MET's Institute of Engineering, Nashik: Final Year Project Work

SAVITRIBAI PHULE PUNE UNIVERSITY
MET’s Institute of Engineering, Nashik
Department of Information Technology
Final Year Project Work
Academic Year: 2020-21
Project Title : Identification System of Hadwrittern Signature
Project Area :
Internal Guide : R. P. Dahake
1
Savitribai Phule Pune University

INDEX
1. Undertaking by Students
2. Project Schedule
3. Group Details
4. Abstract Format
5. Monthly Planning Sheet (Semester – I )
6. Project Review – I Check List
7. Performance Evaluation Sheet – I (Review – I)
8. Project Review – II Check List
9. Performance Evaluation Sheet – II (Review – II)
10. Monthly Planning Sheet (Semester – II )
11. Participation in Project Competition
12. Paper Publications (If any)
13. Examination Evaluation Guidelines
14. Examination Evaluation Sheet (Semester-I)
2
SEMESTER-I
3
UNDERTAKING BY STUDENTS
We, the students of B.E.I.T. are hereby assure that we will follow all the rules and regulations of
SPPU related to the project work for the academic year 2020-21. The Project entitled-
IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM OF HANDWRITTEN SIGNATURE will be fully designed and
developed by us and no part of the project/full project will be designed and developed by any
external entity or copied from some external resources. We are fully aware that copying or taking
help of any external agency in the development of our project is totally unethical and illegal. The
examiners have /University has full rights to initiate an action against us as per University norms if
involved in unfair/illegal/unethical work.
Sr. Roll No. Name of Student Signature

No.
1. B150478555 Kashaf Pathan
2. B150478521 Pooja Gaikwad
3. B150478560 Purva Patil
4. B150478553 Laxmi Pagare
4
Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune
(With effect from Academic Year 2020-21)
Rules & Regulations

1. All students must enter the correct information in the work book.
2. All the entries in the project work book must be verified by the concerned project guide.
3. Students must report to their respective guide on project day as per the time table.
4. Activities of the project work should be completed as per the project plan only.
5. Project group must submit soft copies of Project Abstract, Project Report and
Publications in PDF format only.
6. Project group member submit two hard copies of Project Report in the format provided
by department.
7. Project work book must be brought at the time of Project Reviews & Project
Examination.
8. Any changes, if any, must be countersigned by the concerned project guide.
9. For project reviews and project examination, all students must report 15 minutes before
the scheduled time.
10. For any query, concerned guide should be consulted.
5
Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune

(Academic Year 2020-21)
PROJECT WORK SCHEDULE
Sr.No. Activity Scheduled Date

SEMESTER-I
1. Registration of Project Groups Week 2
2. Project Topic Revisit and Submission Week 3
3. Allocation of Guide Week 4
4. Submission of Abstract to Project Guide and Project Week 4
Coordinator in the Prescribed Format
5. Project Review-I Week 6
6. Project Review-II Week 10
7. Verification of Project Work Book By Internal Guide Week 11
(before submission of Preliminary Project Report)
8. Submission of Final Preliminary Project Report in Week 12
Prescribed Format
9. External Term-work Evaluation (After Theory As per Univ.
Examination) Schedule
6
(Academic Year: 2020-21)
Project Group No.: 14
Project Title: Identification System of Handwrittern signature
GROUP DETAILS:
Name of the T.E.

S.No. Roll No. Mobile No. Email id
Student Result
1. B150478555 Kashaf 9764801755 Kashafpathan2000@gmail.com
Pathan
2. B150478521 Pooja 9112886823 Gaikwadpooja5218@gmail.com
Gaikwad
3. B150478560 Purva Patil 7083962233 Purvapatil1412@gmail.com
4. B150478553 Laxmi 9689918801 Laxmipagare70@gmail.com
Pagare
Name & Signature Name & Signature Dr. S. V. Gumaste
of Internal Guide of External Guide Head of Department
(if applicable)
Mobile No.: Mobile No:
Email id:
Email id : Company Name :
7
(Academic Year:2020-21)
Project Group No.:14 Guide Name : Prof. R. P. Dahake

GROUP MEMBERS: 4
Roll No./ Seat No. Name of Student Project Area Project Platform
B150478555 Kashaf Pathan
B150478521 Pooja Gaikwad
B150478560 Purva Patil
B150478553 Laxmi Pagare
(Please Note: Remove the following guidelines and copy your Abstract)
Abstract :This research was conducted to find a feasible solution to verify handwritten
signatures using various machine learning approaches. The scope has been scaling down to
offline signatures which contains static inputs and outputs. Several classification methods
such as Multinomial Naive Bayes Classifier (MNBC), Bernoulli Naive Bayes Classifier
(BNBC), Logistic Regression Classifier (LRC), Stochastic Gradient Descent Classifier
(SGDC), and Random Forest Classifier (RFC) were implemented to identify the most suitable
classifier to verify handwritten signatures. The classifiers were pre-trained and tested using a
handwritten signature database available for public use available on the Kaggle website. The
best performance was obtained from RFC with and accuracy score of more than 0.6. For
average, the framework made has been successful in verifying handwritten signature images
provided with an extensive precision level.In this work, Convolutional Neural Networks
(CNN) have been utilized to learn features from the pre-processed genuine signatures and
forged signatures. The CNN used is inspired by Inception V1 architecture(GoogleNet). The
architecture uses the concept of having different filters on same level so that the network
would be wider instead of deeper.
8
Abstract Content
An abstract is an outline/ brief summary of your whole project. It should include key
points of introduction, methods, results and conclusions. It highlights major points of
your project and answers why this work is important, what is your motivation. Most
informative abstracts have following key parts.
a. Background
b. Aim or Purpose of Project
c. Method Used
d. Findings/ Results
e. Conclusion
Do not include any charts, tables, figures, or spreadsheets in the abstract body.
Guidelines for Abstract
 In Microsoft Word format
 In Calibri front, size 11
 No more than 300 words approximately in length
 Single-spaced and a single paragraph
Abstract File Name: college code space Group id
e.g. 23A1

(Academic Year :2020-21)
Semester - I
Weekly Planning Sheet
Week Activity Completed Student Guide
Activity Planned
No. Status Signature Signature
Week Discussion of the project idea with
1 the guide
Week First Presentation / seminar before
2 Review Committee
Week Submission of synopsis to project
3 guide & project co-coordinator in
the prescribed format
Week Discussion about the SRS
4 documentation
Week Submission of SRS Document
5 including requirements to the guide
Week Submission of DFDs upto level 2 &
6 Use Case, Sequence and Class
Diagrams
Week Review-I/ Second presentation
7 before Review Committee including
complete Requirements Analysis of
9
the system and DFDs upto level 2
and Use Case diagram, Sequence
diagram and Class diagrams
Week Submission of remaining UML
8 diagrams
Week Reporting about partial
9 implementation viz. GUI &
Database Design
Week
10 Review-II / Third First Presentation /
seminar before Review Committee
( including Remaining UML
diagrams and 25% implementation –
including GUI and database
implementation)
Week Submission of draft copy of Project
11 Report to the guide.
Week Submission of Project Report in prescribed
12 format
Project Coordinator Internal Guide

PROJECT REVIEW–I
Group id: Date :
Project Title: Identification System of Handwrittern
signature
Sr.No Student Contact
RollNo. Internal/ External Guide Details
. Name Details
1. B150478555 Kashaf 9764801755 Guide Name: prof. R. P.Dahake
Pathan
2. B150478521 Pooja 9112886823 Mentor Name, email & Mobile
Gaikwad No.
3. B150478560 Purva Patil 708392233
4. B150478553 Laxmi 9689918801
Pagare
REVIEW-I CHECKLIST: FINALIZATION OF SCOPE 25 Marks
PROJECT STATEMENT
10
1. Is the statement short and concise (10-20 words maximum)? Y/N/NA/NC*
2. Does the statement gives clear indication about what your project will accomplish? Y/N/NA/NC*
3. Can a person who is not familiar with the project understand scope of the project by Y/N/NA/NC*
reading the Project Problem Statement?
REQUIREMENT: SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES
Does the Scope and Objectives establish the "context" for the proposed project Y/N/NA/NC*
by referencing to the following elements:
a. Area all aspects of the requirements document (i.e., Functional Spec.) addressed in Y/N/NA/NC*
the design?
b. Is the architecture/ block diagram well defined and understood? Y/N/NA/NC*
c. The project's objective of study (what product, process, resource, etc.) is being Y/N/NA/NC*
addressed
d. The project's purpose: is the purpose of project addressed properly (why it's being Y/N/NA/NC*
pursued: to evaluate, reduce, increase, etc.)?
e. The project's viewpoint: is the project's viewpoint is understood? (who is the Y/N/NA/NC*
project's end user)?
f. Is the project goal statement is in alignment with the sponsoring organization's Y/N/NA/NC*
business goals and mission?
ANALYSIS Y/N/NA/NC*
1. Is information domain analysis complete, consistent and accurate? Y/N/NA/NC*
2. Is problem statement categorized in identified area and targeted towards specific Y/N/NA/NC*
area therein?
3. Are external and internal interfaces properly defined? Y/N/NA/NC*
4. Does the Use Case Model properly reflects the actors and their roles and Y/N/NA/NC*
responsibilities?
5. Are all requirements traceable to system level? Y/N/NA/NC*
6. Is similar type of methodology / model is used for existing work? Y/N/NA/NC*
7. Are requirements consistent with schedule, resources and budget? Y/N/NA/NC*
PROJECT REVIEW–I
STUDENT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Student's Contribution Performance:

Particulars Marks (25M)
Group Members
1 2 3 4
1. Background and Topic (4M)
2. Project Scope and Objectives (4M)
11
3. Literature Survey (5M)
4. Project Planning (4 M)
5. Presentation Skills (4M)
6. Question and Answer (4M)
Total (25M)
Comments (if any)
# To be filled by internal guide & reviewer(s) only.
* Whether the presentation / evaluation is as per the schedule. : YES / NO (If NO mention the
reasons for the same.)
Review – I: Deliverables
• Problem Statement / Title

• Purpose, Scope, Objectives
• Abstract (System Overview)
• H/W,S/W & other requirement, Test Environment/Tools
• (System Overview- Proposed system &Proposed outcome)
 Architecture & DFD
• References
• Project Plan 1.0
Name & Signature of evaluation committee-
Name of Reviewer 1 Name of Reviewer 2 Name of Internal Guide
12
PROJECT REVIEW–II
Group id: Date :
Internal/ External
Sr.No. RollNo. Student Name Contact Details
Guide Details
1. B150478555 Kashaf pathan 9764801755
2. B150478521 Pooja Gaikwad 9112886823
3. B150478560 Purva Patil 7083962233
4. B150478553 Laxmi Pagare 9689918801
REVIEW-II CHECKLIST: DESIGN 25 Marks
DESIGN Y/N/NA/NC*
1. Are requirements reflected in the system architecture? Y/N/NA/NC*
2. Does the design support both project (product) and project goals? Y/N/NA/NC*
3. Does the design address all the issues from the requirements? Y/N/NA/NC*
4. Is effective modularity achieved and modules are functionally independent? Y/N/NA/NC*
5. Are structural diagrams (Class, Object, etc.) well defined and understood? Y/N/NA/NC*
6. Are all class associations clearly defined and understood? (Is it clear which Y/N/NA/NC*
classes provide which services)?
7. Are the classes in the class diagram clear? (What they represent in the Y/N/NA/NC*
architecture design document?)
8. Is inheritance appropriately used? Y/N/NA/NC*
9. Are the multiplicities in the use case diagram depicted in the class diagram? Y/N/NA/NC*
10. Area behavioral diagrams (use case, sequence, activity, etc.) will defined and Y/N/NA/NC*
understood?
11. Is aggregation/ contaminant (if used) clearly defined and understood? Y/N/NA/NC*
12. Does each case have clearly defined actors and input/ output? Y/N/NA/NC*
13. Is all concurrent processing (if used) clearly understood and reflected in the Y/N/NA/NC*
sequence diagrams?
14. Are all objects used in sequence diagram? Y/N/NA/NC*
15. Does the sequence diagram match class diagram? Y/N/NA/NC*
16. Are the symbols used in all diagrams correspond to UML standards? Y/N/NA/NC*
17. Does code completely & correctly implement the design? Y/N/NA/NC*
18. Does code comply with coding standards? Y/N/NA/NC*
19. Is code well structured ,consistent in style & consistently formatted? Y/N/NA/NC*
20. Are basic functions in the design coded? Y/N/NA/NC*
21. Is code clearly & adequately documented? Y/N/NA/NC*
22. Is test results highlighted? Y/N/NA/NC*
13
PROJECT REVIEW–II
Students' Contribution and Performance

Particulars Marks (25 M)
Group Members
1 2 3 4
1. System Architecture & Literature
Survey (Review-I)
2. Project Design (4 M)
3. Techniques/Methodology
/Algorithms and Project Features
(3 M)
4. Project Planning (4 M)
5. Basic details of
Implementation( Working
module) (4 M)
6. Presentation Skills ( 4 M)
7. Question and Answer (2 M)
8. Summarization of Ultimate
findings of the Project (2 M)
9. Test Results(2 M)
Total (25 M)
Comments (if any)
14
Review-II : Deliverables
 Problem Statement / Title

 Abstract
 Introduction
 Literature Survey (comparison with existing system)
 Methodology
 Design / algorithms / techniques used
 Modules Split-up
 Proposed System
 Software Tools/Technologies to be used
 Working module
 Partial Report (Semester – I)
 Project Plan 2.0
Name & Signature of Evaluation Committee –
15
Participation in Project Competition/Event
Sr.No. Name & Place of Project Date Certificate/ Prizes won

Competition/ Exhibition (if any)
Paper Publication/ Presentation
Sr.No. Name of the Organizing Society Date Certificate/ Prizes won

(if any)
* Photocopy of the certificate must be attached to this booklet.
16
SEMESTER - II
17
MET’s Institute of Engineering
Semester - II Weekly Planning Sheet

Academic Year: 2020-21
Week Student Guide

Activity Planned Activity Completed Status
No. Signatur Signatur
Design of GUI e e
Week 1
Design of GUI
Week 2
Coding of the project

Week 3
Coding of the project

Week 4
Unit Testing of the project

Week 5
Review-III/ First presentation

Week 6
with 60% implementation
Coding & Testing
Week 7
Coding & Testing

Week 8
Coding & Testing

Week 9
Review-IV / Second
Week 10
presentation with final
demonstration
Submission of Draft Copy of
Week 11
Final Project Report to Guide
Verification of Project Book By
Internal Guide (before
Submission of Final Project
Week 12
Report in Prescribed Format
18
PROJECT REVIEW – III

(Academic Year :2020-21 )
Group Id : Date :
Project Title : Identification System of Handwrittern Signature
Sr.No RollNo. Student Name Contact Details Internal / External Guide
. Details
Guide Name :Prof. R. D. Dahake
1 B150478555 Kashaf Pathan 9764801755
2 B150478521 Pooja Gaikwad 9112886823 Mentor Name, email & Mobile
No. :
3 B150478560 Purva Patil 7083962233
4 B150478553 Laxmi Pagare 9689918801
REVIEW – III : IMPLEMENTATION

25 Marks
IMPLEMENTATION (SOURCE CODE REVIEW CHECKLIST)

a. Structure
*
1. Does the code completely and correctly implement the design? Y / N / NA / NC
*
2. Does the code comply with the Coding Standards? Y / N / NA / NC
*
3. Is the code well-structured, consistent in style, and consistently formatted? Y / N / NA / NC
*
4. Does the implementation match the design? Y / N / NA / NC
*
5. Are all functions in the design coded? Y / N / NA / NC
b. Documentation
*
1. Is the code clearly and adequately documented? Y / N / NA / NC
*
2. Are all comments consistent with the code? Y / N / NA / NC
19
PROJECT REVIEW – III

Students’ContributionandPerformance
Marks(25M)
Particulars Group Members
1 2 3 4
1. Architecture / System Design -(if any modification)
2. 50 % Implementation (10 M)
3. Partial results obtained ( 7 M)
4. Presentation skills (4 M)
5. Question and Answer ( 4 M)
6. Summarize the methodologies / Algorithms
Y/N Y/N Y/N Y/N
implemented / to be implemented
Total(25
Comments (if any) M)

Review – III: Deliverables
• Detailed Design (if any deviation)

• 50% of code implementation
• Some Experimental Results
Name & Signature of evaluation committee –
20
PROJECT REVIEW – IV
Group Id : Date :
Project Title :Identification System of Handwrittern Signature
Sr.No RollNo. Student Name Contact Details Internal / External Guide
. Details
Guide Name :prof. R. D. Dahake
1 B150478555 Kashaf Pathan 9764801755
2 B150478555 Pooja Gaikwad 9112886823 Mentor Name, email & Mobile
No. :
3 B150478555 Purva Patil 7083962233
4 B150478555 LaxmiPagare 9689918801
REVIEW – IV : (25 Marks)

IMPLEMENTATION AND TESTING
1. Is sever feature tested? Y / N / NA /
2. Are all functions, user screens and navigation tested? (e.g. module, object, *
NC
Y / N / NA /
integration, usability, system) *
3. Are test cases designed? (manual and automated) NC
Y / N / NA /
4. Is testing tool used? Y / *N / NA /
NC
Y *
5. Is result analysis done properly and appropriate conclusion drawn? NC/ N / NA /
6. Implementation status ( code completion in percentage) *
NC
7. Final thesis status( in percentage)
FILL IN BRIEF
Final results are known or not? :
Quality of Presentation :
List the chapter numbers of final report :
Project Completion Date :
Final Report Submission Date :
General
Is the LOG BOOK of project up-to-date and signed?
 NC – Not Clear
 NA – Not Applicable
21
PROJECT REVIEW – IV
Students’ Contribution and Performance

Marks(25M)
Particulars Group Members
1 2 3 4
1. Implementation (100%) (5 M)
2. Testing, Results and Performance Evaluation ( 5
M)
3. Final Project Report ( 5 M)
4. Publications ( 2 M)
5. Presentation skills ( 4 M)
6. Question and Answer (4 M)
Total(25
Comments (if any) M)

* Whether the presentation/evaluation is as per the schedule. : YES / NO (If NO mention the
Review – IV: Deliverables

• Detailed Design
• 100% of code implementation
• Experimental Results
• Performance Evaluation
• Test Cases
• Result Analysis and Conclusion
• Final Thesis
Name & Signature of evaluation committee -
22
PROJECT REVIEW – I to IV
Summary of Project Work Evaluation Sheet
Sr. Roll No. Student

Name of the Student I II III IV Total
No. / Exam. Signatur
1
Overall Remarks or Comments (if any)
23
Participation in Project Competition/Event
Sr.No. Name & Place of Project Date Certificate/ Prizes won

Competition/ Exhibition (if any)
Paper Publication/ Presentation
Sr.No. Name of the Organizing Society Date Certificate/ Prizes won

(if any)
* Photocopy of the certificate must be attached to this booklet.
24

MET's Institute of Engineering, Nashik: Final Year Project Work

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

MET's Institute of Engineering, Nashik: Final Year Project Work

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SAVITRIBAI PHULE PUNE UNIVERSITY

MET’s Institute of Engineering, Nashik

Department of Information Technology

Final Year Project Work

Academic Year: 2020-21

Project Title : Identification System of Hadwrittern Signature

Internal Guide : R. P. Dahake

MET’s Institute of Engineering, Nashik

5. Monthly Planning Sheet (Semester – I )

6. Project Review – I Check List

7. Performance Evaluation Sheet – I (Review – I)

8. Project Review – II Check List

9. Performance Evaluation Sheet – II (Review – II)

10. Monthly Planning Sheet (Semester – II )

11. Participation in Project Competition

12. Paper Publications (If any)

13. Examination Evaluation Guidelines

14. Examination Evaluation Sheet (Semester-I)

Sr. Roll No. Name of Student Signature

Rules & Regulations

Department of Information Technology

PROJECT WORK SCHEDULE

Sr.No. Activity Scheduled Date

(Academic Year: 2020-21)

Project Group No.: 14

Project Title: Identification System of Handwrittern signature

Name of the T.E.

Name & Signature Name & Signature Dr. S. V. Gumaste

of Internal Guide of External Guide Head of Department

Mobile No.: Mobile No:

Email id : Company Name :

Project Title: Identification System of Handwrittern signature

Project Group No.:14 Guide Name : Prof. R. P. Dahake

MET’s Institute of Engineering, Nashik

Project Coordinator Internal Guide

MET’s Institute of Engineering, Nashik

STUDENT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Student's Contribution Performance:

# To be filled by internal guide & reviewer(s) only.

• Problem Statement / Title

Name & Signature of evaluation committee-

Name of Reviewer 1 Name of Reviewer 2 Name of Internal Guide

REVIEW-II CHECKLIST: DESIGN 25 Marks

Students' Contribution and Performance

# To be filled by internal guide & reviewer(s) only.

 Problem Statement / Title

Name & Signature of Evaluation Committee –

Name of Reviewer 1 Name of Reviewer 2 Name of Internal Guide

Sr.No. Name & Place of Project Date Certificate/ Prizes won

Paper Publication/ Presentation

Sr.No. Name of the Organizing Society Date Certificate/ Prizes won

* Photocopy of the certificate must be attached to this booklet.

Project Coordinator Internal Guide

Semester - II Weekly Planning Sheet

Week Student Guide

Coding of the project

Coding of the project

Unit Testing of the project

Review-III/ First presentation

Coding & Testing

Coding & Testing

Project Coordinator Internal Guide

PROJECT REVIEW – III