You are on page 1of 3

Process Safety News Winter 2012

Volume 19,
Number 1

Understanding recently issued


OSHA PSM NEP
Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals
(29 CFR 1910.119)
By: Amy Theis, PE, Manager, Risk Management Services, Fauske & Associates, LLC (FAI) and
Timothy Cullina, PE, Safety Consulting Engineer, Fauske & Associates, LLC (FAI)

In late November 2011, OSHA released the National


Emphasis Program (NEP) for Process Safety
Management (PSM) officially replacing the limited-scope
T he inspection process will include the use of
investigative questions that are designed to gather
facts related to requirements of the PSM standard which
2009 pilot NEP for PSM - covered chemical facilities. The include guidance for reviewing documents, interviewing
PSM requirements remain challenging, but essentially workers and verifying full implementation. An
unchanged. This article will focus on changes of the new emphasis is placed on the assessor evaluating effective
Chemical PSM NEP and how your facility can be prepared. implementation of the PSM elements in addition to
sufficient program documentation. The questions will be

F
asked based on a dynamic list of questions that will not
acilities Affected and Inspection Process
be public domain.

1) All federal and state-plan OSHA offices are


required to participate in the new Chemical PSM
C itation History
NEP. Formerly, only regions I, VII and X (14 states) were
affected by the original pilot program. In addition,
each OSHA area office is required to complete 3 to 5
inspections per year. O SHA outreach efforts have provided summaries of
the pilot program results as measured by citations.
Table 1 on page 4 provides a summary of completed
2) As before, the target list includes the usual suspects
plus some new less common additions including:
inspection citations from the first 18 months of the pilot
program. If asked, most managers responsible for PSM
• Facilities identified for maintaining greater than implementation may identify the more challenging
threshold quantities of flammable liquids elements to be the same as OSHA’s list of most cited
elements. Roughly 75% of the citations came from
• Facilities identified on the EPA’s Risk Management just 4 elements: Mechanical Integrity, Process Safety
Program database Information, Process Hazard Analysis, and Operating
• Facilities with NAICS codes that match the NAICS Procedures. Training and Management of Change
codes of past PSM - offenders programs captured an additional 9%.

3) Two categories will be used:


Continued on page 4

• Facilities using ammonia in refrigeration use as the Upcoming Events


only highly hazardous chemical (HHC) ∼ 25% of
inspections - FAI Spring 2012 Process Safety Training Courses, March 22-23,
2012 in Burr Ridge, IL (see pages 14 & 15 for more information)
• Facilities using ammonia for other than refrigeration
or using HHCs other than ammonia ∼ 75% of - Visit FAI at booth #1352 at the
PTXi/Powder Bulk Solids
inspections Conference, May 8-10, 2012 in Rosemont, IL

- FAI Relief Systems Design Course, May 21-22 in Burr Ridge, IL


(see page 11 for more information)

- FAI User Group Forum, May 23-25, 212 in Burr Ridge, IL (visit
www. fauske.com for more information)
Process Safety News Winter 2012 Fauske.Com p. 4

Continued from page 1 Th e t y p e o f co m p o n e n t s e l e c te d m a n d a t e d


d i f fe re n t s te p s fo r t h e o p e r a to r s (O p e r a t i n g
Pro ce d u re s ) w h o re q u i re d t r a i n i n g a n d
ve r i f i c a t i o n i n t h e n e w p ro ce d u re s ( Tr a i n i n g ) .
Th e O S H A i n s p e c to r fo u n d u p d a te d p ro ce d u re s
i n u s e a n d d o c u m e n te d t r a i n i n g. Th e r a t i o n a l e
fo r s e l e c t i n g t h e co m p o n e n t w a s cove re d i n
t h e t r a i n i n g a n d m a d e av a i l a b l e fo r re v i e w by
e m p l oye e s a n d t h e i r re p re s e n t a t i ve s ( E m p l oye e
Pa r t i c i p a t i o n ) . N o c i t a t i o n s we re i s s u e d.

W h e n t h e n e w co m p o n e n t w a s i n s t a l l e d by
t h e s u p p l i e r (Co n t r a c to r s ) , i t i nvo l ve d s h u t t i n g
d ow n p a r t o f t h e p ro ce s s ( Pre - s t a r t u p S a fe t y
R e v i e w ) a s we l l a s b r a z i n g s o m e o f t h e l i n e s
( H o t Wo r k Pe r m i t ) . Th e e m p l oye r re v i e we d
t h e re s p o n s e p l a n ( E m e rg e n c y P l a n n i n g ) t o
e n s u re t h a t p ro ce d u re s we re a d e q u a te fo r t h e
i n s t a l l a t i o n h a z a rd s. Wo r k e r s co m p l e te d t h e
h o t wo r k p e r m i t a n d a co py re m a i n e d i n t h e
re co rd s. N o re co rd s we re av a i l a b l e to i n d i c a t e
h ow t h e co n t r a c to r i n te r a c te d w i t h t h e f a c i l i t y
w h e n wo r k i n g o n a P S M cove re d p ro ce s s.
S e ve r a l c i t a t i o n s co u l d b e i s s u e d u n d e r 1 1 9 ( h ) .
Pro p o s e d f i n e s co u l d e xce e d $ 7 , 0 0 0 .

A l t h o u g h M a n a g e m e n t o f C h a n g e p rov i s i o n s
cove re d i n te r i m c h a n g e s, w h e n t h e n e w
co m p o n e n t w a s p l a ce d i n s e r v i ce t h e Pro ce s s
S a fe t y I n fo r m a t i o n w a s n o t u p d a te d. Th e
Pro ce s s H a z a rd A n a l ys i s w a s re v a l i d a te d, b u t
t h e re co rd s co u l d n o t a cco u n t fo r p o te n t i a l
h a z a rd s a s s o c i a te d w i t h t h e n e w co m p o n e n t .
Fo r t u n a te l y, i n s p e c t i o n a n d m a i n te n a n ce
p ro ce d u re s a n d t r a i n i n g we re u p d a te d
( M e c h a n i c a l I n te gr i t y ) . M u l t i p l e c i t a t i o n s
co u l d b e i s s u e d u n d e r 1 1 9 ( d ) ( 3 ) ( i ) fo r t h e P & I D s
Table 1 a n d o t h e r P S I t h a t we re n o t u p d a te d a n d 1 1 9 ( e )
PSM Pilot NEP Citations as of December 21, 2010 ( 3 ) ( i ) fo r n o t e v a l u a t i n g t h e p ro ce s s h a z a rd o f
OSHA Directorate of Enforcement, General Industry Enforcement t h e n e w co m p o n e n t d u r i n g t h e P H A . Ag a i n ,
p ro p o s e d f i n e s co u l d e xce e d $ 7 , 0 0 0 . I n f a c t ,
t h e ave r a g e f i n a n c i a l p e n a l t i e s p e r i n s p e c t i o n
Hypothetical Citation Example u n d e r t h e p i l o t p ro gr a m e xce e d e d $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 .
H owe ve r, s i n g l e c i t a t i o n s f ro m t wo re ce n t P S M
L o o k i n g a t t h e s p e c i f i e d c i t a t i o n s we c a n i n s p e c t i o n s d re w v i o l a t i o n p e n a l t i e s o f $ 2 5 , 0 0 0
s e e t h a t P S M e l e m e n t s fo r m i n te r re l a te d
e a c h fo r f a i l u re to c a l i b r a te a d e v i ce u s e d fo r
re s p o n s i b i l i t i e s a s i l l u s t r a te d by t h e fo l l ow i n g
v i b r a t i o n a n a l ys i s i n o n e c a s e a n d fo r f a i l u re t o
hy p o t h e t i c a l e x a m p l e.
fo l l ow t h e f l a n g e b o l t to rq u e s p e c i f i c a t i o n i n
D u r i n g a P S M N E P i n s p e c t i o n , t h e co m p l i a n ce t h e o t h e r.
o f f i ce r c h e c k e d M e c h a n i c a l I n te gr i t y re co rd s
a n d n o te d t h a t m a i n te n a n ce c h a n g e d a A s i l l u s t r a te d, 1 1 P S M e l e m e n t s c a n b e a f fe c t e d
co m p o n e n t f ro m t h e o r i gi n a l s p e c i f i c a t i o n by c h a n gi n g o n e co m p o n e n t . Th e N E P i n s t r u c t s
( i t n o l o n g e r m e t t h e a p p l i c a b l e co d e ) to a n t h e O S H A i n s p e c to r to c h e c k a re p re s e n t a t i ve
u n s p e c i f i e d i te m . S i n ce t h e o l d co m p o n e n t i s n u m b e r o f t h e e l e m e n t s to co n f i r m t h a t t h e
n o l o n g e r m a d e, a d i f fe re n t t y p e o f co m p o n e n t re q u i re d fo l l ow - u p a c t i v i t i e s h ave b e e n
n e e d e d to b e s e l e c te d a n d i n s t a l l e d. U n d e r i m p l e m e n te d a c ro s s t h e s p e c t r u m o f P S M
P S M , t h i s re p l a ce m e n t re q u i re d M a n a g e m e n t o f e l e m e n t s fo r t h e n e w co m p o n e n t .
C h a n g e p ro ce s s a p p rov a l. Th e i n s p e c to r c ro s s -
c h e c k e d t h e M O C l o g a n d fo u n d t h e c h a n g e
b o t h d o c u m e n te d a n d a p p rove d. Co n t i n u e d o n p a g e 5
Process Safety News Winter 2012 Fauske.Com p. 5
Continued from page 4

What to Expect Develop an Action Plan


W h e n O S H A v i s i t s, t h e f a c i l i t y m a n a g e m e n t I t i s h e l p f u l to e v a l u a te yo u r P S M p ro gr a m' s
s h o u l d e x p e c t to b e a s k e d fo r t h e i r O S H A 3 0 0 e f fe c t i ve n e s s by e x a m i n i n g s u cce s s f u l
l o g s, t y p i c a l l y fo r t h e l a s t t h re e ye a r s. W h e n t h e i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f t h e to p 4 c i te d e l e m e n t s :
O S H A I n s p e c to r v i s i t s a P S M cove re d f a c i l i t y, M e c h a n i c a l I n te gr i t y, Pro ce s s S a fe t y
e x p e c t t h e s a m e a n d m o re. Th e O S H A I n s p e c to r s I n fo r m a t i o n , Pro ce s s H a z a rd A n a l ys i s a n d
w i l l a t te m p t to i d e n t i f y t h e m o s t h a z a rd o u s O p e r a t i n g Pro ce d u re s. Th i s w i l l gi ve a g o o d
p ro ce s s fo r i n s p e c t i o n u n d e r t h e C h e m i c a l i n d i c a t i o n o f w h e t h e r yo u r P S M p ro gr a m n e e d s
NEP based on the quantity of chemicals in i m p rove m e n t to b e co m p l i a n t . A n o t h e r k e y
t h e p ro ce s s, t h e a g e o f t h e p ro ce s s u n i t , e l e m e n t i s M a n a g e m e n t o f C h a n g e, w h i c h
m a i n te n a n ce a c t i v i t i e s a n d l o g s, p re v i o u s a u d i t t r i g g e r s a c t i o n s i n e a c h o f t h e p re v i o u s l y
f i n d i n g s, e m p l oye e i n p u t a n d i n j u r y a n d i n c i d e n t m e n t i o n e d e l e m e n t s. I f p ro ce d u re s a re n o t i n
l o g s. p l a ce o r p ro p e r l y co m p l e te d, t h e re co u l d b e a
d o m i n o e f fe c t re s u l t i n g i n m u l t i p l e c i t a t i o n s.
A m o n g t h e f i r s t i n s p e c t i o n to p i c s cove re d A g a p a n a l ys i s i s u s e f u l to d e te r m i n e a re a s o f
w i l l b e p e r s o n a l p ro te c t i ve e q u i p m e n t ( P P E ) highest risk.
d e te r m i n a t i o n s a n d h a z a rd o u s l o c a t i o n
c l a s s i f i c a t i o n s. Th o u g h n o t s p e c i f i c a l l y Conclusion
P S M - re l a te d, P P E a n d l o c a t i o n c l a s s i f i c a t i o n s
a p p l y to m u l t i p l e P S M e l e m e n t s. Th e i n s p e c to r s M a ny n e w f a c i l i t i e s w i l l b e i n c l u d e d i n t h e
w i l l re q u e s t t h a t yo u p rov i d e a n ove r v i e w o f t h e t a rg e t l i s t , w h i c h we re n o t a f fe c te d by t h e
f a c i l i t y ’s P S M p ro gr a m i n c l u d i n g i d e n t i f i c a t i o n p re v i o u s p i l o t p ro gr a m i n 2 0 0 9 . Th e N E P w i l l
o f k e y re s p o n s i b l e p e r s o n n e l a n d d e s c r i p t i o n s co n d u c t p ro gr a m m e d i n s p e c t i o n s fo r t h o s e
o f re co rd s c re a te d fo r P S M m a n a g e m e n t a n d co m p a n i e s w i t h k n ow n r i s k s a n d e n co u r a g e
co m p l i a n ce d e m o n s t r a t i o n . Th e y w i l l a s k to u n p ro gr a m m e d i n s p e c t i o n s fo r t y p i c a l l y l ow -
s e e a l i s t o f P S M c h e m i c a l s, t h e i r q u a n t i t i e s o n p ro f i l e P S M - cove re d f a c i l i t i e s. O S H A w i l l
s i te, p ro ce s s e s u s e d a n d p ro ce s s d e s c r i p t i o n s. e v a l u a te co m p l i a n ce u s i n g s p e c i a l l y d e ve l o p e d
Pro ce s s a n d s a fe t y s ys te m d e s c r i p t i o n s s h o u l d “d y n a m i c i n s p e c t i o n l i s t s” t h a t a re re - g e n e r a t e d
i n c l u d e s a fe u p p e r a n d l owe r o p e r a t i n g l i m i t s, o n a re g u l a r b a s i s.
d e s i gn co d e s a n d s t a n d a rd s fo r t h e s e l e c te d
u n i t ( s ) P F D s, P & I D s a n d P l o t P l a n s w i l l b e
re q u i re d. Th i s i n fo r m a t i o n s h o u l d b e av a i l a b l e
F A I e n gi n e e r s a re f a m i l i a r w i t h O S H A a u d i t i n g
te c h n i q u e s a n d c a n h e l p yo u r f a c i l i t y p re p a re fo r
a s p a r t o f t h e Pro ce s s S a fe t y I n fo r m a t i o n ( P S I )
a n O S H A P S M N E P i n s p e c t i o n . We c a n p e r fo r m a
f i l e. I n a d d i t i o n , t h e i n s p e c to r w i l l re q u e s t to
P S M g a p a n a l ys i s to i d e n t i f y p r i o r i t y e l e m e n t s
re v i e w t h e m o s t re ce n t Pro ce s s H a z a rd A n a l ys i s
n e e d i n g a t te n t i o n . FA I c a n a l s o p rov i d e
( P H A) o r re v a l i d a t i o n co m p l e te w i t h t h e P S I . A l l
a s s i s t a n ce w i t h P S M p ro gr a m d e ve l o p m e n t
o f t h i s c a n b e e x p e c te d to h a p p e n b e fo re a n
i n c l u d i n g E m e rg e n c y R e s p o n s e Pro ce d u re s a n d
i n i t i a l w a l k a ro u n d. Prov i d i n g a d e q u a te a n d
Pro ce s s S a fe t y I n fo r m a t i o n ( p ro p e r ve n t s i z i n g,
co m p l e te i n fo r m a t i o n to t h e i nve s t i g a to r w i l l
p ro ce s s c h e m i s t r y a n d s a fe o p e r a t i n g l i m i t s ) .
m a k e a g o o d f i r s t i m p re s s i o n .
Co n t a c t M r. J e f f G r i f f i n a t ( 6 3 0 ) 8 8 7 - 5 2 7 8
O S H A i n s p e c to r s w i l l l o o k fo r e v i d e n ce o f o r v i a e m a i l a t gr i f f i n @ f a u s k e. co m fo r m o re
p ro gr a m i m p l e m e n t a t i o n i n t h e m a i n te n a n ce i n fo r m a t i o n re g a rd i n g h ow FA I c a n s u p p o r t yo u r
d e p a r t m e n t , a t t h e o p e r a to r ’s p o s i t i o n s a n d f a c i l i t y i n p re p a r a t i o n fo r a n O S H A P S M N E P
i n t h e f i e l d, r a t h e r t h a n j u s t a cce p t i n g w h a t i s inspection.
w r i t te n i n P S M p ro gr a m p l a n s. Th e N E P e q u i p s
i n s p e c to r s w i t h q u e s t i o n s a n d g u i d a n ce to R e fe re n ce s
n av i g a te f ro m w r i t te n p ro gr a m s to re q u i re d
re co rd s. Th e N E P a l s o d i re c t s Co m p l i a n ce S a fe t y O cc u p a t i o n a l S a fe t y a n d H e a l t h Ad m i n i s t r a t i o n , D i re c t i ve N u m b e r :
C P L 0 3 - 0 0 - 0 1 4 , P S M Cove re d C h e m i c a l Fa c i l i t i e s N a t i o n a l
a n d H e a l t h O f f i ce r s (C S H O s ) to re v i e w p a s t P S M - E m p h a s i s Pro gr a m , N ove m b e r 2 9 , 2 0 1 1 .
L . Lo n g, M . M a r s h a l l  a n d J. L ay, U p d a t e o n O S H A’s P S M N a t i o n a l
re l a te d c i t a t i o n s i s s u e d to t h e s a m e e m p l oye r E m p h a s i s Pro gr a m s, Pro ce s s S a fe t y Pro gre s s, Vo l. 3 0 , N o. 4 ,
D e ce m b e r 2 0 1 1 .
( n o t j u s t t h e s a m e f a c i l i t y ) g o i n g b a c k 6 ye a r s
a n d i d e n t i f y p o te n t i a l f a i l u re s to a b a te a n d
p o s s i b l y re p e a t w i l l f u l v i o l a t i o n s. Amy Theis, Risk Management Services Manager at FAI, will
be a featured presenter at the
AIChE Global Congress on Process Safety,
Loss Prevention Symposium
April 3rd, in Houston, Texas

You might also like