Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10/13
Kyle Starkus
PGY1 Resident
Ascension St. Vincent Evansville
Background and Objective
• Background
• There is benefit in treating an infection with the shortest effective duration antibiotic
regimen to prevent resistance, adverse events, and related costs
• Standard practice in the European guidelines is to treat community acquired
pneumonia (CAP) with 7-10 days.
• Objective
• Assess the efficacy of 3 days of antibiotic treatment vs 5 days of additional
beta-lactam monotherapy when treating moderately severe community acquired
pneumonia
2
Study Design
3
Study Design
• N = 310
• Inclusion criteria
• 18 years or older
• Moderately severe CAP
• treated with beta-lactam monotherapy or parenteral 3rd gen cephalosporin
• Clinical response at 72 hours of treatment
• Apyrexia, HR <100 BPM, RR <24, normal mental status, SBP > 90 mmHg
• Exclusion criteria
• Signs of severe or complicated CAP
• Abscess, pleural effusion, serious chronic respiratory infection
• Known immunosuppression
• Healthcare-associated pneumonia or suspicion of aspiration pneumonia
• Concurrent infection necessitating additional antibiotic treatment
• Suspected or confirmed legionellosis
4
Study Design
5
Study Design
• Study Procedures
• Study group treatment-- Placebo tablets taken 3 times daily for an additional 5 days.
Designed to be indistinguishable in packaging, color, taste, and appearance.
• Pneumonia symptoms and adherence assessed at days 0, 3, 8, 15, and 30
• Primary outcome of cure assessed at day 15
6
Study Design
7
Study Design
• Statistical Analysis
• 310 patients to provide 80% to show non-inferiority
• Allowance for 10% non-inferiority
• Confidence interval was set at 95%
• For the primary outcome the categorical data was presented as proportions
• For the secondary outcome Chi-squared test was used
8
Results
• Primary Endpoint Result-- in the ITT analysis, on day 15, 117/152 (77%) in
placebo group and 102/151 (68%) in the beta-lactam group were determined
to have been cured (95% CI -0.38-20.04)
10
Results
11
Results
12
Evaluation
13
Study Design Assessment
14
Selection Bias
• The studied population aligned with the patient characteristics seen at our hospital
• Average age was ~73 years old
• Included comorbid conditions
• Included relatively equivocal male/female patients
• Lack of external validity due to study population in only France
• The did meet power through the use of intention to treat statistics
• Determined 310 patients required for 80% power
• 310 patients were stratified - but some were lost to follow-up
15
Performance Bias
• The use of amoxicillin-clavulanate 1000mg/125mg TID for an additional 5 days was
an appropriate comparator based on European guidelines
• External validity and our ability to extrapolate findings to our patient population diminished due to
different standards of treatment (both agents and durations)
• Adherence was measured by placing duration of therapy in blister packs and having
patients present the pack for assessment at the 15 day point
• >90% adherence in the treatment group
16
Measurement and Attrition Bias
• Internal validity is compromised by not reporting culture data or the uniformed use of
chest X-rays / ultrasounds
• One group may have had a significant amount of resistant pathogens
• Lack of uniformity of CXR and US utilization to diagnosis CAP
• Improved internal validity by using the validated pneumonia severity index and
stratifying groups based on baseline score
• Internal validity is compromised due to the unavoidable professional judgement aspect
when diagnosing CAP
• Improved internal validity by using ‘worse case scenario’ in the intention to treat
statistical analysis
• For the placebo group - any patient lost to follow up was counted as a treatment failure
• For the beta-lactam group - any patient lost to follow up was counted as a treatment cure
• This would create the most rigorous circumstances to demonstrate non-inferiority
17
Clinical Usefulness
• The primary outcome of cure at 15 days is clinically meaningful, and
surrogate measurements of cure, including apyrexia and resolution of clinical
symptoms, were relevant as feasible markers
• Beware of endpoints that consist of laboratory measures, etc. Unless strongly validated,
which is rare, they cannot be used to assume clinical outcomes.
• The non-inferiority was set at 10%, and a 9.42% difference in favor of
prolonged therapy was shown
• Although this demonstrates non-inferiority as defined, differences in baseline
characteristics tended to skew toward placebo favorable results and may have been
enough to demonstrate inferiority of placebo
18
Evidence Grade and Conclusion
• Evidence Grade (select grade and delete others)
• A—Useful
• Outstanding in design, methodology, execution, and reporting. Meets standards for clinical
meaningfulness and patient/prescriber acceptance. Clinical decisions can be made with reasonable
certitude. Rare.
• B—Possibly Useful
• Well-designed and executed, meets most “A” requirements
• Potentially strong and probably useful but with some threats to validity identified
• B-U—Possible to Uncertain Usefulness
• Possibly useful but sufficient uncertainty to not reach Grade B, but does not warrant Grade U
• U—Uncertain Validity and/or Usefulness
• Most studies. Caution is urged regarding use in making healthcare decisions. Sufficient uncertainty
about accuracy of estimates of effect to comfortably draw conclusions from the research and apply the
results.
• In the context of IDSA/ATS guidelines and standard practice in the US, shorter 5 day
durations (and 3 day azithromycin) are common practice. This trial perhaps
demonstrates the possibility of even greater reductions in duration of CAP treatment
with equivocal outcomes - and further studies are warranted.
19
Questions?
20
Citations
Dinh A;Ropers J;Duran C;Davido B;Deconinck L;Matt M;Senard O;Lagrange A;Makhloufi S;Mellon G;de Lastours V;Bouchand F;Mathieu E;Kahn JE;Rouveix E;Grenet
J;Dumoulin J;Chinet T;Pépin M;Delcey V;Diamantis S;Benhamou D;Vitrat V;Dombret MC;Renaud B;Perronne C; “Discontinuing β-Lactam Treatment after 3 Days for
Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Non-Critical Care Wards (PTC): A Double-Blind, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Non-Inferiority Trial.” Lancet (London,
England), U.S. National Library of Medicine, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33773631/.
Joshua P. Metlay, Grant W. Waterer. “Diagnosis and Treatment of Adults with Community-Acquired Pneumonia. an Official Clinical Practice Guideline of the American
Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America.” IDSA Home, https://www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/community-acquired-pneumonia-cap-in-adults/.
21