You are on page 1of 5

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/334603567

EFFECTIVE WIDTH METHOD FOR LIPPED CHANNEL COMPRESSION MEMBER


UNDERGOING LOCAL AND GLOBAL BUCKLING INTERACTION

Conference Paper · December 2018

CITATIONS READS

0 154

2 authors, including:

Aayillia K Jayasidhan
Indian Institute of Technology Palakkad
3 PUBLICATIONS   1 CITATION   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

POST-GLOBAL BUCKLING STRENGTH OF CFS COMPRESSION MEMBERS View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Aayillia K Jayasidhan on 23 July 2019.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


SEC18: Proceedings of the 11th Structural Engineering Convention - 2018
Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India, December 19 - 21, 2018
Paper No. 20180358_1

EFFECTIVE WIDTH METHOD FOR LIPPED CHANNEL


COMPRESSION MEMBER UNDERGOING LOCAL AND GLOBAL
BUCKLING INTERACTION
Aayillia K Jayasidhan1 and M V Anil Kumar2
1, 2
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Palakkad, Kerala, India
E-mail: 101704001@smail.iitpkd.ac.in, anil@iitpkd.ac.in

ABSTRACT

Cold-formed steel (CFS) compression members may undergo local buckling (L), distortional buckling
(D), global/Euler’s buckling (E) or interaction between these modes such as local-distortional (LD),
local-global (LE), distortional-global (DE) or local-distortional-global (LDE) before failure.The
strength of such members may be calculated using the traditional effective width method (EWM) or
the recent direct strength method (DSM). LE interaction accounted for both EWM and DSM is by
replacing yield strength, fy in the local buckling strength equation with global buckling strength, fn. In
this paper, the adequacy of EWM in estimating the ultimate strength of lipped channel compression
members undergoing independent local buckling or LE interaction before failure was evaluated. Finite
element analysis results available in the literature are used for this study. Even though EWM predicts
strength of lipped channel due to local buckling accurately, it gives very conservative results for LE
interaction especially when the global buckling mode is flexural-torsional.

Keywords: Cold-formed steel, Compression member, Effective Width Method, LE interaction

NOMENCLATURE Pule=Ultimate strength under local-global(LE)


Interaction (N)
beff =Effective width of plate element(mm)
1. INTRODUCTION
b= Width of plate element(mm)
Cold-formed steel (CFS) members are used as
load bearing members in lightweight structures
=non-dimensional slenderness ratio due to its high strength to weight ratio. CFS
members are fabricated from thin steel plates
fy=yield stress of material (N/mm2) (thickness ranging from 0.6mm to 3mm) as
strength relies more on the shape than the
=Critical local buckling stress thickness of the plate elements. The thin plate
elements leads to different buckling modes such
k = Plate buckling coefficient as local buckling (L), distortional buckling (D),
global/Euler’s buckling (E) or interaction
= Youngs modulus(N/mm2) between these buckling modes such as local-
distortional (LD), local-global (LE),
=Poison’s ratio distortional-global (DE), or local-distortional-
global (LDE) before material yielding(Y). The
Pu-FEA= Ultimate strength from Finite Element strength of thin-walled CFS members is
Analysis(FEA) calculated by effective width method (EWM) or
direct strength method (DSM).
Pul=Ultimate strength under local buckling (N)
EWM [NAS(2016), EN 1993-1-3(2004),
IS801(1975), AS/NZS2005] uses the reduced
SEC18:Paper No. 20180358_1

width(effective width, beff) of different plate The FE model used by Kumar and
elements (eg: web, flanges, lips etc.) to account Kalyanaraman (2012) for generating data for
for local buckling and effective area obtained independent local buckling strength is shown in
from the reduced section properties are used for Fig.1. The translational restraints at corners 1
member strength calculation. DSM and 3 (Fig.1) eliminates global buckling without
[NAS(2016), Schafer and Pekö z (1998b), restraining the Poisson’s expansion of the plate
Hancock et. al. (1994), Schafer (2002), and elements. Multi-point constraints (Fig.1)
Schafer(2008)] considers buckling of the ensuring the out of plane translation of the
member(local, distortional and global) as a flange at flange-lip juncture equal to that at
whole and ultimate strength is calculated from web-flange juncture eliminates the out of plane
elastic buckling loads using empirical equations. movement of flange-lip assembly. i.e., MPC
The concept of the effective width of eliminates the distortional buckling mode.
compressed plate elements simply supported
along both longitudinal edges was originally
proposed by Von Karman (1932) and
subsequently calibrated for imperfection by
Winter (1968). Effective width formula
proposed by Winter (1968), is given in Eq.[1].

( . / )
= ≥ 0.673 (1)
1 < 0.673
Fig.1: FEA model for independent local
buckling [Kumar(2012)]
If the member is slender, it may undergo global
member buckling in addition to local buckling The FE model used by Kumar and
of the plate elements. The local-global (LE) Kalyanaraman (2018) for generating data for
buckling interaction is accounted for in both strength of the specimen failed in LE interaction
EWM and DSM by replacing yield stress, fy, in shown in Fig.2. The distortional buckling mode
the local buckling strength (fcr) equation [Eq.(1)] is eliminated from the FE model by using an
with global buckling strength, fn. This procedure artificial constraint, known as distortional
is justified as the maximum stress in the cross buckling constraint (DBC). DBC consists of
section of the long compression member is beam elements connecting four corners to the
equal to global buckling strength, fn. shear centre (SC) as shown in Fig.2. The in-
plane hinges (H1) are provided at end of the
This paper evaluates the accuracy of EWM for beam to avoid rotational restraint offered to
estimating the strength of CFS lipped channel plate elements by the beams. This will ensure
compression member with fully stiffened that local buckling deformations are not affected
flanges under independent local buckling and by DBC. The torsional rigidity remains
LE interaction. The finite element analysis unaffected as the beam elements meets at shear
(FEA) results of lipped channel compression centre. The out of plane hinge (H2) at the shear
members undergoing LE interaction reported in centre end ensures that warping behavior is
Kumar and Kalyanaraman(2012,2018) are used unaffected.
for this study.

2. FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

The details of the finite element (FE) model and


its validation with the test results are reported in
Kumar and Kalyanaraman (2012, 2018).
Statistical summary of FEA validation is shown
in Table 1. Constraints are used in such a way
that the failure of the specimen is either due to
independent local buckling or due to LE Fig.2: FEA model for LE interaction
interaction. [Kumar(2018)]
SEC18:Paper No. 20180358_1

3. EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVE partial rotational restraint offered by the


WIDTH METHOD adjoining element to buckling element)
is ignored in the elastic buckling load
3.1. Local Buckling calculation.

The adequacy of EWM for estimating the local 3.2. LE Interaction


buckling strength of CFS lipped channel
compression members with fully stiffened LE interaction is accounted for in EWM is by
flanges is evaluated using test and FEA results replacing the yield stress, fy by global buckling
of specimens failed due to independent local strength, fn in Eq.(1).The ratio of the ultimate
buckling. strength from FEA to that obtained from EWM
(Pule-FEA /Pule-EWM), is plotted against non-
The ratio of ultimate strength from either tests dimensional slenderness λLE [√(fn/fcrl)] in Fig.4
or FEA to that obtained from EWM (Pul-FEA/Pul- for different web height to flange width, h/b,
EWM) is plotted with respect to non-dimensional ratios. The statistics of Pule-FEA/Pule-EWM are given
local buckling slenderness of cross section in Table 2.
λL[√(fy/fcrl)] in (Fig.3). The statistics of
comparison (Sample size (n), mean ( ), 2.5
h/b=2
standard deviation ( ), maximum value (Max) h/b=1.5
2 h/b=1
and minimum value (Min)) are given in Table 1. h/b=0.6
2
Pule-FEA/Pule-EWM

1.5
1.75

1.5 1
Pul-FEA/Pul-EWM

1.25
0.5
1

0.75 0
0 1 2 3
0.5 λLE
0.25 Fig.4: Pule-FEA/Pule-EWM vs λLE for LE interaction
0
Table.2: Statistical summary of Pule-FEA/Pule-EWM
0 1
λL 2 3 4

Fig. 3: Pul-FEA/Pul-EWM vs λL
h/b n Max. Min.
Table.1: Statistical summary of Pu-FEA /Pul-EWM
2 15 1.058 0.084 1.205 0.939
Reference n Max. Min. 1.5 24 1.2 0.201 1.503 0.780
1 24 1.312 0.245 1.837 0.967
Kumar
32 1.078 0.071 1.238 0.944 0.6 17 1.331 0.252 1.633 0.752
(2012)
FEA . 80 1.235 0.231 1.837 0.752
10 0.974 0.048 1.051 0.903
Validation

Following observations are made from Fig.3 Observations based on Fig.4 and Table 2 are
and Table-1. listed below;

 The statistical parameters (μ =1.078,  The statistical parameters (μ =1.23, and


and σ =0.071) of (Pul-FEA/Pul-EWM) shows σ =0.231) of (Pule-FEA/Pul-EWM) shows that
that EWM predicts the strength of EWM gives very conservative strength
lipped channel compression members estimates for specimens failing due to
accurately. LE interaction.
 For larger values of λL the EWM  The maximum conservative prediction
predictions are conservative. This may is around 83%. This shows that there is
be because the element interaction (the scope of improving the LE interaction
procedure adopted by EWM
SEC18:Paper No. 20180358_1

 The EWM predictions corresponding to Euler Buckling of Thin-Walled Columns",


interaction of local and flexural Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE,128,
buckling (h/b=2) are less conservative pp.128:3(289), 2002.
compared to predictions corresponding
to local and flexural torsional buckling [5] Desmond T. P., Pekoz, T. and Winter., “Edge
(h/b =0.6, 1 and 1.5). Stiffeners for Cold-formed Steel Members”, -
4th International Specialty Conference on Cold-
4. CONCLUSIONS Formed Steel Structures, Missouri University of
Science and Technology, 1978.
In this paper, the accuracy of EWM to calculate
the strength of compression members under [6] Gregory J. Hancock, Thomas Murray, Duane
local buckling and LE interaction was studied S. Ellifrit., Cold-Formed Steel Structures to the
using FEA results available in literature. AISI Specifications, New York, CRC Press
Following are the conclusions made based on
this study [7] Kumar, M. V. A. and V. Kalyanaraman,
"Design Strength of Locally Buckling Stub-
1. EWM accurately predicts the strength of Lipped Channel Columns", Journal of
short compression members undergoing Structural Engineering, ASCE,.pp. 1291-1299,
only local buckling before failure. As non- 2012
dimensional slenderness increases EWM
[8] Kumar, M. V. A, Interaction of local,
predictions are slightly conservative
distortional and overall buckling in cold formed
(almost 15 to 20%). This may be because steel lipped channel compression members,
the element interaction is not considered in Ph.D. thesis, IIT Madras, Chennai, India, 2012
the elastic buckling calculations.
2. In general, the strength of the lipped [9] Kumar, M. V. A. and V. Kalyanaraman,
channel compression members obtained "Interaction of Local, Distortional, and Global
from EWM undergoing LE interaction is Buckling in CFS Lipped Channel Compression
Members", Journal of Structural Engineering,
conservative.
ASCE, 2017
3. As web height to flange width ratio, h/b,
decreases, the strength estimate by EWM [10] Timoshenko. S and Gere,J. M, Theory of
becomes more conservative. i.e., as global elastic stability, McGraw-Hill book company,
buckling is flexural-torsional in nature, the In., NewYork, 1961.
strength estimates are conservative.
[11] Young B. and Kim J. R. Rasmussen, "Tests
of Fixed-Ended Plain Channel Columns",
REFERENCES
Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, pp.
131-139, 1998
[1] American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI),
North American specification for the design of
[12] Young B. and Kim J. R. Rasmussen,
cold-formed steel structural members, AISI
"Design of Lipped Channel Columns", Journal
S100, Washington, 2007
of Structural Engineering, ASCE, pp. 140-148,
1998
[2] European Committee for Standardization
(CEN), Design of steel structures, Part1.3:
[13] Young B. and Kim J. R. Rasmussen, "Shift
Supplementary rules for cold-formed members
of Effective Centroid of Channel Columns",
and sheeting, ENV 1993-1-3, Brussels, 2004.
Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, pp.
524-531, 1999
[3] B.W. Schafer, "Review: The Direct Strength
Method of cold-formed steel member design",
[14] Young B. and Kim J.R. Rasmussen,
Journal of Constructional Steel Research,
"Behaviour of Cold-Formed Singly Symmetric
ELSEVIER 64, pp. 766–778, 2008
Columns", Thin-Walled Structures 33,
ELSEVIER, pp. 83–102, 1999
[4] B.W. Schafer, "Local, Distortional, and

View publication stats

You might also like