4.

0
3.5
3.5
3.0
3.5
3.5
3.0
2.5
3.5
5.0
3.0
3.0
1.5
9.5
8.5
8.5
8.5
10.5
9.0

97.0
dear aspirant, based on your answers, here are some observations
1. in theoretical questions

a). your conceptual clarity is good , you have understood the demand and addressed
accordingly , keep it up although in some question like q 4.b , 6 ,7 and 8 you missed the intent
thus the suggestion is , you must read the words of the question carefully and write answer
as per need of question .

b). you need to little bit improvement in the structure , your content is good although it is
not aligned as per the demand such as in the question of Red tapism (q 8), you can
incorporate more examples
c). you are giving good examples , and can mention good case studies in answers , you
can also use the best practices like in citizen charter question . this is good .

d). your introduction and conclusion is good , you have used the data and figures in
introduction and quote as well that is good Keep it up.

IN Case studies -
a). your introduction is good (you can using the reports, data and connecting with
the context , this is good), however you should have mentioned the stakeholders explicitly
(try to mention the vested interests), this part is good and try to mention the ethical
issues in each question rather than general writting.

b). you are using best examples in the case study . this is good . keep it up!!. you have
to understand the relevance of diagram in the question , diagrams should be
drawn to show additional part however proper naming , main parts must be properly
elaborated. Your have written well Q-9 12 and 14 , keep it up.

c). your conclusion is good, you have maintained language competency . this is also
good and good hand writing which add more ease in comprehend your ideas .
keep it up!!!
good context
also you can say
that it is about
choosing an option
among many
alternatives
available. it is
based on the
wisdom of civil
servants
 good point

points are good

although you
have to support
it with examples

here you can

say that
selection of
one path from
among the
various
alternatives is
often made on
the basis of
PERSONAL
PREFERENCE
, POLITICAL
AFFILIATION,
or PERSONAL
AGGRANDIZE
MENT, then it
may be viewed
as the corrupt
4.0 practice
good introduction

discuss also why

why there is a
social acceptance
---> sociability
norms like
RECIPROCITY
rules of gift giving
, (i have to return
the favour )
---> kinship norms
like putting your
family first
----> horizontal
pressure like " my
colleagues are
doing it too" , peer
pressure
need to hit at the
societal
mindset , how to
change the
mindset of
society and
create a view that
corruption is bad

---> technology
can be
leveraged

good point

well exampled

well conclude

3.5
 good
introduction

can also mention

the Kotak
committee on
ethical
governance
Ethical accounting
practices,
interactions with
the public, and
information
disseminated to
shareholders have
a direct impact on
the overall
profitability of the
company.
can say that
ethical
practices used by
management
increases the
morale of the
employees
exponentially

well discussed

3.5
good introduction

your arguments
and content is
good although it
is not properly
aligned to the
demand

question is about "

if there is no
backing of
individuals
conscience then
law has no
meaning "
 good analysis

individual's
conscience
is a servant of
ones value system
(preferences,
priorities) an
immature
or weak value
system produces
a weak
conscience, while
a
fully informed
value system
produces a strong
sense of right and
wrong

then you have

to write how a
good
conscience can be
developed
---> here you can
write
the use of
PROPER
EDUCATION
that develops
wisdom

good conclusion

3.0
well introduction

first you have to

elaborate the
meaning of the
statement . what
does it mean? why
he said lives begin
to END?
---> we are ALIVE
because we
question the wrong
practices, we are
not silent , once we
stopped
questioning the
injustice , it is and
END of life. (I
THINK,
THEREFORE I
AM)
your EXISTENCE
is dependent on
your ability to think,
to question , to
seek . once you
stop this your life
ends
life is a process ,
which always
moves , flows, it is
not static.
thus if you want to
be alive then you
have to ask the
question,

(then you can give

example)

good conclusion

3.5
well introduction

mention some
differences
between law
and ethics
 good
point

can mention that

as the society
progresses
law also evolves
like
homosexuality
which is
decriminalised but
the society still
thinks
it as unethical

good point

3.5
 good introduction
can also mention
the that SI
includes
awareness of
situations and the
social dynamics
that govern them
and knowledge of
strategies that
can help a
person to
achieve his /her
objectives

first define
emotional
intelligence also

here you can show

that goleman's
model of EI and
then there you can
say that once you
know the emotions
of others (EI) then
only you can get
them to co operate
(SI).
good analysis but
need to examples
to justify

3.0
good introduction
can also mention,
rather than
showing the
differences , first
you have to show
how
---> code of
conduct provides a
structure i.e. it
gives
GUIDELINES of
do's and don'ts , it
helps in taking
decision by
individual
like MODEL
CODE OF
CONDUCT, code
of conduct for civil
services etc.
 show how code
of ethics is the
FOUNDATION to
that structure
ex ethics
committee in
parliament

can say that code

of ethic provides
set of principles
that
which influence
the judgement

it include core
ethical
values , ideals and
principles of that
organisation

example MCC
shows that
what an candidate
has to do
or not to do , this
gives
a codified
structure to the
values

2.5
 well contextual
introduction

well argued point

 well discussed
can also mention
wisdom as per the
Buddhism is
---> right thought
+
---> right
understanding

which includes the

love , non
violence etc
unless you don't
know the real
understanding
about other, how
can you show
compassion

very good flow

diagram

compassion
represents love,
charity, kindness,
tolerance, and
such noble
qualities on the
emotional side,
or qualities of the
heart,

---->while wisdom
3.5
would stand
for the intellectual
side or
the qualities of the
mind
good introduction

well presentation
 well argued

5.0
good introduction

well discussed
 well explained

well discussed

3.0
very good
introduction

well discussed ,
can also mention
the role and
responsibility are
based on
humanity and
humanitarian
principles of
HUMANITY ,
NEUTRALITY,
OPERATIONAL
INDEPENDENCE
etc
 well discussed

can mention
Washington
Consensus,
Geneva
Convention and
German model

good conclusion

3.0
good
introduction

well argued
points
 question is
specific about
transitioning
towards citizen
centric
governance so
---> first define it
----> then mention
what are its
features or what it
needs
----> then show
how red tapism is
a hurdle

features of citizen
centric
governance

---> change
oriented
---->
decentralized
---> dynamic

Mention the
Sevottam
Model and
Mission
Karmyogi

1.5
very well start
well discussed
good point

good points
well analysis

good examples
 good points as
incorporated
international
assistance from
GAVI

well argued

good concluded
very good
contextual
introduction
well discussed
well argued
good points
 well
presented

well concluded

8.5
good introduction,
can also mention
the global air
report.
well analysis
along with it try to
incorporate more
ethical issues
pleasure and
pain
principle,headoni
stic approach of
Thomas hobes
well argued

good point
well analysed
 good example

8.5
well start of case
study
good analysis
good point

well argued
well discussed
 good point

good practical
example

well concluded
8.5
good start
 well written

overall good
presentation
well analysed
well discussed
 well argued

well concluded

10.5
very good start
well discussed

good point
well analysis

very good
presentatio
n
well analysis, can
also mention the
passing reference
of HOW these
challenges should
be addressed.
well concluded