Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nelson
Documentary Analysis
9 Feb 2022
PART I: Choose a film related to your topic area to watch. (Documentaries are recommended
and strongly encouraged, but not required.) Then, answer the background questions below to
2. Genre: Science
5. Explain the rating you awarded: I thought that the narrator, Jim Al-Khalili, explained
everything in a good way, and taught new things, but at times it was hard to follow all the
PART II: Answer each question below in a well-developed paragraph using professional
language and proper spelling, grammar, and mechanics. Each paragraph is worth 5 points for a
6. “Clash of Titans” is a documentary film showing the discovery of the atom, as well as
how we’ve developed our idea of what it is. The beginning portion describes the conflict
between Ludwick Boltzmann along with some other allies and the rest of the scientific
community. Boltzmann believed that all matter could be divided into small fundamental
particles, the atom, but other scientists believed that it was evil and sacrilegious to say
that God’s creation could be reduced that way. After some time of dealing with these
accusations, Boltzmann killed himself. What he didn’t know is that Albert Einstein had
published a paper proving the atoms’ existence less than a year earlier. Einstein's paper
described that tiny pollen grains would “dance” back and forth when floating on water,
bumped around by the molecules and atoms in the water. The next section of the video
talks about how we’ve discovered the actual structure of the atom. The first step was
Ernest Rutherford’s gold leaf experiment, where he shot alpha rays through a very thin
gold leaf where it hit a phosphorescent screen. After seeing the particles did go through
the gold leaf, he told his assistant, Hans Geiger, to see if any of the alpha particles would
turn around and hit near where they were sent from. Geiger discovered that it did happen,
which Rutherford used to determine that most of the atom was empty space, with a tiny
dense nucleus. He also said that the atoms electrons must orbit around the nucleus, which
broke the established scientific system because the electrons should lose their energy and
crash into the nucleus, which doesn’t happen. The next scientist to contribute to the
structure of the atom was Neils Bohr. He was determined to discover why the atom didn’t
collapse and why it was so much empty space. He used the idea that each substance
releases a different wavelength of light as it heats up to develop the idea of the quantum
jump. It’s the idea that an electron can only exist in distinct “orbits,” and instantaneously
foundation to understand more advanced ideas. The narrator, Jim Al-Khalili, also has
Ph.D. in physics and has received several awards, such as Officer of the Order of the
British Empire and the Stephen Hawking Medal for Scientific Communication.
8. One perspective is how there isn’t any one person responsible for ideas in science. For
every one discovery, there are many scientists making small advancements or writing an
equation, such as when Albert Einstein used the work of Robert Brown, Brownian
motion, to prove mathematically that water was made of atoms. Another perspective of
science is how it’s extremely rare for something in science to be done changing. Ideas are
always growing and involving, such as how when the atom was discovered, it was found
it was made of electrons, protons, and neutrons. Then Bohr discovered that atoms had
different energy levels in his Bohr model. Next came Schrödinger realizing that we can
never know exactly where an electron is at a given time, creating the clouds of
probability with the electron cloud in the quantum mechanical model. Even something
that seems as fundamental as gravity has the unknown possibility of the graviton. The
final perspective shown by Atom is how there’s never a scientist that’s always right. An
example of this is how Einstein went to his grave refusing to believe in quantum
principle that it was impossible to know the speed and position of a particle in a moment
of time, he said that “God does not play dice with the universe.” He believed there had to
be some law or equation to remove the randomness in quantum mechanics, which keeps
accomplished by chronologically talking through the people and ideas involved. From the
atom's first discovery to what it was made of to its structure, the narrator builds up from
what has already been established. The documentary also uses visuals such as old photos,
reenactments, and simulations of some of the experiments to keep the watcher engaged.
10. I learned about some of the people who contributed to what we’ve learned about the
atom, such as Albert Einstein, Neils Bohr, and Ernest Rutherford. There were also several
ideas about what the atom is and how it works. There was basic information, such as that
protons, neutrons, and electrons exist, as well as their sizes. More advanced topics like
quantum jumps and the electron cloud were touched on but not too much as to make it
hard to understand.
11. This film has opened several new topics I might investigate. I find a lot of ideas related to
quantum mechanics interesting, such as quantum jump, electron cloud, and I could look
at other ideas in that realm. There are also other elementary particles, like the electron,
that make up the protons and neutrons in the nucleus, known as quarks. Unlike a lot of
other information about atoms, quarks are something that I only vaguely know about, so
they’d be a worthwhile pursuit. There are also some topics that I know exist but weren’t
covered in the documentary, such as the bonds that form molecules, that I will probably
who contributed to its discovery. A lot of people probably find this topic boring, but Al-
Khalili presents and explains these ideas in a way that is entertaining and engaging.
However, at times he gave off the impression that the separate groups of scientists were
enemies fighting, while in reality, it was a lot calmer and more measured discussion.