The document compares the Response to Intervention (RTI) plans of two New York school districts - Monticello Central School District and Beacon City School District. It summarizes each district's definition of RTI and how it is implemented across different tiers or levels. While both districts provide accessible online resources, the Beacon City plan is found to be more detailed with specific examples, charts, and clear expectations at each tier. Some remaining questions are asked about teacher roles, tracking student progress, and addressing parental concerns. Overall, the Beacon City RTI plan is considered to be better outlined and laid out compared to the Monticello plan.
The document compares the Response to Intervention (RTI) plans of two New York school districts - Monticello Central School District and Beacon City School District. It summarizes each district's definition of RTI and how it is implemented across different tiers or levels. While both districts provide accessible online resources, the Beacon City plan is found to be more detailed with specific examples, charts, and clear expectations at each tier. Some remaining questions are asked about teacher roles, tracking student progress, and addressing parental concerns. Overall, the Beacon City RTI plan is considered to be better outlined and laid out compared to the Monticello plan.
The document compares the Response to Intervention (RTI) plans of two New York school districts - Monticello Central School District and Beacon City School District. It summarizes each district's definition of RTI and how it is implemented across different tiers or levels. While both districts provide accessible online resources, the Beacon City plan is found to be more detailed with specific examples, charts, and clear expectations at each tier. Some remaining questions are asked about teacher roles, tracking student progress, and addressing parental concerns. Overall, the Beacon City RTI plan is considered to be better outlined and laid out compared to the Monticello plan.
I picked two school districts out of New York to compare because they had very straightforward plans and all of the districts, I looked at in Wyoming were confusing. I am comparing Monticello Central School District to Beacon City School District. https://www.monticelloschools.net/academics/response-to-intervention-rti/ (Links to an external site.) School 1 https://www.beaconk12.org/site/handlers/filedownload.ashx? moduleinstanceid=221&dataid=49&FileName=District%20RTI%20Plan.pdf (Links to an external site.) School 2 How they define RTI School 1: " a school district’s process to determine if a student responds to scientific, research- based instruction." School 2: "Appropriate instruction delivered to all students in the general education class by qualified personnel. Appropriate instruction in reading means scientific research-based reading programs that include explicit and systematic instruction in phonemic awareness, phonics, vocabulary development, reading fluency (including oral reading skills) and reading comprehension strategies." How RTI is implemented at each level School 1: they do this through a series of different components. It first starts with school-wide screening to gauge where students sit academically. then they monitor the progress between each tier that they have, which is three. They do frequent check-ins to determine if the student is in the correct tier or if they need to be moved up or down. The staff is using instructional methods and materials with the students for this process. There is also differentiated instruction in all lessons while they are to notice the student's different learning styles. They have different styles for students with special needs as well. School 2: this district has a model of the three tiers that they use and how it is mapped out. They gave an example of a literacy chart to follow. if you are in tier three then the student can read naturally and needs no assistance and is not pulled out of the class during any time of the week. In the second tier, the students can read naturally but not fluently and are pulled out of the classroom a max of 3 times during the week. In the first tier, the students are pulled into guided reading with small groups for all reading times during the week. Any remaining questions School 2 has a more detailed plan than that of school 1, I wish I knew what type of teacher was helping with what tiers and how a plan looked for school 1. for school 1- what is a specific example I could see of the process working for students who struggle in multiple areas. During the screening process, what are you looking for to determine what tier the student should fall into/ for school 2- How do you keep track of the progress and keep other teachers informed? What happens if the parents don't approve of the RTI? Critique I thought both schools have amazing resources that were easy to access and follow, but school 2 had an overall better plan. There was no confusion or questions I could have come up with for this district. I wish school 1 was as detailed and outlined as the second one. I also was happy to see that there was parent involvement and notice for both districts. I would want to stay informed as to what my student is doing in class and if at any time they were moving to another class for any reason. I liked how both could be found so easily on the school's websites and that the districts really care about the outcome of the students. I would have to side with the Beacon County School District plans because they are more laid out and give specific examples of what to expect, Monticello Central School District could have improved their process a bit more.