Ethical Principle: Respect for persons (autonomy)

1. Define the assigned ethical value/principle – according to this ethical value, what is the right
thing to do? What responsibility do we have under this ethical principle?
o This question is not specific to KT, it is meant to provide a background definition
o Information that you are including in this background description needs to make sense
according to the ideas you discuss in subsequent questions. These ethical theories may be
extensive, so you must choose the main points, and then apply those main points in your
discussion in response to the subsequent questions
The main idea behind the ethical value or principle of respect for persons is that as an individual you
must owe your respect and acknowledge this respect to others simply because they are a person. This
principle is the pinnacle of Kantian ethics since his principles are set to be universal and applicable to
all human beings no matter the context or situation. The responsibility an individual has under this
ethical principle is to provide universal respect towards anyone and everyone simply because they are a
person, a person is seen to have a certain type of status and worth that is unlike any other form of
being. This ethical value or principle holds respect very highly and is seen as the right thing to do
whenever interacting with any type of individual.

2. What are common critiques of this school of thought?

The common critique that can be found with this school of thought is that in order for this ethical value
to be upheld and effectively practised, everyone must acknowledge and agree to provide respect for
everyone. For instance, if I provide respect to someone because I believe I should simply because they
hold a high level of status of being a human, and this person does not show me respect back then the
principle becomes defeated in a sense. This can then cause conflict and a situation that strays away
from the core principles of this ethical value. Another critique is that some people should not deserve
respect simply because they are human. For example, there are many notable figures in history that
have done nothing but harm to the human race and caused irreversible actions towards others. This is
where the principle of displaying respect for persons becomes controversial since these types of people
clearly do not deserve anyone’s respect and at the same time they aren’t display any form of respect for
others.

3. According to this value, when is it safe to translate knowledge? Where should priorities lie?
Where should resources be allocated?
According to the value of respect for persons, it would be safe to translate knowledge if the planning
and execution of an intervention is respectful of others. For example, if there is a diet health and
wellness intervention in a workplace and in the planning phase of the intervention there is no
consideration of people who are vegan, it would not be safe to continue as it is not respectful towards
all employees. Priorities should lie in making sure interventions in the workplace are respectful towards
all employees. Resources should be allocated in ensuring that during the knowledge-to-action cycle,
respect for all persons are considered
.
4. What does this value compel us to do in the process of KT? According to this value (if this value
is prioritized), what does ethical KT processes look like? How does this value guide/inform the
process of KT?
Respect for persons compels us to consider the needs of all people involved in an intervention. If this
value is prioritised, ethical KT processes would have respect for the needs of all individuals involved.
This can include employees who will participate in an intervention or even any team members involved
in delivering the intervention. Respect for persons guide the process of KT by ensuring that there is no
component of the process or an intervention that would be considered disrespectful towards an
individual or group of individuals.
 5. At which stage of the Knowledge to Action Process is this ethical value likely to be most
critical/crucial? Provide rationale for your response.
Participants must provide their agreement before participating in study, in accordance with the concept of
Respect for Persons. This is the clearest indication that their participation is based on careful analysis of the
research project's risks and possible benefits, as well as other policy principles. An "incidental finding" is a
discovery regarding research participants or potential participants that occurs during the research process but is
unrelated to the study's goals is a crucial stage of respect for persons. If accidental results are fairly found to
have major welfare consequences for the participant or prospective participant, they are deemed material
incidental findings. Incidental material finds might arise at any point throughout the study process. Material
accidental discoveries, for example, might be discovered when screening for study eligibility, collecting baseline
data, conducting the study, or doing follow-up evaluations.

6. In what KT projects are we most likely to encounter this value (i.e. knowledge awareness,
end-of-grant KT, integrated KT, practice reform, etc.)?
Any knowledge translation effort, including knowledge awareness, end-of-grant KT, integrated knowledge
translation, and practise reform, is likely to encounter this value. Research ethics boards should evaluate the
researcher's strategy to communicate material accidental discoveries to participants, regardless of whether the
results were predictable. Researchers and research ethics boards can determine whether a study endeavour
requires such a strategy on a case-by-case basis if there is any doubt. The research ethics board makes the final
decision on whether or not a plan is required. Participants must provide their agreement before to participating
in study, in accordance with the concept of Respect for Persons. This is the clearest indication that their
participation is based on careful analysis of the research project's risks and possible benefits, as well as other
policy principles.

7. What are some of the KT outcomes in relation to important KT parameters (e.g. project quality,
quality of KT product, cost, knowledge users, project partners, partner engagement, KT process,
KT stakeholders) that we are likely to see if this value is prioritized (when your assigned value
takes precedence) or when it is absent/ignored (in a situation, for example, where another ethical
value takes precedence). Note: answers to this question can be summarized in point form notes in
the table (or another style you like).
Knowledge translation (KT) is a difficult and comprehensive topic that requires a complete grasp of its
approaches, methodology, and assessments and its influencing factors at both the human and contextual
stages and their connections.scholars are encouraged to describe their discoveries logically,
systematically, and simply. There are ways to bridge the gap between legislation development and
effective partnership implementation.KT allows KUs and stakeholders to participate in study and
interpretation, resulting in needs administration and the acceptance of a larger group of individuals in
various settings (Smits & Denis, 2014). This concept could encompass disseminating available
research and more in-depth activities, including discourse forums, educational events, and information
sharing. When interpreting integrated information (IKT), the researcher and the user collaborate to
produce long-term outcomes. Because kids may have diverse information demands, engagement styles,
and opinions, KU interactions can be useful in designing and implementing KT (2). Identifying KUs
necessitates considering their knowledge requirements and how they might contribute to the creation
and execution of the KT strategy. KT results or posts should consider the specific needs of KU viewers.
Individuals or groups that can assist in reaching users are highlighted in each recommendation. These
interviews backed up the comments, with nearly all program planners agreeing that they shouldn't rely
on specific leadership to organize the people working on their projects. Though KT procedures can lead
to significant results, their efficacy varies widely, implying that situational circumstances may impact
their usefulness. The degree to which one can address KT hurdles during the deployment process
determines the success of KT strategies.