Rehabilitation and Maintenance of Al Ghouse Road from 7th Ring

Road to Fahaheel Ahmadi

RA/265 Project
– STATE OF KUWAIT –

– CROSSHOLE SONIC LOGGING TEST REPORT –

- On Pile Nos. J16-TP5, J26-TP1 & J26-TP2 -

SUBMITTED TO:

KUWAIT BRUCKNER CONSTRUCTIONS & CONTRACTING CO.

OWNER : Ministry of Public Works, MPW

CONSULTANT : EGIS INTERNATIONAL in association with DAR SSH

Main CONTRACTOR: Kuwait Arab Contractors

Prepared By:

INCO - LABS
For Soil & Material Testing, Surveying, Calibration, Structural Evaluation & Environmental Studies
P.O. Box: 21073, Safat 13071, Kuwait. Tel (965) 2471 0780. Fax (965) 2471 6526

NOVEMBER 2021

www.blpge.com
Date: 15th November 2021
Ref.: INCO/PILING/RC/21-21-5/CSL_21-009

Client: KUWAIT BRUCKNER CONSTRUCTIONS & CONTRACTING CO.

State of Kuwait

Attention: Eng. Sabry

Site Engineer

Job Order No.: 21-21-5

Subject:Crosshole Sonic Logging Test Report

On J16-TP5, J26-TP1 & J26-TP2
RA/265, Al Ghouse Road Project
State of Kuwait
===============================================

Dear Sir,

We are pleased to submit herewith Two (2) copies of our Crosshole Sonic Logging
(CSL) T e s t R e p o r t t h a t contains data, analysis & interpretation of the CSL
performed on t h r e e ( 3 ) B o a r d piles. The CSL was carried out at the site on 13th of
November 2021 for the above mentioned project.

We trust that the information contained herein will suit your current project needs;
if you have any questions or require further technical assistance, please do not hesitate to
contact us.

We are pleased to have been on service on this occasion and we look forward to
working with you further on these on-going & future projects.

Best Regards,
For INCO-LABS

Dr. Abdul Majeed A. Jeragh

Technical Consultant

th
Date Of Issue: 15 NOVEMBER 2021
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 2

1. PILE DETAILS: ....................................................................................................................... 3

2. TEST METHODOLOGY: .................................................................................................... 4

3. INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES: ................................................................................. 5

4. DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS: .................................................................................. 7

APPENDIX: / Plan Location Layout/CSL Output .................................................................. 8

Page 1 of 7P1 Page 1 of 7 Page 1 Page 1 of 7of

 th
RA/265 Rehabilitation & Maintenance of Al Ghouse Road from 7 Ring Road to Fahaheel Amhmadi INCO-LABS

INTRODUCTION

The following note details the Cross-Hole Sonic Logging Test (CSL) and Results of the
large diameter foundation working piles for the proposed development project of
“Rehabilitation and Maintenance of Al Ghouse Road from 7th Ring Road to Fahaheel Ahmadi
RA/265 Project” in The State of Kuwait.

M/s. INCO-LABS (KSC) was engaged by M/s. KUWAIT BRUCKNER

CONSTRUCTIONS & CONTRACTING CO. to conduct the Cross-Hole Sonic Logging
Test (CSL) on three (3) Nos. of reinforced concrete bored cast in-situ piles installed at the
above site. The aim of testing is to assess and check the pile integrity for potential problems
like cross-sectional changes, honeycombing, concrete quality, continuity, etc. The field testing
was conducted on 13th of November 2021 in accordance with ASTM D6760-19.

This report presents the results of Cross Hole Sonic Logging using the Cross Hole
Analyser, CHA, based on the data, details and pile identification provided at site and the site
conditions at the time of testing.

Piles subjected for CSL test are of 1200 mm diameter. There are three (3) numbers of
mild steel sonic tubes of 38 mm diameter installed for CSL Testing.

Level of Measurements was referred to the Kuwait Datum [KD].

Date of Issue: 15th November 2021 Page 2

 th
RA/265 Rehabilitation & Maintenance of Al Ghouse Road from 7 Ring Road to Fahaheel Amhmadi INCO-LABS

1. PILE DETAILS:
CSL Testing was conducted on 1200 mm diameter reinforced concrete cast-in-situ
bored piles. Three (3) mild steel tubes of 38mm internal diameter were installed for the test.
Sonic tubes details during the period of testing are mentioned below.

Table-1: Pile Details:

Existing Measured
Pile
Sr. Date of Ground Toe Level Pile Top
Pile Location Type Pile # Length
No. Installation Level Level
[TL]
[m]
(COL) [m]

40.0610 +
1. J16 TP 5 03-11-2021 17.201 22.860
10 cm

2. J26 TP 1 28-10-221 46.25 2390 22.35

3. J26 TP 2 25-10-2021 42.667 20.317 22.35

Table-2: Tubes Details:

Total Length of
Length tubes Scanned
Tube Tube Tube spacing
Sr. No. Pile Name of Tubes above Depth
No. concrete Corridor [m]
[m] [m]
[m]

1. 1 22.90 0.20 1-2 22.63 0.72

2. J16 – TP5 2 22.90 0.20 2-3 22.63 0.71

3. 3 22.90 0.20 1-3 22.63 0.70

1. 1 22.46 0.06 1-2 22.32 0.79

2. J26 – TP1 2 22.45 0.06 2-3 22.35 0.75

3. 3 22.50 0.04 1-3 22.36 0.73

Date of Issue: 15th November 2021 Page 3

 th
RA/265 Rehabilitation & Maintenance of Al Ghouse Road from 7 Ring Road to Fahaheel Amhmadi INCO-LABS

1. 1 22.47 0.07 1-2 22.32 0.72

2. J26 – TP2 2 22.47 0.08 2-3 22.29 0.759

3. 3 22.43 0.09 1-3 22.30 0.80

2. TEST METHODOLGY:

Cross-Hole Sonic Logging generally applies to drilled shafts and requires that at least
three tubes be installed in a drilled shaft prior to pouring the concrete. The stress pulses are
then sent from one tube to the other at 50mm vertical intervals.

The arrival time of the pulse at the receiver tube indicates the quality and integrity of the
concrete between the tubes.

For conducting the sonic logging test mild steel tubes as described earlier were installed
throughout the length of the shaft by tying them to the reinforcement cage. They were filled
with water throughout the depth of the pile and the bottom of the tubes was sealed before
concreting.

The use of water was to take care of the heat of hydration during curing of concrete
and the water also acts as a medium for transmission of stress waves through the pipes.
Absence of water before concreting may result in warping or bending of tubes and
consequently affect the CSL results.

The test must be conducted after minimum 3 to 7 days of concreting. Early testing is
to check the integrity of the pile shaft although wave speed maybe lower. Testing after
concrete has attained at least 70% of its strength or after the required strength is achieved,
will likely result in better wave speeds. The testing is started marking the tubes and then by
lowering a transmitter in one of the tubes and a receiver in another.

Both transmitter and receiver are connected by cables to the Cross Hole Analyser
(CHA), which records the arrival time and the energy attenuation as the probes are
simultaneously raised to the top. As long as the arrival time and the energy attenuation are

Date of Issue: 15th November 2021 Page 4

 th
RA/265 Rehabilitation & Maintenance of Al Ghouse Road from 7 Ring Road to Fahaheel Amhmadi INCO-LABS

roughly constant, one may deduce that the concrete quality is also uniform and the pile is
therefore acceptable.

The CHA determines the quality of concrete between pairs of tubes pre-installed in
bored piles. A transmitter lowered down on one tube sends a high frequency signal that is
sensed some time later by a receiver in another tube. As the sensors are being pulled, the CHA
records, at regular depth intervals, the time that the signal takes to travel from the transmitter to
the receiver (arrival time), as well as the signal energy.

These two quantities are indicative of concrete quality between the pair of tubes at a
particular depth. The entire shaft length is scanned in this fashion by repeating the test across
diagonals & adjacent perimeters.

The CHA is easy to use and data interpretation is straightforward. Defects in the pile
are easy to recognize. They appear as weak signals in the signal plot, as missing signals in the
traditional plot, as delayed arrivals in the arrival time plot, and as signals with low energy.

3. INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES:

By sending ultrasonic pulse through concrete from one probe to another (probes located
in parallel tubes), the CSL procedure inspects the drilled shaft structural integrity, and extent
and location of defects, if any.

For equidistant tubes, uniform concrete yields consistent first arrival times (FAT) with
reasonable pulse wave speed and signal strengths. Non-uniformities such as contamination, soft
concrete, and honeycombing, voids, or inclusions exhibit delayed arrival times (FAT) with
reduced signal strength.

Typically the following classification explains interpretation of defects in the shaft. Here, the
rating of the shaft integrity considers the increase in “first arrival time” (FAT) and the energy
reduction relative to the arrival time or energy in a nearby zone of good concrete.

Date of Issue: 15th November 2021 Page 5

 th
RA/265 Rehabilitation & Maintenance of Al Ghouse Road from 7 Ring Road to Fahaheel Amhmadi INCO-LABS

Table-3: Defect Classification:

FAT Increase relative to Energy reduction relative

Pile Classification
good concrete to good concrete

Satisfactory / Good 0-10% < 6 db

Questionable (Q) 11-20% > 6 to 9 db

Poor/Flaw 21 to 30% >9 to 12 db

Poor/Defect >31% > 12 db

The wave speed obtained is a useful tool to evaluate concrete quality. However, because
the tubes might not be perfectly straight or even parallel, a fixed absolute limit of a wave speed
value cannot be used for evaluation for perimeter profiles. Wave speed is best determined from
the test results across major diagonals although this also to some extent may depend on bending
of tubes. Other factors that affect wave speed include age of concrete, temperature, concrete
grade, type of cement, sand aggregate, design mix etc. and hence many times the energy is
considered a more important parameter in evaluating the results.

4. DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS:

The detailed test graphs are attached in Appendix B of the report. Generally the
following conclusions can be said from cross-hole sonic logging tests conducted on the pile
shafts based on data, pile location and pile information supplied to us during testing.

Table 4. CSL Output Summary

Probable Locations of Anomalous Zone on Piles

Anomalous Zone Energy FAT Wave Potential Cause of

Pile
Profile Start To Peak Reduction Delay Speed Anomalous & CSL
Name
(m) (m) (m) (db) (%) [m/s] Rating

Date of Issue: 15th November 2021 Page 6

 th
RA/265 Rehabilitation & Maintenance of Al Ghouse Road from 7 Ring Road to Fahaheel Amhmadi INCO-LABS

1. CSL testing was conducted on three (3) piles at RA/265 project.

2. Defect will be considered on both Important Energy Reduction & delay on FAT
together. (Ref. to Table-3 above).
3. Pile zone not listed in Table 4 above may consider have a CSL rating of
Satisfactory/Good.
4. The pile integrity based from CSL results (ref. Appendix B, CSL Output) are considered
to have a rating of “Satisfactory / Good”.
5. Generally, the final decision about acceptance shall be based on various factors (Concrete
Quality, Load Test Results, etc.). Hence, it shall be decided by the consultants of the
project.
6. All sonic tests have been carried out starting from the very bottom of the sonic-pipe, if
any discrepancy should exist between the bottom elevation of the RAW data and the
bottom elevation measured on site by tape, it must be considered within tolerances of the
readings themselves.
7. This report has been prepared with generally accepted engineering practices and the
results of Cross Hole Sonic Logging testing as per ASTM D-6760-19. No other
warranty, expressed or implied, is made. The findings provided in this report are based
on the result of the individual pile tested and information made available to us.

Appendix:
A- Plan Location Layout
B- CSL Output

Respectfully Submitted,
INCO-LAB

Date of Issue: 15th November 2021 Page 7

 Appendix-A
PLAN LOCATION LAYOUT
 AL
J16

GHO

W
J18

N
J26

E
SE S
KEY PLAN

LEGEND :

TRE
TEST PILES SETTING OUT FOR J16 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS U.O.N

TEST PILE DIAMETER EXISTING GROUND PILE TOE PILE LENGTH PILE COORDINATES NOTES

ET E
SERIAL
PILE NO. (M) LEVEL+10cm LEVEL (M) EASTING NORTHING
1 (5) 1.20 40.061 17.201 22.860 509186.169 3226733.175

W
T-1

1
ABU
2 (6) 1.20 41.961 19.101 22.860 509068.719 3226666.720

R-1
J16

2
PIE

N
W E

R-2

3
PIE

No. 210
R O A D
H ADI YA
IQ Q A -
R
PROJECT DIRECTOR
-3

4
PIER FOR APPROVAL ACTION SIGNATURE DATE

E 509186.169 A
B

A D No. 210 N 3226733.175 C

CERTIFIED FOR CO-ORDINATION AND COMPLIANCE WITH
R O
A -H A DIYA THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS EXECPT AS NOTED

R IQQ TRADE CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE DATE

TEST PILE NO. (05) ROADS

STRUCTURE
UTILITIES

R-4 LOCATION SURVEY

5
PIE TELEPHONE

NOTE:
TO REDUCE THE RISK OF DAMAGE OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND
REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY
UTILITIES BEFORE STARTING THE BOREHOLES DRILLING NEED
ONE TRIAL PIT SHOULD EXCAVATE AT THE LOCATION OF ‫تل ك ا ةلود‬
T-2

6
ABU BOREHOLE WITH DEPTH BETWEEN 1.5m TO 2m FROM EXISTING STATE OF KUWAIT
GROUND LEVEL.
E 509068.719 5000
CLIENT:

N 3226666.720 1900 1200 1900

E

00 CONSULTANTS:

12
12

00
W

TR
IA In association with
L LS
PI DAR SSH INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING.

1900
T O CONSULTANTS (SSH) KUWAIT
EX TO CONTRACTOR:
C D TEST PILE
AL

AV AN
TEST PILE NO.(06) AT
E BY
H

5000
GH

1200
T E CLEARANCE PROJECT NAME:
LOCATION VA Y
B
LIMIT
RA / 265
CONSTRUCTION, COMPLETION & MAINTENANCE
O

A H OF AL GHOUSE ROAD FROM

US

XC AN 7th RING ROAD TO FAHAHEEL ROAD(ROAD 212)

E D DRAWING STATUS:
E

T TO
PI SHOP DRAWING
ST

1900
L O
IA LS DRAWING TITLE:
RE

TR

30/10/2021 10:21:48 PM
J16 SETTING OUT OF TEST PILE 5&6
E T

12

00
0 0 DRAWN BY A.G. CHECKED BY A.M.G.

12
TEST PILE PLAN FOR J-16 DATE 30-10-2021 APPROVED BY
SCALE As indicated REVISION 0
SCALE 1:600 TEST PILE TRIAL PIT PLAN DRAWING No RA265-SD-J16-BR-SO-002

REFER CONTRACT DWG NOs.

SCALE 1:50
 0+200
AL GHOUSE STREET
‫صليل لاراش‬
E 510278.544 J26
J16

26+600
N 3219489.148

W
E 510239.100 J18

N
N 3219495.796

E
E 510207.545
N 3219501.115
J26 KEY PLAN

LEGEND :
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS U.O.N

E 510108.936
N 3219517.735 MSE w
all
E 510357.431
E 510317.987 N 3219475.852
00 3
0+1 R6 N 3219482.500
0+219
0+200
E 510388.986
0+100 1
32.000 N 3219470.534
2

1
ABUT.-
0+400 ‫لامفألر‬- 40.000 MSE w

66
all
‫قيرط‬ 3

PIER-1

R
0+
BH-J26 40.000 10
0
/1 ‫فرفرا‬ 4

PIER-2
N
‫ح‬ ‫لا‬ 0+500
0+000 40.000
5
E 510487.595

0
PIER-3
10
0+400 N 3219453.914

0+
32.000
FAHAH 6

PIER-4
EEL-AH BH-J26 0+5
03
MADI R /2

2
ABUT.-
OAD N BH-J26
O. 212 S 0+500 /3 0+600 0+00
0
BH-J26
0+200
/4 0+400
0+00
0 BH-J26
/5 N
0+700
0+2
76
0+600 BH-J26
/6 ‫لامفألر‬- ‫ط‬
BH-J26 ‫قير‬
/7
‫حفرفرا‬
MSE w
all 0+
20 0+000 0+700
‫لا‬
0+
10 0 S BH-J26
0 FAHAHE /8 PROJECT DIRECTOR
EL-AHM
56

E 510190.324 ADI ROA FOR APPROVAL ACTION SIGNATURE DATE

R

N 3219472.364 D NO. 2 A
12 B
0+100 0+100

R5
C
50

3
R CERTIFIED FOR CO-ORDINATION AND COMPLIANCE WITH

TEST PILE NO.(01) 0+191

THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS EXECPT AS NOTED
TRADE CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE DATE

LOCATION ROADS

R
E 510389.206 STRUCTURE

50
UTILITIES
N 3219441.345 SURVEY
TELEPHONE
26+800

NOTE: TEST PILE NO.(02)

T

MSE w
‫صلي‬

TO REDUCE THE RISK OF DAMAGE OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND all

E

LOCATION
STRE

REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY

UTILITIES BEFORE STARTING PILE TEST DRILLING NEED ONE TRIAL PIT
‫لل‬

SHOULD EXCAVATE AT THE LOCATION OF PILE WITH DEPTH BETWEEN ‫تل ك ا ةلود‬
‫اراش‬

1.5m TO 2m FROM EXISTING GROUND LEVEL STATE OF KUWAIT

OUSE

5.000
CLIENT:
1.900 1.200 1.900
0
0+200

0+00
AL GH

1.
20
0
20

0 CONSULTANTS:
1.

TR
IA
L LS
In association with
1.900

PI
27+400

T O TEST PILE PLAN FOR J-26 DAR SSH INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING.

TO
CONSULTANTS (SSH) KUWAIT
EX
0+222

C D TEST PILE SCALE 1:600 CONTRACTOR:

AV AN
AT H
E BY
5.000
1.200

E CLEARANCE
V AT BY LIMIT PROJECT NAME: RA / 265
A H TEST PILES SETTING OUT FOR J26 CONSTRUCTION, COMPLETION & MAINTENANCE
C AN OF AL GHOUSE ROAD FROM

EX D SERIAL
TEST PILE DIAMETER EXISTING GROUND PILE TOE PILE LENGTH PILE COORDINATES NOTES 7th RING ROAD TO FAHAHEEL ROAD(ROAD 212)

IT TO PILE NO. (M) LEVEL LEVEL (M) DRAWING STATUS:

1.900

P L.O.C. EASTING NORTHING SHOP DRAWING

O
I AL LS 1 (1) 1.20 46.25 23.90 22.35 510190.324 3219472.364
26+900

TR
DRAWING TITLE:
2 (2) 1.20 42.667 20.317 22.35 510389.206 3219441.345
J26 SETTING OUT OF TEST PILES
1.

0
20
20

1.
0

DRAWN BY A.G. CHECKED BY A.M.G.

DATE 26-10-2021 APPROVED BY
SCALE As indicated REVISION 001
TEST PILE TRIAL PIT PLAN L.O.C. DRAWING No RA265-SD-J26-BR-SO-002

SCALE 1:50 REFER CONTRACT DWG NOs.

                                                                               

Appendix-B
CSL OUTPUT

www.blpge.com
 
 
 
 Inco-Labs (KSCC)
J16-TP5
J16-TP5 J16-TP5 3
J16-TP5 J16-TP5 3
J16-TP5 J16-TP5 3
Dia=1.20 m 3 Dia=1.20 m Dia=1.20 m 3 Dia=1.20 m Dia=1.20 m 3 Dia=1.20 m
Tube Number=1-2 (F3,3) Tube Number=1-2 Tube Number=2-3 (F3,3) Tube Number=2-3 Tube Number=1-3 (F3,3) Tube Number=1-3
Spacing=0.72 m 1 2
Spacing=0.72 m Spacing=0.71 m 1 2
Spacing=0.71 m Spacing=0.70 m 1 2
Spacing=0.70 m
11/13/2021 10:26 11/13/2021 10:27 11/13/2021 10:36
11/13/2021 10:26 1 2
11/13/2021 10:27 1 2
11/13/2021 10:36 1 2

Wavespeed (m/sec) Arrival (ms) Wavespeed (m/sec) Arrival (ms) Wavespeed (m/sec) Arrival (ms)
0 4000 10000 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 0 4000 10000 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 0 4000 10000 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5
0

0
2

2
4

4
6

6
8

8
10

10

10

10

10

10
Depth (m)

Depth (m)

Depth (m)

Depth (m)

Depth (m)

Depth (m)
12

12

12

12

12

12
14

14

14

14

14

14
16

16

16

16

16

16
18

18

18

18

18

18
20

20

20

20

20

20
22

22

22

22

22

22
22.63 22.63 22.63

high low high low high low

Energy (dB) Energy (dB) Energy (dB)

Pile Dynamics, Inc. 1/3

Cross-Hole Analyzer
 Inco-Labs (KSCC)
J16-TP5
Pile Prof Distance Avg AT Avg WS Standard Discrete Max PSD
m ms m/sec Dev. Coeff.

J16-TP5 1-2 0.72 0.136 5302 633 0.119

J16-TP5 2-3 0.71 0.135 5251 641 0.122
J16-TP5 1-3 0.70 0.138 5082 647 0.127

Pile Dynamics, Inc. 2/3

Cross-Hole Analyzer
Inco-Labs (KSCC)
J16-TP5
Profile TX TX Length CD / Calc.
AB CD meters Diff. Tube Factor

1-2 22.83 23.10 22.90 0.20 100.9% 600.1

2-3 22.79 23.06 22.90 0.16 100.7% 599.1
1-3 22.90 23.17 22.90 0.27 101.2% 602.0

TX avg= 600.4

Profile RX RX Length CD / Calc.

AB CD meters Diff. Tube Factor

1-2 22.81 23.08 22.90 0.18 100.8% -599.6

2-3 22.81 23.08 22.90 0.18 100.8% -599.6
1-3 22.93 23.20 22.90 0.30 101.3% -602.7

RX avg= -600.6

Pile Dynamics, Inc. 3/3

Cross-Hole Analyzer
 Inco-Labs (KSCC)
J26-TP1
J26-TP1 J26-TP1 3
J26-TP1 J26-TP1 3
J26-TP1 J26-TP1 3
Dia=1.20 m 3 Dia=1.20 m Dia=1.20 m 3 Dia=1.20 m Dia=1.20 m 3 Dia=1.20 m
Tube Number=1-2 (F3,3) Tube Number=1-2 Tube Number=2-3 (F3,3) Tube Number=2-3 Tube Number=1-3 (F3,3) Tube Number=1-3
Spacing=0.79 m 1 2
Spacing=0.79 m Spacing=0.75 m 1 2
Spacing=0.75 m Spacing=0.73 m 1 2
Spacing=0.73 m
11/13/2021 08:35 11/13/2021 08:39 11/13/2021 08:41
11/13/2021 08:35 1 2
11/13/2021 08:39 1 2
11/13/2021 08:41 1 2

Wavespeed (m/sec) Arrival (ms) Wavespeed (m/sec) Arrival (ms) Wavespeed (m/sec) Arrival (ms)
0 4000 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 0 4000 10000 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 0 4000 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5
0

0
2

2
4

4
6

6
8

8
10

10

10

10

10

10
Depth (m)

Depth (m)

Depth (m)

Depth (m)

Depth (m)

Depth (m)
12

12

12

12

12

12
14

14

14

14

14

14
16

16

16

16

16

16
18

18

18

18

18

18
20

20

20

20

20

20
22

22

22

22

22

22
22.32 22.35 22.36

high low high low high low

Energy (dB) Energy (dB) Energy (dB)

Pile Dynamics, Inc. 1/3

Cross-Hole Analyzer
 Inco-Labs (KSCC)
J26-TP1
Pile Prof Distance Avg AT Avg WS Standard Discrete Max PSD
m ms m/sec Dev. Coeff.

J26-TP1 1-2 0.79 0.167 4745 140 0.030

J26-TP1 2-3 0.75 0.143 5246 122 0.023
J26-TP1 1-3 0.73 0.142 5151 118 0.023

Pile Dynamics, Inc. 2/3

Cross-Hole Analyzer
Inco-Labs (KSCC)
J26-TP1
Profile TX TX Length CD / Calc.
AB CD meters Diff. Tube Factor

1-2 22.43 22.69 22.46 0.23 101.0% 601.2

2-3 22.33 22.59 22.45 0.14 100.6% 598.8
1-3 22.34 22.61 22.46 0.15 100.7% 598.9

TX avg= 599.6

Profile RX RX Length CD / Calc.

AB CD meters Diff. Tube Factor

1-2 22.45 22.72 22.45 0.27 101.2% -602.1

2-3 22.44 22.71 22.50 0.21 100.9% -600.5
1-3 22.41 22.68 22.50 0.18 100.8% -599.7

RX avg= -600.8

Pile Dynamics, Inc. 3/3

Cross-Hole Analyzer
 Inco-Labs (KSCC)
J26-TP2
J26-TP2 J26-TP2 3
J26-TP2 J26-TP2 3
J26-TP2 J26-TP2 3
Dia=1.20 m 3 Dia=1.20 m Dia=1.20 m 3 Dia=1.20 m Dia=1.20 m 3 Dia=1.20 m
Tube Number=1-2 (F3,3) Tube Number=1-2 Tube Number=2-3 (F3,3) Tube Number=2-3 Tube Number=1-3 (F3,3) Tube Number=1-3
Spacing=0.72 m 1 2
Spacing=0.72 m Spacing=0.79 m 1 2
Spacing=0.79 m Spacing=0.80 m 1 2
Spacing=0.80 m
11/13/2021 09:04 11/13/2021 09:05 11/13/2021 09:06
11/13/2021 09:04 1 2
11/13/2021 09:05 1 2
11/13/2021 09:06 1 2

Wavespeed (m/sec) Arrival (ms) Wavespeed (m/sec) Arrival (ms) Wavespeed (m/sec) Arrival (ms)
0 4000 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 0 4000 10000 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 0 4000 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5
0

0
2

2
4

4
6

6
8

8
10

10

10

10

10

10
Depth (m)

Depth (m)

Depth (m)

Depth (m)

Depth (m)

Depth (m)
12

12

12

12

12

12
14

14

14

14

14

14
16

16

16

16

16

16
18

18

18

18

18

18
20

20

20

20

20

20
22

22

22

22

22

22
22.32 22.29 22.30

high low high low high low

Energy (dB) Energy (dB) Energy (dB)

Pile Dynamics, Inc. 1/3

Cross-Hole Analyzer
 Inco-Labs (KSCC)
J26-TP2
Pile Prof Distance Avg AT Avg WS Standard Discrete Max PSD
m ms m/sec Dev. Coeff.

J26-TP2 1-2 0.72 0.149 4844 195 0.040

J26-TP2 2-3 0.79 0.140 5648 184 0.033
J26-TP2 1-3 0.80 0.170 4715 147 0.031

Pile Dynamics, Inc. 2/3

Cross-Hole Analyzer
Inco-Labs (KSCC)
J26-TP2
Profile TX TX Length CD / Calc.
AB CD meters Diff. Tube Factor

1-2 22.14 22.41 22.47 -0.06 99.7% 593.3

2-3 22.30 22.56 22.47 0.09 100.4% 597.4
1-3 22.41 22.67 22.47 0.20 100.9% 600.4

TX avg= 597.0

Profile RX RX Length CD / Calc.

AB CD meters Diff. Tube Factor

1-2 22.16 22.43 22.47 -0.04 99.8% -593.8

2-3 22.28 22.55 22.43 0.12 100.5% -598.1
1-3 22.37 22.64 22.43 0.21 100.9% -600.5

RX avg= -597.5

Pile Dynamics, Inc. 3/3

Cross-Hole Analyzer