Professional Documents
Culture Documents
− Organizational behavior (OB) is defined as the systematic study and application of knowledge
about how individuals and groups act within the organizations where they work.
− “A field of study that investigates the impact of individuals, groups and structures on behaviour
within organisations for the purpose of applying such knowledge towards improving an
Organisation’s effectiveness.” - Stephen P Robbins
− “Organizational behavior can be defined as the understanding; prediction and management of
the human behavior affect the performance of the organizations.” – Luthans
− “The study and application of knowledge how people act or behave within organization. It is a
human tool for human benefit. It applies broadly to the behavior of people in all types of
organizations such as business, government, school and service organizations.” - Davis and
Newstrom
− Organizational behaviour is defined as the behaviour of human beings in their workplace or only
in a corporate setting. It studies the impact that an individual has on behaviour within the
organization and how groups work together so that the knowledge can help in explaining and
predicting behaviour to improve workplace performances and effectiveness.
1.3 Nature of OB
Organizational behaviour has emerged as a separate field of study. The nature it has acquired is
identified as follows :
− A Separate Field of Study and not a Discipline Only:
o By definition, a discipline is an accepted science that is based on a theoretical
foundation. But, O.B. has a multi-interdisciplinary orientation and is, thus, not based on
a specific theoretical background. Therefore, it is better reasonable to call O.B. a
separate field of study rather than a discipline only.
− An Interdisciplinary Approach:
o Organizational behaviour is essentially an interdisciplinary approach to study human
behaviour at work. It tries to integrate the relevant knowledge drawn from related
disciplines like psychology, sociology and anthropology to make them applicable for
studying and analysing organizational behaviour.
− An Applied Science:
o The very nature of O.B. is applied. What O.B. basically does is the application of various
researches to solve the organizational problems related to human behaviour. The basic
line of difference between pure science and O.B. is that while the former concentrates
of fundamental researches, the latter concentrates on applied researches. O.B. involves
both applied research and its application in organizational analysis. Hence, O.B. can be
called both science as well as art.
− A Normative Science:
o Organizational Behaviour is a normative science also. While the positive science
discusses only cause effect relationship, O.B. prescribes how the findings of applied
researches can be applied to socially accepted organizational goals. Thus, O.B. deals
with what is accepted by individuals and society engaged in an organization. Yes, it is
not that O.B. is not normative at all. In fact, O.B. is normative as well that is well
underscored by the proliferation of management theories.
− A Humanistic and Optimistic Approach:
o Organizational Behaviour applies humanistic approach towards people working in the
organization. It, deals with the thinking and feeling of human beings. O.B. is based on
the belief that people have an innate desire to be independent, creative and productive.
It also realizes that people working in the organization can and will actualize these
potentials if they are given proper conditions and environment. Environment affects
performance or workers working in an organization.
− A Total System Approach:
o The system approach is one that integrates all the variables, affecting organizational
functioning. The systems approach has been developed by the behavioural scientists to
analyse human behaviour in view of his/her socio-psychological framework. Man's
socio-psychological framework makes man a complex one and the systems approach
tries to study his/her complexity and find solution to it.
The three internal organizational elements viz., people, technology and structure and the fourth
element, i.e., external social systems may be taken as the scope of O.B.:
− People:
o The people constitute the internal social system of the organization. They consist of
individuals and groups. Groups may be large or small, formal or informal, official or
Mr. Mehul Pujara, Department of Mechanical Engineering
Organizatioanl Behavior (3141909) 3
Unit-1 Focus and Purpose – Organizational Behavior
unofficial. They are dynamic. They form, change and disband. Human organization
changes everyday. Today, it is not the same as it was yesterday. It may change further
in the coming days. People are living, thinking and feeling being who created the
organization and try to achieve the objectives and goals. Thus, organizations exist to
serve the people and not the people exist to serve the organization.
− Structure:
o Structure defines the sole relationship of people in an organization. Different people in
an organization are given different roles and they have certain relationship with others.
It leads to division of labour so that people can perform their duties or work to
accomplish the organizational goal. Thus, everybody cannot be an accountant or a clerk.
Work is complex and different duties are to be performed by different people. Some may
be accountant, others may be managers, clerks, peons or workers. All are so related to
each other to accomplish the goal in a co-ordinated manner. Thus, structure relates to
power and duties. One has the authority and others have a duty to obey him.
− Technology:
o Technology imparts the physical and economic conditions within which people work.
With their bare hands people can do nothing so they are given assistance of buildings,
machines, tools, processes and resources. The nature of technology depends very much
on the nature of the organization and influences the work or working conditions. Thus,
technology brings effectiveness and at the same restricts people in various ways.
− Social System:
o Social system provides external environment which the organization operates. A single
organization cannot exist also. It is a part of the whole. One organization cannot give
everything and therefore, there are many other organizations. All these organizations
influence each other. It influences the attitudes of people, their working conditions and
above all provides competition for resources and power.
In a very broad sense, the scope of OB is the extent to which it can govern or influence the
operations of an organization. The scope of OB integrates 3 concepts respectively −
− Individual Behavior:
o It is the study of individual’s personality, learning, attitudes, motivation, and job
satisfaction. In this study, we interact with others in order to study about them and
make our perception about them.
Example − The personal interview round is conducted to interact with candidates to
check their skills, apart from those mentioned in the resume.
− Inter-individual Behavior:
o It is the study conducted through communication between the employees among
themselves as well as their subordinates, understanding people’s leadership qualities,
group dynamics, group conflicts, power and politics.
Example − A meeting to decide list of new board members.
− Group Behavior:
o Group behavior studies the formation of organization, structure of organization and
effectiveness of organization. The group efforts made towards the achievement of
organization’s goal is group behavior. In short, it is the way how a group behaves.
Example − Strike, rally etc.
− Custodial Model:
o The root level of this model is economic resources with a managerial orientation of
money. The employees in this model are oriented towards security and benefits
provided to them. They are dependent on the organization. The employee requirement
that is met is security.
o This model is adapted by firms having high resources as the name suggest. It is
dependent on economic resources. This approach directs to depend on firm rather than
on manager or boss. They give passive cooperation as they are satisfied but not strongly
encouraged.
− Supportive Model:
o The root level of this model is leadership with a managerial orientation of support. The
employees in this model are oriented towards their job performance and participation.
The employee requirement that is met is status and recognition. The performance result
is awakened drives.
o This model is dependent on leadership strive. It gives a climate to help employees grow
and accomplish the job in the interest of the organization. Management job is to assist
the employee’s job performance. Employees feel a sense of participation.
− Collegial Model:
o The root level of this model is partnership with a managerial orientation of teamwork.
The employees in this model are oriented towards responsible behavior and self-
discipline. The employee requirement that is met is self-actualization. The performance
result is moderate zeal.
1.6 Reference
1) Stephen P. Robins, Organizational Behavior, / Pearson Education
2) Udai Pareek, Understanding Organizational Behaviour, Oxford Higher Education
3) Margi Parikh and Rajan Gupta, Organizational Behaviour, McGraw Hill Education
4) Fred Luthans, Organizational Behavior, McGraw Hill
− An attitude is generally defined as the way a person responds to his or her environment, either
positively or negatively.
− An attitude is a positive, negative, or mixed evaluation of an object expressed at some level of
intensity. It is an expression of a favorable or unfavorable evaluation of a person, place, thing,
or event.
− Work environment can affect a person’s attitude.
− Some attitudes are a dangerous element in the workplace, one that can spread to those closest
to the employee and affect everyone’s performance.
− According to Gordon Allport, “An attitude is a mental and neural state of readiness, organized
through experience, exerting a directive or dynamic influence upon the individual’s response to
all objects and situations with which it is related.”
− Frank Freeman said, “An attitude is a dispositional readiness to respond to certain institutions,
persons or objects in a consistent manner which has been learned and has become one’s
typical mode of response.”
− “Attitude can be described as a learned predisposition to respond in a consistently favorable or
unfavorable manner for a given object.” — Martin Fishbein and Icek Ajzen.
− According to N.L. Munn, “Attitudes are learned predispositions towards aspects of our
environment. They may be positively or negatively directed towards certain people, service, or
institution.”
− Developed by L.L. Thurstone and Chave (1929) it is the earliest technique of attitude
measurement.
− This technique of equal appearing interval used in the scaling of psychophysical dimensions
was used by Thurstone for the construction of attitude scales to measure attitude towards
various subjects or towards any object.
The scale is prepared in the following manner:
− Developed by Likert the attitude scale prepared by the method of summated rating has an
entirely different approach.
− Likert is famous for constructing several attitude scales to measure attitude towards various
complex issues, like Black and White Problem, imperialism and various other international
problems.
− The procedure of preparation of Likerts’ scale is given below briefly:
o A large number of statements and propositions are collected relating to the issue. These
statements are then presented to a group of subjects to rate them into five categories.
a. Strongly approve-1
b. Approve-2
c. Undecided-3
d. Disapprove-4
e. Strongly disapprove-5.
o The ‘S’ is asked to give his score with regard to each statement on this basis of five point
scale. Then, the total score for each individual subject for all the statement is calculated
by summing up each individual responses.
o Thereafter, inter correlating the scores of each item, with the total scores on all the items
by the item analysis techniques, the most discriminating items are selected and
eliminated. Only those items having highest correlations arc retained for the final scale.
− The concept of social distance was given prominence by Katz and Allport under the
guidance of Gallet and Bogardus. Bogardus was interested in studying racial attitudes,
attitudes of people towards different races, towards different nationalities and comparing
them through his social distance scale.
− The procedure of the construction of the scale is as follows.
o The investigator first formulates various statements indicating different degrees of
acceptance or rejection of the group. The ‘S’ has to indicate how close or how far
away he is from the members of the other group. The distance measured by these
statements are basically psychological.
o A favourable attitude is indicated by the closeness and an unfavourable attitude is
indicated by distance. The greater is the distance, the greater is anti attitude and the
less is the distance the greater is the pro attitude.
o The psychological distance is progressively increased in the scale as one proceeds
from the first to the last statement starting from close kinship by marriage to
exclusion from the country.
− In this manner, by the Bogardus scale attitude is measured towards different nationalities.
− Guttman’s cumulative scaling method (1944) is devised to find out if the sets of statements
and propositions used to measure attitudes can actually satisfy the necessary conditions
of a particular type of scale.
− The main aim of this scaling technique is to determine whether the attitude in question is
“scalable” or not.
− An attitude is said to be scalable when a major proportion of the population being measured
responds to the scale in a consistent way. When an item it endorsed by the endorsement of
all other items that are less extreme and rejection of all those items that are more extreme,
it indicates the criterion of consistency.
− In Guttmans scale, plotting of scale scores were made on the horizontal lines. Guttman’s
technique involves a ‘Scalogram’ device for ascertaining the degree of consistency that is
present. According to Guttman, when significant consistency is shown by a set of items or
propositions, the scale is unidimensional and hence, is expected to measure attitude
reliably.
− But in the reverse case one has to infer that there is more than one dimension underlying
the scale. At this point, by using this method of Guttman the offending items can be
eliminate and the scale can be revised and corrected to meet this criterion of consistency.
− Guttman’s scale helps in determining the zero point. It is also based on the criteria of unique
dimensionality.
− This scale has been developed by Edwards and Kilpartic. It is the synthesis of the various
earlier techniques.
− Like the other scales, a large number of dichotomous items are collected. Judges then
group the items in categories as per their degree of favourableness. Others are discarded
because of ambiguity.
− The retained items are then presented in a multiple choice form with six response
categories starting from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Then, these statements are
served to new groups of subjects. Their responses are scored individually to derive a total
score for each person.
− Like the Likert Scale ‘Item analysis’ technique is applied on each item. The final scale
consists of those items having good discriminating capacity. Then, the selected items are
dichotomised and subjected to scaling as followed by Guttman
− It is a very laborious procedure and perhaps because of that the scale discrimination
technique has not been used in a large scale in psychological researches for the
measurement of attitude. So, the advantages and defects of scale are yet to be traced.
− Employees’ attitudes can be changed, and sometimes it is in the best interests of management
to try to do so.
− For example, if employees believe that their employer does not look after their welfare, the
management should try to change employees’ attitudes and develop a more positive attitude
towards them.
− However, the process of changing the attitude is not always easy.
− Barriers to Change Attitudes are;
1. Prior Commitment
2. Insufficient Information
3. Balance and Consistency
4. Lack of Resources
5. Improper Reward System
6. Resistance to Change
Prior Commitment:
− When people feel a commitment towards a particular course of action that has already been
agreed upon, it becomes difficult for them to change or accept the new ways of functioning.
Insufficient Information:
− It also acts as a major barrier to change attitudes. Sometimes people do not see why they
should change their attitude due to the unavailability of adequate information.
− Sometimes people do not see why they should change their attitude due to the unavailability of
adequate information.
− Another obstacle to a change of attitude is the attitude theory of balance and consistency.
− Human beings prefer their attitudes about people and things to be in line with their behaviors
towards each other and objects.
Lack of Resources:
− If plans become excessively ambitious, they can sometimes be obstructed by the lack of
resources on a company or organization.
− So, in this case, if the organization wants to change the employees’ attitude towards the new
plan, sometimes it becomes impossible for the lack of resources to achieve this.
Resistance to Change:
− In common terminology, perception is defined as “a) the way you think about something and
your idea of what it is like; b) the way that you notice things with your senses of sight, hearing
etc.; c) the natural ability to understand or notice things quickly.”
− In philosophy, psychology, and cognitive science, perception is the process of attaining
awareness or understanding of sensory information.
− The word “perception” comes from the Latin words perceptio, percipio, and means “receiving,
collecting, action of taking possession, and apprehension with the mind or senses.”
− Perception is the organization, identification, and interpretation of sensory information in order
to represent and understand the environment.
− According to Joseph Reitz; “Perception includes all those processes by which an individual
receives information about his environment—seeing, hearing, feeling, tasting and smelling.”
− According to B. V. H. Gilmer, “Perception is the process of becoming aware of situations, of
adding meaningful associations to sensations.”
− Uday Pareek said perception can be defined as “the process of receiving, selecting, organizing,
interpreting, checking, and reacting to sensory stimuli or data.”
− According to S. P. Robbins, perception can be defined as “the process by which individuals
organize and interpret their sensory impressions in order to give meaning to their
environments.”
− Several characteristics of the perceiver can affect perception. When an individual looks at a
target and attempts to interpret what he or she, that interpretation is heavily influenced by
personal characteristics of individual perceiver. The major characteristics of the perceiver
influencing perception are:
1. Attitudes: The perceiver's attitudes affect perception. For example, suppose Mr. X is
interviewing candidates for a very important position in his organization –a position that
requires negotiating contracts with suppliers, most of whom are male. Mr X may feel
that women are not capable of holding their own in tough negotiations. This attitude will
doubtless affect his perceptions of the female candidates he interviews.
2. Moods: Moods can have a strong influence on the way we perceive someone. We think
differently when we are happy than we do when we are depressed. In addition, we
remember information that is consistent with our mood state better than information
that is inconsistent with our mood state. When in a positive mood, we form more
positive impression of others. When in a negative mood, we tend to evaluate others
unfavourably.
3. Motives: Unsatisfied needs or motives stimulate individuals and may exert a strong
influence on their perceptions. For example, in an organizational context, a boss who is
insecure perceives a subordinate's efforts to do an outstanding job as a threat to his or
her own position. Personal insecurity can be transferred into the perception that others
are out to "get my job", regardless of the intention of the subordinates.
4. Self-Concept: Another factor that can affect social perception is the perceivers' self-
concept. An individual with a positive self-concept tends to notice positive attributes in
another person. In contrast, a negative self-concept can lead a perceiver to pick out
negative traits in another person. Greater understanding of self allows us to have more
accurate perceptions of others.
5. Interest: The focus of our attention appears to be influenced by our interests. Because
our individual interests differ considerably, what one person notices in a situation can
differ from what others perceive. For example, the supervisor who has just been
reprimanded by his boss for coming late is more likely to notice his colleagues coming
late tomorrow than he did last week. If you are preoccupied with a personal problem,
you may find it hard to be attentive in class.
6. Cognitive Structure: Cognitive structure, an individual's pattern of thinking, also affects
perception. Some people have a tendency to perceive physical traits, such as height,
weight, and appearance, more readily. Others tend to focus more on central traits, or
Mr. Mehul Pujara, Department of Mechanical Engineering
12 Organizatioanl Behavior (3141909)
Unit-2 Individual Behavior – Organizational Behavior
personality dispositions. Cognitive complexity allows a person to perceive multiple
characteristics of another person rather than attending to just a few traits.
7. Cognitive Structure: Cognitive structure, an individual's pattern of thinking, also affects
perception. Some people have a tendency to perceive physical traits, such as height,
weight, and appearance, more readily. Others tend to focus more on central traits, or
personality dispositions. Cognitive complexity allows a person to perceive multiple
characteristics of another person rather than attending to just a few traits.
− The situation in which the interaction between the perceiver and the target takes place has an
influence on the perceiver's impression of the target. For example, a professor may not notice
his 20-year-old female student in a bikini at the swimming pool. Yet the professor will notice the
same girl if she comes to his organizational behaviour class in abikini. In the same way, meeting
a manager in his or her office affects your impression in a certain way that may contrast with
the impression you would form had you met the manager in a restaurant.
− The strength of the situational cues also affects social perception. Some situations provide
strong cues as to appropriate behaviour. In these situations, we assume that the individual's
Mr. Mehul Pujara, Department of Mechanical Engineering
Organizatioanl Behavior (3141909) 13
Unit-2 Individual Behavior – Organizational Behavior
behaviour can be accounted for by the situation, and that it may not reflect the individual's
disposition. This is the discounting principle in social perception. For example, you mayen
counter an automobile sales person who has a warm and personable manner, asks you about
your work and hobbies, and seems genuinely interested in your taste in cars. Can you assume
that this behaviour reflects the sales person's personality? You probably cannot, because of the
influence of the situation. This person is trying to sell you a car, and in this particular situation
he probably treats all customers in this manner.
2.9 Motivation
− Motivation is defined as inner burning passion caused by need, wants and desire which propels
an individual to exert his physical and mental energy to achieve desired objectives.
− “Motivation is the willingness to exert high levels of effort toward organisational goals,
conditioned by the effort’s ability to satisfy some individual needs.” - Stephen P Robbins
− “It is the desire within an individual that stimulates him or her to action.” - George R. Terry
− “It is the way in which urges, drives, desires, aspirations, strivings or needs direct, control or
explains the behaviour of human beings.” - D.E. McFarland
Intrinsic Motivation
− It is a type of motivation in which the motives originates from inside of the human body.
− It refer to internal driving state stimulating an individual to behave in a specific way.
− It includes all biological drive such as hunger, thirst, sleep, relief from pain, temperature
regulation, need for oxygen and so on.
− For example, the hunger is driving force coming from inside to compel (ફરજ પાડવી) an
individual to eat food.
− The individual feels tired and required a good amount of sleep to relax for the next day.
− Our curiosity, internal fear, psychological needs and desires also serve as intrinsic motives.
− It includes following motives:
1. Biological drives: e.g. hunger, thirst, relief from pain
2. Curiosity
3. Internal fear e.g. Fear of rejection
Extrinsic Motivation
− In this type of motivation, the motives originate from outside of the human body.
− The driving force exists outside of the human body that stimulates the individual for certain the
action.
− Though these motives are external to human body but they have a rewarding or punishing
impact for the individual.
− It includes following motives:
1. Incentives
2. Bonuses
3. Allowances
4. Promotion or demotion
5. Rewards and punishments
6. Merit and distinction certificate
7. Appreciation certificates and prizes
− This is the earliest and most widely known theory of motivation, developed by Abraham Maslow
(1943) in the 1940s and 1950s.
− Maslow's hierarchy of needs is often shown in the shape of a pyramid: basic needs at the
bottom and the most complex need (need for self-actualization) at the top. Maslow himself has
never drawn a pyramid to describe these levels of our needs; but the pyramid has become the
most known way to represent his hierarchy.
2. Alderfer – ERG theory: Existence needs, relatedness needs and growth needs
− Alderfer (Furnham, 2008) distinguished three steps or classes of needs: existence, relatedness
and growth. Maslow’s physiological and safety needs belong together to existence needs.
Relatedness can be harmonised to belongingness and esteem of others. Growth is the same
as Maslow’s self-esteem plus self-actualization. Both Maslow and Alderfer tried to describe
how these needs, these stages of needs become more or less important to individuals.
o Existence needs: These include needs for basic material necessities. In short, it includes
an individual’s physiological and physical safety needs.
o Relatedness needs: Individuals need significant relationships (be with family, peers or
superiors), love and belongingness, they strive toward reaching public fame and
recognition. This class of needs contain Maslow’s social needs and external component
of esteem needs.
o Growth needs: Need for self-development, personal growth and advancement form
together this class of need. This class of needs contain Maslow’s self-actualization
needs and intrinsic component of esteem needs.
− For example there is a student, who has excellent grades, friends, and high standard of living,
maybe also work at the university. What happens if this individual finds that he or she is
frustrated in attempts to get more autonomy and responsibility at the university, maybe also
more scholarship that generally encourage individuals’ growth? Frustration in satisfying a
higher (growth) need has resulted in a regression to a lower level of (relatedness) needs (‘I need
just my friends, some good wine, I do not want to go to the university anymore.’).
− If the hygiene factors, for example salary, working conditions, work environment, safety and
security are unsuitable (low level) at the workplace, this can make individuals unhappy,
dissatisfied with their job. Motivating factors, on the other hand, can increase job satisfaction,
and motivation is based on an individual's need for personal growth. If these elements are
effective, then they can motivate an individual to achieve above-average performance and
effort. For example, having responsibility or achievement can cause satisfaction (human
characteristics) (Dartey-Baah, 2011).
− Hygiene factors are needed to ensure that an employee is not dissatisfied. Motivation factors
are needed to ensure employee's satisfaction and to motivate an employee to higher
performance.
− Herzberg’s five factors of job satisfaction (motivating factors):
o achievement
o recognition
o work itself
o responsibility
o advancement
− Only these factors can motivate us. But at the same time we need the lack of dissatisfactions
(we need hygiene factors, "workpeace") to achieve more efficient work.
− Herzberg’s five factors of job dissatisfaction (hygiene factors – deficiency needs):
o company policy and administration
o supervision
o salary
o interpersonal relationships
o working conditions
Negative reinforcements:
− negative reinforcement when we give a meal to a hungry person if he behaves in a certain
manner/way.
− In this case the meal is a negative reinforcement because it eliminates the unpleasant state
(hunger).
− punishment can be undesired reinforcement, or reinforce undesired behaviour.
− For example, if a student is always late to class and thus he gets negative verbal feedback and
also always has to tidy up the classroom at the end of the day, in this case the undesirable
behaviour is reinforced with an undesirable reinforcer. The punishment declines the tendency
to be late.
− At the workplace the workers put inputs into the job, such as education, experience, effort,
energy, and expect to get some outcomes such as salary, reward, promotion, verbal recognition,
and interesting and challenging work each in equal amounts
− The equity theory works not just in the workplace, but at school as well. For example, when for
the same oral exam performance two students get different marks, then inequity exists. In this
case, the student who gets the worse mark may lose his/her motivation to learn (reduce his/her
efforts), or persuade the teacher to give him/her a better mark, or change the perception of the
reference person's performance ("I did not know everything, but my classmate could answer all
Mr. Mehul Pujara, Department of Mechanical Engineering
22 Organizatioanl Behavior (3141909)
Unit-2 Individual Behavior – Organizational Behavior
the questions"). At the school it can demotivate students if someone who never studies or who
never performs better than the others always gets good mark. The greater the inequity the
greater the distress an individual feels, which will motivate the endeavour to make the outcomes
and the inputs equal compared to the reference person.
− When inequity exists, a person might…
o reduce his/her inputs, efforts, quantity or quality of his/her work
o try to increase his/her outputs (ask for better mark, or pay raising)
o adjust his/her perception of reference person or his/her outcomes or inputs (re-evaluate
his/her or the reference person's effort or outcome)
o change the reference person
o quit the situation.
− The problem with equity theory is that it does not take into account differences in individual
needs, values, and personalities. For example, one person may perceive a certain situation as
inequitable while another does not. Nevertheless ensuring equity is essential to motivation.
• Set challenging but attainable goals. Too easy or too difficult/unrealistic goals don’t
motivate us.
• Set specific and measurable goals. These can focus toward what you want, and can
measure the progress toward the goal.
2.13 Personality
− The word personality itself stems from the Latin word persona, which refers to a theatrical mask
worn by performers in order to either project different roles or disguise their identities.
− Personality is the characteristic patterns of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors that make a
person unique.
− It is believed that personality arises from within the individual and remains fairly consistent
throughout life.
Heredity:
− Some characteristics of our behaviour are genetic, which we inherit. Some of the traits like
physical height, slimness, dexterity, intellectual capacity, ability to learn, logical power, etc. are
also inherited. All these have a significant influence on our behavioural patterns.
Family background:
− This theory is based on the belief that man is encouraged more by unforeseen forces than the
conscious and logical thought. Freud believed that most of the things in life are not present at
the conscious level but they are present at an unconscious level.
− The features of Freud’s theory include three attributes − Id, Ego, and Superego.
Id − It defines the innate component of personality. It is the impulsive and unconscious part of
mind that seeks immediate satisfaction. Example − A hungry baby cries till he/she is fed.
Ego − It is derived from Id and assists in dealing with the external world. It also helps in
translating the inner needs into expressions. It deals with practical and rational thinking
process. Example − We have a fight with our friend and expect the friend to talk first, even
though both of us want to talk.
Superego − It is different from ego and is partially unconscious. It includes the traditional values
of society as interpreted by our parents. It also helps in the integral vision of punishment.
Example − Ram came late today so he is grounded for a week.
Erikson’s Theory
− This theory states that personality is groomed throughout lifetime. He presents eight distinct
stages each with two possible outcomes. Successful completion of each stage leads to a
healthy personality. These stages are −
Infancy − It is the period between 0-1 years of age. In this stage, children learn the ability to trust
others depending on their caregivers. Unsuccessful completion in this stage results in anxiety
and insecurity. Example − Children of this age are more comfortable with those faces they see
more often and not with strangers.
Early Childhood − It is the period between 1-3 years of age. In this stage, children learn to be
independent. If given support, they become more confident else they become dependent over
others. Example − Children in this age are taught how to walk, how to talk etc.
Terminal Values
− These are values that we think are most important or most desirable.
− These refer to desirable end-states of existence, the goals a person would like to achieve during
his or her lifetime.
− They include happiness, self-respect, recognition, inner harmony, leading a prosperous life, and
professional excellence.
Instrumental Values
− Instrumental values deal with views on acceptable modes of conductor means of achieving the
terminal values.
− These include being honest, sincere, ethical, and being ambitious. These values are more
focused on personality traits and character.
2.18 Learning
− Learning can be defined as the permanent change in behavior due to direct and indirect
experience. It means change in behavior, attitude due to education and training, practice and
experience. It is completed by acquisition of knowledge and skills, which are relatively
permanent.
− Learning is any relatively permanent change in behaviour that occurs as a result of experience.
- Stephen P. Robbins
− Learning is the process of having one’s behaviour modified, more or less permanently, by what
he does and the consequences of his action, or by what he observes. - Munn N.L.
− Learning can be defined as relatively permanent change in behaviour potentially that results
from reinforced practice or experience. - Steers and Porter
Visual Learners:
− Visual learners learn primarily through the written word.
− They tend to be readers who diligently take down every word.
Auditory Learners:
− Auditory learners learn primarily through listening.
− They focus their ears and attention on your words, listening carefully to everything you say.
− They like to talk rather than write and relish the opportunity to discuss what they’ve heard.
Kinesthetic Learners
− Kinesthetic learners learn better by doing
− This group learns best when they can practice what they’re learning
− They want to have their hands on the keyboard, the hammer, or the test tube because they think
in terms of physical action.
− Classical conditioning can be defined as a process in which a formerly neutral stimulus when
paired with an unconditional stimulus, becomes a conditioned stimulus that elicits a
conditioned response.
− Ivan Pavlov, a Russian psychologist (Nobel Peace Prize) developed classical conditioning
theory of learning based on his experiments to teach a dog to salivate in response to the ringing
of a bell.
− When Pavlov presented meat (unconditioned stimulus) to the dog, he noticed a great deal of
salivation (conditioned response). But, when merely bell was rung, no salivation was noticed in
the dog.
− Then, when next Pavlov did was to accompany the offering of meat to the dog along with ringing
up of bell.
− He did this several times. Afterwards, he merely rang the bell without presenting the meat. Now,
the dog began to salivate as soon as the bell rang.
− After a while, the dog would salivate merely at the sound of the bell, even if no meat were
presented. In effect, the dog had learned to respond i.e. to salivate to the bell.
− Pavlov concluded that the dog has become classically conditioned to salivate (response) to the
sound of the bell (stimulus). It will be seen that Classical Conditioning learning can take place
amongst animals based on stimulus-response (SR) connections.
− This stimulus-response connection (S-R) can be applied in management to assess
organizational behavior. Historically when a CEO visits an organization, production charts are
updated, individuals put on a good dress, window panes are cleaned and floors are washed.
What all one has to do is to just say that the Top Boss is visiting.
− You will find that all the above work is undertaken (response) without any instructions. Because
the people in the organization have learned the behaviour (conditioned). It has caused a
permanent change in the organization (S-R connections).
Operant Conditioning
− Operant Conditioning is concerned primarily with learning as a consequence of behaviour
Response-Stimulus (R-S). In Operant Conditioning particular response occurs as a
consequence of many stimulus situations.
Mr. Mehul Pujara, Department of Mechanical Engineering
32 Organizatioanl Behavior (3141909)
Unit-2 Individual Behavior – Organizational Behavior
− Operant conditioning argues that behaviour is a function of its consequences.
− People learn to behave to get something they want or avoid something they don’t want.
− Operant behavior means voluntary or learned behavior.
− The tendency to repeat such behaviour is influenced by the reinforcement or lack of
reinforcement brought about by the consequences of the behaviour.
− Reinforcement therefore strengthens behaviour and increases the likelihood it will be repeated.
− This Response-Stimulus (R-S) can be applied in management to assess organizational
behavior. From an organisational point of view, any stimulus from the work environment will
elicit a response. The consequence of such a response will determine the nature of the future
response.
− For example, working hard and getting the promotion will probably cause the person to keep
working hard in the future.
− In our analysis, we’ll need three terms that are closely intertwined: affect, emotions, and moods.
− Affect is a generic term that covers a broad range of feelings, including both emotions and
moods.
− Emotions are intense feelings directed at someone or something.
− Moods are less intense feelings than emotions and often arise without a specific event acting
as a stimulus.
2.27 Reference
1) Stephen P. Robins, Organizational Behavior, / Pearson Education
2) Udai Pareek, Understanding Organizational Behaviour, Oxford Higher Education
3) Margi Parikh and Rajan Gupta, Organizational Behaviour, McGraw Hill Education
4) Fred Luthans, Organizational Behavior, McGraw Hill
− This type of organizational structure is inexpensive to maintain and accountability is very clear.
However, it’s difficult to maintain this kind of structure in any but a small organization. When
this kind of organization structure increases in size, decision making slows down and the
manager becomes overly burdened as the go-to decision maker for 50-100 people. It’s also risky
– everything depends on one person, and should that person become ill or die, it puts the
business in jeopardy.
− The simple structure is often referred to as “pre-bureaucratic,” in that it lacks a standardization
of tasks.
Mr. Mehul Pujara, Department of Mechanical Engineering
2 Organizatioanl Behavior (3141909)
Unit-3 Group Behavior – Organizational Behavior
Bureaucratic Structure
− Bureaucratic organizational structures take a chapter out of researcher Max Weber’s book, with
clearly defined roles and responsibilities, hierarchical structure and respect for merit. This
organizational structure is characterized by
o Highly routine operating tasks achieved through specialization
o Very formalized rules and regulations
o Functional departmentalization
o Centralized authority
o Narrow spans of control
o Decision making that follows the chain of command
− Bureaucratic organizational structures are pyramid-like, with a CEO atop the chain of command
in the corporate structure and a clear chain of command underneath. A bureaucratic
organizational structure might look like this:
− Bureaucratic organizational structures are ideal for organizations that require standardization
(think banks, government offices). They’re ideal for organizations looking for the ability to
perform standard tasks highly efficiently. Organizations with bureaucratic structures can get by
with less talented people at lower levels, because decision making almost always falls to senior
leaders.
− The Matrix Structure
− A matrix structure creates dual lines of authority and combines functional and product
departmentalization.
− Ad agencies, hospitals, universities and management consulting firms use the matrix
organizational structure. It’s easy to see why – by creating a dual reporting situation, a manager
who’s working with a company on advertising would be able to manage a team that included a
representative from each of the needed areas to get a campaign running—a graphic designer, a
space planner and so on.
− This structure allows for the efficient allocation of specialists. Information is more easily
exchanged, as the contact between the different departments is increased.
−
Mr. Mehul Pujara, Department of Mechanical Engineering
Organizatioanl Behavior (3141909) 3
Unit-3 Group Behavior – Organizational Behavior
− The major disadvantage is the ability to get all these people moving at the same time, with clear
priorities, to deliver a solution that’s on time and on budget. It can also create power struggles,
because it tosses aside the idea of unity of command.
Virtual Organization
− A virtual organization is a small, core organization that outsources major business functions.
Think of it as “renting” departments rather than owning them.
− The chart in Figure illustrates a typical virtual organization, which includes employees that
practice flex-time in a home office, ones that are in satellite offices domestically and
internationally, and then a group of independent contractors, telecommuters and vendors.
− The virtual organization is definitely on the other side of the spectrum from bureaucratic
organizational structure. The bureaucratic organizational structure seeks control in multiple
Mr. Mehul Pujara, Department of Mechanical Engineering
4 Organizatioanl Behavior (3141909)
Unit-3 Group Behavior – Organizational Behavior
levels and, if there is a downfall to the virtual organizational structure, it is that there is far less
control over the different parts of the business.
Types of Groups
− There are two types of groups an individual forms. They are formal groups and informal groups.
Let us know about these two groups.
Formal Groups
− These are the type of work groups created by the organization and have designated work
assignments and rooted tasks. The behavior of such groups is directed toward achieving
organizational goals.
− This technique includes a group of people, mostly between five and ten in number, sitting
around a table, producing ideas in the form of free association. The main focus is on generation
of ideas and not on evaluation of these ideas.
−
− If more ideas can be originated, then it is likely that there will be a unique and creative idea
among them. All these ideas are written on the blackboard with a piece of chalk so that all the
team members can see every idea and try to improvise these ideas.
−
− Brainstorming technique is very effective when the problem is comparatively precise and can
be simply defined. A complex problem can be divided into parts and each part can be dealt with
separately at a time.
− This technique is similar to brainstorming except that this approach is more structured. It
motivates individual creativity. Members form the group for namesake and operate
independently, originate ideas for solving the problem on their own, in silence and in writing.
Members do not communicate well with each other so that strong personality domination is
evaded.
− The group coordinator either collects the written ideas or writes them on a large blackboard so
that each member of the group can see what the ideas are. These ideas are further discussed
one by one in turn and each participant is motivated to comment on these ideas in order to
clarify and improve them. After all these ideas have been discussed, they are evaluated for their
merits and drawbacks and each actively participating member is needed to vote on each idea
and allot it a rank on the basis of priority of each alternative solution.
− The idea with the highest cumulative ranking is selected as the final solution to the problem.
− This technique is applicable only in certain situations, but is an excellent method when a
situation actually demands it. The type of problem should be such that it generates output in
the form of yes or no. Say for example, a decision is to be made whether to buy or not to buy a
product, to merge or not to merge, to expand or not to expand and so on. These types of
decision requires an extensive and exhaustive discussion and investigation since a wrong
decision can have serious consequences.
− There are many advantages as well as disadvantages of this type of situation. The group that
makes the decision is divided into two sub-groups, one in favor of the “go” decision and the
opposing in favor of “no go” decision.
− The first group enlists all the “pros” of the problem solution and the second group lists all the
“cons”. These groups meet and discuss their discoveries and their reasons.
− After tiring discussions, the groups switch sides and try to find weaknesses in their own original
standpoints. This interchange of ideas and understanding of various viewpoints results in
mutual acceptance of the facts as they exist so that a solution can be put together around these
facts and ultimately a final decision is reached.
Delphi Technique
− This technique is the improvised version of the nominal group technique, except that it involves
obtaining the opinions of experts physically distant from each other and unknown to each other.
− This isolates group members from the undue influence of others. Basically, the types of
problems sorted by this technique are not specific in nature or related to a particular situation
at a given time.
− Team building is not a one-time act. It is a step by step process which aims at bringing a
desirable change in the organization. Teams are usually formed for a particular task or project
and are mostly for the short term.
− Team building has radically evolved as a technique to develop and manage effective teams in
the workplace.
− The aim to achieve long-term organizational objectives developed the need for carrying out
team building activities frequently.
− Team building is not an easy task. A high-performance team can fulfil the organizational
objectives. However, an inefficient team can lead to wastage of time and resources of the
organization.
− Therefore, we can say that there are multiple adverse effects of team building too, which are as
follows:
3.8 Reference
1) Stephen P. Robins, Organizational Behavior, / Pearson Education
2) Udai Pareek, Understanding Organizational Behaviour, Oxford Higher Education
3) Margi Parikh and Rajan Gupta, Organizational Behaviour, McGraw Hill Education
4) Fred Luthans, Organizational Behavior, McGraw Hill
Leadership can be defined as the ability of the management to make sound decisions and
inspire others to perform well.
It is the process of directing the behavior of others towards achieving a common goal. In short,
leadership is getting things done through others.
Leadership is very important in a firm as it leads to higher performance by the team members,
it improves motivation and morale within the members, and helps to respond to change.
Leadership facilitates organizational success by creating responsibility and accountability
among the members of the organization. In short, it increases value in an organization.
Laissez-Faire
A laissez-faire leader does not directly supervise employees and fails to provide regular updates
to those under his supervision. Highly experienced and trained employees with minimal
requirement of supervision fall under the laissez-faire leadership style.
But, not all employees possess these features. This leadership style blocks the production of
employees needing supervision. The laissez-faire style implements no leadership or supervision
efforts from managers, which can lead to poor production, lack of control and increasing costs.
Autocratic
The autocratic leadership style permits managers to make decisions alone without the input of
others. Managers access total authority and impose their will on employees. No one opposes
the decisions of autocratic leaders. Countries like Cuba and North Korea operate under the
autocratic leadership style.
This leadership style benefits those who require direct supervision. Creative employees who
participate in group functions detest this leadership style.
Participative
This is also known as the democratic leadership style. It values the input of team members and
peers, but the responsibility of making the final decision rests with the participative leader.
Participative leadership motivates employee morale because employees make contributions to
the decision-making process. It accounts to a feeling that their opinions matter.
Mr. Mehul Pujara, Department of Mechanical Engineering
2 Organizatioanl Behavior (3141909)
Unit-4 Leadership and Power– Organizational Behavior
When an organization needs to make changes within itself, that is internally, the participative
leadership style helps employees accept changes easily as they play a role in the process. This
leadership style meets challenges when companies need to make a decision in a short period
of time.
Transactional
Transactional leadership style is formed by the concept of reward and punishment.
Transactional leaders believe that the employee's performance is completely dependent on
these two factors. When there is an encouragement, the workers put in their best effort and the
bonus is in monetary terms in most of the cases. In case they fail to achieve the set target they
are given a negative appraisal.
Transactional leaders pay more attention to physical and security requirements of the
employees.
Transformational
Transformational leadership has the ability to affect employee's perceptions through the
returns that organization gets in the form of human capital benefits. These leaders have the
ability to reap higher benefits by introducing knowledge management processes, encouraging
interpersonal communication among employees and creating healthy organizational culture.
It helps in flourishing organizational innovation by creating a participative environment or
culture. It promotes a culture where the employees have autonomy to speak about their
experiences and share knowledge.
It has been seen that transformational leaders are more innovative than transactional and
laisse-faire leaders.
Leadership Style
Identifying leadership style is the first step in using the model. Fiedler believed that leadership
style is fixed, and it can be measured using a scale he developed called Least-Preferred Co-
Worker (LPC) Scale (see figure 1).
Situational Favorableness
Next, you determine the "situational favorableness" of your particular situation. This depends
on three distinct factors:
Leader-Member Relations – This is the level of trust and confidence that your team has in you.
A leader who is more trusted and has more influence within the group is in a more favorable
situation than a leader who is not trusted.
Task Structure – This refers to the type of task you're doing: clear and structured, or vague and
unstructured. Unstructured tasks, or tasks where the team and leader have little knowledge of
how to achieve them, are viewed unfavorably.
Leader's Position Power – This is the amount of power you have to direct the group, and provide
reward or punishment. The more power you have, the more favorable your situation. Fiedler
identifies power as being either strong or weak.
Role-Taking
Role-taking occurs when team members first join the group. Managers use this time to assess
new members' skills and abilities.
Role-Making
New team members then begin to work on projects and tasks as part of the team. In this stage,
managers generally expect that new team members will work hard, be loyal and prove
trustworthy as they get used to their new role.
The theory says that, during this stage, managers sort new team members (often
subconsciously) into one of two groups.
In-Group - if team members prove themselves loyal, trustworthy and skilled, they're put into the
In-Group. This group is made up of the team members that the manager trusts the most.
Managers give this group most of their attention, providing challenging and interesting work,
and offering opportunities for additional training and advancement. This group also gets more
one-to-one time with the manager. Often, people in this group have a similar personality and
work-ethic to their manager.
Out-Group - if team members betray the trust of the manager, or prove that they're unmotivated
or incompetent, they're put into the Out-Group. This group's work is often restricted and
unchallenging. Out-Group members tend to have less access to the manager, and often don't
receive opportunities for growth or advancement.
Routinization
During this last phase, routines between team members and their managers are established.
In-Group team members work hard to maintain the good opinion of their managers, by showing
trust, respect, empathy, patience, and persistence.
Out-Group members may start to dislike or distrust their managers. Because it's so hard to
move out of the Out-Group once the perception has been established, Out-Group members may
have to change departments or organizations in order to "start over."
Once team members have been classified, even subconsciously, as In-Group or Out-Group, that
classification affects how their managers relate to them from then on, and it can become self-
fulfilling.
For instance, In-Group team members are often seen as rising stars and the manager trusts
them to work and perform at a high level. This is also the group that the manager talks to most,
offering support and advice, and they're given the best opportunities to test their skills and grow.
So, of course, they're more likely to develop in their roles.
This also holds true for the Out-Group. The manager spends little, if any, time trying to support
and develop this group. They receive few challenging assignments or opportunities for training
and advancement. And, because they're never tested, they have little chance to change the
manager's opinion.
Mr. Mehul Pujara, Department of Mechanical Engineering
Organizatioanl Behavior (3141909) 7
Unit-4 Leadership and Power – Organizational Behavior
Path-Goal Leadership Theory
The Path-Goal model is a theory based on specifying a leader's style or behavior that best fits
the employee and work environment in order to achieve a goal (House, Mitchell, 1974). The goal
is to increase your employees' motivation, empowerment, and satisfaction so they become
productive members of the organization.
Path-Goal is based on Vroom's (1964) expectancy theory in which an individual will act in a
certain way based on the expectation that the act will be followed by a given outcome and on
the attractiveness of that outcome to the individual. The path-goal theory was first introduced
by Martin Evans (1970) and then further developed by House (1971).
The path-goal theory can best be thought of as a process in which leaders select specific
behaviors that are best suited to the employees' needs and the working environment so that
they may best guide the employees through their path in the obtainment of their daily work
activities (goals) (Northouse, 2013).
While Path-Goal Theory is not a detailed process, it generally follows these basic steps as
shown in the graphic below:
o Determine the employee and environmental characteristics
o Select a leadership style
o Focus on motivational factors that will help the employee succeed
A leader is someone whom people follow or someone who guides or directs others. A manager
is someone who is responsible for directing and controlling the work and staff in an
organization, or of a department within it.
The main difference between the two is that a leader works by example, while a manager
dictates expectations. If a manager goes against the rules, that will tarnish his position as a
manager. If a leader goes against the example he or she is trying to set, that will be seen as a
setback. Following are a few subtle differences between the two –
o A leader is an innovator and creator whereas a manager is a commander.
o A leader can’t be a manager but the opposite is possible, a manager is more than a
leader.
o A leader does what is right, while the manager makes things right.
o A leader deals with change whereas a manager plans for a change.
o A leader gives direction to do something whereas the manager plans for everything that
is to be done.
o A leader encourages people whereas the manager controls people.
o A leader handles communication, credibility, and empowerment whereas a manager
deals with organizing and staffing.
Sources of Power
Power refers to the possession of authority and influence over others. Power is a tool that,
depending on how it’s used, can lead to either positive or negative outcomes in an organization.
Where does power come from?
What is it that gives an individual or a group influence over others?
We answer these questions by dividing the bases or sources of power into two general
groupings – formal and personal – and then breaking each of these down into more specific
categories.
In 1959, American sociologists John French and Bertram Raven published an article, “The Bases
of Power”, that is regarded as the basis for classifying power in organizations. They identified
some sources of power.
10 sources of power are;
o Formal Power.
o Legitimate Power.
o Expert Power.
o Referent Power.
o Coercive Power.
o Reward Power.
o Informational Power.
o Connection Power.
o Political Power.
o Charismatic Power.
Legitimate Power
In the formal groups and organizations, probably the most frequent access to one or more of
the power bases is one’s structural position. This is called legitimate power.
Legitimate power is also known as positional power. It’s derived from the position a person
holds in an organization’s hierarchy.
Job descriptions, for example, require junior workers to report to managers and give managers
the power to assign duties to their juniors. For positional power to be exercised effectively, the
person wielding it must be deemed to have earned it legitimately.
An example of legitimate power is held by a company’s CEO.
Expert Power
Expert power is influence wielded as a result of expertise, special skill, or knowledge. Expert
power is derived from possessing knowledge or expertise in a particular area.
Such people are highly valued by organizations for their problem-solving skills.
People who have expert power perform critical tasks and are therefore deemed indispensable.
The opinions, ideas, and decisions of people with expert power are held in high regard by other
employees and hence greatly influence their actions.
Possession of expert power is normally a stepping stone to other sources of power such as
legitimate power.
For example, a person who holds expert power can be promoted to senior management, thereby
giving him legitimate power.
Referent Power
Referent power is based on identification with a person who has desirable resources or
personal traits.
If I like, respect, and admire you, you can exercise power over me because I want to please you.
It is derived from the interpersonal relationships that a person cultivates with other people in
the organization.
People possess reference power when others respect and like them. Referent power is also
derived from personal connections that a person has with key people in the organization’s
hierarchy, such as the CEO.
It’s the perception of the personal relationships that she has that generates her power over
others.
Coercive Power
Coercive power is derived from a person’s ability to influence others via threats, punishments
or sanctions.
A junior staff member may work late to meet a deadline to avoid disciplinary action from his
boss. Coercive power is, therefore, a person’s ability to punish fire or reprimand another
employee.
Coercive power helps control the behavior of employees by ensuring that they adhere to the
organization’s policies and norms.
Informational Power
Informational power is where a person possesses needed or wanted information. It comes from
access to and control over information. This is a short-term power that doesn’t necessarily
influence or build credibility.
For example, a project manager may have all the information for a specific project and that will
give him/her “informational power.”
But it’s hard for a person to keep this power for long, and eventually, this information will be
released.
This should not be a long-term strategy.
Connection Power
It is where a person attains influence by gaining favor or simply acquaintance with a powerful
person.
This power is all about networking. If I have a connection with someone that you want to get to,
that’s going to give me power.
People employing this power build important coalitions with others. It is a natural ability to forge
such connections with individuals and assemble them into coalitions that give him/her strong
connection power.
Political Power
This power comes from the support of a group. It arises from a leader’s ability to work with
people and social systems to gain their allegiance and support.
It develops in all the state-owned organizations, especially when a certain political party holds
power and their supporters show power in many aspects in the organizations.
By using political power, leaders can influence others and get some facilities from the
organization.
Charismatic Power
Charismatic power is an extension of referent power stemming from an individual’s personality
and interpersonal style.
Charismatic leaders get others to follow them because they can articulate an attractive vision,
take personal risks, demonstrate environmental and follower sensitivity, and are willing to
engage in behavior that most others consider unconventional.
But many organizations will have people with charismatic qualities who, while not in formal
leadership positions, nevertheless can exert influence over others because of the strength of
their heroic qualities.
The above-mentioned bases/types of power are normally practiced in many organizations.
Politics:
Politics is the making of a common decision for a group of people, that is, a uniform decision
applying in the same way to all members of the group. It also involves the use of power by one
person to affect the behavior of another person.
More narrowly, it refers to achieving and exercising positions of governance organized control
over a human community, particularly a state.
Furthermore, politics is the study or practice of the distribution of power and resources within
a given community as well as the interrelationship(s) between communities.
A variety of methods are employed in politics, which include promoting or forcing one’s own
political views among people, negotiation with other political subjects, making laws, and
exercising force, including warfare against adversaries.
Politics is exercised on a wide range of social levels, from clans and tribes of traditional
societies, through modem local governments, companies and institutions up to sovereign
states, to the international level. It is very often said that politics is about power.
A political system is a framework which defines acceptable political methods within a given
society.
History of political thought can be traced back to early antiquity, with seminal works such as
Plato’s Republic, Aristotle’s Politics and the works of Confucius. Formal Politics refers to the
operation of a constitutional system of government and publicly defined institutions and
procedures.
Political parties, public policy or discussions about war and foreign affairs would fall under the
category of Formal Politics. Informal Politics is understood as forming alliances, exercising
power and protecting and advancing particular ideas or goals.
4.8 Reference
1) Stephen P. Robins, Organizational Behavior, / Pearson Education
2) Udai Pareek, Understanding Organizational Behaviour, Oxford Higher Education
3) Margi Parikh and Rajan Gupta, Organizational Behaviour, McGraw Hill Education
4) Fred Luthans, Organizational Behavior, McGraw Hill
Mr. Mehul Pujara, Department of Mechanical Engineering
14 Organizatioanl Behavior (3141909)
Unit-4 Leadership and Power– Organizational Behavior
Contents
− Many Scholars had given the definition of organizational culture. Some of the popular
definitions are given below:
− According to Robbie Katanga, “Organizational Culture is how organizations do things.”
− According to Alec Haverstick, “In large part, Organizational culture is a product of
compensation.”
− According to Bruce Perron, “Organizational culture defines a jointly shared description of an
organization from within.”
− According to Richard Perrin, “Organizational culture is the sum of values and rituals which serve
as a glue to integrate the members of the organization.”
− According to Alan Adler, “Organizational culture is civilization in the workplace.”
− According to Elizabeth Skringar, “Organizational culture is shaped by the main culture of the
society we live in, albeit with greater emphasis on particular parts of it.”
− According to Abdi Osman Jama, “An organization is a living culture that can adapt to the reality
4s fast as possible.”
− Organizational culture is composed of seven characteristics that range in priority from high to
low. Every organization has a distinct value for each of these characteristics.
− Members of organizations make judgments on the value their organization places on these
characteristics, and then adjust their behavior to match this perceived set of values.
− Characteristics of organizational culture are;
o Innovation (Risk Orientation).
o Attention to Detail (Precision Orientation).
o Emphasis on Outcome (Achievement Orientation).
o Emphasis on People (Fairness Orientation).
o Teamwork (Collaboration Orientation).
o Aggressiveness (Competitive Orientation).
o Stability (Rule Orientation).
− Job satisfaction is the feeling and perception of a worker regarding his/her work and how he or
she feels well in an organization. It indicates the extent of employees’ positive or negative
feelings towards their jobs and organizational behavior tried to improve it.
− In Organizational Behavior, job satisfaction is one of the most researched variables in the area
of workplace psychology and has been associated with numerous psychosocial issues, the
changing world of work, organizational factors ranging from leadership to job design.
− It is the level of contentment a person feels regarding his or her job. This feeling is mainly based
on an individual’s perception of satisfaction.
− It can be influenced by a person’s ability to complete the required tasks, the level of
communication in an organization, and the way management treats employees. There are
different levels of job satisfaction.
− Effective job satisfaction is a person’s emotional feeling about the job as a whole. Cognitive job
satisfaction is how satisfied employees feel concerning some aspect of their job, such as pay,
hours, or benefits.
− Due to the popularity of job satisfaction within the field of occupational and organizational
psychology, various researchers and practitioners have provided their definitions of what job
satisfaction is.
− E. A. Locke describe job satisfaction as, “the pleasurable emotional state resulting from the
appraisal of one’s job as achieving or facilitating the achievement of one’s job values”
− According to P. E. Spector, “Job satisfaction is the extent to which people like or dislike their
jobs”.
− De Nobile defined job satisfaction as “the extent to which a staff member has favorable or
positive feelings about work or the work environment.”
− Davis, Newstrom, and Dessler describe job satisfaction as “a set of favorable or unfavorable
feelings for the employees to perceive their work and that determine the possibility of a major
disposition to achieve higher performance”.
− According to S.P. Robbins, “Job satisfaction refers to an individual’s general attitude toward his
or her job.”
− Job satisfaction may be defined in many different ways.
− Some believe it is simply how content an individual is with his or her job, in other words, whether
or not they like the job or individual aspects or facets of jobs, such as the nature of work or
supervision.
Mr. Mehul Pujara, Department of Mechanical Engineering
Organizatioanl Behavior (3141909) 7
Unit-5 Dynamics of Organizational Behavior
5.7 Importance of Job Satisfaction
− Job satisfaction has been linked to many variables, including productivity, absenteeism,
turnover, etc. It is significant because a person’s attitude and beliefs may affect his or her
behavior.
− Importance of job satisfaction are;
o Lower Turnover.
o Higher Productivity.
o Increased Customer Satisfaction.
o Employee Absenteeism.
o Helps to Earn Higher Revenues.
o Satisfied Employees Tend to Handle Pressure.
5.9 Stress
Stress at Work
− While it is generally agreed that stress occurs at work, views differ on the importance of worker
characteristics versus working conditions as its primary cause. The differing viewpoints
suggest different ways to prevent stress at work. Different individual characteristics, like
personality and coping skills, can be very important predictors of whether certain job conditions
will result in stress. In other words, what is stressful for one person may not be a problem for
someone else.
− Stress-related disorders encompass a broad array of conditions, including psychological
disorders (e.g., depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder) and other types of
emotional strain (e.g., dissatisfaction, fatigue, tension), maladaptive behaviors (e.g.,
aggression, substance abuse), and cognitive impairment (e.g., concentration and memory
problems). Job stress is also associated with various biological reactions that may ultimately
lead to compromised physical health, such as cardiovascular disease.
− Four categories of stressors underline the different causal circumstances for stress at work:
− Task Demands – This is the sense of not knowing where a job will lead you and whether the
activities and tasks will change. This uncertainty causes stress that manifests itself in feelings
of lack of control, concern about career progress, and time pressures.
− Role Demands – Role conflict happens when an employee is exposed to inconsistent or difficult
expectations. Examples include: interole conflict (when there are two or more expectations or
separate roles for one person), intrarole conflict (varying expectations of one role), person-role
conflict (ethics are challenged), and role ambiguity (confusion about their experiences in
relation to the expectations of others).
− Interpersonal Demands – Examples include: emotional issues (abrasive personalities, offensive
co-workers), sexual harassment (directed mostly toward women), and poor leadership (lack of
management experience, poor style, cannot handle having power).
− Physical Demands – Many types of work are physically demanding, including strenuous activity,
extreme working conditions, travel, exposure to hazardous materials, and working in a tight,
loud office.
− Stress can impact an individual mentally and physically and so can decrease employee
efficiency and job satisfaction.
Stress
Psychological Disorders
− Psychosomatic disorders are a type of psychological disorder. They are physical problems with
a psychological cause. For example, a person who is extremely anxious about public speaking
might feel extremely nauseated or may find themselves unable to speak at all when faced with
the prospect of presenting in front of a group. Since stress of this type is often difficult to notice,
managers would benefit from carefully monitoring employee behavior for indications of
discomfort or stress.
Medical Illnesses
− Physiological reactions to stress can have a long-term impact on physical health. In fact, stress
is one of the leading precursors to long-term health issues. Backaches, stroke, heart disease,
and peptic ulcers are just a few physical ailments that can arise when a person is under too
much stress.
Behavioral Problems
− A person can also exhibit behavioral problems when under stress, such as aggression,
substance abuse, absenteeism, poor decision making, lack of creativity, or even sabotage. A
stressed worker may neglect their duties, impeding workflows and processes so that the
broader organization slows down and loses time and money. Managers should keep an eye out
for such behaviors as possible indicators of workplace stress.
− Design jobs that provide meaning and stimulation for workers as well as opportunities for them
to use their skills.
− Establish work schedules that are compatible with demands and responsibilities outside the
job.
− Consider flexible schedules—many organizations allow telecommuting to reduce the pressure
of being a certain place at a certain time (which enables people to better balance their personal
lives).
− Monitor each employee’s workload to ensure it is in line with their capabilities and resources.
Employee Accountability
− Give workers opportunities to participate in decisions and actions that affect their jobs.
− Introduce a participative leadership style and involve as many subordinates as possible in
resolving stress-producing problems.
− When a structure has been in place for a while, habits and routine have naturally settled in. The
organisation as a whole is going in the right direction. But, as shown in the illustration, people
or processes may have strayed off course. For example, tasks that are not relevant or useful
anymore are still being performed by force of habit, without anyone questioning their legitimacy.
Similarly, people might have learned to do things one way, without considering other, more
efficient methods. Unfreezing means getting people to gain perspective on their day-to-day
activities, unlearn their bad habits, and open up to new ways of reaching their objectives. The
current practices and processes have to be reassessed for the wheels of change to be set in
motion.
− Once team members have opened up their minds, change can start. The change process can
be a very dynamic one and, if it is to be effective, it will probably take some time and involve a
transition period.
− To gain efficiency, people will have to take on new tasks and responsibilities, which entails a
learning curve that will look at first slow the organisation down.
− A change process has to be viewed as an investment. This process is both in terms of time and
the allocation of resources. After the new organisation and procedures have been rolled out,
inevitable chaos might ensue, but that is the price to pay to attain enhanced effectiveness within
the structure.
− The change will only reach its full effect if it’s made permanent. Once the organisational
changes have been made and the structure has regained its effectiveness, every effort must be
made to cement them and make sure the new organisation becomes the standard. More
changes can be made later on. Still, once the structure has found a way to improve the way it
conducts its operations, “re-freezing” will allow the people to thrive in the new organisation and
take full advantage of the change. Many quote the model as saying the third step of this
approach is to re-freeze when in Lewin’s original work it was “freeze”.