SNJB's Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers, Jalgaon) Polytechnic,

Chandwad (All AICTE Approved Programs NBA Accredited)

Neminagar, Chandwad, Dist.-Nasik, Pin-423101
Year of Establishment : 1983
Approved by A.I.C.T.E. & Recognized by DTE
Affiliated to M.S.B.T.E., Mumbai

Department of Civil Engineering

Micro Project Report

Academic Year Name of Faculty

Course

Course Code: Semester

Title of Micro Project :

Sr. No. Name of Group Members Enrollment No. Exam Seat No.

1.

2.

3.

4.

1
 SNJB's Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers, Jalgaon) Polytechnic,
Chandwad (All AICTE Approved Programs NBA Accredited)
Neminagar, Chandwad, Dist.-Nasik, Pin-423101

Department of Civil Engineering

Vision and Mission of Institute

Vision
To enhance technical skills of students to meet industry needs along with human values.

Mission
M1- To provide industry- oriented quality technical education to face industrial challenges.
M2- To inculcate professional skills and human values among students.
M3- To develop entrepreneurial qualities among students and motivate them towards lifelong learning.

Programme Vision and Mission of Program

Vision
To impart technical knowledge and skills in the field of Civil Engineering inculcating human values and
Entrepreneurial skills.
Mission
M1. To provide technical knowledge and skills relevant to Civil Engineering industry.
M2. To inculcate ethical values and professionalism.
M3. To mentor student for innovative thinking relevance to entrepreneurial.

2
 Maharashtra State
Board of Technical Education
Certificate of Completion
Of Micro-project Assessment at the end of semester
(By respective Faculty and Head of the Department)

This is to certify that Mr./Ms. 1………………………………………………………...……..

2…………………………………………………………...…..

3………………………………………………………….……..

4……………………………………………………………….….

From (Institute): SNJB's Shri Hiralal Hastimal (Jain Brothers, Jalgaon) Polytechnic, Chandwad
having Enrolment Nos:
..................................................................................... ....................
has completed Micro-Project having title ...........................................................................................
……………………………………………………………………………………………….……..
Individually / in a group consisting of ................ persons under the guidance of the Faculty
Guide

Name and Signature of Guide: …………………………………………..…

Name and Signature of HOD: ……………………………………………..

3
 Annexure - I
Micro- Project Report

1.0 Rationale (Importance of the Micro- Project)

2.0 Aims/Benefits of the Micro-Project:

3.0 Course Outcomes Achieved:

4.0 Actual Methodology Followed (Write step wise work done, data collected and its analysis -if
any. The contribution of individual member may also be noted)

4
5.0 Actual Resources Used (major resources such as raw materials, some machining facility,
software etc.)

Sr.no Name of Resources/Material Specifications Qty. Remarks

6.0 Skill Developed / Learning outcome of this Micro -Project

7.0 Applications of this Micro-Project

7.0 Outputs of the Micro-Project (Color photo of students group with micro project, photo of
micro project 2D/3D, Drawing of the prototype, drawing of survey, presentation of collected data,
finding , any other related material documents etc.)

Start from next page

5
 Annexure -II
Suggested rubric For Assessment of Micro Project
(The marks may be allotted to the characteristics of the Micro-Project by considering the suggested
rubrics)

Sr Characteristic Poor Average Good Excellent

No to be assessed (Marks 1-3) (Marks 4-5) (Marks 6-8) (Marks 9-10 )

Relevance to Related to very Related to some Addressed at-least Addressed more

1
the course few LOs LOs one CO than one CO

Completion in Completed less Completed 50 to Completed 60 to Completed more

2
Time than 50% 60% 80% than 80 %

Well
Just Well
assembled/fabricate
assembled/fabricate assembled/fabricate
d with proper
d and parts are not d with proper
functioning parts.
functioning well. functioning parts.
Quality of Incomplete In proper shape,
Not in proper In proper shape,
3 Prototype/Mod fabrication/assembl within tolerance
shape, dimensions within tolerance
el. y dimensions and
beyond tolerance dimensions and
good
limit. good finish. But no
finish/appearance.
Appearance/finish creativity in design
Creativity in design
is shabby and use of materials
and use of materials

Nearly sufficient
Very short, poor and correct details Detailed, correct Very detailed,
quality sketches, about methods, and clear correct, clear
Details about material, description of description of
Report methods, material, precautions and methods, materials, methods, materials,
4
Preparation. precaution and conclusion, but precautions and precautions and
conclusions clarity is not there Conclusions. conclusions.
omitted, some in presentation, not Sufficient Graphic Enough tables,
details are wrong enough graphic Description charts and sketches
description

Major information Includes major Includes major Well organized,

Presentation of
is not included, information but not information and includes major
5 the Micro
information is not well organized and well organized but information ,well-
project.
well organized not presented well not presented well presented

replied to
Could not reply to considerable replied properly to
replied most of the
6 Viva considerable number of question considerable
question properly
number of question but not very number of question
properly

6
 Annexure III
Micro-Project Evaluation Sheet
(Attach Separate sheet for each student )
Name of Student: Enrollment No:
Name of Programme: Semester:
Course Title : Code:
Title of the Micro-Project:

Course Outcomes Achieved:

a
b
c
d

Practical Outcomes:
a
b

Poor Average Good Excellent

Sr Characteristic to be
Sub total
no assessed (Marks 1-3) (Marks 4-5) (Marks 6-8) (Marks 9-10)

A) Process and product assessment (convert below total marks out of 6 marks)
1 Relevance to the course
2 Completion of the Target
3 Quality of Prototype/Model
4 Report Preparation
B) Individual presentation / Viva (convert below total marks out of 4 marks)
5 Preparation
6 Viva

(A) (B)
Total Marks
Process and Product Assessment Individual presentation/ Viva
10
(6 marks) (4 marks)

Comments/Suggestions about team work/leadership/inter-personal communication (if any):

Name and Dated Signature the Teacher:

7