Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This section shows the results obtained by the researchers throughout the
conduction of their study. It answers both the generals and specific questions formulated
Day 1
Average 51 Average 50
Based on the data presented, the table shows that the calamansi zest is less
effective than the lemon because the weight of the metal with calamansi zest does not
change in weight while the weight of the lemon decrease one (1) gram. On the other hand,
Day 2
Average 50 Average 49
Based on the data presented, the table shows that both metal that applies with
calamansi and lemon zest decrease in weight by one (1)gram. On the other hand, the
Third Application
Average 49 Average 48
Based on the data presented, the table shows that the calamansi zest is less
effective than the lemon because the weight of the metal with calamansi zest does not
change in weight while the weight of the lemon decrease one (1) gram. On the other hand,
Upon the observation the researchers in the experiment that they conducted, metal
that applies with lemon zest decrease 1 gram in weight a day for three (3) days after the
application of lemon zest while metal that applies with calamansi zest only decrease 1
gram on the 2nd day of application. Therefore, lemon zest have the greater ability than
When the metals are exposed or combined to the oxygen, corrosion or what we
called rusting happens. With that, the weight of the iron or any other metal increases but
with the experiment done by the researchers, there is a manifestation of weight change
using calamansi and lemon zest. Where when the researchers applies the two different
zest in two different metal, rust are taken off the metal and the metals that undergo the
experiment decreases its weight upon weighing it after the 3 day application of two zest
on it.
One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test for understanding the difference
Table 4. One-Way ANOVA table for Calamansi zest, Lemon Zest and No treatment
SOURCES SS df MS F
Between
6.22 2 3.11 6.91
Treatment
Within
2.67 6 5.61
Treatment
F = 6.91
Table F = 3.88
capabilities to remove rust of the three (3) treatment (2 experimental and 1 controlled
to the calculation for paired T-test, the application of AOVA statistical treatment was
done manually. And through this calculation, it came up rejecting the Null hypothesis.