Name: Clairielle N.

Dela Rosa

Section: SBENT-1I

I. TRUE OR FALSE

1. True
2. True
3. True
4. True
5. False
6. False
7. False
8. False
9. False
10. True

II. ESSAY

11-15. This cross-point has the same idea from the psychologist and the psychoanalyst that human
psychological personality is a cross-point of various personal relationship, meaning I am a product of a
certain personal lines of event from a certain people, from both our mother’s and father’s. The
personality that we have, come from various people that we interact with every day. For example, our
sisters, our mother, our father and our friends. The personality that we have today is not just from
myself and because I am a conscious cross-point, and I am conscious of myself, there is a possibility that
we might change our personality depending on what might happen in the near future and these certain
changes can also change a intersection of personal lines of events of a certain person. With this
conscious cross-point we can develop and improve our self more, even though our personal sense is not
final because it is still made up and still being made by our self and the people around us.

16-20. Social responsibility means that businesses, in addition to maximizing shareholder value, should
act in a manner that benefits society. Socially responsible companies should adopt policies that promote
the well-being of society and the environment while lessening negative impacts on them. Because it is
suggested that rational thought and deliberation are prerequisite skills for any agent. In this way, moral
agents can discern between right and wrong and be held accountable for the consequences of their
actions.

III. LOWER PLEASURE OR HIGHER PLEASURE

1. A

2. B
3. B

4. A

5. A

6. A

7. A

8. B

9. B

10. B

11. B

12. B

13. A

14. A

15. A

16. B

17. A

18. A

19. B

20. A

21. B

22. A

23. A

24. A

25. A

26. B

27. B

28. B

29. A

30. A

31. A
32. B

33. B

34. B

35. A

36. A

37. A

38. A

39. A

40. B

41. B

42. B

43. B

44. B

45. A

IV. REFLECTION

1. No, because the way we discovered pleasures within ourselves was totally different and
pleasures are not commensurable. But for me when we talk about friendship and money, it’s
not balanced. I appreciated and valued the pleasures I got from my friends more than money.
Yeah, sometimes when we have something we desire, money will give us pleasures, and once
we are hard-working, we can quickly find money, but a genuine friendship is hard to find. As
long as you have friends who love you, if you have no money, they will be part of your quest to
making money.

2. The utilitarian critique raises the question whether human rights are either absolute or
inalienable. The right to life is one such example, for no other human right can be relevant if life
can be taken from an individual; the possession or enjoyment of all other human rights hinge on
an individual being alive. Therefore, there is no greater societal sum equation to assess when
looking at high rights. Indeed, individuals from minorities are often given special protections
within human rights treaties/regimes.