DISAGREE

1. It must be remembered that a teacher powered by artificial

intelligence would have little to no control over its students. For
instance, it is commonly understood that children require the
watchful eye of a teacher to ensure that they are indeed
completing their class work and not fooling around during class
time. Unfortunately, this is something that a robotic teacher
simply cannot provide. That is not to mention that students,
especially young children will have difficulties in learning
human skills such as communication, showing emotion or
solving problems if they have no chance to interact with a
human teacher. Therefore, the argument that technology will
never completely replace theteacher in the classroom could also
be possible.
2. A teacher not only teaches the subject but also deals with the
issues of the children in their daily lives, directly or indirectly. A
teacher is a person who can help a child to not only expand the
knowledge base but also understand life better and make proper
decisions,which surely a computer cannot do.
3. A teacher who is present in the classroom can easily understand
whether the students are learning the topic at the current speed or
any alteration in the teaching method is required. He or she can
also figure out which students require more attention. For
instance, my friend was weak in his studies. Our teachers often
gave him special attention to keep him on the track. This could
not have been possible if the teacher was not present in the
classroom.
4. Direct interaction during teaching are also equally important.
Any doubts in the student’s mind are readily resolved because
they can ask questions and get answers instantly. For example, I
was not good at mathematics while doing my graduation. Hence,
I would note down all my doubts during the class. After the
regular class hours, I would approach my professor with my
 doubts. Those direct interactive sessions with my teacher
improved my grades.
5. a computer can only teach. It cannot figure out whether students
have grasped the concepts or not. Not all students in a class are
of the same intellectual level. Some learn fast while others
require more attention. A computer will give the same attention
to all students. This can affect the performance of poor students.
6. students acquire more than just simple facts from teachers; they
acquire social and communicational skills as well, such as the
appropriate use of body language. In contrast, computers can not
mimic postures, gestures, or even a smile. This is a problem
because body language plays an important role in
communication and learning; they can emphasize our words or
contradict our statements. Without a human educator, students
will not suffer from the lack of this essential skill.
7. computers, no matter how advanced they are, do not have
emotions. They can not show love, care, or comfort. This is a
problem because such emotions are important to stimulate the
learning process and to trigger students to be more involved in
education by feeling comfortable to participate in class or to ask
questions. The absence of emotions in education, in addition to
hinder the learning process, might arejected omage students'
characters by making them feel
AGREE
1. Firstly, with the assistance of computers, a wide range of
difficult lessons has become easier for students to
comprehend. For example, complicated definitions of some
theories in math courses can be explained by the detailed
illustrations presented on the computer screen with the help of
a slide projector. As a result, school students find it less
complex to absorb the knowledge passed on from the
computers. Secondly, it is essential for students to acquire
information technology and computer skills in order to get a
high- paying job in the future. It is necessary for them to start
learning how to use computers at an early young age.
 Therefore, schools need to adopt the usage of computers in
the curriculum system.

->Direct interaction during teaching are also equally

important. Any doubts in the student’s mind are readily
resolved because they can ask questions and get answers
instantly. For example, I was not good at mathematics while
doing my graduation. Hence, I would note down all my
doubts during the class. After the regular class hours, I would
approach my professor with my doubts. Those direct
interactive sessions with my teacher improved my grades.

2. My first argument is that it allows each student to learn at

their own speed. Teachers have 30 students in their class who
each might find a different bit of the lesson more difficult. If
computers are used instead, then each student on a computer
can just focus on the bit they find hard rather than having to
follow the teacher explaining other bits they already
understand. This will allow students to learn more because the
computer won’t move on before they understand or spend lots
of time on one part they’ve already understood. For example,
in Maths class some students might find multiplication most
difficult, while other students might find division most
difficult. As such, computers help students to learn at their
own speed and we should replace teachers with them.
->
A teacher who is present in the classroom can easily
understand whether the students are learning the topic at the
current speed or any alteration in the teaching method is
required. He or she can also figure out which students require
more attention. For instance, my friend was weak in his
studies. Our teachers often gave him special attention to keep
him on the track. This could not have been possible if the
teacher was not present in the classroom.
3. My second argument is that this is the only way to teach
students how to use computers and they are the future.
Computers are really important and all sorts of jobs now use
them. Replacing teachers with computers will give students
more time on computers and so they can learn the skills of
how to use one. Having a teacher lead lessons and then hand-
writing all of your work in class means that you don’t pick up
these skills. For example, if a student does not have a
computer at home that they can use, they will never learn to
use a computer.
If they don’t learn, when they get to secondary school they
will have difficulty doing their homework compared to other
students. Because the point of school is to teach people
valuable skills that they will use later and because using
computers teaches that, I think that we should replace
teachers with computers.
4. My third argument is that computers are really fun. Imagine
playing games on computers whenever you wanted to. Lots of
people really enjoy all the different worlds and activities that
a computer can give you. This means that any time you are on
the computer you could instead stop what you’re doing and
play a game instead. Since without teachers everyone would
be working on computers you would be able to get all your
class to join in as well. For example, if you found science
class boring that day you could instead all play games instead.
Because this would make school more fun as you can play
games whenever you want, something teachers wouldn’t let
you do, I think we should replace teachers with computers.
->computers, no matter how advanced they are, do not have
emotions. They can not show love, care, or comfort. This is a
problem because such emotions are important to stimulate the
learning process and to trigger students to be more involved
in education by feeling comfortable to participate in class or
to ask questions. The absence of emotions in education, in
addition to hinder the learning process, might arejected
 ->Computers, no matter how advanced they are, do not have
emotions. They can not show love, care, or comfort. This is a
problem because such emotions are important to stimulate the
learning process and to trigger students to be more involved
in education by feeling comfortable to participate in class or
to ask questions. The absence of emotions in education, in
addition to hinder the learning process, might arejected
5. My fourth argument is that we could make friends with
computers before they take over the world. We have all seen
that computers are getting more and more intelligent and
more widespread. Because they keep getting better it is only a
matter of time before computers take over the world. It is
important that we stay on the good side of computers when
computer intelligence takes over so they can protect us. For
example in lots of films we see that computers take over the
world. In those films clever people work with the machines
they make friends with and this is an important skill to learn.
Because computers are going to take over the world and we
want to be on their good side, we should choose computers
instead of teachers now.
6. It is easy to see the progressive rate at which technology is
able to mimic the teaching abilities of human beings. For
example, several iPhone applications are able to hold the
attention of young children for hours a huge variety of vivid
images and videos at a time, while concurrently teaching
them things. Besides, computers could provide the answers to
any questions relating to the subject in the fastest and the
most precise way within a second. Thus, it is clear that on a
small scale, machines can act as effective teachers. The
possibility for a robotic teacher in the future can therefore be
seen.
> It must be remembered that a teacher powered by artificial
intelligence would have little to no control over its
students. For instance, it is commonly understood that
children require the watchful eye of a teacher to ensure that
they are indeed completing their class work and not fooling
 around during class time. Unfortunately, this is something
that a robotic teacher simply cannot provide. That is not to
mention that students, especially young children will have
difficulties in learning human skills such as
communication, showing emotion or solving problems if
they have no chance to interact with a human teacher.
Therefore, the argument that technology will never
completely replace theteacher in the classroom could also
be possible.

Conversation :
- Linh: Hey, our school will install the automatic computer system
for children to learn.
- Thư: Really, you mean we don’t need teachers in the classroom
instead using teaching machines.
- Linh: Right. This is over the moon!
- Trọng: Well, I don’t appriciated that is a good idea. Direct
interaction during teaching are also equally important. Any
doubts in the student’s mind are readily resolved because they
can ask questions and get answers instantly.
- Hạ: I couldn’t agree with you more. For example, I was not good
at mathematics while doing my graduation. Hence, I would note
down all my doubts during the class. After the regular class
hours, I would apphroach my professor with my doubts. Those
direct interactive sessions with my teacher improved my grades.
- Thu: To my way of thinking, The teacher does not always have a
free time for us, but the computer can always carry and use when
we need it.
- Linh: I completely agree with Thu. It allows each student to
learn at their own speed. Teachers have 30 students in their class
who each might find a different bit of the lesson more difficult.
 If computers are used instead, then each student on a computer
can just focus on the bit they find hard rather than having to
follow the teacher explaining other bits they already understand.
This will allow students to learn more because the computer
won’t move on before they understand or spend lots of time on
one part they’ve already understood.
- Hạ: A teacher who is present in the classroom can easily
understand whether the students are learning the topic at the
current speed or any alteration in the teaching method is
required. He or she can also figure out which students require
more attention. For instance, my friend was weak in his studies.
Our teachers often gave him special attention to keep him on the
track. This could not have been possible if the teacher was not
present in the classroom.
- Trọng: a computer can only teach. It cannot figure out whether
students have grasped the concepts or not. Not all students in a
class are of the same intellectual level. Some learn fast while
others require more attention. A computer will give the same
attention to all students. This can affect the performance of poor
students.
- Linh: I partly agree. However, It is easy to see the progressive
rate at which technology is able to mimic the teaching abilities
of human beings. For example, several iPhone applications are
able to hold the attention of young children for hours a huge
variety of vivid images and videos at a time, while concurrently
teaching them things.
- Thư: Besides that, I think computers could provide the answers
to any questions relating to the subject in the fastest and the most
precise way within a second. Thus, it is clear that on a small
scale, machines can act as effective teachers. The possibility for
a robotic teacher in the future can therefore be seen.
- Trọng: It must be remembered that a teacher powered by
artificial intelligence would have little to no control over its
students. For instance, it is commonly understood that children
require the watchful eye of a teacher to ensure that they are
indeed completing their class work and not fooling around
 during class time. Unfortunately, this is something that a robotic
teacher simply cannot provide.
- Hạ: That is not to mention that students, especially young
children will have difficulties in learning human skills such as
communication, showing emotion or solving problems if they
have no chance to interact with a human teacher. Therefore, the
argument that technology will never completely replace the
teacher in the classroom could also be possible.
- Thư: I see your point but Replacing teachers with computers will
give students more time on computers and so they can learn the
skills of how to use one. Having a teacher lead lessons and then
hand-writing all of your work in class means that you don’t pick
up these skills. For example, if a student does not have a
computer at home that they can use, they will never learn to use
a computer.
- Linh: That’s just what I was thinking, If they don’t learn, when
they get to secondary school they will have difficulty doing their
homework compared to other students. Because the point of
school is to teach people valuable skills that they will use later
and because using computers teaches that, I think that we should
replace teachers with computers.
- Hạ: I am not sure about that. No matter what skills you learn,
you must have an experienced instructor to help you.
- Trọng: In my opinion, when learning, emotions play a very
important role. Computers, no matter how advanced they are, do
not have emotions. They can not show love, care, or comfort.
This is a problem because such emotions are important to
stimulate the learning process and to trigger students to be more
involved in education by feeling comfortable to participate in
class or to ask questions.
- Linh: You could be right, but computers are really fun. Imagine
playing games on computers whenever you wanted to. Lots of
people really enjoy all the different worlds and activities that a
computer can give you. This means that any time you are on the
computer you could instead stop what you’re doing and play a
game instead.
- Thư: if you found science class boring that day you could
instead all play games instead. Because this would make school
more fun as you can play games whenever you want, something
teachers wouldn’t let you do.
- Trọng: okay, Depending on the learning method of each person,
this can be suitable for you, but that is not comfortable for you.
- Hạ: That’s just what I was thinking. We need to Stop hear and
the teacher is coming here. We will talk more later. See yah.

r unloved.