Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Student’s name
Instructor
Course
Date
This study source was downloaded by 100000844645776 from CourseHero.com on 04-11-2022 17:14:13 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/115249986/Part-II-Abstractdocx/
2
Abstract
Researchers conducted two studies to determine how the type of apology and the
background, gender, and age, were randomly assigned to study one in order to predict how they
would perceive the apology if they received the #SorrySorrySorry at the end of a Twitter post
compared to everyone else. "The type of apology" and "the perception of the apology" were IVs;
"the Twitter account" was a DV. Researchers in study two used digital communication to
distribute the link to the Qualtrics survey to 280 participants of differing backgrounds, genders,
and ages to confirm the findings of Study 1, this time adding the element of persuasion to the
perception of sincerity. Study Two predicted that participants would believe the apology is
sincere when an apology is accompanied with the hashtag #SorrySorrySorry and 878 likes. The
manipulation of the number of likes on each of Charlie's Twitter posts was the IV, whereas the
DV comprised questions about Charlie's impressions. The findings corroborated each study's
hypothesis. People respect honesty, according to the results of both studies. If the apology is not
genuine, it will be ineffective. When a majority likes one apology over the other, people might be
This study source was downloaded by 100000844645776 from CourseHero.com on 04-11-2022 17:14:13 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/115249986/Part-II-Abstractdocx/
3
References
Jehle, A., Miller, M. K., Kemmelmeier, M., & Maskaly, J. (2012). How voluntariness of
apologies affects actual and hypothetical victims' perceptions of the offender. The
https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2012.697079
Jean Kelso Sandlin, E. D. and M. G. (2021, April 20). Fandom, forgiveness, and future support:
youtube-apologies-as-crisis-communication/.
Risen, J. L., & Gilovich, T. (2007). Target and observer differences in the acceptance of
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.418
This study source was downloaded by 100000844645776 from CourseHero.com on 04-11-2022 17:14:13 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/115249986/Part-II-Abstractdocx/
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)