Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SPE 654(I
by
J. w, cc}%
Schlumberger of Canade,, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
L. L. RaymeY
Schlumberger-I)oll Research C eratm, Ridge field, Connecticut
A13S333ACT
—m
INTRODUCTIOIJ
-1-
SPWLA SEVENTEENTH ANNUAL LOGGING SYk4POSWlM, JUNE %12, 1976
(NaCl) to be the dominant salt in the formation water, mud filtrate, and
drilling mud. Today, howmmr, the oil industry is using increasingly
drilling muds in which potassium salto are dominant, Commonly em.
ployed are potassium chloride (IWl) and potassium biear~finate (KHC~).
“2-
SPWLA SEVENTEENTH ANNUAL LOGGING SYMPOSIUM, JUNE 9-12, 1976
rCOUNI’S/MIN. /CHANNEL
60 ‘-
~40
20 “ MW
i A
-3-
,,
SPWLA SEVENTEENTtl ANNUAL LOGGING SYMPOSIUM, JUNE 9-12, 1976
Fig. 2 shows a series of four Gamma Ray logs recorded over the same
section of borehole. ‘ho of the logs were recorded when the hole was
first drilled with a 15 Ib/gal NaCl (radioactively inert) mud. One was run
centered and the other eccentered. Using ptiblished borehole-size and mud-
weight corrections, 1 these two Gamma Ray logs, after correction, yield
similar vabaes -- representing, of course, the true radioactivity of the
traversed formation rocks.
More interesting, however, are the hvo Gamma Ray logs recorded at a’
later date after the drilling fluid had been changed to a potassium-salt mud
with a filtrate salinity of approximately 46,000 p~~~ potassium. Mud weight
remained the same at 15 lb/gal. Again, both centered and eccentered logs
were recorded. The influence of the KC I mud on the logs is obvious.
From these logs and others, some general conclusions have been drawn.
First, and most important, the contribution of mud radioactivity to the
Gamma Ray measurement can be large. Second, the effect is greater for
cente~red sondes than for eccentered sondes. Third, it is greater in large
boreholes than in small. Fourth it appears to be directly proportional to
the potassium concentration.
“4-
. .. _ _____
I CALIPER I
?~--------”l?”
I GAMMA RAY I
o I D
II FRESH MUO
ECCENTEREO
KCI MUO
ECCENTEREO
FI?ESH MUO
NTEREO~ \L-
KCI MUD
CENTEREO
,CALIPER
1
1
2
“s-
SPWLA SEVENTEENTH ANNUAL LOGGING SYMPOSIUM, JUNE 9-12, 1976
is greater in a heavy mud than in a light mud. In other words, given two
muds of identical significant potas siutn concentration but differing mud
weights, the Gamma Ray log will read slightly higher in the heavier mud
than in the lighter mud.
In the meantime, the field study has revealed a technique to correct the
Gamma Ray log recorded in potassium-salt muds. It involves recording
both a centered and eccentered log. This is often done routinely. A Gamma
Ray log is run in combination with the BHC* Sonic or the Dual Laterolog*;
these logging tools are norma~~y r= centered- A Gamm~~ Ray log iS a~s~ r~
h combination with the SNP* Neutron Or FDC* Density, and/or GNU
Neutron logs; these tools are = e~eentered.
Simple relationships relating the log reading, the true formation radio-
activity, and the radioactive-mud cent ribution can be written for non-
invaded zones as follows:
Yt
for the centered Gamma Ray Log (1)
YLoG c = B—=
+ ‘mC
~ (2)
for the eccentered Gamma Ray tog
yLOG E ‘BE + ‘mE
I
where
*Trademark of Schlumberger.
-6-
SPWLA SEVENTEENTH ANNUAL LOGGING SYMPOSIUM, JUNE 9.12, 1976
1.5
1 1 1 ! [ 1 1 1
Lo6- 1
8 10 12 14
HOLE DIAMETER (inches)
M plo~ofk (.Y
~c/Ym=) versus hole diameter for various mud weights.
(TentM5ve)
yt =
‘LOG C ‘k?/LOGEOB B
-kBc CE (3)
‘E
Knowing k, the above rdationship can be solved to give the true formation
radioactivity~ Yt, corrected for hole size and mud weight and for the
radioactivity y contribution of the potassium mud.
To use the above equations and the data of Fig. 3, it must be ascer~in-
ed that the sonde was effectively centered during one logging = and
effectively ec centered during the other. This may be done by a crossplot
of the raw Gamma Ray data from the *O runs.
-’t-
.
I
LINE FOR
RADIOACTIVE
MUD
/
LINE FOR
INERT MUD
sL~pE= 8E /ec Z!u
Plot ofy~ c (coator8d
/ G8uMfmsky Cemitng)Vor
/ ms YLOO z (tceentmed
G&amA Ray reding) far ●
ymc spdfti holo da, ●nd mud
weight.
1 # , d~
00 20 40 60 so I(JO 120 1’ o
YLOGE ~
is added to the mud, a data point, such as A, will move upward and to the
right a distance and direction dependent on the amount of potassium, the
hole size, and the mud weight. The displacement upwards is ymc and
the displacement to the right is ynlE. Thus, Line at has a slope,
ymc~Ym~ = ‘*
Conversely, Data Point At, or any data point for the given conditions of
hole sfze and mud weigh% maybe corrected for the effect of the radioactive
mud by simply moving it back along a line of slope k until it intersects the
inert-mud line. This correction rornoves the effects of the radioactive mud.
The new data point can then be corrected for hote size and mud weight in the
same way as any kert-mud Gamma Ray log would be corrected.
The data used for the crossplot. should be taken from intervals showing
small borehole-size differences -- less than & 1 in.- -from the hole dia-
meter of the zone of interest. The borehole should also be ess entiaUy circu-
lar. The raw data should defiae a line of apprwrimate slope, BE /Bc, where
BE and Bc are the expected correction factors for borehole and mud weight
for eccentered and centered sondes, respectively. A plot of BE/Bc for
various hole diameters and mud weights is presented for reference as Fig. 5.
(Fig. 5 is from Chart Per-7, Ref. 1.) Enterfng the effective hole diameter
and the mud weight into Fig. 3 yieLds IG the slope of the Line along which
Mta Point A? should be corrected for the effect of radioactivity.
-8-
SPWLA SEVENTEENTH ANNUAL LOGGING SYMPOSIUM, JUNE 9-12, 1974
Lo’
0.9 - . MUD
WEIGHT
lb/gal
0.8 -
0.0
O@c
o.? - 10
E41d
Plot of BE/Be (trusd-
Lino 8tO~–b Figm. 4 wad 12
6) rorsos hole -otor
for -rious mod weights. 0.6 “ 14 .
.
16
0.51 1 1 I i
J
6 9 12 15 18
HOLE DIAMETER (inches)
TABLE 1
3 16 83 79 35 55 96 96 99
6 15+ 89 93 46 70 122 98 97
7 16 90 90 43 66 115 100 99 “
10 13 65 55 21” 29 41 48 52
11 12+ 66 53 18 25 35 46 48
12 13- 63 49 16 ?2 31 41 45
. ..— —
A 11Gamma Ray readings (y} are in API units.
*~ole size ~ag ~2 1/2 !no at & the of these r~s.
“9- .
SPWLA SEVENTE~NTH ANNUAL LOGGING SYMPOSIUM, JUNE 9-12, 1976
t o 1 ; 1 1
1S”21“ HOLE - .
100 -
IS lb/gal MUd
80 “
~SLOPE
13ni I“HOLE ?
151
b/gal Mud / / k*l.89
// EiuA
60 - ?kunple of correction
t 0/ for r8dio8ctive mud.
‘LOG C w 4// SLOPE
4 / BEtBc~ 0.65
40 “ SLOPE-’
k=l.68 //
/ #
20 “ .x” o L06 DATA
“SLOPE
/ BEtBcsO.71
L= # n n 1 , *
J
00 20 40 60 60 1~ 120 140
tOG E -
for 15-lb mud and 13-in. hole, and the other is BE/BG = 0.65 for 15-lb
mud and 15-in. hole. The lines through the data points parallel the inert-
mud lines. Now, from Fig. 3, the correction slopes are k = 1.68 for
15-lb. mud and 13-in. hole, and k = 1.89 for 15-Ib mud and 15-in, hole.
Correction of the 12 levels for radioactivity of the mud can now he done
by moving the levels, along a line of tie proper slope, k, to the inert-mud
lines of Fig. 6. This has been done, and the resulting coordinates reccrd-
ed on Table 1. Correction for bcmehole size and mud weight (using Chart
Per- ?) yields the formation radioactivity (in API Units). The accuzac y of
th corrections can be ascertained by comparison with the formation
radioactivity computed from the cantered and eccentered Gamma Ray logs
recorded earlier in the non-potassium mud. The comparison indicates the
technique to be fairly good--at least for this example.
This method loses resolution as the hole size decreases and the center-
ed and eccentered sonde positions approach each other; and also as tie
radioactivity of the mud decreases, But then in these situations the effect
of the radioactive mud on the Gamma Ray log approaches zero, and the
need for correcting the effect is no longer necessary,
(4)
‘C ‘LOG C “ ‘E ‘LOG E
y=E “ ~. BE
“lo”
SPWLA SEVENTEENTH ANNUAL LOGGING SYMPOSIUM, JUNE 9-12, 1976
The YmE correction will, of course, be a constant for a given borehole size
in the same welL Thus, YmE cm be cakulated km the above eqmtion for
several levels having the same hole size. These values can be average~ or
a histogram made, to define the average ymE correction for the particular
hole size. k this manner, errors can be reduced somewhat: and once this
average ymE value is determined, log analysis can be done for the same
hole size in the same well with only the eccentered Gamma Ray log.
T1+8
=R (5)
‘2 l=()
where
RI is the resistivity, in ohm-m, at temperature, Tl, in ‘F, and
-11-
SPWLA SEVENTEENTH ANNUAL LOGGING SYMPOSIUM, JUNE 9.12, 1976
‘j =- (tcl - tNa) ~- h =
amf
(7)
F is the Faraday,
-12-
.,:,.
SPWLA SEVENTEENTH ANNUAL LOGGING SYMPOSIUM, JUNE 9-12, 1976
R
12 log ~, h mv at 75°F (7a)
‘j=- weq
where
The substitution of KCl or KHC03 for the NaCl in the mud ~ystem
does not greatly change the membrane potential. b this situat40n, tlw
cation transference is essentially unity for a “perfect” shale membrane’
and the activity of the potassium-mud filtrate simply replaces the activity
of the NaCl mud filtrate in the membrane-potential equation. The general
appearance of the equation in its simplified form remains the same as
Eq. 6a:
Em= .5910g
‘mfe
~, in mV at 75°F (6a) “
weq
However, for use in Eq. 6a, the equivalent resistivity of the mud filtrate,
R~eq$ for a potassium mud d$ff ers from that for a sodium-chloride mud.
Fig. 7 presents the conversion of mud-filtrate resistivity, R*, to “eq@-
-lentt’ resistivity, R~eq~ for KCL and KHC03 solutions as we~~ as for
solutions of several other salts.
The effect of a potas si-- salt mud on tie liquid- j~ction potentials Ej #
is more pronounced. In KC1 solutions the transference numbers for the
potas siurn ion, tK, and the chloride ion, tcl, are 0.496 and O. 504, respec-
tively. Since ~ and tcl are approximately equal, the potassium cation,
K+, carries about the same amoud of current as the chloride anion, Cl-.
Thus, in pure KCI solutions, no liquid-junction potential is developed.
-13”
SPWLA SEVENTEEFJ ,,, ANNUAL LOGGING SYMPOSIUM, JUNE 9.12, 1976
K
4
R ~f
(or
1.(
25° C
a
E. = -b+c~ln~, inmV (8)
J ad
-14-
SPWLA SEVENTEENTH ANNUAL LOGGING SYMPOSIUM, JUNE 9-12, 1976
Fig. 8 presents a chart whit’h solves the equation above for the KCl-
mud case, which is the more common.
Em+%
‘j u
1 i
Ag/AgCl/avr/~/shale /aw/AgWAg
-15”
SPWLASEVENTEENTH ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM, JUNE 9.12, 1976
100i , I , 1
I f 1/
/“ f i
80 I
60 I
50
40
30 I
I
20
10
,- 1 I 1 1 I
72” I I I I
8 1 I } I I
r 1 , 1 I I 1
4
6
Rmfeq 5
%ueq 4
3
I 1 1 1
!
J
2 I
I I I 1 I
—
Lo
-.
“*8
0.6
L-t41#
0.5 ,
0.4 Clean Fo motions
-.
KC! Muds, NOC;I Fm. water Rmfe~
0.3 en
—
.eB-tceAni97=or - - ;) log Rweq
Y I ‘rKC1 “ GG–$QU ~volc I
#$ ’F! 3
I
)
AD
V*8F 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I ( 1 1 1
8
“16-
SPWLA SEVENTEENTH ANNUAL LOGGING SYMPOSIUM, JUNE 9-12, 1976
SP
tloo rnvz F?ES IS TIVITY
GAMMA RAY
) APIU 15C DUAL LATE ROLOG’M - Rxo
--------------
CALl PER
ohm-m
i---- inches I 10
CALIPER
4
MIGROSPti”
Fig. 9
Legs recorded in well drilled
with KC1 mud.
f.
I
or
SCE//aw/amf/ehale /aw//SCE
-17-
SPWLA SEVENTEENTH ANNUAL LOGGING SYMPOSIUM, JUNE 9-12, 1976
‘d ,() T?+8
= 0“29 130 + 8
= 0.18 ohm-m at 130°F
The formation waters of this area and depfi~ are known to ctmt.ain
approximately equal parts by weight of NaCl ax.ldNaHC03. Assuming this,
the R.we to ~ conversion yields through interpolation betieen the NaCl
and NaHC03 lines of Fig. 7:
The zone was perforated. Recovery from a test included over 500 bbls
of water with a resistivity of 0.43 ohm-m at 130°F. Chemical composition
was of the expected equal parts by weight of NaCl and NaHC03. Acceptable
agreement was obtained betvteen the talc-ulated Rw value from the SP equa-
tion for the KC1 mud and that measured on the recovered water sample.
CONCLUSIONS
In the case of the Gamma Ray, the potassium concentration, mud weight,
hole size, and tool position all influence the measurement. In the case of
the SP, the presence of the potassium and bicarbonate ions alter somewhat
the classical SP equation; and a hi-ionic potential is developed.
-18-
SPWLA SEVENTEENTH ANNUAL LOGGING SYMPOSIUM, JUNE 9.12, 1976
Charts have been presented based on, these relations for use of the SP in
formation-water- resistitity determination.
ACKNOtiLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES
-1$-