Professional Documents
Culture Documents
if
for example
Conclusion – restate the main idea in the introduction and give examples from the body
paragraph
The conclusion is brief. That is fine. Note though how it reflects the main idea in the introduction –
completing the essay. It also uses some language from the body paragraphs to show the examiner
that it is a logical conclusion;
The major argument against hosting international sporting events is financial. Typically, it can cost
several million pounds to build the arenas and modernise the infrastructure so that it can cater for the
athletes and the spectators. This money, it is argued, would be better spent on welfare and education
programmes that provide direct support for the population. Indeed, some governments have incurred
so much debt through hosting the Olympic Games that they have had to reduce spending on other
social programmes.
While there is some merit in that argument, hosting sporting events does also bring significant
benefits. First among these is the honour and prestige it brings to the host country because that
country will be the centre of the sporting world for the duration of the event. For many people this is
beyond any price. More than that, if the authorities plan carefully, they can use the occasion of the
sporting event to help finance public works that benefit the whole population in the long term. For
example, the village for the athletes can be transformed into public housing and the various stadia
can be used to build a sporting legacy for future generations.
My own view is that it is an honour for a country to host a major sporting event. However, if a
government wishes to bid for an international event to be staged in its country, it should ensure it has
sufficient funds to maintain spending on other projects.
The first point to make is that advertising does make us spend money we do not need to. There are
nowadays so many different ways companies promote their products and services, ranging from
television commercials to simple flyers that we cannot escape it. If, for example, you watch a football
match on television, you will see the logos of the tournament sponsors. Likewise, if you watch the
latest blockbuster movie, very probably you will see a product placed in the film by some advertising
agency. The volume of this advertising means that we, as consumers, tend to be profoundly
influenced by it and buy without thinking.
It is not easy to decide how to regulate advertising. Clearly, governments ought to restrict
advertisements for harmful products such as alcohol and tobacco. They do not have the power,
however, to control other forms of advertising. This means we need to use our common sense when
we go to the shops, and ask ourselves whether we really need to make that purchase. Parents
should, however, ensure that young people are protected from too much exposure to advertising.
This can mean simply explaining that it is not in fact necessary to buy the newest Xbox, or simply
turning the television off.
My conclusion is that while we cannot escape advertising or its effects in the modern world, children
should be encouraged not to pay too much attention to it.
This means it does influence us. All you have to do now is explain why and how.Or
This means that controlling advertising is complex. All you have to do now is explain why that is so
and what can be done.
explanation; the most dangerous type of adverts are those that we see all the time and don’t think
about
examples: tv commercials/flyers/sponsorship/product placement
So the final paragraph looks like this:
The first point to make is that advertising does make us spend money we do not need to. There are
nowadays so many different ways companies promote their products and services, ranging
from television commercials to simple flyers that we cannot escape it. If, for example, you watch a
football match on television, you will see the logos of the tournament sponsors. Likewise, if you watch
the latest blockbuster movie, very probably you will see a product placed in the film by some
advertising agency. The volume of this advertising means that we, as consumers, tend to be
profoundly influenced by it and buy without thinking.
Step 3 – paragraphs are like essays: it can better to
repeat/rephrase an idea than to give a new idea
The next point to note is that one possible paragraph structure is to repeat/rephrase your main idea
rather than give a new one. This works best in more complex paragraphs like the one above. The
main idea is:
The first point to make is that advertising does make us spend money we do not need to.
I then use a mixture of reasons and examples to explain this idea. At the end of the paragraph, I don’t
try and say something different. Rather I come back to the main idea:
The volume of this advertising means that we, as consumers, tend to be profoundly influenced by it
and buy without thinking.
This should be a familiar idea to you. It is really just using the introduction – main body –
conclusion structure of an essay for a paragraph. You wouldn’t add a new idea in the conclusion of
your essay, so why would you in a paragraph?
Read the essay again
You can read the essay and writing notes on the use of pronouns and introductions and conclusions
here.
Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies.
To what extent do you think are consumers influenced by advertisements? What measures
can be taken to protect them?
In today’s material world, we are inundated with various forms of advertising. In my view, this can be
dangerous as it encourages us to spend without thinking and young people, in particular, need some
protection from it.
The first point to make is that advertising does make us spend money we do not need to. There are
nowadays so many different ways companies promote their products and services, ranging from
television commercials to simple flyers that we cannot escape it. If, for example, you watch a football
match on television, you will see the logos of the tournament sponsors. Likewise, if you watch the
latest blockbuster movie, very probably you will see a product placed in the film by some advertising
agency. The volume of this advertising means that we, as consumers, tend to be profoundly
influenced by it and buy without thinking.
It is not easy to decide how to regulate advertising. Clearly, governments ought to restrict
advertisements for harmful products such as alcohol and tobacco. They do not have the power,
however, to control other forms of advertising. This means we need to use our commonsense when
we go to the shops, and ask ourselves whether we really need to make that purchase. Parents
should, however, ensure that young people are protected from too much exposure to advertising.
This can mean simply explaining that it is not in fact necessary to buy the newest Xbox, or simply
turning the television off.
My conclusion is that while we cannot escape advertising or its effects in the modern world, children
should be encouraged not to pay too much attention to it.
(266 words)
notes
My introduction and conclusion are both quite short: 2 sentences and 1 sentence. There are different
ways of writing introductions and conclusions. The benefit of this approach is that it allows me more
words for the main body of the essay – perhaps the most important part.
If you are writing an academic essay, it is conventional to try and not use personal pronouns unless
you need to. In this essay, I use first person, second person and third person pronouns.
I/MY
If the question asks you for your opinion, you are probably going to need to use first person pronouns
in order to answer the question. You should try and use “I”/”my” as little as possible. Here I use them
in my introduction and conclusion to show the examiner what my personal point of view is.
We
I use “we” and “ourselves” to talk more impersonally about people/consumers. This is one academic
convention and it is perfectly acceptable in IELTS.
You
Normally, in my essays I avoid using “you”. It is fairly informal and avoided in academic writing.
Some/many teachers will tell you that it is wrong to use “you” in academic essays because it is more
spoken and not written language. In IELTS, however, you can get away with this provided you use
enough more formal/written language elsewhere – this is one way IELTS is not exactly like academic
writing. My best advice: try to find another solution if you can.
He/They
In my view, perfectly acceptable. In fact, you are going to need these pronouns if you use examples.
It is better to use a pronoun rather than repeat the noun.
IELTS exams and continuous assessment essay
This is one of my model IELTS essays lessons where you can
There are three major arguments in favour of retaining exams. One is that they provide a clear and
objective measure of what students have learned, whereas any form of continuous assessment
is probably going to be far more subjective. An additional point is that testing tends to be an excellent
way of motivating learners to study harder and to reward the students who do best. Likewise,
examinations test the ability of students to work under pressure, and this is a vital life skill for their
later careers.
On the other hand, there are still occasions when it can be better to relieve the students of exam
pressure and to measure their abilities through continuous assessment. This is particularly the
case in lower age groups where young children can be affected negatively by stress and under-
perform in exams. It can also be argued that continuous assessment is a more effective way of
testing some subjects such as design and technology, which are more creative and less academic. A
further point is that often continuous assessment can allow teachers to reward students who work
hard, but who may be less able and not do well in more formal testing.
In conclusion, while continuous assessment may be fairer in some contexts, there are still times when
traditional exams may be more appropriate. A possible compromise would be to use both forms of
testing together, allowing teachers to reward both ability and hard work.
(280 words)
1. Essay structure: Outline your position in the introduction to the essay and summarise it in the
conclusion. If you “top and tail” your essay like this, the examiner should have a clearer idea of what you are
saying in the content paragraphs and finish the essay thinking that it was well-organised.
2. Paragraph structure: start each content paragraph by explaining what the purpose of that paragraph
is: Are you arguing in favour or against? Does this paragraph add to or contradict the points made in the
previous paragraph?
3. Link your sentences: make sure that each sentence links in some way to the sentence before. This
does not just mean using words like “Furthermore”, you can also link by using words like “this” or by
explaining the sentence before.
Paragraph coherence – count the reasons why
One possible way to structure a paragraph and make it coherent is to number the arguments for or
against an idea. This is the “firstly”, “secondly”, “thirdly” paragraph. This is a useful structure for when
you get a complex question where you can think of lots of different arguments. Rather than try and
explain one complex idea, you outline 3 different ones in brief. I have two connected tips for you:
Tip 1: start your paragraph by saying that you are going to make a number of different
arguments. For example, some language you could use here is:
There are several arguments why…
There are at least three points that can be made in favour of …..
This works because the examiner now knows what is going to come next. That is coherence. Your
writing is now more readable.
Tip 2: count your arguments and vary your “counting language” , don’t just go ‘”firstly”,
“secondly”, “thirdly”. You should have seen from my example below that I “count” out the different
arguments in favour of exams. I make it easy for the examiner to see what I am doing. Coherence
again. It really helps if you use some variation in your vocabulary. It’s a very simple structure so we
want some more complex vocab. Possible language to use is:
The most important argument is…
I don’t do the counting thing in the first sentence. You want to vary your writing techniques – there are
marks for that. I do however say there are “some occasions“. This is the same idea really.
My linking language between sentences is different too. I use “This is the case” for the first idea and
then “also” and “further” for the later ideas. The structure of the writing should be obvious and this
helps make my writing clear and coherent.
Understanding the question
Some people believe that exams are an inappropriate way of measuring students’
performance and should be replaced by continuous assessment. Do you agree or disagree
with this view?
This is an agree/disagree type question that asks you for your opinion. My tip is that if you get a
question of this type is to remember that there is always a 3rd way of answering it: you half agree and
you half disagree. Unless you have strong feelings about the question, I suggest this approach
because
you can use all the arguments you can think of – both for and against
it allows you to organise your essay in a simple way (and in IELTS simple is good)
you can use some good cautious academic language (good for your range of grammar)
Structuring the essay – getting the content right
The question demands that you talk about both continuous assessment and exams. You will not have
answered the question fully if you only write about exams or continuous assessment. With this in
mind, the sensible choice is to use one content para for exams and another for continuous
assessment – then you are sure to cover the content. So my rough plan looks like this
intro: the answer depends on context – both exams and continuous assessment have points in their
favour
para 1: reasons why exams work (objective) (motivation to study) (preparation for life)
para 2: reasons why continuous assessment works (good for young kids) (good for skills based
subjects) (rewards hard work)
conclusion: both can work – perhaps they should be used together
A note about academic language
Simple language can be good language. There is a danger though that you make your writing too
simple. That you don’t want. One tip is to add in a little academic caution language. Done well, this
can really improve your writing, not least because you will use a greater range of grammar.
How does it work? If you find yourself writing the verb “is” or “are”, you should ask yourself the
question whether what you are writing is 100% true, or whether you want to qualify it in some way. In
my essay, this allows me to use this language:
“major arguments”
“is probably”
“tends to be”
Put together, this language helps this essay get a band score 9.0.
It is highly likely that in the future there will be comparatively few aspects of our lives that will not be
influenced by computer technology. The probability is that it will control more and more forms of
communication, transforming fields such as education and business when video-conferencing
platforms become more stable. It might even affect romance with more people forming relationships
online.
While there may be benefits to this technological revolution, there are also a number of potential
dangers. Perhaps the most serious of these would be that if people rely on computers too much for
communication, they could in fact begin to communicate less well. For example, if every member of a
family had their own computer screen and smart phone, they might speak less and less often to one
another and simply look at a screen. This would be serious because our ability to communicate is an
essential part of our humanity.
My conclusion is that the growth of computer technology is inevitable, but that this may not be
entirely positive. Just one area in which it is possible to foresee dangers is communication, and if we
are going to ensure that computers do not become a negative influence, we need to think carefully
how we use them.
education
communication
transport
personal robots
You do not need to be very imaginative. There are no prizes for originality. I’d suggest you pick 2 areas and
briefly explain how they might be used in the future, perhaps contrasting what happens now.
Varying vocabulary
influence/affect/control are 3 similar words. See how I vary my vocabulary, rather than just repeating
the same word.
Being academic
This essay is quite academic in tone. This is because I do not always use “is” and “will”. Rather I
choose to lots of modal verbs such as would, might and may.
Matching the introduction and conclusion
The essay is extremely coherent. Part of the way I achieve this is by matching my introduction and
conclusion. This is an easy trick to learn and will certainly help your essay writing.
It is highly likely that in the future there will be comparatively few aspects of our lives that will not be
influenced by computer technology. The probability is that it will control more and more forms of
communication, transforming fields such as education and business when video-conferencing
platforms become more stable. It might even affect romance with more people forming relationships
online.
While there may be benefits to this technological revolution, there are also a number of potential
dangers. Perhaps the most serious of these would be that if people rely on computers too much for
communication, they could in fact begin to communicate less well. For example, if every member of a
family had their own computer screen and smart phone, they might speak less and less often to one
another and simply look at a screen. This would be serious because our ability to communicate is an
essential part of our humanity.
My conclusion is that the growth of computer technology is inevitable, but that this may not be
entirely positive. Just one area in which it is possible to foresee dangers is communication, and if we
are going to ensure that computers do not become a negative influence, we need to think carefully
how we use them.
education
communication
transport
personal robots
You do not need to be very imaginative. There are no prizes for originality. I’d suggest you pick 2 areas and
briefly explain how they might be used in the future, perhaps contrasting what happens now.
Varying vocabulary
influence/affect/control are 3 similar words. See how I vary my vocabulary, rather than just repeating
the same word.
Being academic
This essay is quite academic in tone. This is because I do not always use “is” and “will”. Rather I
choose to lots of modal verbs such as would, might and may.
Matching the introduction and conclusion
The essay is extremely coherent. Part of the way I achieve this is by matching my introduction and
conclusion. This is an easy trick to learn and will certainly help your essay writing.
Perhaps the principal cause of this rise in youth crime is the increased use of drugs and alcohol
among young people. Many cities suffer from the phenomenon of binge drinking by teenagers who
lose control under the influence of alcohol and commit crimes. For instance, it is a common sight on
the streets of Britain to see fights breaking out outside pubs and clubs. Similarly, there is a clear
connection between drug abuse among the young and crime. It is still unfortunately the case that
young people frequently see drugs as cool and become addicted. It is a common occurrence for
these addicts to resort to petty theft in order to pay for their habit.
There are a variety of potential ways of combatting this problem. One possibility that is sometimes
suggested is a much stricter system of penalties and punishments to deter young people from a life of
crime. That might work, but it would also be sensible to improve the system of education so
that young people were better informed about the dangers of drugs and alcohol. This should have the
effect of dealing with the issues that cause youth crime in the first place.
In conclusion, alcohol and drug abuse are among the primary reasons for the rise in young offenders
and if the authorities wish to tackle youth crime, one approach would be to educate the young more
effectively.
Topic vocabulary
One obvious area is topic vocabulary. Here we have:
crime
young people
cities
More functional vocabulary
What other language do you need? Sometimes it can be easy to forget this part.
cause
effect
result
reason
lead to
2. Varying your word combinations
A slightly different idea is to keep the main word, but change the words you use with it. This can be a
sensible approach as keeping the same word is good for cohesion, while changing the combinations
helps show off your range of vocab. For example, all these phrases use “problem” in different ways:
a pressing problem
an urgent problem
deal with a problem
a problematic situation
Look at my IELTS youth crime essay and see how I use this vocabulary
When I say “look at”, I really mean look. I have highlighted the different functional language in
different colours. You should see these words are a huge part of the essay:
The rise of crime among young people is an urgent problem in many cities that needs to be
addressed. However, in order to find a solution, it is first of all necessary to understand what has
led to this happening. In this essay, I first of all examine the reasons for the rise in youth crime,
then I suggest how this problem may be resolved.
Perhaps the principal cause of this rise in youth crime is the increased use of drugs and alcohol
among young people. Many cities suffer from the phenomenon of binge drinking by teenagers who
lose control under the influence of alcohol and commit crimes. For instance, it is a common sight on
the streets of Britain to see fights breaking out outside pubs and clubs. Similarly, there is a clear
connection between drug abuse among the young and crime. It is still unfortunately the case that
young people frequently see drugs as cool and become addicted. It is a common occurrence for
these addicts to resort to petty theft in order to pay for their habit.
There are a variety of potential ways of combatting this problem. One possibility that is
sometimes suggested is a much stricter system of penalties and punishments to deter young
people from a life of crime. That might work, but it would also be sensible to improve the system of
education so that young people were better informed about the dangers of drugs and alcohol. This
should have the effect of dealing with the issues that cause youth crime in the first place.
In conclusion, alcohol and drug abuse are among the primary reasons for the rise in young
offenders and if the authorities wish to tackle youth crime, one approach would be to educate the
young more effectively.
Notes on vocabulary
Problem/solution
an urgent problem… to be addressed
find a solution
Explanation
examine the reasons
Perhaps
Suggestions
then I suggest how
“Crime” words
I haven’t highlighted these in the essay, but you might want to look at:
petty theft
life of crime
drug abuse
addicted
their habit
The first point to make is that there are some downsides to this process of cultural globalisation, but
these are relatively minor. The most significant of these disadvantages is that it can weaken national
culture and traditions. For example, if people watch films and television programmes produced in the
United States, sometimes they adopt aspects of the lifestyle of the American characters they see on
television. Typically, however, this only affects minor details such as clothing and does not seriously
threaten national identity.
When we turn to the other side of the argument, there are two major points to make in favour of this
process. The first of these is that the more we share habits, products and services, the better we
understand each other and this reduces prejudice against other nations. The other point relates to
modernity. It is a sign of progress in a society that people no longer are restricted to brands and
advertisements from their own society but are able to access more international goods. If, for
example, there were unable to drink Coca Cola or wear Nike, then that would mean their society was
not part of the international community.
In conclusion, I understand the point of view of people who worry about cultural globalisation because
it is a threat to national traditions. However, this is outweighed by its positive impact on international
understanding and the fact that it represents progress within a society.
These ideas obviously balance each other and relate to the main question. All you need to do is find
reasons and examples to support those ideas.
The top tip here is to try and make the first sentence of each content paragraph reflect/balance the
language of the the previous paragraph. This makes the argument of your essay much easier to
follow and so more coherent. So, for example, if you start one paragraph with:
There are several reasons to argue that this form of cultural globalisation has had negative
consequences for society.
The next should begin with a sentence that reflects/balances that sentence so that the
reader/examiner can understand how the two paragraphs link together:
There are, however, also arguments that that the positive effects of this globalisation are more
significant.
In this way, the structure of your argument and the coherence of your essay is immediately obvious.
This is the intelligent way of writing “Firstly,” “Secondly”.
A top tip here is that you want to start off with a very general point and then become more detailed
with each sentence. This allows the reader/examiner to follow your train of thought.
There are a number of ways in which this form of globalisation has had negative effects on society.
[Very general statement]. Perhaps the most significant of these is how there is now far less
diversity than before and that this has also lowered satndards. [more complex explanation]. A good
example here is how one of the most popular meals in the world is McDonalds’ Happy Meal, a dish
that cannot compare to any of the national dishes it has replaced, such as a curry in India or a hotpot
in China. [balanced by a simple example]
3. Balancing your vocabulary
Another form of balance you want to consider is repeating or reflecting vocabulary in your essay. The
idea here is that if you keep on changing your words, it can make you essay harder to follow. There
are 3 separate ways in which you can do this:
1. repeating words
2. changing the form of the word
3. using a synonym or similar phrase
There are a number of positive aspects to this form of cultural globalisation. One
such aspect [repeated word] is how the “new” goods and services generally make out lives
more convenient and have improved our quality of life. For example, fast food chains such as
McDonalds provide us with convenience [change of word form] food that is much better adapted
to the pace of modern life. Indeed, few people nowadays can find the time to sit down [a phrase with
the same general meaning]and have a traditional meal in the middle of the day.
It is undoubtedly the case that the world today has become a global village. One of the effects of this
is that increasingly people in all corners of the world are exposed to similar services and products and
adopt similar habits. My view is that this is largely a beneficial process [personal opinion balanced
by the opinion in the conclusion]and in this essay I will explain why.
The first point to make is that there are some downsides to this process of cultural globalisation, but
these are relatively minor. The most significant of these disadvantages [balances/reflects
downsides in the previous sentence]is that it can weaken national culture and traditions. For
example, if people watch films and television programmes produced in the United States, sometimes
they adopt aspects of the lifestyle of the American characters they see on television. Typically,
however, this only affects minor details such as clothing and does not seriously threaten national
identity. [an example and explanation that balance and develop the main idea of the paragraph
that globalisation weakens national culture]
When we turn to the other side of the argument, there are two major points to make [balances the
language of the first paragraph – the structure is clear] in favour of this process. The first of these
is that the more we share habits, products and services, the better we understand each other and this
reduces prejudice against other nations. The other point relates to modernity. It is a sign
ofprogress [balances/reflects modernity in the previous sentence] in a society that people no
longer are restricted to brands and advertisements from their own society but are able to access more
international goods. If, for example, there were unable to drink Coca Cola or wear Nike, [two famous
brands, reflecting/balancing brands in the previous sentence] then that would mean
theirsociety [repeated language] was not part of the international community.
In conclusion, I understand the point of view of people who worry about cultural globalisation because
it is a threat to national traditions [summary of first paragraph]. However, this is outweighed by its
positive impact on international understanding and the fact that it represents progress within a
society [summary of second paragraph].
Get more sample essays and exercises
IELTS traffic essay
This is one of my model IELTS essays lessons where you can
The first step is to understand why traffic has increased in towns and cities. Broadly speaking, there
are three main reasons for this. One is that cars have become more affordable for the
average consumer and they are no longer a luxury item, but something that most families expect to
own. A second reason is that public transport has become increasingly unreliable in recent years, not
least because many bus and train services have been reduced because of the difficulty
in funding them. The third reason is that society has in general become more mobile and this means
more people are prepared to commute to work by car than they were before.
In conclusion, there are a variety of different factors that have led to rising levels of traffic in urban
areas. While it may not be possible to find a complete solution, any action should
probably involve encouraging greater use of public transport and making it more expensive for the
motorist to drive in urban areas.
Essay structure
With this type of essay question with a double question, the natural structure is to deal with each
question in a content separate paragraph – dealing with the causes and the policies separately. It is
often quite hard to summarise your position quickly in relation to two question and so it can make
sense to just say that you are going to discuss the questions in the introduction as opposed to stating
your position to both of them. You do want to make sure, however, that your conclusion does
summarise your main points.
A key tip here is to make sure that you use the introduction, topic sentences and the
conclusion to form the spine of your essay. Just reading those should be enough to tell the reader
what it is about.
Introduction
Here you can see the situation behind the question/the topic is identified in red. While in the next
sentence, it is clear that the essay is going to look at both the causes of and solutions to this problem
(blue and green)
It is undoubtedly the case that urban areas around the world increasingly suffer from congestion. In
this essay, I examine the reasons for this trend and suggest some practical policies the authorities
could implement to reduce the level of traffic in our cities.
Content 1
The first two sentences clearly link back to the introduction and outline what the paragraph is going to
be about. Here I choose to use two quick and short sentences, rather than one long one. Clarity is
the main goal here.
The first step is to understand why traffic has increased in towns and cities. Broadly speaking, there
are three main reasons for this.
Content 2
Again, I use a quick short sentence to start that clearly links back to the introduction. The goal is to
make my structure clear, I don’t worry about introducing details of my argument in my first sentence.
There is almost certainly no one solution to this problem given the complexity of its causes.
Conclusion
My conclusion is split into two halves to make sure I answer both halves of the question. It also
borrows some language from the introduction to improve coherence. I choose to add more detail
about the solutions as this neatly links back to the second of my topic paragraphs.
In conclusion, there are a variety of different factors that have led to rising levels of traffic in urban
areas. While it may not be possible to find a complete solution, any action should probably involve
encouraging greater use of public transport and making it more expensive for the motorist to drive in
urban areas.
Ideas for the essay
Here are some possible ideas for the essay. You should note that I have not used all these ideas in
my own essay. The idea is to select those ideas that work best for you – meaning those that you can
expand with reasons and examples. A top tip is NOT to include ALL your ideas.
More cars
cars are more affordable than ever before
cars have become a status symbol
people need cars to commute to work
people do not share car journeys
improved road networks make it easier to travel
many families now own two cars (both husband and wife work)
public transport is inconvenient
public transport is unavailable in some areas
Solutions
improve public transport by adding more bus routes
give incentives to drivers to share journeys
add more cycle routes
put tariffs on using roads in peak periods
advertising campaigns to highlight negatives of using cars
have more pedestrianised areas in towns to prevent cars from entering them
Structuring your paragraphs when you have more than one idea
When you have a number of different ideas to include in one paragraph, you probably want to choose
a “listing paragraph” structure. The way to do this is simply to start your paragraph by saying that it
will include a number of related points. This way it is clear to the examiner what you are saying. So in
this example it is clear that I have three things to say about why traffic has increased in cities.
The first step is to understand why traffic has increased in towns and cities. Broadly speaking, there
are three main reasons for this. One is that cars have become more affordable for the average
consumer and they are no longer a luxury item, but something that most families expect to own. A
second reason is that public transport has become increasingly unreliable in recent years, not least
because many bus and train services have been reduced because of the difficulty in funding
them. The third reason is that society has in general become more mobile and this means more
people are prepared to commute to work by car than they were before.
If this appears “too simple” for you. You can also look at the structure of my second topic paragraph
where I also use more than one reason. The pattern is much the same though. I start by saying that
there is more than one point I wish to make.You may want to notice how “also” is a natural linking
word.
There is almost certainly no one solution to this problem given the complexity of its causes.
However, one option has to be to improve the reliability of public transport to encourage people to
take the bus or the train rather than get in the car. It would also be possible to discourage people from
driving to work by introducing special tariffs for using the roads, especially during peak periods. A
successful example of this is the congestion charge scheme in London which has certainly reduced
the level of traffic in inner-city areas.
Vocabulary
Academic vocabulary
Almost certainly the most useful vocab to focus on in IELTS essays comes from the academic word
list. These are words that can be used in ANY essay and the idea is that IELTS essays should be
formal in language.
It is undoubtedly the case that urban areas around the world increasingly suffer from congestion. In
this essay, I examine the reasons for this trend and suggest some
practical policies the authorities could implement to reduce the level of traffic in our cities.
The first step is to understand why traffic has increased in towns and cities. Broadly speaking, there
are three main reasons for this. One is that cars have become more affordable for the
average consumer and they are no longer a luxury item, but something that most families expect to
own. A second reason is that public transport has become increasingly unreliable in recent years,
not least because many bus and train services have been reduced because of the difficulty
in funding them. The third reason is that society has in general become more mobile and this means
more people are prepared to commute to work by car than they were before.
There is almost certainly no one solution to this problem given the complexity of its causes.
However, one option has to be to improve the reliability of public transport to encourage people to
take the bus or the train rather than get in the car. It would also be possible to discourage people from
driving to work by introducing special tariffs for using the roads, especially during peak periods. A
successful example of this is the congestion charge scheme in London which has certainly reduced
the level of traffic in inner-city areas.
In conclusion, there are a variety of different factors that have led to rising levels of traffic in
urban areas. While it may not be possible to find a complete solution, any action should
probably involve encouraging greater use of public transport and making it more expensive for the
motorist to drive in urban areas.
Topic vocabulary
You also want, however, to use a good range of topic vocabulary. Here the vocabulary you want falls
into these areas:
transport
cities
problem/solution
cause
general academic language
You should see in the essay that I both vary and repeat language. Varying language is good for range
of vocabulary, repetition is good for cohesion.
It is undoubtedly the case that urban areas around the world increasingly suffer from congestion. In
this essay, I examine the reasons for this trend and suggest some practical
policies the authorities could implement to reduce the level of traffic in our cities.
The first step is to understand why traffic has increased in towns and cities. Broadly speaking,
there are three main reasons for this. One is that cars have become more affordable for the
average consumer and they are no longer a luxury item, but something that most families expect to
own. A second reason is that public transport has become increasingly unreliable in recent years,
not least because many bus and train services have been reduced because of the difficulty
in funding them. The third reason is that society has in general become more mobile and this
means more people are prepared to commute to work by car than they were before.
There is almost certainly no one solution to this problem given the complexity of its causes.
However, one option has to be to improve the reliability of public transport to encourage people
to take the bus or the train rather than get in the car. It would also be possible to discourage
people from driving to work by introducing special tariffs for using the roads, especially during
peakperiods. A successful example of this is the congestion charge scheme in London which has
certainly reduced the level of traffic in inner-city areas.
In conclusion, there are a variety of different factors that have led to rising levels of traffic in
urban areas. While it may not be possible to find a complete solution, any action should
probably involve encouraging greater use of public transport and making it more expensive for the
motorist to drive in urban areas.
More related lessons
There are several reasons why these innovations in agriculture can be said to be positive. One is that
the world’s population has exploded within the past century and that traditional methods of agriculture
could not provide sufficient food for everyone. It can also be argued that we need more efficient
methods of farming because many countries in Asia and Africa suffer regular famine and droughts
and the people would starve if it was not for genetically modified crops that are drought resistant. It
should also not be forgotten that the quality of life of farmers has been improved by these advances
which are less labour intensive.
Those who argue for a return to smaller scale and more organic farming base their arguments on the
impact of agriculture on health and the environment. Firstly, it is claimed that a variety of diseases
such as BSE, swine flu and bird flu were caused by conditions in factory farms and that organic food
is much healthier. Then, there are concerns about the lack of research into how genetically modified
crops might affect the ecosystem for the worse.
While there are strong arguments on both sides of the case, my personal belief is that the long-term
dangers of these developments mean that we should be extremely cautious. I suggest that there
should be more investment in traditional farming methods to make them more efficient and that there
should be stronger legislation to ensure that both factory farms and GM crops are safe.
How to do it
In your first sentence you state that there are different ideas to support the main point. Then you
begin each sentence with “listing” words such as “Firstly”, “Secondly”. To see how to do this, look at
this paragraph:
There are several reasons why these innovations in agriculture can be said to positive. One is
that the world’s population has exploded within the past century and that traditional methods of
agriculture could not provide sufficient food for everyone. It can also be argued that we need more
efficient methods of farming because many countries in Asia and Africa suffer regular famine and
droughts and the people would starve if it was not for genetically modified crops that are drought
resistant. It should also not be forgotten that the quality of life of farmers has been improved by these
advances which are less labour intensive.
You should note that the key word here is “also” – a simple but effective way of listing ideas.
Understand the structure of the essay
One way to understand this essay is to see how it uses “structural” phrases. These are phrases that
you can borrow and use in your own essays on different topics. Use phrases like these and almost a
third of your essay is written before you reach the exam.
You should notice how each sentence of the essay begins with a phrase that tells the reader what
that sentence is about. This is excellent for coherence and cohesion. Each sentence links into the
next.
Introduction
There is some controversy about______________. While it is possible to claim
that______________ , my view is that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. In this essay, I
shall explain my point of view by analysing both sides of the argument.
Para 1
There are several reasons why ______________________. One is that
___________________________. It can also be argued that we ___________________. It should
also not be forgotten that___________________________________.
Para 2
Those who argue for _______________________________. Firstly, it is claimed that
___________________________________. Then, there are concerns about
______________________________.
Conclusion
While there are strong arguments on both sides of the case, my personal belief is that
______________________. I suggest that __________________________________.
The principal reason why developed nations should help is that we now live in a global village and it is
no longer possible to ignore what happens on the other side of the world. This is partly a moral issue
and partly because it is in the economic self-interest of industrialised nations to ensure that
developing nations continue to progress. A practical way of achieving this would be to accept more
immigration, particularly when it is caused by natural disasters or civil war.
I would argue, however, that this is not an open and shut case, as there is a negative side to mass
immigration. The multi-cultural experiments in Europe have not always succeeded and immigrants
have often suffered badly from racism and other prejudices. On a practical level, refugees are
sometimes better off receiving aid in their native land than begging on the streets in a country where
they cannot speak the language. Many so-called economic migrants end up returning to the country
of their birth.
My personal conclusion is that developed nations should agree to take in more refugees, but only in
restricted numbers and in extreme cases. I also believe that there needs to be a global effort to
provide aid to solve the problems that cause emigration. Prevention is as they say better than cure.
a global problem
not an easy issue
a moral issue
solve the problems
caused as many problems as it solves
Refugees
This is another word given in the question that you want to try and avoid overusing. Some of the
variants I use are:
immigrant
immigration/mass immigration
economic migrants
emigration
Developing countries etc
This is a tough one. You are going to need to talk about developing nations and countries in general
a lot. Again you want to try and look for some alternatives. The one I don’t use is “third world” as it is
slightly politically incorrect nowadays. Try some of these:
developing nations
industrialised countries/nations
native land
country of their birth
Ideas and essay structure
If you plan your vocab well, you should come up with plenty of ideas for this essay. The problem is
more likely to be what to leave out than to put in. My essay structure looks something like this
Introduction: rephrase the problem and mention the proposed solution. The state that it is an
argument with two sides to lead into a pro/con type essay
Content 1: Arguments in favour of accepting refugees = moral responsibility/global village/economic
self-interest. Use brief example of natural disasters
Content 2: Problems caused by immigration – prejudice and racism etc. Mention possibility of aid in
own countries
Conclusion: Yes and no! Up to a point it’s a good idea but there are difficulties (refer back to
introduction). Suggest alternative of aid (refer back to content 2). Easy.
The principal reason why some people take this view is fairly clear in the case of newspapers. It is
generally much easier and quicker to discover what is happening in the world from the internet or the
television than from a newspaper. If you use Google or another search engine or simply switch on the
television, you can instantly get the latest news bulletin. A newspaper, by contrast, is out of date the
moment it is published because it contains yesterday’s news.
It is perhaps less obvious why books are said to be out of fashion. One possibility is that fewer people
choose to read for pleasure nowadays because they prefer the instant gratification and thrills of
modern technology. There is less effort involved in enjoying a 3D movie or playing a computer game
than in turning the pages of a book.
My own view and conclusion is that books and newspapers will never go completely out of fashion or
become redundant. The reason for this is that they serve basic human needs. I believe that people
will always want to read about the news and escape into the imaginary worlds of great novels.
However, books and newspapers may need to change to meet the new demands of twenty-first
century consumers. We can already see this happening with the arrival of the audio-book and the
various free newspaper internet sites. (292 words)
Essay structure
There are different ways to structure this essay. The way I have chosen is to write one paragraph
about newspapers and one about books and then use a slightly longer conclusion than usual for my
own views. In this form of essay, one natural technique is to use the conclusion in this way.
The vocabulary
Topic vocabulary
You need vocabulary to talk about books and newspapers and other media. There is a great range to
choose from here. Some of the topic vocabulary I use in this essay is:
great novels
use Google or another search engine
switch on the television
the latest news bulletin
read for pleasure
enjoying a 3D movie
in turning the pages of a book
Outdated and opinion vocabulary
If at all possible you do not want to repeat the vocabulary from the question too much. Here are some
options for you for “opinion” and “outdated”.
One reason why this approach may not work is that there is not just one environmental problem the
world faces today. If governments did make fuel more expensive, it might well help reduce the
amount of carbon dioxide we produce and so slow down the rate of global warming and air pollution.
However, it would not help with other major problems such as intensive farming, overpopulation, the
hole in the ozone layer or water pollution. For these problems we need to find other solutions.
A second reason why this policy may not be the most appropriate is that it places the emphasis on
governmental policy and not individual responsibility. Ultimately, most environmental problems are
the result of the way we as individuals live our lives. If we wish to find a long-term and lasting solution
to them, we need to learn to live in a way that it is greener or kinder to the environment. What
governments need to do to make this happen is to ensure there is a global programme to educate
people of all ages about the environmental consequences to their actions.
In summary, I believe that increasing the level of taxation on fuel is at best a short-term solution to
only one environmental problem. If we wish to provide a home for our children’s children, education is
likely to be the key to making this happen. (283 words)
The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what
extent do you agree or disagree?
The best?
This is very strong language. It may be “a” way, but is it the best? The natural way to approach this
type of question with “most” or “best” in them is:
To what extent
This means “how much”. If you get this type of question, in your conclusion you need to say one of:
completely
not at all
something in between
Typically, the easy (and the academic) answer in a timed exam is to choose something in between.
To do this, you need to discuss the advantages and the disadvantages in the main body and then say
in your conclusion that there are both advantages and disadvantages.
intro: restate the question and outline that “the best” is too strong language
para 1: explain that there are many different environmental problems not affected by fuel increases
para 2: explain that education is a better solution in the long-term
conclusion: restate the introduction (best is too strong) and summarise the main point (education is
more effective)
Vocabulary
Problem
This is an area you need variety of language (see my post The language of problems). I suggest that
you note down some variations before you start writing. Here are some I use:
Again, you want to try not to repeat the language of the question too much. Try these:
Environmental problems
There are a large range of possible environmental problems. The environmental language I use in
this essay is:
Get more model IELTS essays
It does often seem wrong that certain people should earn so much money when their only talent is to
entertain. While giving pleasure is important, people in the medical and educational professions have
far more important roles in society. For example, a surgeon can save your life in the operating theatre
and a teacher can prepare you for your career. Indeed, because both doctors and teachers are so
vital to any society, it would seem only right that they receive the largest financial rewards.
When, however, we look to see who earns the most, we discover that it is typically sports and
entertainment personalities. There are a variety of reasons why this should be. Firstly, we live in the
age of mass media: these people earn so much because they are national or even global stars and
get rewarded through endorsements and other sources of income. Secondly, these stars are unique
in a way doctors and teachers are not, often they can do what no one else can. Finally, sometimes
these stars may have short careers in comparison with other professions. For instance, while doctors
can work until they are 65, footballers normally retire in their early 30s.
I personally believe that in the ideal world someone’s income would relate to their value to society.
However, in the modern world, it is almost unavoidable the famous will have the highest incomes
because of their media exposure.
surgeon
operating theatre
medical and educational professions
It is fairly easy to understand the reasons why this proposal has been made. The reasoning is that if
workers are not allowed to work for more than 35 hours weekly, then employers will be forced to
engage more staff. There would be at least two advantages to this. Not only would unemployment be
reduced, but the working conditions of employees on very long shifts would also be significantly
improved. For example, a factory employing 300 manual workers doing 10 hours a day might employ
450 workers.
There is also, however, a strong argument not to implement this proposal. This argument is based on
economic competitiveness. If a company was forced to employ more workers to produce the same
amount of goods, then its wage bill would rise and its products might become more expensive and
less competitive compared to companies with longer working weeks. In this case, it is possible that
the company either might become insolvent or it would have to make some employees redundant. As
a result, the intended benefit to the personnel would not happen.
In summary, we can see that this is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and
disadvantages to the proposal. My own personal view is that it would be better not to introduce the
shortened working week because it works only in theory and not in practice.
Those who argue that museums should be free typically make one of two arguments. The first
argument is that institutions like museums are a public service and therefore there should be free
access to the man in the street. If, for example, there was a charge only the wealthy could afford to
enjoy works of art. The second, and related, argument is that if they did levy a charge fewer people
would go to museums. This would be serious as they are educational institutions and standards
would fall.
In contrast, there is only one major argument on the other side of the debate. This is that both
museums and art galleries need to charge an entrance fee if they are to survive in the modern world.
Governments do not have sufficient funds to subsidise all such institutions and there are other
priorities for public money. Therefore these galleries and museums need to charge their customers
not only to survive but to update their exhibitions and make new purchases. By way of illustration, the
Tate Modern in London could not have been founded without revenue from admissions.
My personal position is that there is no clear answer to this question as there are such strong
arguments on both sides. Perhaps it is possible for some museums and galleries to charge fees and
for others not to. It will depend on the situation of the individual museum or gallery.
The first point to make is that politicians have a responsibility to spend public money on projects that
bring a benefit to the general public. This has not been the case with space research as most
developments have been limited to helping astronauts in space or have been very specialised. For
example, it is not of great value to the general public that we now have pens and biros that can write
upside down. This does not merit the huge amount of money spent.
The second point to make is that there are many much more urgent projects on Earth that require
investment. If governments spent less money on space research, then they would be able to help
solve some of these problems such as population control, elimination of diseases like cholera, global
warming and food shortages. It seems to me that all of these issues are more important because they
affect the lives of millions of ordinary people. An illustration of this is that the US government could
provide food for all the starving people in the world if they did not spend so much on NASA.
My conclusion is that politicians should not fund space research. The grounds for saying this are that
it is very costly and provides few real benefits. Furthermore, there are several more urgent issues that
need to be funded.
Learn to write the essay with an academic word list exercise
If I have helped you with these ideas and resources, please share them
There are, however, several reasons why it can be argued that television has a negative effect on
cultural development. Perhaps the principle argument is the lowbrow nature of many programmes,
particularly sitcoms and soap operas. People who watch these programmes do not learn anything,
they are simply entertained. The other major argument is that because people watch so much
television, they no longer take part in more traditional forms of cultural entertainment. An example
here is how traditional dancing and music is becoming much less popular because people are staying
at home to watch the television.
On the other hand, there are a variety of ways in which cultural development has been assisted by
television. Here the major argument is that television has allowed the whole of society access to
cultural entertainment. For example, in the nineteenth century only a small proportion of people could
go to the ballet or the theatre. However, it is now possible for everyone to enjoy these on television. A
second positive effect is that on television we can learn more about other cultures and societies
because there are so many interesting documentaries about other countries.
My personal conclusion is that television is a largely positive influence. However, it is important that
we do not watch it too much and that we watch the right sort of programme. If we watch the wrong
sort of programme and watch too much television, we may become couch potatoes.
There is one major argument in favour of replacing art, music and sport on the curriculum with
subjects like IT. This is that the purpose of school is to prepare children for their working life after
school, so the subjects on the curriculum should be relevant to their potential careers. From this point
of view, IT is much relevant to schoolchildren as they need to be computer literate if they want to
survive in the workplace. For example, it is easy to see that word processing and programming skills
will impress employers more than the ability to run fast or draw well.
There are also, however, strong arguments for retaining the more traditional subjects as part of the
curriculum. One significant counter-argument is that the purpose of education is not just to prepare
children for later careers, but also to develop their all round “culture”. It is important that children leave
school with some knowledge of art, music and sport as all these are all help develop aspects of
young people’s personalities.
My own personal point of view is that there is merit in both sides of the debate and that all children
should study some IT, art music and sport at least at primary school. At secondary school, however,
children should be offered a choice between these subjects so that they can continue to study them if
they wish.
Perhaps the major advantage of living in a house is the issue of privacy. Typically, there is more
opportunity for peace and quiet, if you live in a house. This is particularly the case if it is a detached
house. Other significant advantages are that houses are generally more spacious and on the whole
have gardens. This is especially important if there is a family so that the children can have a safe
environment to play in. If, however, you live in a tower block, then the children may have to play
outside on the pavement.
There are, of course, negative aspects to living in houses. The greatest of these is that they tend to
be more expensive to purchase and to maintain. Indeed, a large majority of people choose to live in
apartments because they cannot afford the mortgage to buy a house. Another possible problem is
that there are fewer houses in cities than the countryside. So if you like urban life, it may be
preferable to live in an apartment. A second reason to avoid living in a house is that there is a greater
sense of community to life in an apartment.
My conclusion would be that this is a well-balanced issue. There are probably an equal number of
pros and cons to making either choice. Ultimately, whether you decide to live in a cottage in the
countryside or a duplex in the city depends on your own personality, family and financial
circumstances.
(285 words)
advantages
disadvantages
house
apartment
prefer
If you are not careful, you will find yourself repeating these words a lot in your essay. Have a look at
some of the variations I offer you:
Tip: make sure you don’t repeat words from the question too often.
house and apartment
This one is not so easy. There aren’t so many choices and it is certainly better to repeat the correct
word “house” than to try something odd like “place of habitation”!
What I did do though was try and think of some related words or detail words. This helps not just to
vary my vocabulary, but to give me more ideas.
One area in which we can learn from the arts is that concepts such as beauty matter in and of
themselves, whereas in the world of science and technology the only true measure is whether
something works or not. This is a limited view of the world and the arts differ in that they offer us an
alternative and more spiritual outlook. For example, if we listen to Mozart we can learn about
harmony and joy through the medium of music or if even we read an author like PG Wodehouse we
learn about the value of humour. These essential aspects of life are absent from the clinical world of
science and technology.
The other way in which artists can teach us more about life is that enjoying art encourages the habit
of self-reflection. If you walk into an art gallery, attend a concert or even just stay in to read a book,
you will almost certainly begin to think about your inner values. For me, this is a invaluable lesson in
life because if we begin to reflect about ourselves, we begin not just to become more human, but also
consider the lives of others too.
So while science and technology may have made our physical lives more comfortable in the 21st
century. It remains true that the arts and humanities are still absolutely necessary for ordinary people
as they promote a more spiritual and reflective view of life that is essential to our humanity.
1. It is not enough to write about the value of the arts. You have not answered the question. You need to
writ about the things that the arts offer that science and technology do not.
2. Note the wording of “the arts”. This is not the same as “art”. “The arts” include painting, music and
writing etc”
3. There is no doubt that the quality of our lives in the 21st century has been greatly improved by various
scientific and technological advances. Despite this, the arts and humanities too still have much to teach us
about ourselves and life in general.
Problem area
This is quite a “philosophical” question. If you try and give a very philosophical answer, you may write
very complex English and so make more mistakes. I suggest:
Introduction
Highlight the task
Suggest there are two ways the arts have something different to teach us
Topic 1
Point in topic sentence: concepts such as beauty come from the arts
Explain: sciences limited to practicality
Example: Mozart shows us harmony
Re-explain: sciences do not show us this
Topic 2
Point in topic sentence: arts make us think about ourselves
Explain with art gallery example
Re-explain how this makes us think about others too
Conclusion
Reflect introduction: science makes us comfortable but the arts teach us about spiritual aspects (topic
1) and reflection (topic 2)
The first step is to recognise what the consequences of overpopulation are. Only by doing this can we
find an appropriate solution. Perhaps its most important effect is the increased rate at which we are
consuming the Earthʼs resources such as oil. To combat this, governments need to do more research
on alternative and renewable energy supplies so that we do not use up all the oil reserves. Another
negative effect of overpopulation is how some countries suffer from a lack of basic necessities such
as food. Here, an answer could be greater international co-operation so that countries with a food
surplus donate what they do not need to the less fortunate countries.
It is not quite so easy to decide how governments should deal with the causes of overpopulation. The
Chinese have adopted legislation that requires parents to pay a special tax if they have more than
one child. I doubt, however, whether this solution is realistic in other countries. Another option would
be to improve levels of sex education by explaining the difficulties caused by having too many
children.Promoting contraception though may be problematic in many regions on cultural and
religious grounds.
In conclusion, while it may be possible to find ways to address some of the consequences of
overpopulation by international co-operation, it is harder to find policies to deal with its causes. It
might be that the only way forward is for different countries to adopt policies that work within their
particular culture.
1. overpopulation
2. the causes of overpopulation
3. the causes and effects of overpopulation
4. policies to deal with the causes and effects of overpopulation
It is of course 4. If you try 1,2 or 3 you will lose heavily. This is an easy mistake to make and many,
many candidates will do just that.
1. causes of overpopulation
2. effects of overpopulation
3. the policies to deal with causes and effects of overpopulation
If you can do that, the essay you write will almost certainly be on task. You have set the “programme” for the
rest of the essay.
Suggestion
As a training exercise try and use these words from the question and write the introduction yourself
policy
overpopulation
cause
effect
If you do that, you are almost certainly on task. You may then look at my essay to see if you can find
words/phrases to replace those words because in the ideal world you don’t want to repeat the language of
the question too much.
One of the most pressing problems facing the world today is overpopulation. What policies do
you believe governments should adopt to address the causes and effects of this problem?
INTRODUCTION
The first step is to recognise what the consequences of overpopulation are. Only by doing this
can we find an appropriate solution. Perhaps its most important effect is the increased rate at which
we are consuming the Earth’s resources such as oil. To combat this, governments need to do more
research on alternative and renewable energy supplies so that we do not use up all the oil reserves.
Another negative effect of overpopulation is how some countries suffer from a lack of basic
necessities such as food. Here, an answer could be greater international co-operation so that
countries with a food surplus donate what they do not need to the less fortunate countries.
It is not quite so easy to decide how governments should deal with the causes of
overpopulation. The Chinese have adopted legislation that requires parents to pay a special tax if
they have more than one child. I doubt, however, whether this solution is realistic in other countries.
Another option would be to improve levels of sex education by explaining the difficulties caused by
having too many children.Promoting contraception though may be problematic in many regions on
cultural and religious grounds.
In conclusion, while it may be possible to find ways to address some of the consequences of
overpopulation by international co-operation, it is harder to find policies to deal with its causes. It
might be that the only way forward is for different countries to adopt policies that work within their
particular culture.
Perhaps the greatest bonus of the introduction of technology is the flexibility it offers. This is evident
in two different ways. Firstly, it is now no longer essential for students to be present in the lecture
theatre for their courses. This means that part-time courses for adults who are in employment
and distance learning courses for people in other countries are now much more practical. Another
area of flexibility is of course that the lecturer and tutor are able to use Moodles, interactive
whiteboards and other tools to deliver their courses in a more stimulating way to large numbers of
students.
Not everything, however, about the introduction of this new technology into education is positive. One
major problem is that not all students are comfortable with using technology, even if they are part of
the digital native generation. This is a serious issue as they may suffer from their lack of technological
skills. Another related issue is that education is a human activity and it works best with as much
human interaction as possible. Impersonal technology cannot replace the human contact found in
traditional face-to-face tutorials and seminars.
As we have seen, there are major benefits to the introduction of technology into education, not least
because it enables modern forms of education such as distance learning courses. This is balanced,
however, by the fact that it can be too impersonal for some and disadvantages others for their lack of
technological skills.
Vocabulary
Before I start writing, I try and think of some useful vocabulary. This should help me get some ideas
for the essay:
1. how I use the beginnings of paragraphs to state the main ideas: these are very simple ideas and
contain few details. These ideas link back to the introduction and link forward to the rest of the paragraph
2. how I then use the beginnings of sentences to link back to the main idea. I do this by using language
like “One major problem.
The basic pattern is “There are two ideas”. “This is the first idea” and “This is the second idea”. It is simple, yet
effective. The key to making this work is to think about how you start your paragraphs and sentences.
In the past lectures were the traditional method of teaching large numbers of students.
Nowadays new technology is increasingly being used to teach students. What are the
advantages and disadvantages of this new approach.
As we move into the twenty-first century, technology is affecting many different areas of life and
education is no exception. [statement of topic] Indeed, in some institutions traditional forms of
education have been revolutionised by new technology to the extent that the lecture is no longer the
main method of delivery [identification of task]. While there are a variety of benefits to this new
approach, there are also significant drawbacks.[statement of balanced position]
Perhaps the greatest bonus of the introduction of technology is the flexibility it offers. This is evident
in two different ways. [Main idea – flexibility is an advantage in two ways]Firstly, [coherence phrase
linking to “two different ways]it is now no longer essential for students to be present in the lecture
theatre for their courses. This means that part-time courses for adults who are in employment and
distance learning courses for people in other countries are now much more practical. Another area of
flexibility[second main reason for flexibility] is of course that the lecturer and tutor are able to use
Moodles, interactive whiteboards and other tools to deliver their courses in a more stimulating way to
large numbers of students.
Not everything, however, about the introduction of this new technology into education is positive.
[Main idea – not everything good]One major problem[coherence phrase showing there is more than
one problem] is that not all students are comfortable with using technology, even if they are part of
the digital native generation. This is a serious issue as they may suffer from their lack of technological
skills. Another related issue is [second coherence phrase linking back to “One major problem”]that
education is a human activity and it works best with as much human interaction as possible.
Impersonal technology cannot replace the human contact found in traditional face-to-face tutorials
and seminars.
As we have seen, there are major benefits to the introduction of technology into education, not least
because it enables modern forms of education such as distance learning courses [coherence link
back to para 1]. This is balanced [refer back to introduction], however, by the fact that it can be too
impersonal for some and disadvantages others for their lack of technological skills [coherence link
back to para 2].