You are on page 1of 4

DETAILED LESSON PLAN

STUDENT NAME : MASAWI TINASHE


CANDIDATE NUMBER : 082/21
SCHOOL : GOROMONZI HIGH SCHOOL
TOPIC : LANGUAGE STRUCTURE
LESSON TOPIC : EDUCATE THE GIRL EDUCATE THE NATION
CLASS : 1 WEST
DATE : 19/05/22
TIME AND LESSON DURATION :
LESSON OBJECTIVES
Learners should be able to:

 Distinguish claims, warrants and impacts.


 Construct arguments that include all the three parts.
 Debate on the given topic.

ASSUMED KNOWLEDGE
Learners can make warrants on their debates
MEDIA

 Hand-outs on debate
SOURCE OF MATERIAL
 Schemes of work ending 20/05/22 Resource file
LESSON STAGES TOPIC AND CONTENT TEACHER ACTIVITIES LEARNER ACTIVITIES

Phase 1 Educate the girl, educate the


Introduction (5 nation.
minutes) -Claim – solicit the argument
from the class either pro or con. Introduce learners to the resolution of the day. -taking note of the teachers
-warrant- providing evidence - introduction.
-impact-the important of the
argument

Phase 2 presentation
Break-out groups Groups Group work.
(10 minutes) -break students into small groups -generate 5 complete
-brainstorming on the potential arguments arguments for either side of
the practice resolution.

Written work Group work- debate Group work -debate


Phase 3 (40 minutes) Question guidelines -taking note of the proceedings of the debate -debating on the bases of
their resolution analysis
Application
Phase 4 Conclusion. Summation method. Taking note of the
(5mins)conclusion Summation method Claim, warrant and impact form will be teachers conclusion.
referenced whenever one talks about making
an argument from research and casing to
refutation and flowing
EVALUATION

The planned concepts of the lesson were taught and learnt successfully. Learners were able to read the comprehension passage and
relate the story to their real life experiences as to that of the author. The lesson was successfully done as the set objectives were met.
The weekly aim was also achieved as learners’ skills on debate and public speaking were enhanced.

STRENGTHS

The concept development by the teacher was good as the teacher also went further on to explain on the hidden curriculum. The group
discussion was effective as most of the learners made valid arguments on their claims and they demonstrated that have researched on
the notion of the debate. The quality of discussion was good as learners offered concrete evidence, they did not generalize their ideas.
The media used by the teacher was informative and clear on the guidelines on debate. The assumed knowledge of the teacher was
correct. The teacher managed to project his voice well during the lesson and the whiteboard was effectively bused by the facilitator.

WEAKNESSES

The classroom management by the teacher was not effective as there was noise during discussion from groups. This has affected
learners like Tinokutendai Nyakurerwa.

POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS

The teacher intends to work on classroom management skills and probably allocate few learners in group so that they will maximum
participation by all learners.

You might also like