Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Instructions:
1. Carefully read the modules page by page to evaluate its compliance to standards indicated
in the criterion items under the six (6) factors below.
2. Put a check mark () in the appropriate column beside each criterion item. If your answer is
NO, cite specific pages, briefly indicate the error/deficiency found, and give your
recommendations in the attached Summary of Findings form.
3. Write Not Applicable (NA) for criterion items that do not apply in the modules evaluated.
5. SLM allows for review, comparison, and integration with previous lessons (if ✓
1
applicable).
7. SLM uses process questions and activities which require different levels of ✓
cognitive domain to achieve desired learning outcomes.
8. SLM has written and performance tasks that are differentiated based on ✓
target user’s multiple intelligences, learning styles, and readiness levels.
9. SLM develops 21st century skills and higher order cognition (i.e., critical ✓
thinking, creativity, learning by doing, problem solving).
2. SLM has assessments that are aligned with the specific objectives and ✓
contents (i.e., lesson / topic).
5. The SLM has assessment activities that ensure active engagement of the ✓
learners.
6. The SLM has answer keys that provide exact answers for objective-type ✓
assessments and discussion points for non-objective types.
2
7.The SLM has pre- and post- assessment items that are constructed ✓
differently.
Factor V. Readability
1. Vocabulary used in the SLM is appropriate to the target user’s level of ✓
comprehension and experience.
4. Topics and ideas presented from one lesson to the next are coherent and ✓
integrated with each other.
5.Instructions, discussion points, questions, and activities are clear to the target ✓
users.
2. The references are properly cited in the Reference List containing the
following:
- Name of creator
- Title of source
- Publication details; publisher, location of publisher, date of publication, etc.
Prepared by:
3
Date accomplished: _2-13-2022_____________
Summary of Findings
for DepEd-developed Self-Learning Modules (SLMs)
Instruction: For all NO answers provided in the respective evaluation tools, indicate in this
template the following: specific modules, paragraphs, and pages where the errors/ deficiencies
are found (1st column), the brief description of the errors/deficiencies observed (2nd column),
the type of error (3rd column), and the specific recommendations to improve the identified error /
deficiency (4th column). Additional rows may be added as necessary.
Type of
Module Error (Write
Number / C if for
Paragraph / Brief Description of Content, L
Specific Recommendations to Improving Identified
Line / Page Errors/ Findings/ for
Error / Deficiency
number (in Observations Language,
chronologic or F for
al order) Layout/Form
at)
Module 4, Spacing after
L Proper spacing should be followed after punctuation
page 15 punctuation
Module 4, Lay out of the matching F Proper layout & spacing
page 18-19 type activity
4
Please affix your signature(s) below:
I/We certify that this evaluation report and recommendations are my/our own and have been
made without any undue influence from others: