Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.0 Objectives
4.0 Conclusion
1.0 Objectives
The main objective of this report is to present different structural flooring that
are intended to be considered by the structural designers in the design efforts
during the different coming design development stages for the project of
Thakher city.
This report is to discuss different structural slab systems (mainly for, cost, time
and constructability). in coordination with the up-to-date developed conceptual
architectural documents.
The suggested structural slab systems introduced in this report were studied and
recommended to satisfy the following features:
The structural slab systems introduced in this report are intended to be the basis
for the structural design development in the upcoming design stages with the
possibility to be modified and/or refined upon developing the structural design
calculations, the expected architectural development or the owner’s
requirements, that may be proposed to enhance the functional behavior for the
different structural elements of the project components.
2.0 Proposed Structural Slab Systems.
2.1 Beam and Slab Floor System
This system consists of beams framing into
columns and supporting slabs spanning
between the beams. It is a very traditional
system. The relatively deep beams provide a
stiff floor capable of long spans, and able to
resist lateral loads. However, the
complications of beam formwork, co-
ordination of services, and overall depth of
floor have led to a decrease in the popularity
of this type of floor.
The traditional reinforced concrete beam-
and-slab floor has an economical span ‘L’ of
D x 15 for a single span and D x 20 for a
multi-span, where D is the depth of the slab
plus beam. The depth of slab between the
beams can be initially sized using the span-
to-depth ratios for a flat plate. Prestressing is
not normally used with this system.
Advantages:
Traditional effective solution.
Economic for small to medium spans.
Familiarity with local market
Disadvantages:
Penetrations through beams for large
ducts difficult to handle
Depth of floor
Greater floor‐to‐floor height.
Affect fixation of e/m services.
Economic lose in cost and time for large
spans.
2.2 Ribbed (Waffle) Slab System
Advantages:
Advantages:
Longer spans
Thinner slabs
Slenderer column
More generous opportunities for
design
Reduction of height reduces the total of
the building
3.0 Slab system comparison
In order to enable proper selection of one of those proposed slab systems, a
comparison schedule was prepared as shown below to qualify each system upon
different structural, technical and financial criteria. An out-of-ten grading ranks
were utilized to evaluate each criterion to come out with final total grade that direct
the attention upon the more efficient one.
Weight
Slab & Steel
No criteria of Waffle Flat H.C P. T Voided
beam Deck
criteria
1
cost 20% 7 8 9 8 10 9 8
2 Time of
15% 5 5 8 10 9 8 9
construction
3
Slab thickness 15% 5 5 9 7 10 10 9
VS. Floor height
4 Accommodating
post- construction 10% 10 8 10 5 8 10 8
openings
5
Floor vibration 10% 10 10 9 8 8 9 6
6 Behavior under
seismic loads
10% 10 10 9 7 9 9 8
8
Acoustic properties 10% 6 6 6 8 6 10 6
Average weighed Rank 7.5 7.5 8.75 7.85 8.95 8.8 7.6
4.0 Conclusion.
Comparison table could show us clear selection that we have great opportunity to
select between two different systems (Post tension and Voided slab) in addition to
the option of flat slab which already used in Thakher city conceptual design,
however the unfamiliarity of the voided slab gives an advantage to post tension
proposal it could give great cost saving if we decide to use this system in raft
foundation.