MARKING RUBRIC

NUMBERS AND NUMBER STRUCTURE

PRESENTATION TO ASSESS CLO4 (Group – Topic 2: Number Base) (weightage 10%)

Grade Scale
10.0 Descriptor
marks

DISTINCTION - The content is very accurate about the basic number system
9.0-10.0 - Content discussion very clearly stated (CPTS2)
Amat - Able to show the relationship between the various basic number
Cemerlang systems studied very clearly
(A+) - Able to make connections between various basic number systems
90- 100 very well
- Able to compare the differences of various number systems very
Clearly (A4,C4)
- The example given in the analysis is very clear
- Very able to use arguments / knowledge in real context
- Very clear evidence, there is collaboration in the production of ideas,
arguments and joint formulations(TS3,CS3)

EXCELLENT
7.0-8.9 - Accurate content about the basic number system
Cemerlang - Content discussion clearly stated. CPTS2)
(A or A-) - Be able to show the relationship between the various basic number
75-89 systems studied clearly
- Able to make connections between various basic number systems
well
- Able to compare the differences of various basic number systems
Clearly (A4,C4)
- The examples given in the analysis are clear
- Ability to use arguments/knowledge in a real context
- Clear evidence, the existence of collaboration in the production of
ideas, arguments and joint formulations (TS3,CS3)

CREDIT
5.0-6.9 - The content is quite accurate about the basic number system
Kepujian - Content discussion is quite clear CPTS2)
( B+, B or B-) - Able to show the relationship between the various basic number systems
60-74 studied quite clearly
- Able to make connections between various basic number systems quite well
- Able to compare the differences of various basic number systems quite
clearly
- The example given in the analysis is quite clear(A4,C4)
- Can use arguments/knowledge in real context
- Quite clear evidence, the existence of collaboration in the production of ideas,
arguments and conclusions together (TS3,CS3)

PASS
3.0-4.9 - Inaccurate content about the basic number system
Lulus - Content discussion with less clarity CPTS2)
(C+ or C) - Lack of ability to show the relationship between the various basic number
50-59 systems studied
- L ack of ability to make connections between various basic number systems
- Lack of ability to compare the differences between various basic number
systems (A4,C4)
- There are examples given in the analysis but less can use
arguments/knowledge in real context
- Less clear evidence, the existence of collaboration in the production of ideas,
 arguments and conclusions together (TS3,CS3)
FAIL
<3.0 - Inaccurate content about the basic number system
Gagal - Content discussion vaguely CPTS2)
(C-, D+, D or F) - Unable to show the relationship between the various basic number systems
< 50 studied
- Not the ability to make connections between various basic number systems
- Unable to compare the differences of various basic number systems (A4,C4)
- Some examples given in the analysis cannot use arguments/knowledge in a
real context
- There is no evidence of collaboration in the production of ideas, arguments
and conclusions together (TS3,CS3)