MPU2202U4 – CO-CURRICULUM

FACULTY OF
NAME/ GROUP: ____________________ SUBJECT: CO-CURRICULUM
ID: ___________________________ CODE: MPU2202U4
TYPE: PROJECT 2 – PRESENTATION
& REPORT

SCORE/ WEIGHTAGE: 100/ 40%

PRESENTATION (20%)

EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

CRITERIA SCORE %
(4) (3) (2) (1)
PREPAREDNESS Students bring needed Students almost always Students almost always Students often forget / 4 x 10
FOR THE EVENT materials for project and are bring needed materials for bring needed materials for needed materials for minor
always ready to work. minor project and are minor project but sometimes project or are rarely ready
(10%) always ready to work. needs to settle down and get to get to work.
to work.

EFFORT Work reflects this group's Work reflects a strong effort Work reflects some effort Work reflects very little / 4 x 10
DISPLAYED best efforts. from this group. from this group. effort on the part of this
group.
(10%)

DELEGATING Students routinely delegate
TASK and monitor the
effectiveness of the group,
10% and makes suggestions to
make it more effective.
Students delegate and
monitor the effectiveness of
the group and works to
make the group more
effective to the best of
his/her ability.
Students occasionally
delegate and monitor the
effectiveness of the group
and works to make the
group more effective.
Students rarely delegate / 4 x 10
and monitor the
effectiveness of the group
and do not work to make it
more effective.

PROBLEM- Students actively look for Students refine solutions Students do not suggest or Students do not try to solve / 4 x 10
SOLVING and suggest solutions to suggested by others. refine solutions, but is willing problems or help others
problems. to try out solutions solve problems. Let others
(10%) suggested by others. do the work.

WORKING WITH Students almost always Students usually listens to, Students often listens to, Students rarely listens to, / 4 x 10

SESS 2021
 FACULTY OF
NAME/ GROUP: ____________________
ID: ___________________________
& REPORT
OTHERS listens to, shares with, and
supports the efforts of
(10%) others. Tries to keep people
working well together.
FOCUS ON THE Students consistently stays
TASK focused on the task and
what needs to be done. Very
(10%) self-directed. (achieve
objective)
Role, Role, involvement, and
Involvement activities of student are
and Activities of carefully presented and
Student explained. It is obvious that
the proposed activities are
(20%) student focused. Students
will not be merely observing
or performing menial tasks—
they will be actively involved
in the process. The number
of students involved is not as
critical as the quality of their
involvement.
Social media Student uses suitable and
posts interesting posts which are
related to the event. A rich
-INSTAGRAM variety of supporting
SESS 2021
shares with, and supports
the efforts of others. Does
not cause "waves" in the
group.
Students focus on the task
and what needs to be done
most of the time. Other
group/class members can
count on this person.
Role, involvement, and
activities of student are
clearly described are only
generally presented.
Each student play a role in
the planned activities but
are mostly involved in the
implementation and/or
dissemination of the project
and have little or no
creative input.
Student uses suitable posts
which are related to the
event. Information is
presented as a connected
shares with, and supports
the efforts of others, but
sometimes is not a good
team member.
Students focus on the task
and what needs to be done
some of the time. Other
group/class members must
sometimes nag, prod, and
remind to keep this person
on-task.
Role, involvement, and
activities of student only
vaguely presented.
The plan for involvement of
student is not clearly
articulated and appears to
be limited in scope. Students
are mostly observers.
Student uses inappropriate
visual aids but related to the
event. Some of the
supporting information does
SUBJECT: CO-CURRICULUM
CODE: MPU2202U4
TYPE: PROJECT 2 – PRESENTATION
SCORE/ WEIGHTAGE: 100/ 40%
shares with, and supports
the efforts of others. Often
is not a good team player.
Students rarely focus on / 4 x 10
the task and what needs to
be done. Let others do the
work.
Role, involvement, and / 4 x 20
activities of student are only
vaguely presented.
The student’s role is merely
as a bystander or the role is
only superficially presented
Student does not use any / 4 x 10
visual aids or uses
inappropriate visual aids,
not related to the event.
 FACULTY OF
NAME/ GROUP: ____________________
ID: ___________________________
& REPORT
information in the posts
contribute to the
(10%) understanding of the
project’s main idea. Student
uploaded 10 or more posts
in the Instagram.
COMPLETE Student set benchmarks for
PROJECTS self to reach goal, anticipate
and strategic to overcome
(10%) obstacles, independently
revise as well as seek
feedback from others to
create a polished finished
product with minimal errors.
(originality)
SESS 2021
theme with accurate,
current supporting
information that contributes
to understanding the
project’s main idea. Student
uploaded 9 to 7 posts in the
Instagram.
Student set benchmarks for
self to reach a goal, create
a plan by identifying needs
for project completion, seek
feedback from others to
revise work by a deadline.
not seem to fit the main idea
or appears as a
disconnected series of
scenes with no unifying main
idea. Student uploaded 6 to
3 posts in the Instagram.
Student follow benchmarks
to reach a goal, identify
basic needs for project
completion, and use
feedback from others to
revise work by a deadline.
SUBJECT: CO-CURRICULUM
CODE: MPU2202U4
TYPE: PROJECT 2 – PRESENTATION
SCORE/ WEIGHTAGE: 100/ 40%
Much of the supporting
information is irrelevant to
the overall message.
Student uploaded 2 to 0
posts in the Instagram.
Student follows / 4 x 10
benchmarks to reach a goal
by a deadline.
TOTAL /100
 FACULTY OF
NAME/ GROUP: ____________________ SUBJECT: CO-CURRICULUM
ID: ___________________________ CODE: MPU2202U4
TYPE: PROJECT 2 – PRESENTATION
& REPORT

SCORE/ WEIGHTAGE: 100/ 40%

COMMENTS/ REMARK

Preparednes Effort Delegating Problem Working Focus on task Role Social Complete Total ma
 
s Displayed task Solving with others (10%) involvemen media posts project (100%
N  Matric No  Student Name
(10%) (10%) (10%) (10%) (10%) t (10%) (10%)
o
(20%)
1
2
3
4
5
6

SESS 2021
 FACULTY OF
NAME/ GROUP: ____________________ SUBJECT: CO-CURRICULUM
ID: ___________________________ CODE: MPU2202U4
TYPE: PROJECT 2 – PRESENTATION
& REPORT

SCORE/ WEIGHTAGE: 100/ 40%

REPORT - REFLECTION (10%)

EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

CRITERIA SCORE %
(4) (3) (2) (1)
/ 4 x 10
Introduction is somewhat Introduction does not address
There is a well-focused Introduction clearly states the
Introduction clear but elements discussed the topic and the elements
statement that introduces the main topic but elements
(10%) are inadequate. discussed.
topic and clearly addresses discussed are inadequate.
all elements discussed.

Content Purpose and main ideas of
Analysis the activity and association
-Activities are clear, relevant and
conducted focused. Supporting details
are relevant and carefully
(20%) selected.
Student presents a
comprehensive view of the
topic, compelling
recommendations with
Discussion excellent justification,
-Activities evidences and portrays
(20%) critical thinking skills.
Students explain their
findings thoroughly based on
the data collected and
provide in depth views on the
results.
Purpose and main ideas of
the activity and association
are clear, relevant and
focused. Supporting details
are general or limited in
places.
Student provides good
overview of the topic and
supports their
recommendations with good
reason, evidences and
portrays critical thinking skills.
Students explain their finding
based on the data collected
and provide suitable views on
the results.
Purpose and main ideas of
the activity and association
are overly broad or simplistic.
Supporting details are limited,
off topic, predictable or too
general.
Student has some view of the
topic and recommendations,
but not well supported or
argued for. Students explain
their findings based on the
data collected and provide
basic views on the results.
Purpose and main ideas of / 4 x 20
the activity and association
are unclear and require
inferences by reader.
Supporting details are
insufficient and irrelevant.
Student does not present a / 4 x 20
comprehensive view of the
topic, and does not present a
clear discussion.
Students did not explain their
findings based on the data
collected and provide little
views on the results.

SESS 2021
 FACULTY OF
NAME/ GROUP: ____________________
ID: ___________________________
& REPORT
Response demonstrates an
in-depth reflection on, and
Reflection personalization of, the
theories, concepts and/or
(Individual)
strategies presented in the
course materials to date.
Viewpoints and
(10%) interpretations are insightful
and well supported. Clear,
detailed examples are
provided, as applicable.
Meets all format
requirements, attention to
Organisation
details, margin, spacing and
(10%)
indentation. Essay is
structured and neat.
Written work has no errors in
Mechanics word selection and use,
(10%) sentence structure, spelling,
punctuation, and
capitalization.
SESS 2021
Response demonstrates a
general reflection on, and
personalization of, the
theories, concepts, and/or
strategies presented in the
course materials to date.
Viewpoints and
interpretations are supported.
Appropriate examples are
provided, as applicable.
Meets format requirements,
attention to details, margin,
spacing and indentation.
Essay is structured and neat.
(1-2 errors)
Written work is relatively free
of errors in word selection
and use, sentence structure,
spelling, punctuation, and
capitalization. (1-2 errors)
SUBJECT: CO-CURRICULUM
CODE: MPU2202U4
TYPE: PROJECT 2 – PRESENTATION
Response demonstrates a
minimal reflection on, and
personalization of, the
theories, concepts, and/or
strategies presented in the
course materials to date.
Viewpoints and
interpretations are
unsupported or supported
with flawed arguments.
Examples, when applicable,
are not provided or are
irrelevant to the assignment.
Meets format requirements,
less attention to details,
margin, spacing and
indentation. Essay is
structured and neat. (3-4
errors)
Written work has several
errors in word selection and
use, sentence structure,
spelling, punctuation, and
capitalization. (3-4 errors)
SCORE/ WEIGHTAGE: 100/ 40%
Response demonstrates a / 4 x 10
lack of reflection on, or
personalization of, the
theories, concepts, and/or
strategies presented in the
course materials to date.
Viewpoints and
interpretations are missing,
inappropriate, and/or
unsupported. Examples,
when applicable, are not
provided.
Fails to follow format and / 4 x 10
requirements, incorrect
margin, spacing and
indentation. Structure and
neatness of essay needs
attention.
Written work has serious and / 4 x 10
persistent errors in word
selection and use, sentence
structure, spelling,
punctuation, and
capitalization. (more than 4
errors)
 FACULTY OF
NAME/ GROUP: ____________________
ID: ___________________________
& REPORT
Conclusion The conclusion is strong and
(10%) logical as well as provides
clear summary of the topic.
Required Response includes all
Components components and meets or
-minute meeting exceeds all requirements
-pictures indicated in the instructions.
Each question or part of the
(10%) assignment is addressed
thoroughly. All attachments
and/or additional documents
are included, as required.
SESS 2021
The conclusion is logical and
adequately summarizes the
topic.
Response includes all
components and meets all
requirements indicated in the
instructions. Each question or
part of the assignment is
addressed. All attachments
and/or additional documents
are included, as required.
SUBJECT: CO-CURRICULUM
CODE: MPU2202U4
TYPE: PROJECT 2 – PRESENTATION
SCORE/ WEIGHTAGE: 100/ 40%
/ 4 x 10
The conclusion is logical but The conclusion is illogical and
does not summarize the does not summarize the
topic. topic.
Response is missing some Response excludes essential / 4 x 10
components and/or does not components and/or does not
fully meet the requirements address the requirements
indicated in the instructions. indicated in the instructions.
Some questions or parts of Many parts of the assignment
the assignment are not are addressed minimally,
addressed. Some inadequately, and/or not at
attachments and additional all.
documents, if required, are
missing or unsuitable for the
purpose of the assignment.
TOTAL /10
FACULTY OF
NAME/ GROUP: ____________________ SUBJECT: CO-CURRICULUM
ID: ___________________________ CODE: MPU2202U4
TYPE: PROJECT 2 – PRESENTATION
& REPORT

SCORE/ WEIGHTAGE: 100/ 40%

PROGRESSION/ PREPARATION (10%)

CRITERIA EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (1) SCORE

(4) (3) (2)

Communication Communication among Communication among group Communication among Communication among
skill/critical group members and critical members and critical thinking group members and critical group members and critical
thinking thinking were excellently were good. thinking were average and thinking were at beginning / 4 x 20
demonstrated. met standards. level.
(Group)

(20%)

Project preparation was Project preparation was not Project preparation lacked
Organization Project preparation was very organized and pretty clearly organized. organization. / 4 x 20
organized and was very easy followable.
(Group) to follow.

(20%)

Teamwork The team worked well
together to achieve
(Group) objectives. Each member
contributed in a valuable way
(20%) to the project.
The team worked well together
most of the time, with only a
few occurrences of
communication breakdown or
failure to collaborate when
appropriate.
The team worked well
together some of the time,
with only a few occurrences
of communication breakdown
or failure to collaborate when
appropriate.
Team did not collaborate or / 4 x 20
communicate well. Some
members would work
independently, without
regard to objectives or
priorities.

Participation Student was on task, Student was usually on task, Student was frequently off Student rarely participated in / 4 x 20
participated at all times, participated daily, followed the task, participated at times,

SESS 2021
FACULTY OF
NAME/ GROUP: ____________________ SUBJECT: CO-CURRICULUM
ID: ___________________________ CODE: MPU2202U4
TYPE: PROJECT 2 – PRESENTATION
& REPORT

SCORE/ WEIGHTAGE: 100/ 40%

(Individual) demonstrated leadership, action plan. sometimes strayed from group collaboration.
followed the action plan. action plan.
(20%)

Helped keep the Consistently provides Sometimes gave good Rarely Provide relevant Provided irrelevant feedback / 4 x 20
group focused dignified, clear and respectful acceptable feedback, solutions feedback or comments. or comments.
on the task feedback, solutions and and strategies.
strategies.
(Individual)

(20%)

TOTAL

SESS 2021
 FACULTY OF
NAME/ GROUP: ____________________ SUBJECT: CO-CURRICULUM
ID: ___________________________ CODE: MPU2202U4
TYPE: PROJECT 2 – PRESENTATION
& REPORT

SCORE/ WEIGHTAGE: 100/ 40%

  Communication/ Organization Teamwork Participation Focus on task Total marks
N  Matric No  Student Name Critical Thinking skills (20%) (20%) (20%) (20%) (100%)
o (20%)
1
2
3
4
5
6

SESS 2021