of the content of the At least 60 % of the content of the less than 40% of the content of the
with the intended presentation output is aligned to presentation output is aligned to the ILO entire presentation output is aligned entire presentation output is aligned to entire presentation output is aligned
learning outcomes) the ILO to the ILO the ILO to the ILO 4

Content (Accuracy) All informations are accurate. at least 80% of the information at least 60% of the information at least 40% of the information less than 40% of the information
There is an in-depth discussion & presented is accurate. There is an in- presented is accurate. There is an in- presented is accurate. The presented presented is accurate. No in-depth
elaboration about the activity in all depth discussion & elaboration about depth discussion and elaboration dicussions are not clearly elaborated. discussion and elabotation of the
sections of the presentation. the activity in almost all sections of the about the activity in some sections of content.
presentation. the presentation.
4
free from any grammatical erros 1-3 errors are commited in spelling, 4-6 errors are commited in spelling, 7-9 errors are commited in spelling, 10 or more errors are commited in
punctuation and grammar punctuation and grammar punctuation and grammar spelling, punctuation and grammar

Contetnt (References) Presented more than two Presented at least two referecnes and Presented at least one reference and Presented refernces but are not No reference was cited
referecnes and all are reliable and all are reliable and well cited is reliable and well cited reliable and not well-cited
well cited 4
Use of ICT ( Usefulness All media/app used (graphics, at least 80% of the media/app used at least 60% of the media/app used at least 40% of the media/app used less than 40% of the media/app used
of the chosen media) video, sounds, text) reinforce (graphics, video, sounds, text) reinforce (graphics, video, sounds, text) (graphics, video, sounds, text) reinforce (graphics, video, sounds, text)
content content reinforce content content reinforce content
4

USe of ICT (Design and Layout makes the entire Layout makes the entire presentation of Layout is pleasing but the design is Layout is somewhat pleasing. The Layout makes more that 40% of
layout of Presentation) presentation of the content easy the content easy to read but fails to somewhat inapproprite to the design in some part of the presentation presentation of the content difficult
to read and captures attention of capture the attention of the audience content is distructive. to read. Design is inconsistent and
the audience. throughout the viewing process. inapproprite to the ontent
Design is consistent and
approprite to the content
Design is consistent and
approprite to the content
4

Time Submitted the group presentation submitted the group presentation submitted the group presentation submitted the group presentation submitted the group presentation
output on of before the deadline output a day ater the deadline output 2 days after the deadline output 3 days after the deadline output more than 3 days after the
deadline. 5

Cooperation all members of the group at least 80% of the members of the at least 60 % of the members of the at least 40% members of the group less than 40% of the members of the
participated in the development group participated in the development group participated in the participated in the development and group participated in the
and presentation of group output and presentation of group output development and presentation of presentation of group output
group output
development and presentation of
group output
5

Average Score 4.2

Equivalent Excelent
 Group No. 2 Course/Yr. & Sec. BTLED IV-B

Leader John Eidreff Flores

Members Diaz, Emelyn Sais Garcia, Frenz S. Malicdem, Justine De Vera

Espinoza, Vanessa M. Lavarias, Romnick Imus Mamanta, Jomar V

Ferrer, Karen Casillan Lavarias, Ruel A. Mandapat, Jessica Marie Perpose

Gallaza, Ashley Kaye D.S. Magleo, Praise Joy A. Marcellano, Mika Ollica
Mendoza, Rizalyn Gundayao Malicdem, Beverly Cancino Mendoza, Jr., Armin Castillo

Comment:

Name of Assessor: REA R. TIANGSON Year & Section: (for student)

Designation FS Mentor
Directions: Below is a rubric for assessing the group presentation. Assess the output by putting the score on the last column of the rubric opposite the stated criterion. Then write your
comment about the output that will justify the score that you have given.

Criteria/ Dimension Excellent Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Fair Poor

Score
5 4 3 2 1
Content (Congruence The content of the entire at least 80% of the content of the entire at least 60 % of the content of the At least 60 % of the content of the less than 40% of the content of the
with the intended presentation output is aligned to presentation output is aligned to the ILO entire presentation output is aligned entire presentation output is aligned to entire presentation output is aligned
learning outcomes) the ILO to the ILO the ILO to the ILO 4

Content (Accuracy) All informations are accurate. at least 80% of the information at least 60% of the information at least 40% of the information less than 40% of the information
There is an in-depth discussion & presented is accurate. There is an in- presented is accurate. There is an in- presented is accurate. The presented presented is accurate. No in-depth
elaboration about the activity in all depth discussion & elaboration about depth discussion and elaboration dicussions are not clearly elaborated. discussion and elabotation of the
sections of the presentation. the activity in almost all sections of the about the activity in some sections of content.
presentation. the presentation.
4
free from any grammatical erros 1-3 errors are commited in spelling, 4-6 errors are commited in spelling, 7-9 errors are commited in spelling, 10 or more errors are commited in
punctuation and grammar punctuation and grammar punctuation and grammar spelling, punctuation and grammar

Contetnt (References) Presented more than two Presented at least two referecnes and Presented at least one reference and Presented refernces but are not No reference was cited
referecnes and all are reliable and all are reliable and well cited is reliable and well cited reliable and not well-cited
well cited 4
Use of ICT ( Usefulness All media/app used (graphics, at least 80% of the media/app used at least 60% of the media/app used at least 40% of the media/app used less than 40% of the media/app used
of the chosen media) video, sounds, text) reinforce (graphics, video, sounds, text) reinforce (graphics, video, sounds, text) (graphics, video, sounds, text) reinforce (graphics, video, sounds, text)
content content reinforce content content reinforce content
4

USe of ICT (Design and Layout makes the entire Layout makes the entire presentation of Layout is pleasing but the design is Layout is somewhat pleasing. The Layout makes more that 40% of
layout of Presentation) presentation of the content easy the content easy to read but fails to somewhat inapproprite to the design in some part of the presentation presentation of the content difficult
to read and captures attention of capture the attention of the audience content is distructive. to read. Design is inconsistent and
the audience. throughout the viewing process. inapproprite to the ontent
Design is consistent and
approprite to the content
Design is consistent and
approprite to the content
4

Time Submitted the group presentation submitted the group presentation submitted the group presentation submitted the group presentation submitted the group presentation
output on of before the deadline output a day ater the deadline output 2 days after the deadline output 3 days after the deadline output more than 3 days after the
deadline. 5

Cooperation all members of the group at least 80% of the members of the at least 60 % of the members of the at least 40% members of the group less than 40% of the members of the
participated in the development group participated in the development group participated in the participated in the development and group participated in the
and presentation of group output and presentation of group output development and presentation of presentation of group output
group output
development and presentation of
group output
5

Average Score 4.2

Equivalent Excelent
 Group No. 3 Course/Yr. & Sec.
Leader Kathleen Joy Sebastian
Members Notado, Micharissa Castro
Quijano, Romalyn
Ramos, John Philip Quitaleg
Reyes, Danna Mae C.
Romero, Joevani Catubig
Comment:
Name of Assessor: REA R. TIANGSON
Designation FS Mentor
BTLED IV-B
Rosario, Erica Joy D Vinluan, Carla Mamaril
Rosario, Erwin C. Solomon, Lotes Kaye S.
Samson, Jenicel Soriano Soriano, Esther Ruth Ramos
Sanchez, Cyrel Domiic Soriano, Michelle M
Sarmiento, Sarah Z Villanueva, Christine Doctolero
Year & Section: (for student)