You are on page 1of 4

Teacher Evaluation Sheet

Roll No. Enrollment No Name of Student

Name of Programme: Electronics &Telecommunication Semester: IV


Course Title:-Digital Communication System
Code:-22425

Title of the Microproject:. ***************** *************** ****** ****** ******.


*****.

Course Outcomes Achieved:

a). *********** ****** *****************e********* **o*********************************************** ****************** ************""*** *sssn* **nu oos wu**

b. °°°°°°°°°*°°°000****°°******°°****°****°°*°°°******°**°**********° *****"*****"********** ******°**********

C).*********************e********** ****o******************essossese*******************e*ss*osoee********* s*o*sisnsssss **** smnss mnruno


Evaluation as per Suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro Project
(Please tick in appropriate cell for each characteristic)

S.No Characteristic Poor Average Good Excellent


to be assessed (Marks1-3) (Marks4 -5) (Marks 6-8) (Marks 9-10)

Information Does not Collects Collects more Collects a


search and collect basic information, great deals of
component information information. most refer to information,
Collection. relate to topic most refer to the topic all refer to the
the topic topic

2 Circuit Not more than At-least 5 At-least 7 About 10 relevant


construction two sources relevant sources, relevant sources, sOurces, most
(primary and at least 2 latest most latest latest
secondary), very
old reference

3 Circuit Test Test less than Test 50 to 60% Test 60 to 80% Test more than
50% 80%

4 Full-fills Does not Performs Performs Performs all


team roles perform any nearly all almost all duties of
and duties duties assigned duties duties assigned team
to tHe team roles
role

Quality of Incomplete Just Well Well


Prototype/Mod fabrication/asse assembled/fabric assembled/fabric assembled/fabric
el mbly. ated and parts ated with proper ated with proper
are not functioning parts. functioning parts.
functioning well. In proper shape,in proper shape,
Average Good Excellent
S. Characteristic Poor
No to be assessed (Marks1-3) (Marks4-5) (Marks 6 -8) (Marks 9-10
Not in proper
within tolerance within tolerance
dimensions and dimensions and
shape,
dimensions good good
beyond tolerance finish/appearance finish/appearance
limit. .But no creativity .Creativityin
in design and use design and use of
Appearance/finis
h is shabby. ofmaterial material

Very short, poor Nearly sufficient Detailed, correct Very detailed,


Report
Preparation quality sketches, and correct and clear correct, clear
Details about details about description of description of
methods, methods, methods, methods,
material, material, materials, materials,
precaution and precautions and precautions and precautions and
conclusions conclusion, but Conclusions. conclusions.
omitted, some clarity is not there Sufficient Graphic Enough tables,
details are wrong in presentation. Description. charts and
But not enough sketches
graphic
description.

7 Presentation Major Includes major Includes major Well organized,


information is information but information and includes major
not included, not well well organized information ,well
information is organized and not but not presented presented
not well presented well well
organized.

Defense Could not reply Replied to Replied properly Replied most of


to considerable considerable to considerable the questions
number of number of number of properly
question. questions but not question.
very properly
Evaluation Sheet for the Micro
Projcect
Program:- Electronics & Telecommunication
Academic Year:-2021-22
Name ofthe Faculty:Prof.A.A.Pendam
Course:Digital Communication system Course code: 22425 Semester:IV
Title of the project:-.... . .

Cos addressed by Micro Projeet:


A
B. .
C..

Major learning outcomes achieved by students by doing the project


(a) Practical outcome:

(b) Unit outcomes in Cognitive domain:


.

Outcomes in Affective domain:

Comments/suggestions about team work leadership/inter-personal communication (if any)

*****.

Marks out of 6 for Marks out of 4for


Roll No performance in performance in
Name of the Student group activity oral/ presentation Total out of 10
(D5Col.8) (D5Col.9)

Name and Signature of the faculty


Micro Project Evaluation Sheet

Name of Student: Enrollment No:

Name of Programme: Semester:

Course Title: Code:

Title of the Micro-Project:

Course Outcomes Achieved:

Sr. Characteristic to be Poor AvTge Good Ecellen Sub


o Marks 1-3) (Marks 4-5)Afarks -8) (arks 9-10)Totl
assessed

Asessent (Convert above total :aks out of 6 Marks)


(A) Process and PIotuct
1Relevanceto the course

2 Literature Review/

Completion of the target


3
asper project proposal
Analysis of Data and
Representation
Quality of
PrototypeModel
6 Rerort Preparation
(B) Individual Presentation/ Viva (Convert above total marks out of 4 marks)
7 Presentation
8 Viva

(A) (B) Total Marks


Process and Product Assessment Individual Presentation Viva
10
(6 Marks) (4 Marks)

Cpmmets Suggestions about team pork1éadershjp inter-personl conmunication

Name and designation of the Teacher

You might also like