JI CHEN’S INEQUALITY REVISITED FORM

D.M. BĂTINEŢU-GIURGIU, DANIEL SITARU, FLORICĂ ANASTASE

Abstract: In this paper are presented Ji Chen’ s inequality revisited form.

Proposition 1.

If m, n, p, x, y, z > 0, then:
  
xy yz zx 1 1 1 9
(1) + + 2
+ 2
+ 2
≥
p m n (mx + ny) (ny + pz) (pz + mx) 4mnp

Proof. We have:
! ! ! 
X xy X 1 1 X 1 Ji Chen
2
= mxy ≥
cyc
p cyc
(mx + ny) mnp cyc
(mx + ny)2

1 9 9
(2) ≥ · =
mnp 4 4mnp
If mnp = 1, then inequality (2), becomes:
! !
X xy X 1 9
(3) 2
≥
cyc
p cyc
(mx + ny) 4

If m = n = p = 1, then we get:
 
1 1 1 9
(J.C) (xy + yz + zx) 2
+ 2
+ 2
≥
(x + y) (y + z) (z + x) 4
i.e. Ji Chen’s inequality.
In [1] Arkady M. Alt has proved the following inequality:
3
(A.A.) (x2 + t2 )(y 2 + t2 )(z 2 + t2 ) ≥ (x + y + z) · t4
4
If m = 1, we get:
3
(4) (x2 + 1)(y 2 + 1)(z 2 + 1) ≥ (x + y + z)2
4
If m, n, p, x, y, z > 0, then:
3
(5) (x2 y 2 + p2 )(y 2 z 2 + m2 )(z 2 x2 + n2 ) ≥ (mnxy + npyz + pmzx)2
4
Proof We have:
(x2 y 2 + p2 )(y 2 z 2 + m2 )(z 2 x2 + n2 ) =
!
Y  xy 2 A.A. 3

xy yz zx 2

2 2 2
=m n p + 1 ≥ m 2 n2 p 2 + + =
cyc
p 4 p m n
1
 3 2 2 2 1
m n p (mnxy + npyz + pmzx)2 · 2 2 2 =
4 m n p
3
(6) = (mnxy + npyz + pmzx)
4
If m, n, p, x, y, z > 0 then:
!2
Y 1

A.A 3 X 1
(7) +1 ≥
cyc
(mx + ny)4 4 cyc (mx + ny)2
From (5) and (7), we get:
!2 !2
Y Y 1

3 X 3 X 1
2 2 2
(x y +p )· +1 ≥ nmxy · =
cyc cyc
(mx + ny)4 4 cyc 4 cyc (mx + ny)2
" ! !#2
9 X X 1 JiChen
= mnxy ≥
16 cyc cyc
(mx + ny)2

9 9 81
(8) ≥ · =
16 4mnp 64mnp
If in (5), we take mnp = 1, then:
Y 3
(x2 y 2 + p2 ) ≥ (mnxy + npyz + pmzx)2
cyc
4
If m = n = p = 1, it follows:
Y 3
(9) (x2 y 2 + 1) ≥ (xy + yz + zx)2
cyc
4
If in (8) we take mnp = 1, we get:
Y Y 1

81
2 2 2
(10) (x y + p ) · +1 ≥
cyc cyc
(x + y)4 64
If in (8) we take m = n = p = 1, we get:
Y Y 1

81
2 2
(11) (x y + 1) · 4
+1 ≥
cyc cyc
(x + y) 64

References
[1] Alt M. Arkady, ABOUT ONE INEQUALITY FROM APMO,2004-NEW SOLU-
TION AND GENERALIZATIONS, OCTOGON MATHEMATICAL MAGAZINE,
Vol.27,No.1, April 2019,pages 228-232
[2] ROMANIAN MATHEMATICAL MAGAZINE-www.ssmrmh.ro