The 

means of communicating in society today has changed greatly 
over the latest ten years. Give your opinion.

The notion that the means of communicating in society today has changed greatly over the last
ten years is widely debated, with many people claiming that there are legitimate reasons for as
well as effects of this trend. In this essay, I will outline these aspects and effects of this trend.

The most telling reason lies in the fact that communication is changing day by day. Experts not
only contend that communication in society has changed greatly with the help of the education
system but also that communication is changing because of the increasing facilities provided for
educating. Needless, to say all these examples bear a testimony to the fact that the means of
communicating in society today has changed greatly over the last ten years.

However, there are some conspicuous solutions that can easily overwhelm the potential
drawbacks of the aforementioned trend. The primary one stems from the fact that this
situation can be remedied provided that some effective measures are taken. Besides, this
problem can be shaken off with the help of both governments as well as individuals. Examples
of this scenario can be seen in many parts of the world, be it impoverished or affluent, showing
deluge of success associated with this trend. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of
the view that this problem can be alleviated successfully.

From what has been discussed above, one can understand that there are valid reasons
supporting the idea that the means of communicating in society has changed greatly. However,
in my opinion, these reasons can be eradicated only when the aforementioned measures are
taken.
Some languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while 
the 
usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive or a negative 
development?

The notion that some languages speaking should increase in different countries, while the
usage of others is rapidly declining is widely debated, with many people claiming that there are
legitimate arguments against this proposition. In this essay, I will outline why the demerits of
this proposition are far outweigh its merits.

There are myriad arguments in favour of this notion. The most telling one lies in the fact that in
different countries speaking of some languages should increases while others should decline.
Experts not only contend that increasing of a language plays a beneficial role in communicating
with each other, but also that a language becomes common for most of the countries and
becomes easy for tourists also. Needless, to say all these examples bear testimony to the fact
that some languages should increase in different countries.

However, there are some potential solutions that can easily overwhelm the potential benefits
of the aforementioned trend. The primary one stems from the fact that increasing of some
languages in different countries is inequality with the other countries. Beside, every country
have different languages and the other country languages will be prohibited due to lack of
communication of their language. Examples of this scenario can be seen in many parts of the
world, be it impoverished or affluent showing a deluge of drawbacks associated with this trend.
Hence, it is apparent why many are against the view that some languages should increase in
different countries.

From what has been discussed above, one can understand that there are valid reasons
supporting the idea that some language should be spoken more while others not. However, in
my opinion, these reasons are no match for the countless arguments against this proposition.
 1. “The only thing that interferes with my learning is education.”
– Albert Einstein. What did he mean by that? Do you think he is correct?
Type-2
1 Thing that interferes with my learning is education.
2 Education interferes in my learning.
3 Thing that interrupts my learning is education.
4 Education interpose in my learning.
5 Thing that intercede with my learning is education.
6 Only thing that interferes with my learning is education.

2. A healthy diet is more effective for keeping fit than exercise. What is your o
pinion?
Type-2
1 Healthy diet is more effective for keeping fit than exercise.
2 Diet is more useful for keeping fit than exercise.
3 Exercise is not as much as useful as diet is in keeping fit.
4 Diet is more important to be healthy.
5 Diet is more important than exercise for our body.
6 To be health we should have proper diet.

3. A healthy diet is more important for keeping fit than exercise. To what exte
nt do you 
agree with this statement? Give example or personal experiences.
Type-2
1 Healthy diet is more effective for keeping fit than exercise.
2 Diet is more useful for keeping fit than exercise.
3 Exercise is not as much as useful as diet is in keeping fit.
4 Diet is more important to be healthy.
5 Diet is more important than exercise for our body.
6 To be health we should have proper diet.

4. Advertising may make people buy something they don’t need or cannot aff
ord, but also, they can convey information to increase their life quality. Wh
at is your opinion?
Type-2
1 Advertising may make people buy something they don’t need.
2 Advertising may make people buy something they cannot afford.
3 Advertisement can convey information to increase their life quality.
4 By advertisements people buy useless things.
5 Advertisements attracts people.
6 Advertising make people buy something they don’t need or cannot afford.
 5. As cities expand, some people claim governments should try to create bett
er networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than 
building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? 
Give some examples or experience to support your opinion.
Type -2
1 People claim governments should try to create better networks of public transportation.
2 Government should create better networks than building more roads.
3 Governments should create better networks of public transportation available for everyone.
4 Governments should focus on creating networks than constructing roads.

6. Because university degrees can get people jobs with higher salaries, univer
sity students should pay full cost for their education. Do you agree or not?
Type-1
1 University students should pay full cost for their education.
2 University degrees should get people jobs with high salaries.
3 University students must pay full cost for their education.
4 University degrees might get people jobs with high salaries.
5 It is important for university students to pay full cost for their education. (Positive Argument)
6 There are high chances of people who have university degrees to get job. (Positive Argument)
7 University should not pay full cost for their education. (Negative argument)
8 University degrees are expensive so students should not pay full cost. (Negative Argument)
9 People studied from university not always get high salaries. (Negative argument)

7. As national services, which one deserves to receive more financial support, 
education or health?
Type-2
1 As national services, education needs to deserve more financial support.
2 As national services, health needs to deserve more financial support.
3 Health is important for healthy life style so it deserves more financial support.
4 Education is important for growth of country so it deserves more financial support.
5 Both education and health are important so they deserve equal financial support.

8. Climate change is a concerning global issue. Who should take the responsib
ilities, governments, big companies or individuals?
Type -2
1 Climate change is a concerning global issue.
2 Government should take the responsibility of climate change.
3 Big companies should take the responsibility of climate change.
4 Individuals should take the responsibility of climate change.
5 Climate change is an important global issue.
6 Climate change is a one of the most important global issue.

9. Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss the po
sitive and negative impacts of this change.
Type – 1