You are on page 1of 1

St.

Bridget College
Batangas City, Philippines
COLLEGE DEPARTMENT

INSTRUCTIONS FOR ACTIVITY/ASSIGNMENT NO. 1 (PRE-MIDTERM)


 
1. For our online/synchronous class this February 07 (Monday), please refer to the
previous announcement I made in our last Synchronous class pertaining to the coverage
of the Recitation (the remaining slides of the PowerPoint last Session 2).

2. Read and study this case, either thru its full text or digest or both.
2.1. ANTONIO ROXAS, EDUARDO ROXAS and ROXAS Y CIA., in their own
respective behalf and as judicial co-guardians of JOSE ROXAS, vs.COURT OF TAX
APPEALS and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, respondents., G.R. No.
L-25043 April 26, 1968,( https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1968/apr1968/gr_l-
25043_1968.html)

3. After reading and analyzing the said case or its digest, fill up this Table with your
answers:
Questions Answers
1. . Who were the 2
contending parties or
persons in the case?
2. What are the important
facts in the said case that are
also related to the topics in
the above-mentioned
PowerPoint?
3. What is the issue or
dispute in the said case or
why were those parties
contending with each other?
4. What were the arguments
or standpoint or reasoning
of the 2 parties or persons
contending in said case?
5. Give the brief decision or
ruling of the Supreme Court
and explain briefly why it is
related to the topic.
4. Make the said Table in a Word document and submit the same to me via MS TEAMS
on or before 6pm of February 7.

Stay safe and God bless! 

You might also like