Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NO
1 INTRODUCTION 1-6
BIBLIOGRAPHY
APPENDIX
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE TABLE NAME PAGE
NO NO
YEAR 2017-2018
NO NO
1
A project is conducted in "KERALA STATE
FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LTD" and is based on "A
STUDY ON WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT" gives
an idea about working of the organization and their financial
position.
2
company. Ratio analysis is the best way to analyze the working
capital of the company, it helps to measure the performance
financial performance and profitability of KSFE is reflected in its
financial statement and to provide suggestions to improve its
business. The study helps in understanding of the various concept
of the working capital like current asset and current liabilities.
Comparing the working capital from one period to another helps
in underlying problems in the company's operations.
1.4 OBJECTIVES
3
management, study involved the analysis and interpretation of
cash, inventories and receivables and profitability of the concern.
4
phenomenon under study. The collection of the data is the
primary step is statistical, investigation. Collection of data is a
process of enumeration together with the proper collection of
data. The analysis of financial condition and performance of the
enterprise necessitates accurate and reliable data.
PRIMARY DATA
SECONDARY DATA
5
TOOLS AND TECHNIQUE
ANALYTICAL TOOLS
Ratio analysis
Comparative statement
Statement of changes in working capital
PRESENTATION TOOLS
6
CHAPTER - 2
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
7
Considerable variability in the take-up of eleven working capital
management routines was detected. Principal components
analysis and cluster analysis confirmed the identification of four
distinct “types” of companies with regard to the patents of
working capital management. While the first three„ types‟ of
companies focused upon cash management, stock or debtors
routines respectively, the fourth „type‟ was less likely to take -up
any working capital management routines. The objective of the
study is to encourage additional research rather than to provide an
exhaustive overview of all the factors associated with the take-up
of working capital management routines by small companies. The
results suggest that small companies focus only an areas of
working capital management where they expect to improve
marginal returns.
8
AGRAWAL (2005): He studied working capital Management
on the basis of sample of 34 large manufacturing and trading
public limited companies in 10 industries in private sector for
the period 2001 -2002 to 2004-2005. Applying the same
technique of ratio analysis, response to questionnaire and
interview, the study concluded the although working capital per
rupee of sales showed a declining trend over the year but still
there appeared a sufficient scope for reduction in investment in
almost till segment of working capital.
9
the measurement of working capital Management three indexes
are taken into consideration performance index, utilization index
and efficiency index and EBIT of the selected companies for the
study period are taken at the end of the study be suggested that
there is a need to improve the working capital Management.
SYEDNOORULSHAJAR, SALEEMAKHTARFUROOQI
(2010): Analysed the Performance of three automobile firms
for 10 years from 2005 to 2014. Return on capital employed was
taken as dependent variable and current ratio, inventory turnover
ratio and debtor turnover ratio were taken as independent
10
variables. They were using correlation coefficient and regression
analysis. They noticed that all the dependent variables are
significantly and positively associated with profitability.
11
INDUSTY AND COMPANY PROFILE
12
3.1.1 NON-BANKING FINANCIAL COMPANY
(NBFCS)
13
outsourced agents should not resort to intimidation or harassment
of any kind. All NBFCs have been directed to set up grievance
redressed machinery which will also deal with the issues relating
to services provided by the outsourced agency.
14
in the United State of America, the growth of NBFCs was more
pronounced during the first three decades of this century and two
of the top five commercial lenders are NBFCs and the three of the
four top providers of construction finance are non-bank Firms at
present. In India such marked growth in the non-bank financial
sector was noticed in the last two decades. The NBFCS as a group
have succeeded in broadening the range of financial service
rendered to the public during this period.
15
India are concentrated in six states like West Bengal,
Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka and Delhi.
16
Housing finance company: Any company which carrying on
as its principal business the financing as acquisitor or
development of plots and land in connection there which is
called Housing finance-company.
Investment Company: Any company which is carrying on as
its principal business the acquisitor of securities is termed as
investment company.
Loan Company: It is a company which is carrying on as its
principal business the providing of finance whether by
making loans of advances otherwise for any activity other
than its own. This category docs not include an equipment
leasing or hire purchase finance company or a housing
finance company.
Mutual benefits finance company (Nidhi company): It is
those companies which are notified by the central
government as a Nidhi company under section 620-A of the
companies act 1956.
Mutual Benefits Company (potential nidhi company): A
company which is working on the lines of a nidhi company
but has not yet been declared by the central government as
minimum NOF ( Net Owned Fundes) of Rupees 10 Lakh
has applied to the RBI for Certificate of Registration (COR)
and also to the Department of Companies Affairs (DCA) for
17
being notified as nidhi company and has not contravened
directions / regulations of RBI/ DCA.
Non-Banking financial Company: Any hire purchase
finance, housing finance, investment loan, equipment
leasing or mutual benefit financial company but does not
include a finance company or a stock exchange or a stock
broking company.
18
3.2 COMPANY PROFILE
19
of the board. The first board was constituted as per government
orders no: GO (RT)4876/69/FM dated 26/11/1979 and they
assume charge is appointed by the governor. The remuneration is
subject to the control and supervision of the board of director's
general body representation the shareholders shall be supreme
governing body of the company.
3.2.2 BEGINNING
20
3.2.4 OBJECTIVES OF KSFE
21
of the society. The chitty are come under the Kerala Chitty Act
1975, which bought into force with effect from 25th August 1975.
The act is to give adequacy and safety to the funds of The society
and gave good returns to them. It also ensures lesser rate of
interest for loans and advances.
Chitty
Fixed deposits
22
Sugama deposits
Deposits in trust scheme
Safe deposit locker
New chitty loan
Gold loan
FD loan .
Consumer vehicle loan
Reliable consumer loans
Trade loan
Housing loan
Tax planning scheme
Sugama Akshaya OD
Mangalya loan
Vidyadhanam loan
23
Introducing ATM facilities and any time anywhere
transaction facilities.
Implementation of core solutions software in the company.
Going for CRISIL rating to obtain FAAA
Undertaking trading of Gold.
24
Lending money and accepting deposits: As like banks,
KSFE also providing money to the customers by the way of
different loans like chitty loans, gold loans, passbook loans,
trade financing, flexi trade loan etc. the returns are
comparatively higher and because the effective returns are
really higher than the published interest rate because of
monthly payment of interest (in case of all other institutions,
the interest is paid quarterly). KSFE accept deposits from
customers by the way of chitty, sugama deposits, fixed
deposit etc. The customer can have introduced either by any
existing customer or an employee of the KSFE the customer
has to provide necessary documents like ration card or any
license for address, age and income proof.
25
the public, is 7% per annum. Interest for chitty price money
deposits is 8% per annum. Due to the monthly payment of
interest the effective rate will be higher than its rate. Senior
citizen will get 7.25% for fresh deposits and 8% for price
money deposits. Normally 75% of fixed deposits amount
can be availed as loan. The facility is called fixed deposits
loan.
Industry Finance
26
ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE OF KSFE (HEAD OFFICE)
Board of Directors
Chairman
Managing Directors
Secretariat PA/SM (RR)
SM/CM SM/CM
SM/CM (LEGAL) AGM
SM/CM JMI&V
JM(PIG) JM(BUSI)
SM/CM Secretary
SM/CM SM/CM Board Board Board
of of of
JM Branch
27
GM: General Manager
28
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Working capital
29
liabilities and the Inter relationship that exist between them, it
involves both the formulations working capital policy and
carrying out that policy in day-to-day operations, the primary
purpose of working capital Management is to make sure the
company always made in sufficient to meet its short-term
operating cost and short-term debt obligation, managing working
capital means managing inventories cash, accounts, payables, and
cash receivable. There are two concepts used for working capital
these are:
30
to net current assets. working capital as per net concept working
capital is called net working capital it is a qualitative concept.
CURRENT ASSETS
CURRENT LIABILITIES
31
Permanent working capital
COMPETITORS
Onlinesebi.com
32
adcb.com
emicalculator-india.com
manoramaonline.com
wikipedia.org
gokulamchits.com
rupaiyaexchangr.com
reliancemoney.co.in
myinvestmentidea.com
Charteredclub.com
Certain tools arc to be used for the research works that are follows,
1. ANALYTICAL TOOL
A. RATIO ANALYSIS
MEANING
OBJECTIVES
Utility to management.
Utility to shareholders and investors
Utility to creditors.
Utility lo employees.
Utility to government
34
SIGNIFICANCE TO MANAGEMENT
SIGNIFICANCE TO INVESTORS
35
SIGNIFICANCE TO EMPLOYEES
DISADVANTAGES
Limited comparability.
Fake ratios.
Effect of price level changes.
Qualitative factors are ignored,
Effect of window dressing.
Costly technique.
Misleading results.
Absence of standard university accepted terminology.
36
TYPES OF RATIOS
1. LIQUIDITY RATIO
2. SOLVENCY RATIO
3. ACT1VITY RATIO
4. PROFITABILITY RATIO
1. LIQUIDITY RATIO
Current ratios
Quick ratios
Cash ratio
Working capital ratio etc.
37
2. SOLVENCY RATIO
Proprietary ratio
Debt equity ratio
Fixed asset to net worth
3. ACTIVITY RATIO
B. COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS.
39
COMPARATIVE INCOME STATEMENTS
COMPARATIVE BALANCESHEET
2. PRESENTATION TOOL
40
The points on the graph often represent the relationship between
two or more things. There are many different types of graphs such
as connected and disconnected graphs, weighted graphs, directed
and undirected graphs, and simple graphs etc....
41
4.1 CURRENT RATIO
The table 4.1 showing current ratio for the year 2014-2019
42
Chart 4.1 showing the CURRENT RATIO for the year 2014-
2019
Series 1
1.03
1.028 1.028 1.029
1.026
1.026 1.026
1.023
1.024
1.022
1.02
2014-2015
2015-2016
2016-2017
2017-2018
2018-2019
Series 1
INTERPRETATION
43
4.2 QUICK RATIO
The table 4.2 showing liquid ratio for the year 2014-2019
44
Chart 4,2 showing liquid ratio for the year 2014-2019
Series 1
1.03
1.028 1.029
1.026 1.027
1.026 1.026
1.023
1.024
1.022
1.02
2014-2015
2015-2016
2016-2017
2017-2018
2018-2019
Series 1
INTERPRETATION
45
4,3 ABSOLUTE LIQUID RATIO
The table 4.3 showing Absolute liquid ratio for the year 2014-
2019
46
Chart 4.3 showing the Absolute liquid ratio for the year 2014-
2019
Series 1
0.25
0.22
0.172
0.2 0.176
0.163 0.181
0.15
0.1 Series 1
0.05
0
2014-2015
2015-2016
2016-2017
2017-2018
2018-2019
INTERPRETATION
The standard norms' of liquid ratio are 0.5:1, in other words if the
amount of cash and cash equivalent are at least 50% of liquid
liabilities, the liquid position is not considered as good.
47
4.4 DEBT EQUITY RATIO
Table no:4.4 showing Debt Equity Ratio for the year 2014-
2019
48
Chart 4.4 showing the Debt Equity Ratio for the year 2014-
2019
19
18.5 18.54
18.2 18.48
18
17.5
17 16.89
16.21
16.5
16
15.5
15
2014-2015
2015-2016 Series 1
2016-2017
2017-2018
2018-2019
INTERPRETATION
49
4.5 PROPRIETARY RATIO
50
Chart 4.5 showing the Proprietary Ratio for the year 2014-
2019
2.65
2.6 2.61
2.55
2.5
2.45 2.41
2.4 2.44
2.4
2.35 2.35
2.3
2.25
2.2
2014-2015
2015-2016 Series 1
2016-2017
2017-2018
2018-2019
INTERPRETATION
The ratio is computed for the purpose of knowing how much fund
have been provided by shareholders to total asset. An ideal ratio is
0.5:1. Owner's contribution is high in the year 2015-2019. It
indicates safety to creditors and the bank less dependent on
creditors.
51
4.6 WORKING CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIO
52
Chart 4.6 showing Working Capital Turnover Ratio for the
year 2014-2019
3.427
3.5
3.009
3 2.979
2.707
2.5
2.409
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
2014-2015
2015-2016 Series 1
2016-2017
2017-2018
2018-2019
INTERPRETATION
This analysis measure how well a company is utilizing its
working capital to support a given level of sales. Here shows
fluctuating trend in maintain companies working capital. In the
year 2014-2015 indicates high turnover ratio, So the management
was efficient in using a firm’s Short-term assets and liabilities to
support sales.
53
4.7 TOTAL ASSET TURNOVER RATIO
The Total asset turnover ratio is an efficiency ratio that measures
a company's ability to generate sales from its assets. This ratio
establishes the relationship between total assets and sales.
Total Asset Turnover Ratio = Sales/ Total Assets
Table No 4.7 showing Total Asset turnover ratio for the year
2014-2019
Year Sales Total Assets Ratio
2014-2015 12160293890 157384592960 7.726
54
Chart 4.7 showing the Total Assets Turnover Ratio for the
year 2014-2018
7.726 7.758
7.8
7.6 7.585
7.4 7.385
7.2
7
6.8 6.985
6.6
6.4
2014-2015
2015-2016 Series 1
2016-2017
2017-2018
2018-2019
INTERPRETATION
55
4.8 GROSS PROFIT RATIO
Table No 4.8 showing Gross Profit Ratio for the year 2014-
2019
56
Chart 4.8 showing the Gross Profit Ratio for the year 2014-
2019
Series 1
16 14.06 14.12
14
13.31
12
9.73
10
8.63
8
6 Series 1
4
2
0
2014-2015
2015-2016
2016-2017
2017-2018
2018-2019
INTERPRETATION
57
4.9 NET PROFIT RATIO
Table 4.9 showing Net Profit Ratio for the year 2014-2019
58
Chart 4.9 showing Net Profit Ratio for the year 2014-2019
8
7 7.5
6 4.92
4.92
5 4.88
4
3
2 2.26
1
0
2014-2015
2015-2016 Series 1
2016-2017
2017-2018
2018-2019
INTERPRETATION
59
4.10 RETURN ON SHARE HOLDERS FUND .
This is the ratio of net profit to shareholders fund or net worth. It.
measures the profitability from the shareholders point of view.
60
Chart 4.10 showing the Return on shareholder fund for the
year 2014-2019
25
20
15.77 15.89 20.05
15 14.81
10
7.31
5
0
2014-2015
2015-2016 Series 1
2016-2017
2017-2018
2018-2019
INTERPRETATION
61
4.11 Comparative Balance sheet of the year 2014-2015
Particulars 2014 2015 Increase / %
Decrease
EQUITY &
LIABILITY
1.Shareholder's fund
ASSETS
1 .Non-Current assets
(a)Tangible assets 310044818 285603364 (24441454) (7.88)
(b)Intangible assets - - -
(c)work in progress 41135 - (41135) (100)
2.Current assets
(a)inventories - - - -
(b)cash & cash 20767855138 25444695913 4676840775 22.51
equivalent
(c)Short term loans & 10566393031 12980962065 24145690349 22.85
advances 0 9
(d) other current assets 1402617980 1844673024 442055044 31.51
TOTAL 12814448938 15738459296 29240103579 22.81
1 0
62
4.12 Comparative balance sheet for the year 2015-2016
Particulars 2015 2016 Increase / %
Decrease
EQUILY&
LIABILITY
1.Shareholder's fund
ASSETS
1 .Non-Current assets
(a)Tangible assets 281889393 246474850 (35414543) (12.56)
(b)Intangible assets 3713971 3083493 (630478) (16.97)
(c)work in progress - - - -
2.Current assets
(a)inventories 15339414 15089064 (250350) (1.63)
(b)cash & cash 25444695913 30974133596 5529437683 21.73
equivalent
(c)Short term loans & 129809620659 151269564866 21459944207 16.53
advances
(d) other current assets 1829333610 2655709538 826375928 45.17
TOTAL 157384592960 185164055407 27779462447 17.65
63
4.13 comparative balance sheet of the year 2016-2017
ASSETS
1 .Non-current assets
(a) Tangible assets 246474850 243655217 (2819633) (1.14)
(b)Intangible assets 3083493 4295038 1211545 39.29
(c)Work in progress - 84112 84112 -
2.Current assets
(a) Inventories 15089064 19390668 43016045 28.50
(b) Cash &cash 30974133596 35726779618 4752646022 15.34
equivalent
(c) short term loans 151269564866 168586499139 17316934273 11.44
& advances
(d) Other current 2655709538 3994898039 1339188501 50.42
assets
TOTAL 185164055407 208574601831 23410546424 12.64
64
4.14 comparative balance sheet of the year 2017-2018
ASSETS
1. Non-current assets
(a) Tangible assets 243655217 215658965 (27996252) (11.49)
(b)Intangible assets 4295038 1717415 (2577623) (60.01)
(c)Work in progress 84112 84112 - -
2.Current assets
(a) Inventories 19390668 18993325 (397343) (2.04)
(b) Cash &cash 35726779619 41507011097 5780231478 16.17
equivalent
(c) short term loans 168585499138 18856612678 19980627240 11.85
& advances
(d) Other current 3994898040 5977815748 1982917708 49.63
assets
TOTAL 208574601831 236287407041 27712805210 13.28
65
4.15 Comparative balance sheet of the year 2018-2019
ASSETS
1. Non-current assets
(a) Tangible assets 215658965 189766178 (25892787) (12.00)
(b)Intangible assets 1717415 3267154 1549739 90.23
(c)Work in progress 84112 - (84112) -
2.Current assets
(a) Inventories 18993325 19269728 276403 1.455
(b) Cash &cash 41507011097 58834762579 17327751482 41.74
equivalent
(c) short term loans 188566126378 209777264679 21211138301 11.24
& advances
(d) Other current 5977815748 6552638816 574823068 9.61
assets
TOTAL 236287407040 275376969134 39089562094 16.54
66
INTERPRETATION
67
4.16 Schedule of changes in working capital 2015-2016
68
4.17 Schedule of changes in working capital 2016-2017
69
4.18 Schedule of changes in working capital 2017-2018
70
4.19 Schedule of changes in working capital 2018-2019
71
INTERPRETATION
72
5.1 FINDINGS
73
During the year 2018-19, there are greater the use of return
on shareholders fund, the higher the percentage the more
money is being returned to investors.
From 2014-18 there is low net profit ratio.
The analysis of degree gross profit ratio shows smaller
changes till in the year 2016-17
74
5.2 SUGGESTIONS
75
5.3 CONCLUSION
76